Circuit Court Record Book 27: 1858
Item
St. Louis Circuit Court. Circuit Court Record Book 27: 1858. 1857, St. Louis Circuit Court Historical Records Project, accessed October 2, 2026, https://digitalexhibits.library.washu.edu/s/ccr/item/65816
- Title
- Circuit Court Record Book 27: 1858
- Creator
- St. Louis Circuit Court
- Date
- 1858
- Source
- Missouri State Archives - St. Louis
- Rights
- Public Domain
- Identifier
- rcd1858.0027.492
- PDF Download
- Download PDF of all images
- Transcription
-
# Record 27 1858
---
**Viewer Page 1** (rcdbook1858_27_0000.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 2** (rcdbook1858_27_0001.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 3** (rcdbook1858_27_0002.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 4** (rcdbook1858_27_0003.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 5** (rcdbook1858_27_0004.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 6** (rcdbook1858_27_0005.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 7** (rcdbook1858_27_0006.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 1
**State of Missouri County of Saint Louis**
Is it remembered that at a term of the Circuit Court, held at the City of Saint Louis, within and for the County of Saint Louis, State of Missouri, it being the twenty-second day of February, Eighteen-hundred and fifty-eight, there were present the Honorable James R. Lackland, Judge; James Castelle, Sheriff and Stephen Price, Clerk.
**Edward J. Glasgow et al vs Inluis Jones et al**
Defendant Jones files an answer herein.
**John H. Joveshack et al vs Joseph Garnean et al**
Defendant Garnean files an answer herein.
**James Morris et al vs Stephen Lee et al**
Defendants file an answer herein
**Thomas M. Taylor et al vs George M. Morsis et al**
The defendant Inslee files an answer herein
**Sheridan C. Hunt et al vs Robert Cartan et al**
Proof of Publication. Now at this day come the plaintiffs and file proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication heretofore made in this behalf, has been duty published, according to law.
**Thomas D. Ford vs Beard & Brother**
The defendants come and file an answer herein.
**Louis Freligh vs F. Pollity et al**
The defendants file an answer herein.
**Franklin H. McClung vs Thomas Archer et al**
The defendant Archer files an answer.
**William Price vs George Collier et al**
The defendants file an answer herein.
**John S. Thomson et al vs George W. Tygack et al**
The defendant Reisen files an answer herein.
---
**Viewer Page 8** (rcdbook1858_27_0007.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 2
**February Term 1858**
**Rezin Davidge vs Robert Montgomery**
The defendant files an answer herein.
**President Directores and Company of the Bank of Lousivelle vs Morris Cahn**
The Plaintiff, by leave of Court, files an amended petition.
**Edwin C. Gates vs Joseph S. Hull**
Confession of Judgment. in Now at this day comes the said defendant and files his statement in writing duly verified by affidavit, whereby he confesses himself indebted to said plaintiff in the such of Four hundred and five dollars and forty-eight cents and consents that Judgment be rendered against him for said sum. His, therefore, considered by the Court, that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid, in form aforesaid as confessed, and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Oliver Guinette vs Charles J Carpenter**
The defendant files an answer herein
**Mechanic's Bank vs C. D. Sullivan et al**
The defendants file a lemurrer herein.
**H. Grundl vs J. D. Sullivan et al**
The defendants file a lemurrer herein
**Louis L. Freligh vs Joseph S. Swes et al**
Defendants file a lemurrer herein
**John F. Dowdall vs John F. Lay et al**
The defendants file an answer herein
**Stephen Hashell et al vs King'n F. C. Champion et al**
Answer filed
**Stephen Hashell et al vs G. D. Sullivan et al**
Answer filed
**Louis C. Carr et al vs C. D. Sullivan et al**
Motion for security for costs and lemurrer to petition filed.
---
**Viewer Page 9** (rcdbook1858_27_0008.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 3
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs Thomas J. Smith et al**
Demurrer filed
**John J. Parkinson vs Joseph L. Papin et al**
Answer filed
**The Bank of Missouri vs R. F. C. Champion et al**
Demurrer filed
**Stephen Castell et al vs Benj'n F. C. Champion et al**
Answer filed
**George G. Presbury et al vs Joseph L. Papin et al**
Answer filed
**Haymun Levin vs George S. Nichells et al**
Exhibit filed
**Louis Palli vs Frank Hudson et al**
Plea in abatement filed
**Henry Wells, President et al vs Michael Rourke**
Demurrer filed
**Joseph Canway, admr et al vs John K. Hempeteal, admr et al**
Demurrer filed
**The Bank of the State Missouri vs Addison G. Bragg et al**
Answer filed
**Isaac Wickersham vs A. H. Menkins et al**
Answer filed
**John G. Gay vs James Crowley**
Answer filed
**Albert Bellings vs Charles Fink**
Plea in abatement filed
**Theodore N. Becker vs Page & Racon**
Amended Petition filed
**Natale Kahn vs Louis Davis**
Plea in abatement filed
**Peter St Cin vs Mury St Cin**
answer and Crossbill filed.
**Jules Hauel vs Suphen Haskell et al**
Demurrer filed.
**John Devins et al vs Louis Davis**
Motion for additional bond filed
**William M. Morrisen et al vs Samuel McCartney et al.**
Demurrer filed
**Dewitl Van Evard vs Hynian Levin**
Interrogatories filed.
**Edward Chase vs James Castello et al**
Answer filed
**Dwight Dur kee et al vs Carr & Kennett**
Answer filed
**George W.. Clark et al vs A. S. Roberts, Jr**
Plea in abatement filed
**Logan D. Dameron vs John W. Carroll et al**
Demurrer filed
---
**Viewer Page 10** (rcdbook1858_27_0009.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 4
**February Term 1858**
**Joseph S Foster vs Stephen A. Whitehouse**
Alligations and Interrogatories
**Hanenkamp & Hynes vs Joshn Nevison**
Proof of publication in Now at this day come the plaintiffs and file proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication heretofore made in this behalf has been duly published according to law.
**John S. Thomson vs John Nevison**
Proof of publication. Now at this day comes the said plaintiff and files proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication heretofore made in this behalf has been duty published according to law.
**George C. Reed et al vs Francis A. Pelletier et al**
Plea in abatement filed
**Charles G. Gill et al vs Francis A. Pelletier et al**
Plea in abatement filed
**William F. Enders et al vs Francis A. Pelletier et al**
Plea in abatement filed
**Robert K. Wright et al vs George M. Willing**
Answer filed.
**Fx M. Meyer vs G. W. Fisher et al**
Agreement files.
**Ellen J. Wilgus et al vs Steam Boat David Tatum**
Answer filed.
**George Pomeroy et al vs William H. Hall et al**
Demurrer filed.
**P. Hogan vs Joseph K. Rent**
Motion for security for costs filed.
**Anios C. Paxon vs J. S. Nashell**
Allegations and Interrogatories filed
**The Collier White Lead Oil Company vs John Keller**
Interrogatories filed.
**John Shillito et al vs James Gormley**
Interrogatories filed
**E. M. Clellan vs S. M. Whitehouse**
Interrogatories filed.
**The President and Directors & Company of Louisville vs Morris Kahn's gar**
Interrogatories filed.
**State of Missouri, to use et al vs Henry Meyers et al**
Demurrer filed
**William R. Callody vs A. Cutter**
Answer filed.
**Thomas Craden vs Catharine Creaden**
Answer filed.
---
**Viewer Page 11** (rcdbook1858_27_0010.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 5
**C. K. Racon vs William M. Plant et al**
Answer filed
**Lucien Carr et al vs Henry Pileher, Sr et al**
Answer filed
**Michael Owens vs William Smith**
Answer filed.
**Frederick Robertson vs John All**
Answer filed.
**Thomas Walsh vs Robert Caston and Dennis Fennessy**
Dismissal.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, and on his motion, if is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**John H. Calhoun vs George Frederick**
Answer filed.
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs John A. Hall et al**
Demurrer filed.
**Thomas Rutherford vs Isaac J. Kelfcham**
Plea in abatement filed
**The President Directors and Company of the Bank of Louisville vs Ellen J. Smith et al**
Answer filed.
**Elius abraham vs Raphael Keiler et al**
Demurrer filed.
**David Anderson vs John A. Singleton**
Answer filed.
**William M. Morrison et al vs Samuel M Cartney**
Answer filed.
**Joseph Farnsworth vs Jerre Hunte, Allon, Rail Road Company**
Motion to dismiss suit filed.
**Walker Reed vs Frederick K. Conway**
Motion for security for costs filed.
**George D. Little et al vs Emnut Mc Donald et al**
Answer filed.
**Edward Anthony vs J. H. Fitzgibbon**
Answer filed.
**William C. Wagley et al vs William S. Grant**
Answer and Counter claim, filed
**David Cone vs Linard Forhes**
answer filed.
**William Wade et al vs Joseph R. Halland**
Answer filed.
**Patrick McKenna vs Patrick Molloy**
Answer filed.
**Samuel M Cartney et al vs Joseph W. Clark et al**
Interrogatories filed.
**George H. Russing et al vs George M. Willing**
Answer filed.
---
**Viewer Page 12** (rcdbook1858_27_0011.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 6
**February Term 1858**
**Sangunette H. Renoish et al vs Solomon H. Robbins**
Answer filed
**Saint Louis Car Wheel Company vs John Lowry**
Answer filed
**Henry M. Schieffelin vs Horace G. Brady et al**
Dismissal
On motion of said plaintiff by their attorney, if is ordered by the Court, that this cause be dismissed as to the said William K. Brady.
**George H. Catter vs Daniel D. Page et al**
Dismissal
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the court that this cause be dismissed as to the said Defendant Thomas Braun at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
Aime Pernod, who is personally known to the Court, at this day, comes in open Court, and acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation in favor of his above Lucy, aged about twenty four years, of black color.
Aime Pernod, who is personally known to the Court, at this day, comes in assen Court, and acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation in favor of his above Peter, aged about sixteen years, of black color.
Now at this day, in open Court, comes Aime Pernod, who is personally known to the Court and acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation in favor of his above Marie aged about forty-five years of black color.
Now at this day, in open Court, comes Aime Pernod, who is personally know to the Court, and acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation in favor of his above James, aged about three years, mulatti
Now at this day, in Open Court, comes Aime Pernod who is personally known to the Court and acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation in favor of his above John aged about Fourteen years, of black color.
Aime Pernod, comes in Open Court, and acknowledges the execution the execution of a deed of emancipation in favor of his above Nelly, aged about five years, mulatti.
Now at this day comes in Open Court, Aime Pernod, who is personally known to the Court, and acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation in favor of Martha aged about twenty years of black color.
Now at this day comes in Open Court, Aime Pernod, who is personally known to the Court, and acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation in favor of his slave Tom, aged about twenty-eight years, mulatti.
**Sherman J. Bacon vs Oliver F. Pragg et al**
Answer filed
**S. G. Seans vs Daniel D. Page et al**
Dismissal On motion of said plaintiff, if is ordered that this cause he dismissed as to the said Henry D. Bacon.
---
**Viewer Page 13** (rcdbook1858_27_0012.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 7
**Joseph Stouvenal et al vs Charlis M. Baker et al**
Dismissal.
On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court, that this cause be dismissed as to the said defendant Thomas B. Baker, at the costs of the said plaintiffs and that execution above therefore.
**D. G. Tieman et al vs William D. W. Barnard et al**
Dismissal
On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court, that this cause be dismissed as to the said defendant Charlis Bernard, at the costs of said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**Sherman J. Bacon et al vs Oliver T. Pragg et al**
Dismissal
On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said Oliver T. Pragg, at the costs of said plaintiffs and that execution issue there for.
**In the matter of the assignment of Gerhard H. Sand Francis H. Pee, assignee**
Upon the application of said assignee it is ordered that he be do proceed to sell the personal property conveyed by said assignment at private sale, for cash, for all sums under one hundred dollars, and for all sums over one hundred dollars, the said assignee may sell upon a credit not exceeding three-months, the Purchase money to the secured by note with a good endorser. All personal property remaining unsold at the expiration of three months shall be sold at public auction, for each The real estate conveyed by said assignment, shall be sold at public auction upon twenty days notice; terms, and third cash, and the balance at three and six months, secured by notes and deeds of trust upon the property.
C. C. Simmons announced to the Court the death of Richard S. Blenner hassett, and presented the proceedings had at a meeting of the Members of the Saint Louis Bar, and on his motion it is ordered by the Court that the same be entered of record.
At a meeting of the members of the saint Louis Bar, held at the Common Pleas Court.-Room on the Twenty-seventh day of December Eighteen hundred and fifty-seven, to give expressions to their sentiments relative to the death of Richard J. Blenner hassitt Easy the following preamble and resolutions were unanimously adapted.
Whereas it has pleased [provideack ?] to remove from amongst as our distinguished be other Richard J. Blenner hassett Esq. and whereas it is due to the great talents and abilities manifested in his professional career that a fitting tribute he paid to his memory, therefore, be it Resolved, that use hold in the greatest respect and regard the many eminent qualifications that adorned his career as a lawyer and the amiable traits of personal character, that so largely commended him to the love and friendship of his friends and personal associates Resolved, That me deeply and sincerely sympathize and condole with the bereaved family of the deceased in the great loss they have sustained. Resolved, that as a testimony of respect to the memory of our professional brother and of our sorrow for his loss we will attend his funeral in a body and wear the usual badge of mourning for thirty days. Resolved that the secretary of this meeting he requested to furnish the family of our departed associate with a easy of these resolutions
---
**Viewer Page 14** (rcdbook1858_27_0013.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 8
**February Term 1858**
and also to cause the same to be published in the several City papers.
**George Pomeray et al vs J. H. Alexander et al**
Answer filed
**Jacob S. Brown admr et al vs Francis G. Headerson et al**
Demurrer filed
**R. J. Guthridge vs Lockwood & Pierson gar et al**
Dismissal. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney in this behalf and on his motion, if is ordered by the Court that the said garnishees be his charged hence, at the Cost of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Squeri Hall for vs The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company**
Interrogatories filed.
**James M. Crawford vs Aruvs H. Shulty**
Answer filed
**The State of Missouri vs Joseph W. Thornton**
Motion to discharge defendant filed.
**Edward G. Sloan vs J. D. Gorlon et al**
Answer filed
**Henry M. Kehey vs William Wade et al**
Answer filed.
**A. H. Smith et al vs Rusoill Scarritt et al**
Answer filed.
**Gottfried Kleinmann vs John Helgenberg et al**
Answer filed
**George Richardson vs Charles Gilpin**
Answer filed.
**James C. Riney vs Michael Burk et al**
Reply filed.
**George Pomeray vs William Wade et al**
Answer filed.
**Ferdinand A. Rauss vs P. D. Gordon et al**
Answer filed.
**Stephen Hagh vs P. J. Peter et al**
Interrogatories filed.
---
**Viewer Page 15** (rcdbook1858_27_0014.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 9
**Joseph Farrell vs Thomas Nelen**
answer filed.
**The State Bank of Missouri vs William Wade et al**
Answer filed.
**Samuel B. Wiggins vs John Smith et al**
Answer filed.
**Henry Grone vs Francis Petterson et al**
Answer filed.
**Samuel Simmons vs Thomas Campbell et al**
Demurrer filed.
**James Burkard and Benjamin H. Hatten vs George T. Pettman and Albert Tennent**
Dismissal.-
On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, if is ordered that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**Amalu Valli vs Charles L. Gilphin et al**
Demurrer filed.
**Henry [Piter ?] vs Morley J. Levi et al**
Answer filed.
**John Dallon vs Charles Wightman**
Answer filed
**Thomas J. Comstock vs Edward S. Wheaton et al**
Demurrer filed.
**Samuel Mckee vs Joseph H. White**
Answer filed.
**William Mc. Gully et al vs William Hassinger et al**
Answer filed.
**The Champaigne County Bank vs Miles G. Moris et al**
Answer filed.
**Inluis Berseh vs John Helginberg Frederick Pecker and Philip J. Helginberg**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, if is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of plaintiff and that execution therefor.
**Samuel L. Hale vs Charles L. Hunt and William M. Cooke**
Dismissal.- On motion of plaintiff by his attorney, if is ordered that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Edward C. Iloan vs James C. Parks**
Demurrer filed.
**Thomas M. Taylor vs Rickwell & Co**
affidavit of a partnership filed.
**Joshua W. Owings vs D. J. W. Laughlin et al**
Demurrer filed.
**Hugh Boyle vs Francis Buchanan**
Answer filed.
**H. Baxter et al vs Miles G. Moris et al**
Answer filed.
**Benedict Schultz vs John Valentine et al**
Answer filed.
---
**Viewer Page 16** (rcdbook1858_27_0015.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 10
**February Term 1858**
**George P. Fein vs John Valentine et al**
Answer filed.
**L. A. Willard vs Miles G. Morris et al**
Answer filed.
**John Aartman vs Miles G. Morris et al**
Answer filed.
**John F. Parkinson vs Largue & Aunt**
Answer filed
**Joseph Farrell vs Henry Bernstein**
Answer filed.
**James H. Sturdy vs Louis Palmer**
Answer filed.
**John Cochran vs Louis Davis**
Plea in abatement filed.
**John Dallon vs John Sigerson**
Answer filed.
**Matthew S. Maloney vs Henry Bernstein et al**
Answer filed.
**Thomas B. Ellis vs Richard C. Schakelford**
Dismissal.
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court, that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendant and that execution issue therefor.
**Isaac Young vs Newman N. Ross**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**L. J. Sanger vs D. D. Page et al**
Demurrer filed.
**Dwight Durkee et al vs Miles G. Morris et al**
Answer filed.
**L. A. Willard vs M. G. Morris et al**
Answer filed.
**John J. Anderson et al vs Miles G. Morris et al**
Answer filed.
**Louis G. Jones vs Charles L. Hunt et al**
Answer filed.
**Bank of the state of Missouri vs Louis A. Wellon et al**
Answer filed.
**Thomas Carson vs Thomas Nelson gar et al**
Interrogatories filed.
**James Than vs E. O. English et al**
Answer filed.
**John Kennedy vs Charles D. Gilpin gar et al**
Interrogatories filed.
**Commercial Insurance Company vs Richard Ivers et al**
Answer filed.
**Richard Bridgford vs Louis Charleville et al**
Answer filed.
---
**Viewer Page 17** (rcdbook1858_27_0016.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 11
**Francis Molair vs George B. Michael, Kenneth McKenzie and Charles Bobb**
Dismissal.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, and in his motion, if is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Simon Heiter vs Edward A. Owens**
Dismissal.
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, if is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Daniel T. Tiemann, Inluis Tiemann and Peter G. Treimann vs William D. W. Barnard and Charles Barnard**
Dismissal.
On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney if is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**James Owen vs Joseph A. Eddy, Joseph A. Jamison Jabez P. Eddy, Amos Cotting Jr, Anson M. Bissell, Charles C. Hellmers and Werner Meyers**
Dismissal.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, and on his motion, if is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Charles Ridgoray and William Fling vs Joseph A. Eddy, Joseph A. Jamison Jabez P. Eddy, Amos Cotting, Jr, Anson M. Bissell, Charles C. Hellmers and Werner Meyer**
Dismisseal
Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, and on their motion, it is ordered by the board that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**J. P. Sanger vs D. D. Page et al**
Demurrer filed.
**Henry Garne vs Francis Petterson aim**
Answer filed.
**Matthew Park vs Henry C. Lynch**
Answer filed
**David C. Tardy vs Edward S. Wheaton et al**
Answer filed.
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs Benjamin F. C. Champion et al**
Answer filed
**Louis H. Benoist vs Louis F. Curtes**
Answer filed.
**Louis V. Bogy et al vs Edward S. Wheadon et al**
Anwer filed.
**Thomas B. Davis vs M. S. White**
Answer filed.
**Louis C. Garnier vs Joseph L. Papin et al**
Answer filed.
---
**Viewer Page 18** (rcdbook1858_27_0017.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 12
**February Term 1858**
**L. H. Simpson et al vs Theodore Bredon**
Answer filed.
**George G. Presbury et al vs Joseph L. Papin et al**
Answer of defendant Waugh, filed.
**William A. Moffit et al vs P. S. Lauham et al**
Answer filed
**George B. Sanderson vs Charles C. Hant et al**
Answer filed
**William W. Glenny vs Pacific Insurance Company garnishee of James B. Townsend et al**
Dismissal-
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the said garnisher he hence discharged, at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Daniel C. Michael vs Isaac T. Wise and John M. Krum**
Dismissal.
On motion of said plaintiff, and with the consent of the parties hereto, it is ordered by the Court, that this cause he dismissed at the costs of the said defendants and that execution issue therefor.
**Thomas Cohen vs Thomas M. Hanter**
Answer filed.
**William Henry vs The Globe Insurance Company**
Dismisseal
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that the said garnisher he discharged hence at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Daniel Ryan vs Roger C. McAllister**
Ten days for the time is given the said defendant to plead herein.
**Inluis H. Gerhard vs Charles Marlon**
Dismisseal
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Samuel Jones et al vs Marrier Steinbach**
The time for answering herein is extended fifteen days.
**Dewitt Van Evard et al vs Hayman Levin**
Plea in abatement filed
**George S. Nichelts et al vs Hayman Levin**
Plea in abatement filed.
**Charles Wiggins vs Charles L. Hunt et al**
Answer filed.
**Louis C. Garnier vs C. L. Hunt et al**
Answer filed.
**Louis C. Garnier vs Charles L. Gilpin**
Answer filed.
---
**Viewer Page 19** (rcdbook1858_27_0018.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 13
**Stephen Haskell et al no 227 vs Benjamin F. Champion et al**
The time for answering, is, by leave of Court, extended ten days.
**Stephen Haskell et al no 228 vs Benjamin F. Champion et al**
The time for answering, is, by leave of Court, extended ten days.
**Stephen Haskell et al vs Banjamin F. Champion et al**
The time for answering is extended ten days.
**E. J. Glasgon et al vs Isaac W. Taylor**
Defendant files an answer herein.
**The State Savings Institution vs Francis F. Graff and others**
Answer filed.
**M. T. Miller et al vs Francis T. Graff et al**
Answer filed.
**Inluis Beisch vs John Helgenberg Frederick Picker and Philip J. Helgenberg**
Dismissal.-
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**John S. Thompson vs Robert Sterling et al**
Ten days further time allowed to the said defendant Robert Sterling to file an answer herein.
**Isaac Lamaster vs The Wood-book Hardin**
Leave is given said plaintiff to file an amended petition herein, within thirty days.
**William V. A. Ray vs Charles L. Hunt r**
Answer filed.
**Ryan & Lanthan vs William P. Fenn**
Answer filed
**George B. Sanderson vs Fenn and Hunt**
Answer filed.
**Dweight Durkee et al vs Peter Chonteau et al**
Motion to quash return filed.
**John S. Thompson vs Robert Sterling et al**
Motion by defendant Wallace to quash affidavit re filed.
**Thomas L. Salisbury vs John Largue et al**
Answer filed.
**Hughes & Marshall vs Fenn & Hunt**
Answer filed.
**John Hoffmann et al vs W. F. Denny et al**
Answer filed.
---
**Viewer Page 20** (rcdbook1858_27_0019.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 14
**February Term 1858**
**The Saint Louis Building and Savings Institution vs James D. Gage et al**
Answer filed
**George Ragers vs John Sigerson et al**
Answer filed
**David Rokohl et al vs Oaul Garlin**
Answer filed
**The First Ward Savings Institution vs Ezra O. English et al**
Answer filed.
**Joseph Farrell vs John Helgerberg et al**
Answer filed
**Joseph Farrell vs Paul Carlin et al**
Answer filed
**In the matter of the assignment of Rogers, Anderson et al**
Now at this day comes Charles B. Anderson the assignee of said Rogers, Anderson and Company and files an application praying that he may be discharged from his trust aforesaid.
**The Saint Louis Building and Savings Institution vs Rudolph Fritsch et al**
Demurrer filed
**David B. Hill vs Paul Carlin et al**
Demurrer filed.
**George Pomeray et al vs Theodore Betts et al**
Motion to strike out Petition filed.
**United States Savings Institution vs Henry Gronheim et al**
Answer filed
**United States Savings Institution vs Robert C. Gordon**
Answer filed.
**George B. Murray vs William P. Fenn et al**
Answer filed.
**James S. Thomas vs E. D. Sullivan et al**
Answer filed.
**Jail Nourse et al vs John Sigerson et al**
Answer filed.
**Louis C. Garnier vs B. F. C. Champain et al**
Answer filed.
**The People's Savings Institution vs E. D. Sullivan et al**
Answer filed.
**Hugh Bayle vs Inluis Buchnan**
Answer filed.
**Wm H. Smith et al vs Anapen's Rree et al**
Answer filed.
**James G. M Pleeters vs John Singerson et al**
Answer filed.
**Nathaniel C. Meyers vs John Sigerson et al**
Answer filed.
**A. M. Watermann vs John Sigerson et al**
Answer filed.
**James Fay vs John Sigerson et al**
Answer filed.
---
**Viewer Page 21** (rcdbook1858_27_0020.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 15
**The Covenant Life Insurance Company vs Charles F. Baker et al**
Answer filed.
**Logan D. Camerson vs John W. Carroll et al**
Answer filed
**Samuel Myerson vs John Halliday et al**
Answer filed.
**Gottfried Kleinmunn vs John Helgenberg et al**
Answer filed.
**Charles W. Green et al vs Henry Gronheim**
Answer filed.
**The People's Savings Institution vs John Helgenberg et al**
Answer filed
**Newton S. Guy et al vs C. D. Sullivan et al**
Answer filed.
**George W. Clark Jr et al vs A. S. Roberts Jr gar et al**
Dismissal.-
On motion of said plaintiff by their attorney, if is ordered that the firm of Bogy & Miltenberger, garnishees herein be discharged, at the costs of said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**George Corneny vs Charles L. Hunt et al**
Answer filed.
**Michael L. Kelly vs Charles L. Hunt et al**
Answer filed.
**Elizabeth Clark vs William P. Fenn et al**
Answer filed.
**George Trumball vs William M. Cooke et al**
Answer filed.
**Isaac Mitchill vs Thomas Campbell et al**
Answer filed.
**Samuel Simmons vs Thomas Campbell et al**
Answer filed.
**The State of Me, to use of Spols vs Samuel Jacoby et al**
Answer filed.
**Joseph Farrell vs Paul Carlin et al**
Answer filed.
**Joseph Farrell vs Anapins Rice et al**
Answer filed.
**The Citzens Savings Institution vs Darrah & Pomeroy**
Answer filed.
**Emanuel D. Holiamanh vs Charles L. Hunt et al**
Answer filed.
**George D. Shackleford vs Charles L. Hunt et al**
Answer filed.
**George B. Sanderson vs William P. Fenn et al**
Answer filed
**State of Missouri vs Joseph A. Capaire**
On motion of C. G. Manso Circuit Attorney, if is ordered that this cause be dismissed upon the payment of costs by the defendant
---
**Viewer Page 22** (rcdbook1858_27_0021.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 16
**February Term 1858**
**Fideli C. Sharp vs Charles L. Hunt et al**
Answer filed
**S. H. Benaist et al vs John Largue et al**
Answer filed
**William Kelly vs D. D. Page et al**
Answer filed.
**William C. Jamison vs John Largue et al**
Answer filed.
**Jonus Moore vs Chalres L. Hunt et al**
Answer filed
**John F. Parkinson vs Charles L. Hunt et al**
Answer filed.
**John Dallon vs John Sigerson**
Answer filed
**Stephen Haskell et al vs James H. Hayden et al**
Answer filed.
**The Boatmen's Savings Institution vs Thomas S. Nelson et al**
Answer filed.
**Henry C. Boardman vs Jacob Fritsch et al**
Answer filed.
**Louis Ombray, dit Soulouque vs Joseph Vaclair**
Motion for security for costs filed
**Joseph Farrell vs Jacob Fritsch et al**
Answer filed
**George W. Bruke vs Allen Brown**
Plea in abatement filed
**James S. Chen vs P. Vandermale et al**
Answer filed
**George B. Sanderson vs E. O. English et al**
Answer filed
**Stephen Haskell et al vs Paul Carlin et al**
Answer filed
**Nathan D. Allen vs A. H. LeKenn et al**
Answer filed
**Louis C. Garnier vs Jr C. Papin et al**
Answer filed
**Wesley D. Alkerie vs James Reed**
Answer filed
**Henry Block vs Darrah & Pomeroy**
Answer filed.
**William A. Hargadine vs Darrah & Pomeroy**
Answer of Darrah & Pomeroy filed
**George B. Sanderson vs David R. Risley et al**
Answer filed.
**The State of Missouri to use of M. Goldsoll vs William B. Watson et al**
Answer filed.
---
**Viewer Page 23** (rcdbook1858_27_0022.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 17
**George Bellas vs John Kachler et al**
Answer filed.
**George D. Hall vs E. O. English et al**
Answer filed.
**Peter D. Muller vs Edward S. Wheaton et al**
Answer filed.
**James Gordon et al vs Benjamin F. Champion et al**
Plea in abament filed.
**James M. Franciseus vs Edward S. Wheaton et al**
Answer filed.
**John G. Evans et al vs Charles H. Pond**
Answer filed.
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs Francis McFaul**
Demurrer filed.
**John F. Parkinson vs John Largue et al**
Answer filed.
**Thomas Berck vs Thomas Camphell et al**
Answer filed.
**Thomas B. Wing vs Jacob S. Williams**
Answer and set off filed.
**James E. Gall et al vs H. F. Crass et al**
Answer filed.
**Stephen Hashell et al vs Joseph Harren et al**
Answer of Camphell filed.
**Edward W. Tryon et al vs H. F. Crass et al**
Answer filed.
**Frederick L. Rillon vs Edward S. Wheaton et al**
Answer filed.
**Fisrnin A. Cousinery et al vs B. F. Champion et al**
Answer filed.
**John T. Parkinson vs Joseph L. Papin et al**
Answer filed.
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs William Wade et al**
Answer filed.
**Samuel McCartney et al vs Daniel D. Page et al**
Answer filed.
**Daniel G. Haviland vs Charles F. Baker et al**
Answer filed.
**Thomas H. West vs James Stewart**
Answer filed.
**James A. Monks vs Charles L. Hunt et al**
Answer filed.
**Hughes & Marshall vs Largue & Hunt**
Answer filed.
**Almon Thompson vs Charles L. Hunt et al**
Answer filed.
**Covenant Mutual Life Ins Co vs Charles F. Baker et al**
Answer filed.
---
**Viewer Page 24** (rcdbook1858_27_0023.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 18
**February Term 1858**
**Louisa L. Freligh vs Chalres L. Hunt et al**
Answer filed.
**James G. Catlin vs Charles L. Hunt et al**
Answer filed
**Fidelis C. Sharph vs Edward S. Wheaton et al**
Answer filed
**Stephen Haskell et al vs Paul Carlin et al**
Answer filed
**L. G. Dickinson vs John Largue et al**
Answer filed
**Pomeroy, Benton & Co vs Moses Pfeiffer**
Plea in abatement filed.
**Louis A. Benvist et al vs Charles M. Baker et al**
Answer filed.
**Samuel Bonner vs Ezra O. English et al**
Answer filed.
**Abeles Taussig vs Adelph L. Komick**
Answer filed.
**George B. Sanderson vs Frunklin Field et al**
Answer filed
**Quaker City Insurance Company of Pennsylvania vs Edwin H. Wheadon et al**
Answer filed
**Isaac A. Mitchell vs A. A. LeBean et al**
Answer filed.
**Hayden & Wilson vs John Segirson et al**
Answer filed.
**Patrick Canway vs Joseph [Kater ?] et al**
Answer filed.
**David Rokohl et al vs Ferdinand Vandermale et al**
Answer filed
**Pomeroy, Benton & Company vs E. O. English et al**
Defendant Myerson files an answer herein.
**James S. M Pleeters vs A. A. LeBean et al**
Defendant Myerson files an answer herein
**Stephen Haskell et al vs B. J. Champion et al**
Answer filed
**Henry Block et al vs C. W. Hebert et al**
Answer filed
**Samuel M Cartney vs A. William Street et al**
Answer filed.
**The Commercial Insurance Company vs Samuel S. Sanderson et al**
Answer filed.
**The State Fire & Murine Insurance Co vs Samuel Sanderson et al**
Answer filed.
**The Pennsylvania Insurance Co vs Samuel Sanderson et al**
Answer filed.
**Amos C. Paxon vs J. S. Haskell**
Plea in abatement filed.
---
**Viewer Page 25** (rcdbook1858_27_0024.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 19
**Louis V. Bogy et al vs Lorenz Schaeffler et al**
Answer filed.
**The Michanics Bank vs A. W. Street et al**
Answer filed.
**Robert Holmes et al vs R. F. Reasley et al**
Answer filed.
**Augustus Rolker vs J. G. Miller et al**
Answer filed.
**Stephen Heaskell et al vs John Peters et al**
Answer filed.
**Joseph E. Barrm vs Joseph B. Holland**
Demurrer filed
**Joseph E. Busson vs Joseph B. Holland**
Demurrer and Answer filed
**James M. Mc Fadlin et al vs Albert L. Green et al**
Answer filed.
**Louis C. Garnier vs Anton Jarger et al**
Defendant Myerson files an answer herein.
**John F. Mauntel vs John M. Mc Fadlin et al**
Answer filed.
**Thomas Boylun et al vs Benj F. Reasly et al**
Demurrer filed
**John M. Meyers vs Angel S. Meyers**
Answer filed.
**A. R. Albett vs G. O. English et al**
Answer filed.
**James Shen vs Jacob Fritschle et al**
Answer filed.
**George H. Chase vs A. A. LeBean et al**
Answer filed.
**Louis C. Garnier vs Oliver Labadie et al**
Answer filed.
**Joseph W. Green vs Samuel Cone et al**
Plea in abatement filed
**James S. Chen vs A. A LeBean et al**
Defendant Samuel Myerson files an answer herein
**Louis C. Garnier vs A. A. LeBean et al**
Defendant Samuel Myerson files an answer herein
**David Rohkohl vs Philip Caesar et al**
Myerson files an answer herein.
**John E. Cook vs Benjamen F. Reasly et al**
Demurrer filed
**John C. Ivory vs Paul Carlin et al**
Answer filed.
---
**Viewer Page 26** (rcdbook1858_27_0025.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 20
**February Term 1858**
**Thomas Slevin and Charles Slevin vs Francis A. Pelletur et al**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, if is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**In the Matter of the Assignment of Ragers, Anderson & Co**
The Court having duly heard and fully Considered the application of Charles R. Anderson, assignee is this behalf, doth order that said assignee be discharged from his said trust; and the Court doth further order that all the books, papers, effects, moneys and evidences of left be delivered by him to his successor or successors in the trust, as seen as the Court shall designate the persons to receive the same, and discharge the trust.
**George B. Murray vs Thomas Nugent and Richard King**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff but the said defendants although duly summoned and Solemnly called come not Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and twenty six dollars and five costs. If is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended together with ten percent interest on said Judgment until paid, and that execution issue therefor.
**Frirre E. Brulatour vs Philip Gratiaa**
On Bell of Exchange.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth order that said petition be taken as confessed, against said defendant. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and forty-eight dollars and ninety four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**George B. Murray vs Edward Dobyns and James B. Dobyns**
On Note.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth order that said petition be taken against said defendants as confessed And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and forty-one dollars and Seventy five cents. If is, therefore Considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in
---
**Viewer Page 27** (rcdbook1858_27_0026.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 21
form aforesaid, with interest from maturity at the rate of ten per cent per annum, until paid, and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Charles Bussy vs Edward Dobyns**
On Note.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, Wherefore the Court doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as Confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and fifty-five dollars and forty-five cents. It is therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**James M. Hughes vs Ferdinand Vandermale and Frederick Picker**
On Note.
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not. Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff his petition is taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred And twenty-two dollars and Sixty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Samuel Kirkman et al vs George W. Cable et al**
On Note.
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants George W. Cable and Ira Stout, although duly summoned and called come not, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed.
**George B. Sanderson vs David R. Risley et al**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants David R. Risley and William Risley although duly summoned and called come not but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed.
**James S. Chen vs Ferdinand Vandermale et al**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants Ferdinand Vandermale and Frederick Picker although duly summoned and solemnly called come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against them as confessed.
**George B. Sanderson vs Franklin Field and C. H. Barton et al**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants Franklin Field and C. H. Barton although duly summoned and called come not but make default, Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed.
---
**Viewer Page 28** (rcdbook1858_27_0027.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 22
**February Term 1858**
**John J. Roe and Henry J. Moore vs William H. Thompson, Joseph W. Thompson, Peter J. Somers and James M. Hughes**
On Note.
Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants William H. Thompson, Joseph W. Thompson and Peter J. Somers although duly summoned and called come not, but make default Wherefore the Court cloth order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against then as confessed.
**George B. Sanderson vs William M. Cooke and Charles C. Hunt**
Dismissal.
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Henry Thayer vs Charles F. Hoelzle, Anthur Olshausen, James V. Westtake and Appleton A. Britton**
On Note.
Now at this day comes said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants confessed. And finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and nineteen dollars and forty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William Patrick, James Patrick and Griswold E. Wasner vs William C. Payler and John D. Stone**
On Note.
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make default, wherefore, the Court doth order the, petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed. And finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and thirteen dollars and eighty one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William Patrick James Patrick and Griswold E. Wasner vs Jacob Bersch, Adum R. Richtscheid and Philip Krass**
On Note.
Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs he taken against them as confessed and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two Thousand One hundred and thirty-eight dollars and twenty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Mary L. Lamargue vs John Simonds**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by her attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause he dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 29** (rcdbook1858_27_0028.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 23
**George B. Sanderson vs John M. Wimer, James A. Rogers, Charles Rogers and Henry F. Watson**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make default. Wherefore the Court doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One Thousand-Three-hundred and Seventy-three dollars and ninety cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**George B Sanderson vs John M. Wimer and Charles Gibson**
On Note.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against them as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this suit is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Seven hundred and forty one dollars and eighty three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**James M. Hughes and Thomas Marshall vs John Giles and Robert W. Hunt**
On Note.
Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Five hundred and forty-five dollars and thirty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**George B. Sanderson vs George W. Goode, David D. Mitchell and James H. Comfort**
On Note.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff but the said defendants George W. Goode and James H. Comfort although duly summoned and called come not but make default, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff, his petition is taken against said defendants as confessed.
**George B. Sanderson vs Curtis A. Cromwell and Carrline Cromwell**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make default, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff his petition is taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Six-hundred and forty-four dollars and twenty-eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 30** (rcdbook1858_27_0029.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 24
**February Term 1858**
**George B. Sanderson vs George W. Goode and James H. Comfort**
On Note.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make default, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiffs attorney, it is ordered by the Court that his petition be taken against said defendants as confessed And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Fifteen hundred and eighty dollars and eighty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Samuel Kirkman and John W. Luke vs William Hassinger and John O. Brien**
On Note.
Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs he taken against said defendants as confessed And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Four hundred and nineteen dollars and seventy-eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**David Gabson Joseph W. Cheeseman and Henry Groveten Kemper vs B. Stout**
Dismissal.
On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause he dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**James M. Hughes and Thomas Marshall vs William M. Cooke and Charles L. Hunt**
Dismissal.-
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed a the costs of the said defendants and that execution issue therefor.
**James M. Hughes and Thomas Marshall vs William M. Cook and Charles L. Hunt**
Dismissal
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause he dismissed at the costs of the said defendants and that execution issue therefor.
**Rensalear W. Lee vs Philip Gratiaa**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and twenty four dollars and forty-cents It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 31** (rcdbook1858_27_0030.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 25
**William Woodward, William H. Baldwin Jr and Christopher C. Baldwin vs John T. Chappell and Vetal Francis Valli**
On Note.-
Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three Thousand One hundred and seventy two dollars and thirty seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Eli Mygatt Jr, George Mygatt and John Ingraham vs True W. Hoit**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth order that the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Seven thousand, Six hundred and sixty nine dollars and sixty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Albert Tennant and George T. Pittman vs David D. Page, Henry D. Bacon Thomas Brinn and Edward Wyman**
On Note.-
On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said Henry D. Bacon. Thereupon come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, but the other said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against them as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of One hundred and seventy-three dollars and ninety four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have there of execution.
**Alfred M. Waterman vs Henry C. Lester**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five-hundred and sixty-eight dollars and eighty-cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and that he have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 32** (rcdbook1858_27_0031.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 26
**February Term 1858**
**Alexis Mudd, Graham C. Hughes John J. Mudd, Henry F. Mudd and Amstead O. Grubb vs Humann Moll**
On Note.
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs he taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and eighty-one dollars and ninety-four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William P. Rekhill vs True W. Hoit**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff he taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One Thousand eight hundred and seventy dollars and sixty seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid, as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Henry Pike vs Dominick J Mc Laughlin**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff he taken against said defendant as confessed and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and twenty four dollars and eleven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William Allriance and Parker L Hall vs Julius Jonas**
On Note.
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendant as confessed and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and forty-two dollars and thirty-eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
**Samuel N. Pike vs Joseph J. Tourville and A. S. Leone**
On Draft
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff he taken against said defendants, as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and eighty-one dollars and eighty seven cents It is therefore, considered by the Court that sum plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and her costs and charges herein expended and have therefor execution.
---
**Viewer Page 33** (rcdbook1858_27_0032.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book:
---
**Viewer Page 34** (rcdbook1858_27_0033.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 28
by her attorney it is ordered by the Court that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three-hundred and ninetynine Dollars and forty-five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and her costs, and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Benjamin Liker vs John B. Ganter**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default. Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three hundred and seventy dollars and Twenty-three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.
**Sherman Spencer vs James K. B. Rice and Griffin Theebold**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called comes not, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against them as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and Eighty seven dollars and thirtyfive cents. It is, therefore considered by the Court that said defendants pay to the said plaintiff the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and that said defendant have execution therefor.
**Thomson Maylan vs William Hassinger**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that his petition be taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five Hundred and nine dollars and seventy eight cents It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Armstrong Beattie vs Daniel D. Page, Henry L. Bacon Edward Wyman and Thomas Bacon**
On Note.
Now this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court, that this cause he dismissed as to the said Henry L. Bacon. Thereupon, comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the other said defendants although duly summoned and called come not. Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff he taken against them in confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of On thousand Three hundred and seventy dollars and three cents It is, therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
---
**Viewer Page 35** (rcdbook1858_27_0034.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 29
**William C. Davis vs Margeret Davis**
Order of Publication.-
The Sheriff having made return that said defendant cannot be found and the Court being satisfied that said defendant cannot be served with process, it is, on motion of said plaitniff by his attorney, ordered that said defendant be notified of the commencement of this suit, the abject of which is to obtain a judgment of divorce from the said defendant on the grounds of desertion and adultery, and unless she he and appear at the next term of this Court, to be begun and held at the City of Saint Louis, on the First Monday of October next, and an a before the sixth day thereof, answer the petition of said plaintiff the same will be taken against her as confessed. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law, in the St Louis, Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed in the City of Saint Louis.
**Josiah G. McClellan vs Daniel D. Page, Henry D. Bacon and Thomas Brown**
On Note.
Now at this day comes said plaintiff by his attorney, and on his motion it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said defendant Henry D. Bacon. But the other said defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make default, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that his petition be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Eleven Thousand, three hundred and sixty four dollars and forty-six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court hat said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William Morgan vs Daniel D. Page, Henry D. Bacon and Thomas Brown**
On Note.
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said Henry D. Bacon. Thereupon comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said other defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and Sixty dollars and ninety-three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found And his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William Burteh vs Daniel D. Page, Henry D. Bacon Thomas Brown and Edward Wyman**
On Notes.-
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said Henry D. Bacon. Thereupon comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument or writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-Thousand and eighty-three dollars and sixty nine cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 36** (rcdbook1858_27_0035.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 30
**February Term 1858**
**Harris D. Booge vs Peter S. Schyler and Abram A. Van Womer**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that his petition be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five-hundred and eleven Dollars and twelve cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John J. Anderson, Reuben Anderson and Erastus H. Gaylord vs Eugene Laveille, A. Michael and J. W. Roberts**
On Note.-
Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, wherefore, on motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument or writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Five-hundred and sixty-five dollars and eighty-five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Charles A. Wrisert and Lebananon B. Smith vs Daniel D. Page, Henry D. Bacon Thomas Brown and Edward Wyman**
On Note.
Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorneys, and on their motion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said Henry D. Bacon. But the other defendants although duly summoned and called come not, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiffs by their attorneys, it is ordered by the Court, that the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three-hundred and thirty six dollars and fifteen cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**The Citizens Savings Institution vs Frederick Dent and Kenneth MacKenzie**
On Note.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff by its attorney, it is ordered by the Court, that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One thousand and fifty-seven dollars and thirty-three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid, as found, and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 37** (rcdbook1858_27_0036.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 31
**Lemons Gimble vs Daniel D. Page, Henry D. Bacon Thomas Brown and Edward Wyman**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes said plaintiff by his attorney, and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause he dismissed as to the said Henry D. Bacon. But the said other defendants although duly summonel and called come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred and twenty six dollars and eight. It is, therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, together with his costs and charges herein expended and have therefor execution.
**John J. Anderson, Erastus Gaylord and Reuben J. Anderson vs James A. Felps**
On Note.
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summonel and called comes not but makes default; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Four hundred and Twenty-nine dollars and Seventy one cents. It is, therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Ernest C. Angelradt and Robert Barth vs Paul P. Patchin**
On Note.-
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their Attorney, but the said defendant although duly summonel and called comes not, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two- hundred and sixty-five dollars and seventy six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have therefor execution.
**Richard J M Kenny vs Daniel D. Page, Henry D. Bacon, Thomas Brown and Edward Wyman**
On Notes.
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said defendant Henry D. Bacon and thereupon, it appearing to the Court that the said other defendants have been duly summoned and called and come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instruments of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of eighteen hundred and seventy two dollars and eighty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William C. Jamison vs Jacob Merrit et al**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff, in his run proper person, It is ordered by the Court that this cause he dismissed as to the said defendant George F. Rootes.
---
**Viewer Page 38** (rcdbook1858_27_0037.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 32
**February Term 1858**
**Louis A. Beuvist and James Christy vs Chester W. Pomeroy and Henry T. Darrah**
On Note.-
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of One thousands-Two-hundred and twenty dollars and forty-seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have therefor execution.
**William J. Horstman, Sigismund H. Horstman John G. Frunklin George O. Evans and William S. Hassall vs Hiram A. Pryor and John S. Thomson**
On Note.-
Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorneys, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default: Wherefore, the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Eight hundred and thirty seven dollars and thirty-three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have therefor execution.
**Harriett O. Vancourt vs George W. Goode and James H. Comfort**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes said plaintiff by her attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument or writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Fifteen hundred and eighty-five dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and her costs and charges herein expended and have therefor execution.
**James A. Monks vs Hugh K. Wagner and George B. Field**
On Note.
Now at this day comes said plaintiff by his attorney but said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three-hundred and thirty-five dollars and ninety cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, together with his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Lachariah W. Tinker and George Tinker vs Francis Human**
On Note.-
Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which
---
**Viewer Page 39** (rcdbook1858_27_0038.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 33
this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Four hundred and fifteen dollars and forty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have therefor execution.
**Thomas Garrett and Eli Garrett vs Hiram A. Pryor and John S. Thomson**
On Note.
Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants although duly summonel and called come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing in which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three-hundred and twenty six dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**James Shen vs Ferdinand Vandermale, Frederick Picker and Alexander Guenandon**
On Note.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summonel and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and thirty dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, together with his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Christian Stachler vs Philip Pausback and John C. Degenhart**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and eighty dollars and ninety cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Mount Vernon Company vs Henry B. Merrit, William Risley and Jacob Merrit**
On Bill of Exchange.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three Thousand and nineteen dollars and ten cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Sharman J. Bacon, Samuel J. Hyde Edward E. Pike and George Erskine # 151 Feb Isn 58 vs John P. Chappell V. Frank Valli, John B. Valli and Nerie Valli**
On Bill of Exchange.
Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not,
---
**Viewer Page 40** (rcdbook1858_27_0039.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 34
**February Term 1858**
but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Five-thousand-six hundred and ten dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, together with their costs and charges in this behalf expended and have therefor execution.
**John Ludewig vs John Renz et al**
On Note.- Default.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant John Renz although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default: Wherefore the Court doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against him as confessed.
**Louis P. Payne vs Curtis A. Cromwell, Carrline J. Cromwell and Joseph E. Elder**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default: Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and seven dollars and seventy-six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court, that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Meyer Friede vs George N. Lynch, Samuel S. Brainerd, Charles H. Heywood James Morris, William A. Lynch and John C. Cannon**
On Note.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default; Wherefore the Court doth find form the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One Thousand six hundred and seventy six dollars and forty-one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John B. Wells and Stephen H. Provost vs Dominick J. McLaughlin**
On Note.
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default; Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Five hundred and eleven Dollars and forty-seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, together with his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John H. Grisbeck, John Kilgour and John C. Culbertson vs William A. Nelson and F. W. Atheam**
On Note.
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorneys, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on
---
**Viewer Page 41** (rcdbook1858_27_0040.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 35
which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and sixty-four dollars and fifty-five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that sum plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Louis A. Benvist and James Christy vs Predick K Dent**
On Note.-
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default; Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Five hundred and fifteen dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the debt aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Thomas Baylon et al vs Benjamin F. Bersly and Pleasant Devinney**
On Note.- Default.
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendant Pleasant Devinney Although duly summonel and called comes not, but makes default; Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed.
**Thomas Baylon et al vs Washington Westand John L. Harbinson**
On Note.- Default.
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs he taken against the defendants as confessed
**John E. Cook vs Benjamin F. Beasley and Pleasant Devinney**
On Note.- Default.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed.
**Jacob S. Brown vs Francis G. Henderson and Edward Rice**
On Note.-Default.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not: Wherefore the Court doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed.
**David C. Pandy vs Edward S. Wheaton et al**
On Note.- Default.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summonel and called comes not; Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed.
---
**Viewer Page 42** (rcdbook1858_27_0041.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 36
**February Term 1858**
**Charles W. Green and Jonas W. Green vs Amos Green and Franklin Field**
On Note. Default.
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed us to the said defendant Amos Green. But the other said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not; Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and forty six dollars and eighty two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover or said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges >herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John M. Krum vs Joseph G. Shands**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not; Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that his petition be taken against said defendant as confessed and the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five-hundred and forty-eight dollars and twenty-five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Henry Bogue vs David W. Graham**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default; Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One Thousand eight hundred and twelve dollars and four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Charles W. Green and Jonas W. Green vs Daniel D. Page, Henry D. Bacon and Thomas Brown**
On Note.-
On Motion of said plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said defendant Henry D. Bacon. And thereupon, the other said defendants although duly summoned called come not, but default; Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument or writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of nine hundred and sixty-two dollars and sixty one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**George W. Thomas et al vs Inles G. Kingsbury**
The time for answering herein is extended fifteen days.
---
**Viewer Page 43** (rcdbook1858_27_0042.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 37
**Hiram Mills vs Louis A. Wellon, Barton Able, Richard P. Sass, James O. Carson, John J. Anderson and Nicholas Springer**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants Louis A. Wellon Barton Able, James O. Carson John J. Anderson and Nicholas Springer although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff he taken against them as confessed.
**James Shea vs Jacob Fritschle, Augustus Fritschle, and George W. Campbell**
Now at this day come the defendants by their attorney, and by leave of Court with draw the demurrer herein filed by them. On motion of said defendants by their attorney leave in given them until the 27th instant to file answer herein.
**William C. Jamison vs George W. Goodell**
On Note.
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default; Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and ninety three dollars and twenty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William C. Jamison, as administrator of Volney C. Musick vs Jehvilla G. Musick and James Castells**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and eighty-three Dollars and thirty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William C. Jamison vs Jacob Merrit, William Risley Henry B. Merrit, Robert C. Gordon and George F. Rootes**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff in his own proper person, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default; Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-thousand one hundred and nineteen dollars and eighty five cents. It is therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid, in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have therefor execution.
---
**Viewer Page 44** (rcdbook1858_27_0043.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 38
**February Term 1858**
**Charles Bobb vs George W. Goode and James H. Comfort**
On Note.- Default.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default: Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and thirty-three dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid, with interest after maturity at the rate of ten per cen tum per annum, until paid, and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William C. Jamison as administrator of Volney C. Musick vs John Hyatt**
On Note.- Default.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff in his own proper person, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default; Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and fifty dollars and thirty-five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John Baxter vs Louis Dozier and Richard Dozier**
On Note.- Default.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three-hundred and twenty four dollars and thirty six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John A. Goodlett vs Edward S. Wheaton and William Finney**
On Note.- Default.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four-hundred and fifteen dollars and sixty six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John A. Goodlett vs Richard Ivers and Frunklin Weston**
On Note.- Default.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four-hundred and fifty-two dollars and four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in
---
**Viewer Page 45** (rcdbook1858_27_0044.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 39
from aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William C. Jamison vs John Largue and Charles L. Hunt**
On Note.- Default.-
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants John Largue although duly summoned and called comes not; Wherefore, the Court doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against him as confessed.
**David C. Tandy vs John Goodfellow and Edward S. Wheaton**
On Note.- Default.
Now at this day comes said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not; Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as Confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three-hundred and seventy dollars and thrity cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Munnel J. DeFranca vs Charles L. Hunt and William M. Cooke**
On Note. Default.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and forty-one dollars and forty-five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid, together with interest at the rate of ten present per annum, until paid and also, his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Fretrick Lauman vs Francis J. Miltenberger and John P. G. Sill**
On Note.- Default.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sun of Five hundred and twenty five dollars and forty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Charles B. Anderson vs William McDonald and William Singe**
On Note.- Default.
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but that said defendants although duly summonel and called come not but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Eight-hundred and thirty nine dollars and eighty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum
---
**Viewer Page 46** (rcdbook1858_27_0045.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 40
**February Term 1858**
aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Commercial Insurance Company vs Thomas P. Saunders and Jonathan Jones**
On Note.- Default.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five-hundred and thirty-three dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
[A. ?]856.44
**Commercial Insurance Company vs Richard Ivers and William O. Shands**
Default.- On Note.-
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of eight hundred and fifty-six dollars and forty-four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**James B. Hill vs Walter E. Sell, Thomas Sheppard James E. Yeatman, George R. Robinson and James J. Garrard**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and Twenty nine dollars and sixty five cents. It is there fore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Michael Phelps vs John Sigerson**
On Note.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not; Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument or writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One-hundred and eighty-seven dollars and forty five cents. It is therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, together with ten percent per annum, until paid, and also his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 47** (rcdbook1858_27_0046.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 41
**Isaac Walker vs George Wood**
On Notes.-
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default; Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred and sixty five dollars and twenty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Commercial Insurance Company vs William O. Shands and Edward W. Shands**
On Note.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney but The said defendants although duly summoned and called come not; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and sixty five dollars and twenty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Commercial Insurance Company vs William O. Shands and Richard Ivers**
On Note.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by to attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that Said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and fifty-one Dollars and ninety four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Commercial Insurance Company vs Jonathan Jones**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and thirty dollars and fifty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Milanie Christy vs Charles H. Harber**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes said plaintiff by her attorney, but said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and twenty nine dollars and ninety-two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and her costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 48** (rcdbook1858_27_0047.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 42
**February Term 1858**
**Commercial Insurance Company vs John Halliday and Fretrick Welcker**
On Note.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney but the said defendant John Halliday being duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default; Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed.
**Commercial Insurance Company vs Richard Ivers and Theodore Hequembourg**
On Note.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney, but the said defendant Richard Ivers although duly summoned and called comes not; Wherefore the Court doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken again said defendant as confessed.
**Joshua W. Owings vs James H. Haden**
On Note.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default; Wherefore, the Court doth find the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and Sixty-sex dollars and five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Peter D. Muller vs Abner Hopton and John B. Hopton**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney and the said defendants also come by their attorney; and the said defendants consent and agree that Judgment may be rendered against them and in favor of said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and seventy six dollars and sixty-two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as agreed upon, together with ten per cent interest on the same until paid, and also his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution. By consent of parties, It is ordered by the Court that execution be etayed herein for six months from this date.
**Henry Van studdiford vs Abner Hopton and John B. Hopton**
On Note.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney and the said defendants also come by their attorney and the said defendants consent and agree that Judgment may be rendered against them and in four of said plaintiff for the sum of Three-hundred and fourteen dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as agreed upon, together with ten percent interest upon the sume, until paid, and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution. By consent of parties the execution herein is etayed for six months from this date.
**Rensalear W. Lee vs David H. Evans**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 49** (rcdbook1858_27_0048.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 43
**Fleming Bates vs Samuel Sides, John Valentine and Hrischfeld**
On Note.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default; Where fore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and ninety-two dollars and seventy cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Henry M. Schieffelen Frederick M. Fowler and Frederick K. Tailer vs Horace G. Brady, William K. Brady and Samuel S. Brainerd**
On Note.
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default; Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and Eighty-three dollars and sixty one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John J. Anderson and Renber S. Anderson vs Saungrain Michael and William C. Taylor**
On Note.
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three hundred and fifteen dollars and thirty-eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Samuel McNeilly vs Eleazer J. Beard and George W. Beard**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default; Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and thirteen dollars and nine cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Jacob D. Kurllaum vs Bernard Nakers**
On Note.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and
---
**Viewer Page 50** (rcdbook1858_27_0049.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 44
**February Term 1858**
called comes not but makes default; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument or writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and ninety one dollars and ninety-two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Dwight Durkee and Samuel B. Bullock vs Anthony M. Foster, Frederick Heman and John W. Thornburg**
On Note.-
Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default; Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which the action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and fifteen dollars and sixty six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Dwight Durkee and Samuel B. Bullock vs Frederick Gelfort, John D. White, James G. Stewart, Josiah Parks, John S. Thomson William H. White and Herain A. Pryor**
On Note.-
Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorneys and on their motion this cause is dismissed as to the said defendants James G. Stewart and Josiah Parks; but the other said defendants although duly summoned and called come not; Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and thirty-two dollars and ninety cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John S. Thompson vs Edwin Ellis and James Hutton**
On Note.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three-hundred and sixteen dollars and seventeen cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William F. Stary vs Henry Chynch**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not. but makes default; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and nine dollars and ten cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and ten percent interest on the same, until paid, together with his costs and charges herein expended and have therefore execution.
---
**Viewer Page 51** (rcdbook1858_27_0050.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 45
**William F. Sracy vs George W. Lunch and Henry C. Lynch**
On Note.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default: Wherefore, the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and seventeen dollars and thirty nine cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, with percent interest on the same until paid, together with his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William Meissner vs William Dorr**
On Note.
Now at this day comes said plaintiff by his attorney but said defendants although duly summoned and called comes not: Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this suit is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and fifty-three dollars and twenty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Matthen T. Miller and Allen B. Miller vs James Morris and Charles H. Heywood**
On Note.-
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default: Wherefore, the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of six hundred and ninety five dollars and sixty-three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John S. Thomson, William H. White and Hiram A. Pryor, composing firm of Thomson White & Pryor vs Christian Schaeffler and Frank Fox doing business under the style of Schaeffler and Fox**
On Note.
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not; Wherefore, the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three hundred and twenty two dollars and fifty five cents. It is, thereof, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Mutthen T. Miller and Allen B. Miller vs James Morries and Charles Heywood**
On Note.-
Now At this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court, doth find from the instrument of
---
**Viewer Page 52** (rcdbook1858_27_0051.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 46
**February Term 1858**
writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of six hundred and the dollars and fifty-five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**The United States Savings Institution vs James V. Westtake, Appleton A. Button and Charles F. Hoelzle**
On Note.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney but the said defendants although duly summonel and called come not; Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and four dollars and eighty-one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John F. Mauntel, Henry Butte and Mathius Baecker vs John M. Schmitt**
On Note.
Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not; Wherefore, the Cart finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and fourteen dollars and eighty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William W. Keach and Thomas J. Carpenter vs Jacob Nathun**
On Note.-
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not; Wherefore, the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Four hundred and eighteen dollars and fifty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have therefor execution.
**Ferdinand Overstolz vs Henry Lueders**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default; Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed: and the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three-hundred and twenty dollars and twenty three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
---
**Viewer Page 53** (rcdbook1858_27_0052.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 47
**Henry Blakesley vs Edward S. Wheaton**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three-hundred and eighty-six dollars and forty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**The Mechanics Bank vs Louis A. Welton, James O. Carson, Nicholas Springer and Richard F. Sass**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff he taken against said defendants as confessed; and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-Thousand one hundred and forty three dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**The Mechanics Bank vs George J. King, Samuel Rodgers and David J. Beattie**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed: and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and thirty eighty dollars and sixty eight cents. It is, therefore, ordered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and the costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**The Mechanics Bank vs George W. Capell, Adrien Michel, James W. Roberts and Kenneth M Kenzie**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One-hundred and sixty seven dollars and fifty-seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have therefor execution.
**Mechanics Bank vs John Goodin**
On Note. Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney but said defendants although duly summoned and called comes not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant in indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three-hundred and thirty six dollars and five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 54** (rcdbook1858_27_0053.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 48
**February Term 1858**
**Henry Bergesch and Theodore Bresikurth vs Ferdinand Vandermale and Frederick Picker**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make default; Wherefore the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of One thousand and sixty dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
[# ?]728.75.
Error
**Louis A. Willard vs Miles G. Moris and Henry M. Woodward**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and twenty eight dollars and seventy five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have therefore execution.
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs Edwin R. Mason and Josephus W. Hall**
On Bond.- Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys, and the said defendants consent and agree that the Court may render judgment in favor of said plaintiff and against then for the sum of Eight hundred and forty five dollars and fifty eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and her costs and charges in this behalf expended and have therefore execution.
**George Fider vs Martin Haemmerle and Thomas Gunss**
On Note [in ?] Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default; Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five-hundred and ten dollars and eighty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Pierre Chouteau Jr, James Harrison and Felix Vallil vs John H. Singleton**
On Note.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant, although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default; Wherefore the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of eight hundred and twenty four dollars and eighty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Albert Franke vs A. William Street**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default; Wherefore the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is
---
**Viewer Page 55** (rcdbook1858_27_0054.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 49
indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and fifteen dollars and fifteen cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Louis Roever and Herman H. Laumeier vs William Siever**
On Note.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Five-hundred and fifty-two dollars and seventy cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William Beste and Felix Grima vs Rudolph Rochkaff and L. S. Bargen**
On Bill of Exchange.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed, And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and fifty-two dollars and twelve cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid us found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**George Rogers vs John Sigerson and John D. Taylor**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed.
**William B. Sparks and William Wright vs Christian Schaeffler and Frane Fox**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which they action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Five hundred and thirty six dollars and ninety-five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid is found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**James C. Walker vs George G Presbury**
Dedimus.-
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered that a dedimus issue herein to the District of Columbia to take depositions of witnesses, to be used in evidence in the trial of this cause.
---
**Viewer Page 56** (rcdbook1858_27_0055.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 50
**February Term 1858**
**Thomas B. Moore vs Daniel D. Page Henry D. Bacon, Edward Wyman and Thomas Brown**
On Certificate Deposit.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause he dismissed as to the said defendant Henry D. Bacon, But the said other defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Six thousand, five hundred and fifty dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Franklin H. McClung vs William H. McClung**
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, and it appearing to the Court, that the Clerk of this Court omitted to append his name to the furat attached to the affidavit, in this cause, the same is now ordered to be done as of the fifth day of January 1858. ``nune protune''
**Louis Bach vs Barthold Vennewitz**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and twelve dollars and seventy-five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Louis Bach vs James Waugh**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One-hundred and sixty nine dollars and eighty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**David W. Fenton et al vs Christian Schaeffler et al**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth order that the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed.
**Sylvester M. Morrison vs B. Gibson**
Dismissal.
On motion of the said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court, that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue herein.
---
**Viewer Page 57** (rcdbook1858_27_0056.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 51
**John Hartman vs Miles G. Moies et al**
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants Thomas B. Ellis, Henry Ellis and James Ellis, although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court, doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed.
**Barton Bates vs Edwin R. Mason and Isaac W. Taylor**
Dismissal
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that this cause he dismissed as to the said defendant Isaac W. Taylor, and that the costs of this proceeding abide the determination of this action.
**Samuel S. Dauglass James B. Gazzam, James E. Breading vs Oliver Greene, William Wade James S. Wilson and Samuel S James**
Dismissal & Judgment.
On motion of the said plaintiffs by their attorney it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said defendants James S. Wilson and Samuel S James. Thereupon come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants Oliver Greene and William Wade although duly summoned and called come not but make default Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the said defendant are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of seven hundred and six dollars and sixty one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
**Theodore H. Recker vs Elijah Eubank and W. H. Stovalt**
On Note.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said defendant W. H. Stovalt.
Thereupon comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant Elijah Eubank although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of eight hundred and eighty-two dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution. It further appearing to the Court that the said defendant gave bond and security to the Sheriff conditioned according to law, for the forthcoming of the property attached at the commencement of this suit, whenever the Court shall direct Now, therefore, on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered that said defendant deliver the said property to the Sheriff of the County of Saint Louis, forthwith.
**John F. Sell vs The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company**
The said defendant comes and files an answer herein.
---
**Viewer Page 58** (rcdbook1858_27_0057.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 52
**February Term 1858**
**Thomas Conrun vs Calvin Townsley**
Deposition on part of plaintiff filed.
**Ferdinand Meyer and Adolphus G. Braun vs Peter Reinhart and Fred Morathe**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendant Peter Reinhart, although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against him as confessed, But the said other defendant comes by his attorney, and thereupon the said parties submit this cause to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find form the answer of the said defendant Morath that the said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of eight-hundred dollars and forty seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs (no 383) William Wade et al**
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs (384) William Wade et al**
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs George W. Goode et al**
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs William Wade et al**
**Edgar Sprague vs James D. Houseman et al**
The plaintiffs by their counsel, consent that the defendants in the above entitled causes may have one week further time to file their answers therein.
**George Pomeroy et al vs (no 143) William Wade et al**
**George Pomeroy et al vs (no 188) William Wade et al**
**Henry McKelvy vs William Wade et al**
The plaintiffs in the above entitled causes, by their respective attorney, consent that the defendants Daniel M. Frost and Eleza Graham Frost, may have thirty days further time to answer herein.
**Joseph Farrell vs Henry C. Lynch and George W. Lynch**
On Note.-
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and sixty seven dollars and eighteen cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found together with ten percent per annum upon The same, until paid, and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 59** (rcdbook1858_27_0058.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 53
**Joseph Farrell vs William S. Burke**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of sixty-four dollars and sixty eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said plaintiff the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found together with ten percent interest on the same, until paid, and that he have thereof execution.
**Joseph Farrell vs George W. Lynch and Henry C. Lynch**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and thirty-eight dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, with interest on the same, at the rate of ten percent per annum, until paid, and also his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Joseph Farrell vs Henry C. Lynch and George W. Lynch**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and thirty-six dollars and twenty one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and interest thereon at the rate of ten percent per annum, until paid, together with his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**The State of Missouri, which sues to the use of Peter J. Peters vs Luther M. Shreve and others**
Default.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney, but the said defendant George Sonizer although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed.
**Nathaniel C. Myers vs John Sigerson and George Smizer**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant George Smizer although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against the said defendant as confessed
**Hatfield Halatead vs W. D. W. Bernard et al garnishees of Ezra Easterly**
Dismissal.-
On motion of said garnishees by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that said garnishees be discharged hence, at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 60** (rcdbook1858_27_0059.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 54
**February Term 1858**
**Peter O. D. Byrne vs Rose Ann Masterson and James A. Maginnis**
Order of Injunction.-
On hearing the petition in this case, it is ordered, that Rose Ann Masterson and James A. Maginnis the defendants, be enjoined from all further proceeding on partnership account, as members of the mercantile firm of Masterson, Byrne and Co., and from selling, buying or exchanging any wares or merchandize on said account; and from collecting or compromising or changing any debt, account as due of said firm, and that they be required to surrender on oath all the stock in trade, books, notes, accounts and dues of every description to the Receiver hereby appointed, and to render a true and such account of all assets and of all business transactions when called so to do before said Receiver. It is further ordered that be appointed Receiver in this case to adjust all the interests involved, subject to the further orders and directions of this Court. And the said defendants are hereby required to surrender on oath all the books notes accounts, dues and papers of every description now in their possession and belonging to the late firm of Masterson, Byrne & Co, to the Receiver hereby appointed; and it is further ordered that the said plaintiff execute a bond to the said defendants in the penal sum of Twenty-five thousand dollars, conditioned that said plaintiff will abide the decision which shall be made in the premises and pay all sums of money, damages and costs that shall be adjudged against him, if said injunction be dissolved.
**Joseph Farrell vs Henry C. Lynch**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although duly Summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and eighty one dollars and fifteen cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found with interest at the rate of ten percent per annum, until paid, together with his costs and charges herein expended And have thereof execution.
**Isaac W. Mitchell vs Louis A. Welton, William M. McPherson, James O. Carson and Nicholas Springer**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court finds from the instrument or writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four Thousand Dollars and Thirty four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have therefore execution.
---
**Viewer Page 61** (rcdbook1858_27_0060.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 55
**George C. Reed et al vs Hugh Boyle et al gar & c**
Motion to discharge garnishees filed.
**Charles J. Gill et al vs Hugh Bayle et al gar & c**
Motion to discharge garnishees filed
**In the matter of Schuermann & Kefferstein**
On motion of the assignee herein, it is ordered by the Court that Ferdinand Meyer, John McDowell and Robert Scott, be and they are hereby appointed appraisers herein, to appraise the property and effects assigned.
**Louis A. Benoist et al vs John G. Bryan**
Motion for Judgment upon answer filed.
**John Burke vs Edward F. Dix**
Answer filed
**Rohland H. Hall vs Robert L. McGhee et al**
Answer filed.
**Dewitt Van Evard et al vs Rudolph Uhrici gar & c**
Answer of Uhrici, filed
**David Rokohl et al vs Charles Gilpin et al**
Answer of defendant Gilpin filed
**William Price vs George Smizer et al**
Motion to strike out parts of answer filed.
**Catherine Heisick vs George Heisick**
Motion for special execution filed.
**George B. Sanderson vs E. O. English et al**
Separate answer of Gilpin filed.
**Dwight Durkee et al vs A. M. Foster**
Motion to set aside Judgment, filed.
**James Fay vs John Wasson et al**
Amended answer filed.
**Samuel McKee vs Joseph H. White**
Motion to strike out answer filed.
---
**Viewer Page 62** (rcdbook1858_27_0061.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 56
**February Term 1858**
**John D. Smith et al vs Samuel A. Buckmaster et al**
Demurrer filed
**Devitt VanEvard et al vs Dryer gar & c**
On motion of the said garnishee, and it appearing to the Court that no allegations and interrogatories have been exhibited against him, it is, therefore, ordered that said garnishee be discharged hence at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**George L. Micholls et al vs Dryer gar & c**
On Motion of the said garnishee, it is ordered by the Court that he be discharged hence, at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**James M. Thornburn, Grant Thornburn Jr, William H. Elphinstone and Frederick W. Bruggerhoff vs John Largue**
On Note.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Five hundred and sixty three dollars and fifty-eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Udolphs Wolfe vs William D. W. Barnard, Rudolph Adams and Charles Barnard**
On Note.- On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said defendants Rudolph Adoms and Charles Burnard. Thereupon the plaintiff comes by his attorney, but the said defendant William D. W. Burnard although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff by his attorney the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-Thousand, Seven hundred and forty-four Dollars and eighty-three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Peter Helmbacker, Daniel Wolff Alexander McDonald, Caleb Broomal and Michael Hehubacher vs Walter Sell and Thomas Sheppard**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said Defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth, on motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three hundred and eighty dollars and Seventy-three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Olwir Luinette vs Charles J. Curpenter**
Motion to strike out answer and for Judgment filed.
---
**Viewer Page 63** (rcdbook1858_27_0062.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 57
**Mary E. Louis vs James C. O. Louis**
On motion of the plaintiff by her attorney, it is ordered by the Court that an alias writ of summons, issue herein, returnable to the next term of this Court.
**Charles Balmer vs Frederick Vandermale and Frederick Picker**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and thirty-three dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Lorentz Shaffler vs Franklin Field and William G. Goodale**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and eighty six dollars and fifty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges expended and have thereof execution.
**George B. Sanderson vs Patrick Long and J. W. Sherman**
On Note.- On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause he dismissed as to the said defendant J. W. Sherman. Thereupon comes the plaintiff but the said defendant Patrick Long although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default Wherefore, on motion of plaintiff by his attorney, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three hundred and Twenty dollars ad thirty-two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**George B. Sanderson vs John Largue and Charles L. Hunt**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five-hundred and forty-two Dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 64** (rcdbook1858_27_0063.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 60
**February Term 1858**
**William A. McDawell vs George J King**
Demurrer filed
**Calvin F. Burns vs Christian Schaefler and Frank Fox**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of seven-hundred and seventy one dollars and fifty-four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**James D. Houseman and Inluis H. Smith vs Eneas Mc. Faul**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Five hundred and seventeen dollars and forty-six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**James D. Houseman and Inluis H. Smith vs Philip Gradtiaa**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of One-hundred and sixty-three dollars and fifty seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein Expended and have thereof execution.
**Calvin Stigleman, Nathan Johnson and Richard Emerson vs John M. Parks**
On Note.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney and the said defendant also comes by his attorney, and by virtue of a warrant of attorney for that purpose executed by the said defendant and now produced, in Open Court, and duly proved, waives the issuing and service of process, and acknowledges that the said defendant in indebted in manner and form as the said plaintiffs has in their said petition mentioned and confessed that said defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Twelve hundred and twenty-three dollars and seventy-two cents. It is therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and their costs and charges herein expended and have therefore execution.
**Calvin Stigleman, Nathan Johnson and Richard Emerson vs George W. Willer, Mores Marshall Esward Reynolds and John Oatman**
On Note.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, and the said defendants by their attorney appeared in Open Court, and by virtue of a warrant of attorney for that purpose executed by the said defendants, and now produced in Open court, and duly proved
---
**Viewer Page 65** (rcdbook1858_27_0064.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 61
waived the issuing and service of process, and acknowledged that the said defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Seventeen-hundred and eighty three dollars and seventy cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William Messuri vs William Dorr**
Dismissal.- On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed, at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**The Peoples Savings Institution vs Ferdinand Vandermale, Frederick Picker, William Stewart, Joshua Parks and John M. Young**
On Note.- On motion of the plaintiff by its attorney, it is ordered by the Court, that this cause he dismissed as to the said defendants William Stewart, Joshia Parks, Joseph Park and John M. Young. Thereupon comes the plaintiff by its attorney but the said other defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One thousand and sixty-two dollars and ten cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Ulrich Roethlisberger and Simon Girber vs Henry A. Shuerman and Frederick W. Kefferstein**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Twelve hundred and forty nine dollars and thirteen cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**The Pilot Knol Iron Company vs John H. Singleton**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and thirty five dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
**Louis V. Bogg, Eugene Miltenberger and William Poulterer vs Robert Stevers**
On Bill of Exchange.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Seventeen hundred and fifty-seven dollars and twenty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 66** (rcdbook1858_27_0065.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 62
**February Term 1858**
**Ulrich Roethlisberger and Simon Girber vs Henry A. Schaermann and Frederick W. Keferstein**
On Bill of Exchange.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three hundred and thirty four dollars and fifty four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Louis V. Bogy, Eugene Miltenberger and William Poulterer vs Ferdinand Vandermale and Alexander Guenandon**
On Note.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said Defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of One-thousand and sixty five dollars and forty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
**Joshua W. Owings vs James H. Hayden and Henry Hudson**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and thirty five dollars and forty eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
**James A. Monks vs Hugh K. Wagner and George B. Field**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find firm the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Three hundred and thirty five dollars and ninety cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
**John R. Gill vs George J. King**
Motion for security for costs filed.
**Norman Cutter vs M. A. Childress et al**
Continued.
**Robert Patterson and William C. Patherson vs John B. Camden**
Dismissal.- On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**Norman Cutter vs William Waddingham et al**
Continued.
---
**Viewer Page 67** (rcdbook1858_27_0066.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 63
**Robert Patterson, James E. Negus and William C. Patterson vs John B. Camden**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**John Veitch vs George Eberle**
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that an alias writ of summons issue against said defendant, returnable to the next term of this Court.
**Edward P. Tesson and Antoine L. Danjen vs Charles S. Schaerff, Christian Schaerff and J. G. Heinrichs**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, and dismiss this cause as to the said defendant J. G. Heinrichs, but the said other defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of nine hundred and three dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 68** (rcdbook1858_27_0067.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 64
**February Term 1858**
**Joseph Farrell vs Charles S. Schaerff, Christian Schaerff and J. C. Justave Heinrichs**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said defendant J. C. Gustave Heinrichs, but the other said defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three hundred and twenty seven dollars and ninety-two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Joseph Farrell vs Landry Charleville, Philip D. Gordon and George W. Lynch**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said defendant Landry Charleville, but the other said defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three hundred and twenty three dollars and thirty nine cents. It is, therefore, considered by the court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Richard Ridgley vs Alner Stone, Charles H. Pond and Anthony M. Foster**
Dismissal.- On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**William D. Glenn vs Edward S. Wheaton**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three-hundred and sixty four dollars and seventy cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Albert Bellings and George W. Billings vs James B. Ricords and John A. Smithers garnishees of Charles Fink**
Now at this day come the said defendants, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiffs have failed to file allegations and interrogatories, within the time they are required so to do, it is, on motion of said garnishees by their attorney, ordered by the Court, that they be discharged as such, at the costs of the said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 69** (rcdbook1858_27_0068.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 65
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs Alfred De Clausel, A. A. Vanwormer George Trowbridge and William Palm**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her attorney, and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said defendant Alfred De Clausel, But the said other defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and seventy nine dollars and sixty nine cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and her costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Richard J. Tunstall et al vs The Keokuck Packet Company gar of Joseph Shinkle**
Dismissal.- Now at this day comes the said garnishee, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiffs have failed to file allegations and interrogtories within the time in which they are required so to do, it is, on motion of said garnishee by its attorney ordered by the Court, that the said garnishee be discharged as such, at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**Thomas C. Wales vs Robert E. McCarthy**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three hundred and forty-six dollars and twenty six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William Raiguel et al vs Herman Weiner**
Answer and counter claim filed.
**John Hartman vs Miles G. Mories et al**
Motion to strike out answer and for Judgment filed.
**Thomas W. Glisan vs Richard J. Compton**
Confession of Judgment.- Now at this day comes the said defendant and files a written statement, duly verified by affidavit, whereby he confesses himself indebted to the said plaintiff in the sum of Three hundred and twenty eight dollars and eight cents, and consents and agree that Judgment may be rendered against him for that sum and in favor of said plaintiff. It is, therefore, considered by the Court, that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 70** (rcdbook1858_27_0069.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 66
**February Term 1858**
**Ellen Wilgers et al vs E. A. Bryan**
Answer filed.
**Charles R. Anderson vs William B. Watson et al**
Watson and [Jullis ?] file answers herein
Beard & Bro., also file an answer herein.
**Henry B. Belt vs George W. Goode et al**
Answer filed.
**Justus Finch vs James Tarleton et al**
Motion for security for costs filed.
**Joseph Farnswroth vs The Terre Haute, Alton and Saint Louis Rail Road Company**
Security for costs filed.
**Dweight Durkee and Samuel B. Bullock vs Archibuld Carr and Hortemer Kennett**
Dismissal.- On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**Dwight Durkee and Samuel B. Bullock vs Thomas H. Brreily**
Dismissal.- On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**John Davis and Noel Davis vs Samuel Michael and Isaac Michael**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three-hundred and eighty seven dollars and fifty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended
**Jacob Schilitter vs Noel Tillbert**
The Defendant, by leave of Court, has fifteen days additional time to file an answer herein
**Lyman W. Patchin vs William Silcott**
Demurrer filed.
**James Shea vs Jacob Fritschle et al**
Separate answer of Augustus Fritschle, filed.
**Charles D. Colman vs The City of Saint Louis**
Answer filed.
**C. E. Solomon vs Edward W. Shands**
Answer filed
---
**Viewer Page 71** (rcdbook1858_27_0070.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 67
**Joseph Farrell vs Henry N. Hart**
The defendant files an answer herein.
**Frederick Marquard vs Michael Renter**
Demurrer filed.
**Saint Louis Building Association vs James D. Gage et al**
Motion to strike out answer filed.
**William F. Enders et al vs Hugh Bayle and Isaac E. Wolff garnishees of F. A. Pelleteer et al**
Dismissal.- Now at this day come the said garnishee by their attorney, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiffs have failed to file allegations and interrogatories, within the time in which they are required so to do, it is on motion of said garnishees by their attorney, ordered that they be discharged as such, at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**Charles J. Gill et al vs Hugh Bayle and Isaac E. Wolff garnishees of F. A. Pelleteer et al**
Dismissal.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiffs have failed to file allegations and interrogatories, within the time in which they are required so to do, it is, on motion of said garnishees by their attorney, ordered that they be discharged as such, at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**George E. Reed et al vs Hugh Boyle and J. E. Holff garnishees of F. H. Pelleteer et al**
Dismissal.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiffs have failed to file allegations and interrogatories in the time in which they are required so to do, it is on motion of said garnishees by their attorney, ordered that they be discharged as such, at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**Warren Reed vs F. R. Conway**
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be continued until the next term of the Court, at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company vs Anthony H. Menkins and Bernard Menkins**
Dismissal.- By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendants and that execution issue therefor.
**Richard J. Turrstall et al vs Louis Heininger & Co, garnishees of Joseph Shinkle**
On motion of said garnishees by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that they be discharged as such garnishees, at the costs of the said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor. The sum of Five Dollars, is allowed to said garnishees for appearing herein.
---
**Viewer Page 72** (rcdbook1858_27_0071.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 68
**February Term 1858**
**Samuel B. Allen et al vs Thee Breckenridge Oil & Coal Company**
On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered that a Commission issue herein to the State of Ohio, to take the depositions of witnesses, to be used on the trial of this cause, on the park of the said plaintiffs.
**William B. Belknaphh et al vs The Breckenridge Oil & Coal Company**
On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered that a Commission issue herein to the state of Kentucky, to take depositions of witnesses, to be used on the trial of this cause on the park of plaintiffs.
**Zachariah W. Tinker vs Elizabeth Tinker**
Divorce.- Order of Publication. The Sheriff having made return that the said defendant cannot be found, and the Court being satisfied that the ordinary process of lair cannot be served upon said defendant it is, therefore, on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, ordered, that that the said defendant be notified of th commencement of this suit, the object of which is to obtain a decree of divorce from the said defendant on the grounds of desertion and adultery, and unless she be and appear at the next term of this Court, to be begun and held at the City of Saint Louis, on the first Monday of October next, and on or before the sixth day thereof answer the petition of said plaintiff the same will be taken against her as confessed. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law, in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed in the City of Saint Louis.
**In the matter of the application of Joseph L. Woodson, Alvira Cottle William Lewis Jr, Benyn F. Todd William Sempson, John Haren, Andrew J. Cruch and Charles H. Murtin**
Now at this day come the said applicants by their attorney and pray the Court for on order of allowance in the case of the Collier White Lead Company against Joseph L. Papin and B. F. C. Champion; and it appearing to the Court that the said applicants were summoned to appear at this term of the Court, as the garnishees of the said defendants, in the aforesaid mentioned suit; and that in obedience to said summons the said defendants left their home in the County of Lincoln, State of Missouri, on the twenty second day of February 1858 and arrived in this City on the night of the twenty fifth of the same month, without having been notified of the dismissal of the said suit, in vacation; and it further appearing to the Court that the applicants herein have been subjected to much expense thereby, therefore it is, ordered that the sum of ten dollars be allowed each of said garnishees; and that the defendants in the case of The Collier White Lead and Oil Company vs Joseph L. Papin and Benjamin J. C. Champion pay to the said applicants the allowance in from as allowed, and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
**John Davis and Noel Davis vs Samuel Michael and Isaac Michael**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed, And the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three-hundred and eighty-four Dollars and twenty-eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the court that said plaintiffis recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
---
**Viewer Page 73** (rcdbook1858_27_0072.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 69
---
**Viewer Page 74** (rcdbook1858_27_0073.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 70
**February Term 1858**
**John Kennedy vs Charles L. Gilpin gar et al**
The said garnishee files an answer herein
**Squire Hall vs The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company garnishee of William H. Deriar**
The said garnishee files an answer herein.
**Frank W. Tillay, to use et al vs Joseph Bennett's garnishee**
On motion of William Bernard, garnishee herein, it is ordered by the Court that he discharged hence, for want of allegations and interrogatories being filed against him by the plaintiff, Henry Hitcheock comes and states to the Court, that since the institution of this suit by him, as attorney for the plaintiff, the entire claim of said plaintiff as trustee, has been assigned; therefore on his motion the Court doth permit the said attorney to withdraw from said cause as attorney of record for plaintiff.
**John J. Barrow vs Joseph B. Holland**
Agreement to dismiss filed.
**Ellew J. Wilgus vs The Steamboat Flying Cloud**
Demurrer filed.
**John Levin vs James Castelle**
Motion for additional security filed.
**John Levin vs Dewitt Van Evard**
Motion to quash return filed.
**John Levin vs John G. Nicholls et al**
Motion to guash return filed.
**Archibald J. Sommerville vs Thomas S. Nelson**
Motion for Security for costs filed.
**Solomon Smith vs A. M. Wasterman**
Motion to strike out parts of affidavit filed.
**Ellen J. Welgus vs The Steamboat Allegheny**
Demurrer filed.
---
**Viewer Page 75** (rcdbook1858_27_0074.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 71
**Jacob Hostetter vs Edward W. Williams et al**
Demurrer filed.
**The Citizens Savings Institution vs Alfred M. Waterman**
Motion to strike out parts of affidavit, and plea in abatement filed.
**James C. Page vs Alfred M Waterman**
Motion to strike out parts of affidavit, and plea in abatement filed.
**James W. Sherman vs Bernard Noel et al**
Answer filed
**John Levin vs Lyman W. Patchin**
Motion for additional security on bond filed.
**Abraham Goldsmith vs Adams Express Company**
Answer filed
**The State of Missouri, to use of Ipold vs Wilgus, Noble & Company**
Defendants file an answer herein.
**John Gorgerty vs Henry Bruckmann**
Answer and motion for security for costs filed.
**James Harrison vs Charles Hays et al**
Answer filed.
**Squire Hull vs William H. Deriar**
Plea in abatement withdraw and answer filed.
**Ephraim Ball vs John Sigerson et al**
Answer filed.
**James F. Death et al vs Robert A. W. Crenshaw**
Agreement filed.
**Jacob Hostetter vs Benjn A. Albright et al**
Demurrer filed.
**John A. Ubodell et al vs Michael Gillespie**
Plea in the nature of a plea in abatement, filed.
---
**Viewer Page 76** (rcdbook1858_27_0075.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 72
**February Term 1858**
**Bernandine Florez vs Able S. Merritt et al**
Demurrer filed
**Franklin McClung vs William H. Thompson**
The defendant files a motion to guash notice, service & c.
**Francis Hamilton vs Frederick Myers et al**
Demurrer filed.
**William A. Hargadine vs Henry P. Darrah et al**
Answer of A. M. Waterman filed.
**John H. Groesback vs A. M. Watermann**
Answer filed.
**Samuel M Kee vs Joseph H. White**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said plaintiff to strike out the answer of the said defendant, doth order that said motion be sustained. On motion of the said defendant by his attorney, leave is given him to file an amended answer.
**Jacob S. Brown admr & c vs Francis G. Henderson et al**
The time for answering herein is, by leave of Court, extended five days.
**Frederick Biebusch vs Henry Bussemeyer**
The time for answering herein is extended two-weeks from date.
**John B. Valli vs Henirich and Rhinehart**
The time for answering herein is extended one week, from to day.
**Frederick Heaman vs Martin Hammerle**
The time for answering herein is extended one week.
**John S. Thomson vs Robert Sterting et al**
Dismissal.- On motion of the said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the defendant Detrick, at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Barton Bates vs Isaac W. Taylor and Edwin Mason**
Dismissal.- On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said defendant Isaac W. Taylor.
---
**Viewer Page 77** (rcdbook1858_27_0076.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 73
**Patrick Conway vs George J. Barnett and M. Weber**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed, at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Eugene Bellamy vs Louis Mayer**
Confession of Judgment.- Now at this day comes the said defendant and files a written statement, duly verified by affidavit, whereby he confesses himself indebted to the said plaintiff in the sum of Four Thousand two hundred and thirty seven dollars and thirty four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
**Solomon Smith vs Alfred M. Waterman**
On motion, one week's further time is given to George W. Thatcher to file abjections to the bond of indemnity given by the plaintiff to the Sheriff.
**James C. Page vs A. M. Waterman et al**
On motion, on one week further time is given to George W. Thatcher to file objections to the bond of indemnity given by the plaintiff to the Sheriff.
**The Citizins Savings Institution vs A. M. Waterman et al**
On motion of George W. Thatcher, the time for his filing exceptions to the bond of indemnity taken by the Sheriff, is extended one week.
**Abial R. Abbott vs Ezra O. English et al**
By leave if Court the note sued on in this cause is withdrawn and an attested copy left therefor.
**William Nisbit vs Peter Reinhart, Theodore Wolff and Sebastian Engert**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed, at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor. By leave of Court the note sued on is withdrawn, and an attested copy left therefor.
**Alexis Mudd et al vs William H. Austin**
The time for answering herein is extended fifteen days.
**James Shen vs Jacob Fritschle et al**
Default.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants Jacob Fritschle and George W. Campbell, although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against the said defendants as confessed.
**James G. Cattin vs Charles L. Hunt and Wm M. Cooke**
Dismissal.- On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 78** (rcdbook1858_27_0077.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 74
**February Term 1858**
**The Mechanics Bank vs C. D. Sullivan et al**
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her attorney and confesses the demurrer herein filed by the defendants; and on application of the plaintiff by her attorney, leave is given said plaintiff to file an amended petition herein.
**Henry Tanzberger vs Stephen Stock**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three-hundred and thirty nine dollars and forty-eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**David Rokohl et al vs Paul Carlin et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion filed by the said defendants to strike and out parts of plaintiffs petition, and being thereof sufficiently advised, it doth order that the same be overruled.
**Richard Emerson et al vs Lorenzo D. Jones**
Motion to dismiss filed.
**Edward C. Sloan vs P. D. Gordon, James H. Gordon, Richard Dozier and Benjamin R. Tyler**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney and on his motion this cause is dismissed as to the said James H. Gordon. The other said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and forty-eight dollars and eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution. It is further ordered that the said Judgment bear interest at the rate of ten percent per annum, until paid.
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs Francis McFaul, John Kirkpatrick and Eneas McFaul**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer filed by the said defendants to the petition of said plaintiff, and being thereof fully advised, it doth order that said demurrer be overruled Leave is given to said defendants to file an answer herein within five days.
**George D. Little et al vs Emmet McDonald, James W. Mac Donald, Andrew C. Peckham, James F. Small Josiah H. Obear and John C. Joory**
Default.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants Emmet Mc Donald, James W. Mac Donald Andrew C. Peckham, James F. Smull and Josiah Obear, although duly summoned and called come not but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of the plaintiffs be taken against them as confessed.
---
**Viewer Page 79** (rcdbook1858_27_0078.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 75
**Archibald J. Sommerville vs Thomas S. Nelson**
The time for answering herein is extended ten days.
**Thomas J. Lowrenson vs Joseph Campbell**
Answer filed.
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs William Hall, A. R. Hynson John H. Hall, Clark J. Worton and Leonidas A. Hall**
On Note.- The Court having duly heard the demurrer of said defendants to the petition of said plaintiff and being thereof fully advised, doth order that said demurrer be overruled, And it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it doth on motion of said plaintiff by its attorney, order that its petition be taken against said defendants as confessed. And this Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Eight hundred and thirty six dollars and twenty one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Rine Guillon and Charles P. Anderson vs John L. Chandler**
On Note.- The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of said defendant to the petition of said plaintiff and being thereof fully advised, doth order that the same be overruled. And it appearing to the Court there is no answer filed in this cause, it doth on motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, order that the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendant as confessed, And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and sixty one dollars and sixty five cents. It is, therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Thomas J. Comstock vs Edward S. Wheaton and Joseph L. Papin**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer filed to the petition of said plaintiff, and being thereof fully advised, doth order that the same be overruled; And it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it doth order that the petition of the plaintiff be taken against the defendants as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and eighty eight Dollars and eighty-eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid, as found, and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 80** (rcdbook1858_27_0079.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 76
**February Term 1858**
**James Foy vs John Sigerson and George Smizer**
Default.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant George Smizeet although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of the plaintiff be taken against him as confessed.
**William Price vs George M. Collius et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said plaintiff to strike out parts of the answer of said defendants and being thereof fully advised, doth order that said motion be sustained.
**Joshua W. Owings vs Dominie McLaughlin and Terrence Scully**
On Note.- Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and the said defendants by their attorney withdraw the demurrer filed herein by them. And it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it doth, therefore, on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney order that his petition be taken against said defendants as confessed; And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Fourteen hundred and eighty-three dollars and forty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William D. Sedgwinck vs John Holliday, Ferdinand Wilcker, Eleazer Sherman James H. McCullick and Charles Webb**
On Note.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said defendants John Holliday and Ferdinand Welcker. And it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and eighty dollars and fifty-six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Henry Bohler and George K. Zeigler vs Lucas C. Topping**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said Defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to Said plaintiffs in the sum of Three hundred and eighty-one dollars and seventy-eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
**Louis A. Benvist and James Christy vs John Gano Bryan**
On Note.- the Court having duly heard and considered the motion of the said plaintiffs to strike out the answer of said defendant, and being thereof fully advised, it doth order that the same be sustained. And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs on the sum of seven thousand four hundred and twenty-one dollars and ten cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 81** (rcdbook1858_27_0080.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 77
**James Shen vs William O. Shands and Edward Shands**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against them as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and forty nine dollars and ninety six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**James Shen vs Henry C. Lynch**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called come not, Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and twenty five dollars and forty-eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, together with ten percent interest on said judgment, until said, and have thereof execution.
**Andren Lyons and Samuel Boyd vs Thomas F. Wightman**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and seventy-three and five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Amos S. Foster vs Emilus F. Kraft and Otto C. Kraft**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of six-hundred and forty four dollars and forty-two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court, that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John Hughes vs Thomas F. Wightman**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One-hundred and seventy dollars and fifty-two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Thomas Slevin et al vs Michael J. Breitenback**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by their attorney, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed, at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 82** (rcdbook1858_27_0081.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 78
**February Term 1858**
**Saint Louis Building and Savings Institution Association vs Rudolph Fritch, Charles Fritz William F. Holske, Herman G. Bohm, Charles F. Meyer, Andren King and F. W. Meister**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by her attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three-hundred and seventy one dollars and fifty-six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Jacob S. Brown vs Francis G. Henderson et al**
Time to answer extended five days.
**C. Gibson vs William Bechler and Francis Bechler**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and eighteen dollars and fifty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**C. Gibson vs Ed. Augustine, David Daniel Frederick Bushman**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three hundred and two dollars and ninety are cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Barton Bates vs Edwin Wason**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called comes not, but make default, wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and fifty dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 83** (rcdbook1858_27_0082.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 79
**George Smiger vs William C. Taylor**
Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys, and consent and agree that the Court may render judgment in this cause in favor of said plaintiff and against said defendant for the sum of seven hundred and three dollars and thirty nine cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and agreed upon and his costs and charges herein and have thereof execution
**John Scott et al vs Thomas M. Goldwell et al**
The plaintiffs come and file proof satisfactory to the Court, that the order of publication heretofore made in this cause has been duly published, according to law. Thereupon come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants although duly notified and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth order that the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed.
**John Scott et al vs James M. McFaddin gar & c**
On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney the time for filing allegations and interrogatories is extended, until the fourth day of the month.
**Robert M. Barclay, Levi Hinkle and John Shields vs Daniel Gale**
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against him as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court it doth find that the said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and eighty dollars and eighty cents. It doth therefore order that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Thomas Williams and George Brobstone vs The Breckenridge Cannel Coal Company alias The Breckenridge Coal and Oil Company**
On Bill of Exchange.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and forty-four dollars and twenty one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Samuel Cupples vs James L Benson and Wm T. Hazard**
Dismissal.- On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 84** (rcdbook1858_27_0083.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 80
**February Term 1858**
**William D. Kerr vs John W. Wollman**
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and consent and agree that the Court may render Judgment against said defendant and in favor of said plaintiff for the sum of Two-hundred Dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as agreed upon, and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Charles Tourville vs F. Vandemale and Frederick Picker**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default. Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One Thousand and sixty-two dollars and fifty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**George Gehrke and Francis A. Lorenz vs Thomas J. Meier and Alwine Meier**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three-hundred and eighteen dollars and thirty-eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John A Haiw vs William W. Phillips and James F. Allright**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court, doth, on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney order that his petition be taken against said defendant as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and thirteen dollars and nineteen cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution. It is further ordered that said Judgment bear interest at the rate of ten percent per annum, until paid.
**The Ohio and Mississippi Transfer Company vs Human H. Wamke**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by its attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Nichilas Schaeffer et al vs John Nevison**
Default.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of the plaintiffs be taken against him as confessed.
---
**Viewer Page 85** (rcdbook1858_27_0084.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 81
**Alexander Suss vs Simon Block**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and thirty dollars and thirty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Rensselaer W. Lee vs Christian Schaffler and Frank Fox**
On Note.- Now at this day comed the plaintiff by his [respective ?] attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and ten dollars and fourteen cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John Shillitto and William Woods vs James Gormley**
On Note and Account. Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against him as confessed, except as to so much of said petition as relates to the account sued on, as the plaintiffs by their attorney dismiss their suit as to the account sued on. And this cause being submitted to the Court, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this suit is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of six-hundred and sixty-four dollars and thirty three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**James M. Carpenter vs Frederick Vandemale and Frederick Picker**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Five hundred and thirty three Dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Richard R. Field, Reuben Beardslee John K. Field , Isaac M. Field and Thineas Reardslee vs Louis Baum**
On Note and Account Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, and on his motion this cause is dismissed as to the account sued on; and it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it doth on motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, order that their petition be taken against said defendant as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing
---
**Viewer Page 86** (rcdbook1858_27_0085.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 82
**February Term 1858**
on which this action is founded that said defendants is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Eight hundred and sixty-two dollars and twenty three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Richard R. Field, Reuben Beardelee John K. Field, Isaac N. Field and Phineas Beardelee vs F. W. G. Bolmes**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant it indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of One hundred and sixty dollars and ten cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Robert M. Renick and Alexander Peterson vs J. H. Singleton**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded. that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three hundred and two dollars and ninety six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**George B. Sanderson vs John Brooks and J. W. Sherman**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said defendants, at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**John B. Thursby, Robert G. Thursby, James S. C. Thursby and Samuel T. Thursby vs Samuel Sanderson**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of six-hundred and four dollars and forty seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Josthene Thomas vs Edwin Ellis**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of eighteen hundred and seventy-three dollars and thirty two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 87** (rcdbook1858_27_0086.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 83
**Lessack H. Simpson, Jr Solomon L. Simpson and Joel L. Simpson vs Edwin Ellis**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three hundred and ninety six dollars and eighty-five cents It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Anton Franz vs Margaret Fraz**
Default.- Now at this law comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed.
**John F. Mauntel, Henry Butte and Matthias Backer vs James McMullen**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of six hundred and fifty-three dollars and seventy two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Thomas Slevin and Charles Slevin vs Thomas Swales**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of One hundred and fifty-one dollars and ninety eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**James S. Thomas vs Aaron H. Hackney**
Revival of Judgment.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly notified and called comes not, but makes default, and it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff on the twelfth day of December Eighteen hundred and fifty-three obtained a Judgment against said defendant, in this Court, it is now, on the application of the said plaintiff, and no one appearing to show cause to the contrary, ordered by the Court that said Judgment be and the same is hereby revived, according to the statute in such cause made and provided.
**ReniPaul vs Aaron H. Hackney**
Revival of Judgment.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly notified and called comes not, but makes default, And it appearing to the Court that the plaintiff on the on the twenty ninth day of April Eighteen hundred and fifty-one obtained a
---
**Viewer Page 88** (rcdbook1858_27_0087.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 84
a Judgment against said defendant, in this Court, it is now, on the application of the said plaintiff by his attorney, and no appearing to slow cause to the contrary, ordered by the Court, that the said Judgment be and the same is hereby revived; according to the statute in such case made and provided.
**William R. Martin and Charles G. Martin vs Jacob Clearwater and Hardin**
Attachment.- Order of Publication.- The Sheriff having made return that said defendants cannot be found, and the Court being satisfied that process cannot be served upon them; therefore, on motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered that the defendants be notified that a civil action has been commenced against them for the sum of Two-hundred and forty-dollars and eighty cents, on account account of a promissory note, and execution and delivered by them to plaintiffs for the sum aforesaid; which and the interest thereon are yet due plaintiffs, and that their property has been attached; and unless they appear at the next term of this Court, to be begun and held at the City of Saint Louis, within and for the County of Saint Louis, on the first Monday of October next, and on or before the third day thereof, answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, Judgment will be rendered against them, and their property sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed in the City of Saint Louis.
**Narren Outten vs Washington West, Thomas H. West and Isaac T. Greene**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One-thousand And forty right dollars and sixty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found And his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Jesse Lee vs John V. Schenck**
On Bill of Exchange.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and sixty-nine dollars and fifty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Hiram Mills vs Louis A. Welton, Barton Able Richard F. Sass, James O. Carson, John J. Anderson and Nicholus Springer**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said defendant Richard F. Sass. And it appearing to the Court, that there has been no answer filed in this cause, it is, on motion of the said plaintiff by his attorney ordered that this cause be submitted to the Court, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five Thousand and forty four dollars and thirty-two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 89** (rcdbook1858_27_0088.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 85
**Peter L. Vandeventer, Thomas Stringer Lewis L. L. Allen and Jacob Van Vorstrand vs John Sigerson**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Four hundred and eighty five dollars and thirteen cents. It is, therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John T. Manny, George S. Drake and William Dawning vs William P. Fenn and Bryant S. Steele**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default Wherefore, the Court doth order that the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Four hundred and forty one dollars and thirty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Pierre Chouteau Jr James Harrison and Felix Valli vs George N. Lynch, Jessi Arnot, and Anderson Arnot**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Five hundred and sixty eight dollars and seventy eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Gottllieb Hebrock vs Frederick Meissenmeyer**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, Wherefore the Court doth, on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, order this petition be taken against said defendant as Confessed, And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and ninety-five dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Stephen Haskell et al vs Benjamin T. C. Champion**
Answer filed.
---
**Viewer Page 90** (rcdbook1858_27_0089.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 86
**February Term 1858**
**Samuel M Cartney vs Joseph W. Clark et al**
By leave of Court the draft said on in this cause in withdrawn, and an attested copy left therefor.
**William T. Hazard vs Lyman Scatt et al**
The time for answering herein is extended ten days.
**Michael S. Wepham et al vs John Nevison**
Default.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly notified and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against him as confessed.
**Dewitt C. Sandford et al vs John Nevison**
Default.- Now at this day comes the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against him as confessed.
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs William Wade et al**
The defendant William Wade files an answer herein.
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs William Wade et al**
The dependant William Wade files an answer herein.
**Bank of the State of Missouri vs George W. Goode et al**
Answer filed.
**Thomas Boylan et al vs Benjamin F. Beasley et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of the said defendant Beasley to the petition of said plaintiff and being thereof fully advised, doth order that said demurrer be sustained. Leave is given to said plaintiffs to file an amended petition herein within five days from this date.
**Thomas Boylan et al vs Benjamin F. Beasley et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of the said defendant Beasley to the petition of said plaintiff, and being thereof fully advised, doth order that the same be sustained. Leave is given said plaintiffs to file an amended petition herein, within five days from this date.
**Sheridan C Hunt et al vs Robert Cartan et al**
Default.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the defendants to although duly summoned and called come not but make default. Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against them as confessed.
---
**Viewer Page 91** (rcdbook1858_27_0090.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 87
**James Gordon et al vs Thomas Marshall, gar & c**
The said garnishees file an answer herein.
**Samuel Engler vs Thomas Marshall gar & c**
The said garnishees file an answer herein.
**Ellen G. Smith et al vs William R. Brown et al**
Dismissal.- On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**Albert A. Anvil vs Daniel D. Page et al**
Default. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants Daniel D. Page, Edward Wyman and Thomas Brown although duly summoned and called come not, but make default. Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed. It is further ordered that an alias writ of summons issue herein against Henry D. Bacon, returnable to the next term.
**Morris Rosenheim and Martha Collins vs Leopold Fisher**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed, at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
James Castelle, Sheriff of the County of Saint Louis comes in Open Court and acknowledges the execution of a deed by him, as Sheriff as aforesaid to Daniel Rehoe being all the night title, interest, claim, estate and property of Frederick Picker and Ferdinand Vandermale in lot Number Ten and lying and being in Trum's subdivision and as is represented on the plat of said addition on file in the Recorders Office of the County of Saint Louis. Sold by vertue of an execution issued from the office of the Clark of the Saint Louis Circuit Court, returnable to the February term 1858 of said Court and directed in favor of Joseph Farrell and against Frederick Picker, Ferdinand Vandermale and Frederick Richard
James Castelle, Sheriff of the County of Saint Louis comes in Open Court and acknowledges the execution of a deed by him as Sheriff as aforesaid to Jacob B. Wall, of in and to the following described property, to wit: Lot number seven containing six and fifty-nine hundreths acres lying and being in Frederick W. Heidorns subdivision of part of Survey nineteen hundred and fifty-three as represented on the plat of said sub-division on file in the Recorders Office of Saint Louis County, and being in the City and County of Saint Louis, State of Missouri Sold by authority of an execution issued from the office of the Clark of the Saint Louis Circuit Court, returnable to the Februrary Term 1858. of said Court, and in favor of Joseph Farrell and against Frederick Picker Ferdinand Vandermale and Frederick Richard.
**John R. Gill vs George King**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said defendant to in be the plaintiff for security for costs and being thereof advised doth order said motion be sustained. Leave given plaintiff to file same within ten days.
---
**Viewer Page 92** (rcdbook1858_27_0091.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 88
**February Term 1858**
**Madison Y. Johnson vs C. D. Sullivan r**
Continued by consent.
**James D. Denegre vs O. Wales, gar & c**
Continued.
**Hudson B. Powell vs Michael Buckley**
Continued.
**S. Cathorine Heisick vs George Heisick**
The Court having duly heard the application of the said plaintiff for a special execution against the property of the said defendant for her alimony up to this date, and being thereof fully advised, doth order that said motion be sustained, and that a special execution do forthwith issue against any property which may be found belonging to the said defendant, for the alimony now due and owing her.
---
**Viewer Page 93** (rcdbook1858_27_0092.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 89
---
**Viewer Page 94** (rcdbook1858_27_0093.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 90
**February Term 1858**
**Mechanic's Bank vs C. D Sullivan & Co**
Defendants file an answer herein.
**William Morrison et al vs Samuel M Cartney**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of said defendant to the petition of the plaintiffs and being thereof fully advised, it doth order that the same be over-ruled. Leave is given said defendant to file an answer herein
**The Collier White Lead and Oil Company vs John Keller**
Default.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its attorney and files proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication heretofore made in this cause has been duly published according to law. Thereupon comes the said plaintiff by its attorney but the said defendant although duly notified and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against him as confessed.
**The President Directors and Company of the Bank of Louisville vs Norris Cahn**
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by their attorney and file proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication heretofore made in this cause has been duly published according to law. Thereupon come the plaintiff by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly notified and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Nine hundred and twenty seven dollars and thirty one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John A. Brownlee, Thomas J. Homer David Brownlee, James Riordan and John Rex vs James J. Todd and James McMahan**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the account sued on; and it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it doth on motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, order that the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instruments of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Four thousand, Four hundred and eighty-two dollars and sixteen cents. It is, therefore, considered
---
**Viewer Page 95** (rcdbook1858_27_0094.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 91
by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended, and have thereof execution against the property attached at the commencement of this suit, as well as against any other property which may be found belonging to the said defendant James J. Todd. It is further ordered by the Court that the Judgment herein rendered bear interest at the rate of ten percent per annum until paid.
**John Sigerson vs Wait Barton**
Dismissal.- On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**William Farrell vs James Brennan's admx**
Now at this day comes Ann Brennan and files her appearance herein for the said infant defendants.
Motion to set said appearance of P. B. Gareschi, to guash writ and to dismiss suit filed.
**Isaac Bernheimer et al vs Abraham Newmark**
On motion of the said defendant by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that a commission issue herein to the State of New York to take depositions of witnesses, to be used on the trial of this cause. on the park of said defendant.
**T. G. Comstock vs Joseph L. Papin**
Motion in arrest of Judgment filed.
**William T. Smith vs Joseph Mogridge and Francis McFaul**
Now at this day comes the said parties by their respective attorneys and neither party requiring a Jury, this cause is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the trial of this cause progressed, and the Court having heard the same doth order that the plaintiff be nonsuited. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff take nothing by his said suit in this behalf but that the said defendants go hence without day and recover of said plaintiff their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Mary Gresla vs Emanuel Gresla**
Default.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by her attorney and files proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication heretofore made in this cause has been duly published, according to law, and it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it doth on motion of the plaintiff by her attorney order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant is confessed.
**Simson D. Gratiaa, Louis Commagere and Paul Longis vs Christian Schaffler**
On Bill of Exchange.- Now at this day comes the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not. Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against him as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Fifteen hundred and five dollars and forty-four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 96** (rcdbook1858_27_0095.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 92
**The Saint Louis Building and Savings Institution vs Ferdinand Vandermale, Frederick Picker and Louis Schirmer**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against them as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and twenty nine dollars and eighteen cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Joseph Farnsworth vs The Terre Hante Alson and Saint Louis Rail Road**
On motion of the said plaintiff by his attorney, leave is given said plaintiff to amend the affidavit attached to his petition.
**In the matter of the assignment of Schuermann and Keferstein**
Now at this day comes Henry N. Hart, assignee herein, and files a bond conditioned according to law, which is approved by the Court; and on the application of said assignee for an order of sale, the Court doth order that the estate and effects assigned be sold at publication for cash in hand to the highest and best bidder
**In the matter of the assignment of Henry Bodeman**
Now at this day comes Henry N. Hart, assignee herein and files a bond, conditioned according to law, which is approved by the Court, and on his motion for an order of sale, the Court doth order the estate and effects assigned be sold at public auction, to the highest and best bidder for cash
**Samuel Hart and Henry Levi vs Christian Schaffler**
On Bill of Exchange.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendant as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and eight dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in firm aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Thomas Boylan et al vs Benjamin F. Beasley et al**
Amended petition filed by leave of Court.
**John E. Cook vs Benjamin F. Beasley et al**
Amended petition filed by leave of Court.
**Edward V. Bryan vs E. Jr Michael**
Continued by consent.
---
**Viewer Page 97** (rcdbook1858_27_0096.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 93
**Samuel Jones, Michael Jones and John P. Jones vs Maurice Steinback**
On Draft.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and forty dollars and twenty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Joseph Stouvenal, Francis Stouvenal and Charles Stouvenal vs Charles F. Baker, Thomas B. Baker and James Moore**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of One hundred and ninety one dollars and fifty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Sunderland G. Sears vs Daniel D. Page, Henry D. Bacon and Thomas Brown**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff and on his motion, this cause is dismissed as to the said defendant Henry D. Bacon; And it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it doth on motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, order the petition of said plaintiff to be taken against the said defendant as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and seventy-six dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**George H. Cutter vs Daniel D. Page, Henry D. Bacon and Thomas Brown**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant Henry D. Bacon, this suit is dismissed as to him; And it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it is on motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, ordered that said plaintiff petition be taken against them as confessed. And the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and twenty six dollars and eighty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Samuel Cupples vs James L. Benson and Wm T. Hazzard**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 98** (rcdbook1858_27_0097.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 94
**February Term 1858**
**Robert Dougherty vs George W. Lunch and Henry C. Lynch**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and Called come not, but make Default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three hundred and eighty one dollars and fifty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants to the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William B. Fenner vs Maria D. Fenner**
Default.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly notified and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore, the Court doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed.
**Louis A. Benvist et al vs Lydia M. Rector et al**
It is ordered by the Court that this cause be continued at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**Laurence Myers vs Wm Muroe**
It is ordered by the Court that this cause be continued until the next term of the Court.
**George P. Fein vs John Valentine et al**
Amended petition filed.
---
**Viewer Page 99** (rcdbook1858_27_0098.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 95
**Hanen Kamp & Hynes vs John Nevison's gar**
On motion of Daniel Glasgow by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that he be discharged hence for the want of Interrogatories, at the costs of the plaintiffs. Five dollars is allowed said garnishee for answering herein.
**John S. Thompson et al vs Daniel Glasgow gar & c**
On motion of Daniel Glasgow, garnishee herein, by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the said garnishee be discharged hence at the costs of the plaintiffs. The sum of five dollars is allowed said garnishee for appearing.
**George Pomery, William H. Benton Jrand George H. Chase vs William Hall A. R. Hynson John H. Hall, Clark J. Morton and Leonidas A. Hall**
By consent of parties the petition is amended by the insertion of the words ``negotiable and payable without defalcation or discount'' inserted after the word ``date'' in the fifteenth line from the top of said petition. thereupon on motion of the said plaintiffs by their attorney, this cause is dismissed as to the said defendant Leonidas A. Hall. And it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, the Court doth on motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of nine hundred and sixty four dollars and Ten cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
**John B. Munroe vs Charles Barnard Wm D. W. Barnard and Rudolph Adams**
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, and on his motion, this cause is dismissed As to the said defendants Charles Barnard and Rudolph Adams. And it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, the Court doth on motion of said plaintiffs by his attorney order that his petition be taken against said defendant as confessed, And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of[- ?] It is, thereof, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**George D. Little vs Emmet McDonald, James W. McDonald Andrew C. Peckham, James F. Small, Issiah H. Obear and John C. Ivory**
Now at this day comes the said defendant John C. Ivory and withdraws the answer filed herein by him; thereupon the plaintiffs by their attorney, dismiss this cause as to the said defendant John C. Ivory: And it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed herein, it doth order that the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed. And this cause being submitted to
---
**Viewer Page 100** (rcdbook1858_27_0099.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 96
**February Term 1858**
the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Eight-hundred and forty dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs Francis M Faul et al**
Answer filed.
**John N. Frank vs Frederick Ehlert**
Now at this cay comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and ninety seven dollars and fifty six cents. It is therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William R. McCord vs Daniel D. Page, Henry D. Bacon, Edward Wyman and Thomas Brown**
Now at this day come the plaintiff by his attorney and on his motion this cause is dismissed as to the said defendant Henry D. Bacon. And it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this case, it doth on motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against them as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two hundred and ninety-three Dollars and three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Thomas B. Wing vs Jacob S. Williams**
Demurrer to counter-claim filed by leave of Court.
**William W. Wakelam vs Charles H. Valentine et al**
The plaintiff comes and asks leave of the Court to file an amended petition herein and the Court having heard said application, doth grant the same.
Amended petition filed.
**Bacon, Hyde & c vs A. G. Bragg et al**
Reply to counter claim filed.
**Henry Boernstein et al vs Simon Eimer**
Reference.
It is ordered by the Court that this cause be referred to Charles D. Drake, to settle the matters in controversy between the parties.
---
**Viewer Page 101** (rcdbook1858_27_0100.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 97
**Samuel McKee vs Joseph H. White**
Amended answer filed.
**Stephen Hoyt vs Henry Harmsen gar et al**
answer of garnishee filed.
**The President, Directors and Company of the Bank of Louisville vs E. G. Smith and others**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of the said defendant to strike out the answer of the said defendants, and being thereof fully and sufficiently advised, it doth order that said motion be sustained.
**Andrew J. Short vs James Castells**
Default.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default. Wherefore, the Court orders the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed.
**John J. Barron vs Joseph B. Holland**
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**David Rokohl et al vs Paul Carlin et al**
Answer filed.
**William Morrison et al vs Samuel M Cartney**
Motion to strike out parts of answer filed.
**Pierre E. Brulatour vs Philip Gratiaa**
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and it appearing to the Court that the Judgment heretofore taken in this behalf, on the Twenty-fourth day of February last, was irregularly taken, the same is, therefore, on motion of the said plaintiff by his attorney, set aside and for nought held Thereupon comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the petition of said plaintiff is taken against said defendant as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court by the plaintiff upon the pleadings and proofs, the Court doth find from such proofs that said plaintiff is entitled to recover of the said defendant the sum of Four hundred and forty-eight dollars and ninety four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Jacob S. Brown vs Henderson & Rice**
The Defendant Rice files an answer herein.
---
**Viewer Page 102** (rcdbook1858_27_0101.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 98
**February Term 1858**
**The Etezens Savings Institution vs A. M. Watermann et al**
Motion to strike out the answer of Darrahand Pomroy filed.
**James C. Page vs A. M. Watermann**
Motion to strike out the answer of Darrahand Pomroy filed.
**David Rokohl and vs Ferdinand Vandermale, Frederick Picker and Samuel Myerson**
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney and on his motion this cause is dismissed as to the said defendant Samuel Myerson. And it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, the Court doth on motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney order the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Five hundred and thirty dollars and forty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**David Rokohl and vs Philip Censon, Caspar Herget and Samuel Myerson**
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney and dismiss this cause as to the said defendant Samuel Myerson. And it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause it doth on motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney order their petition be taken against said defendant as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Four hundred and thirty dollars and eighty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found together with ten per cent interest upon the same, until paid, and also their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**James W. Paige and vs Theodore R. Porey**
Dismissal- On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**Charles Speck et al vs The Steamer James E. Woodruff**
It is ordered by the Court that this cause be continued until the next term of the Court, at the costs of the said plaintiffs.
**Morris Langhorne vs Joseph L. Papin gar et al**
By consent of parties this cause is continued until the next term of this Court.
---
**Viewer Page 103** (rcdbook1858_27_0102.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 99
**George Rinehart and Catherine Rhinehart vs Corad Okel and Eliza Rhinehart**
Dismissal.- On motion of the said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**Joseph Conway admr & c et al vs John K. Hempstend et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of the said defendants to the petition of said plaintiffs and being thereof fully advised, doth order that the same be overruled.
**Bank of the State of Missouri vs William Hall, A. R. Hynson John H. Hall, Clark J. Worton and Leonidas A. Hall**
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that the Judgment heretofore rendered in this cause be and the same is hereby set aside. Thereupon come the said parties by their attorneys, and the plaintiffs dismiss this cause as to the said defendant Leonidas A Hall and the said defendant withdraw the demurrer herein filed by them. And it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause it doth on motion of the plaintiff by its attorney order that its petition be taken against said defendants as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Eight hundred and thirty eight dollars and twenty one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Louis G. Picat vs Henry P. Hortmann et al**
It is ordered by the Court that this cause be continued until the next term of the Court.
**Richard R. Field et al vs Louis Magnus**
Order of Sale.- Now at this day comes James Castells, Sheriff of Saint Louis County and files a statement, whereby it appears to the Court that the property levied upon by virtue and authority of the attachment issued in the above entitled cause is likely to depreciate in value before the probable termination of this suit and that the keeping of the same would be attended with much expense. It is, therefore, ordered by the Court that the said James Castells, Sheriff as aforesaid, do proceed to sell said property so levied upon, in conformity to the Statute in such case made and provided.
**Richard R. Field et al vs Henry F. Crass et al**
On motion of plaintiffs, it appearing to the Court that the original writ and petition in this cause were lost by the Sheriff, after due service thereof according to law, upon all the defendants, it is ordered that the record in this cause be supplied, and that to that end the Clerk of this Court make out a writ and petition in strict conform its with the originals in this cause, as nearly as the same can be done-further that the Sheriff of this Court endorse upon said writ, when so made out his service thereof and that said writ and petition when so made out and endorsed with service be filed in this Cause, and the same shall stand in all respects for the originals.
**The Bank of the State of Missouri - vs - Francis M Faul et al on Answer filed.**
---
**Viewer Page 104** (rcdbook1858_27_0103.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 100
**February Term 1858**
**John Knauer vs Charles Blank**
Dismissal.- By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court, this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendant and that execution issue therefor.
**Edgar Sprague vs James D. Houseman and Samuel Loury**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Eight hundred and forty five dollars and twenty seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William Wade, Eliza Frost by her Trustee Daniel M. Frost and Mary B. Stewart vs The Saint Louis Mutual Fire and Morine Ins Company**
Dismissaul.- On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor. Leave is given said plaintiffs to withdraw the exhibits filed herein by them.
**John J. Roe and Henry J. Moore vs William H. Thompson, Joseph W. Thompson, Peter J. Sowers and James M. Hughes**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney and dismiss this cause as to the Said defendant James M. Hughes. And it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it doth, on motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, order that their petition be taken against said other defendants as confessed. And the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-thousand six hundred and fifty seven dollars and twenty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
Remitteter.-
[A ?]132.25.
**George B. Sanderson vs John Largue and Charles L. Hunt**
Remettiter.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and remits the sum of One hundred and thirty two Dollars and twenty five cents off the Judgment heretofore obtained by him in this behalf against the said defendants.
**Emister McClellan [r. ?] vs Henry Ames gar & c**
Answer filed.
---
**Viewer Page 105** (rcdbook1858_27_0104.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 101
**Richard R. Field, Reuben Beardslee John K. Field, Isaac N. Field and Phincus Beardslee vs Henry F. Cross, Franklin Field and Thomas Simpson**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth, on motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Fifteen hundred and ninety five dollars and ninety three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Henry W. Bellings vs Alexander Norton**
It is ordered by the Court that this cause by referred to Thomas T. Gantt and John M. Krum, to determine the matters in controversy between the said parties.
**John S. Thompson vs John Nevison**
Interplea filed.
**Solomon Smith vs A. M. Watermann**
**James C. Page vs A. W. Waterman et al**
**The Citizens Savings Institution vs A. M. Watermann et al**
In each of the writing entitled causes the time for propounding interrogatories to garnishees is extended until the fifteenth day of the present month.
**Charles Tillman, Ferdinand Rozier Wiliam Fullagar and Amade Berthold vs John Nevison**
Attachment.- Order of Publication. The Sheriff having made return that the said defendant cannot be found, and the Court being satisfied that process cannot be served upon said defendant, it is, on motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney, ordered that the defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against him for the sum of Four hundred and fifty-five dollars and ninety nine cents, on account of a promissory note executed by the said defendant to the plaintiffs for the sum of Three hundred and thirty-three Dollars and seven cents; and also for the sum of One hundred and twenty one dollars and thirty seven cents, on account of goods wares and merchandize by plaintiffs sold and delivered to the said defendant, and that his property has been attached; and unless he appear at the next term of this Court, to be begun and held at the City of Saint Louis within and for the County of Saint Louis, on the First Monday of October next, and on or before the third day thereof, answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, Judgment will be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof will be published according to law, in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed in the City of Saint Louis.
**Robert Thornburg vs William Clark et al gar & c**
The said garnishees come and file an answer herein.
---
**Viewer Page 106** (rcdbook1858_27_0105.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 102
**February Term 1858**
**John A. Ubsdell, Charles Pierson William Bass and James Duncan vs Louis Kaufman**
Dismissal.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiffs and that Execution issue thereof.
**F. Dattelzwig vs M. W. T. Black**
Plea filed.
**Joseph Farrell vs Anapias Rice, John Sigerson and Lemuel S. Pardee**
On Note. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and the said John Sigerson, one of the within named defendants also come and with draws the answer filed by him in this cause, Thereupon the said plaintiff dismisses his said suit as to the said defendant John sigerson. And it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed herein, by the said other defendants, it is, on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, ordered that his petition be taken against them as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and fifty-nine dollars and ninety cents. it is, therefore, considered by the court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Joseph Farrell vs Joseph A. Barret Mary L. Barret and Anapias Rice**
On Note. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and twenty dollars and sixteen cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William Milburn et al vs Thomas C. Reynolds**
Ordered by the Court that this cause be continued until the next term of the Court.
**John H. Graesback et al vs William B. Miller et al**
Withdrawal of answer filed.
**William M. Morrison et al vs Samuel McCartney**
Defendant files an answer herein.
**John S. Thomson et al vs John Nevison's garnishee Daniel Glasgow**
On motion of Daniel Glasgow, garnishee herein, and it appearing to the Court that no Interrogatories have been filed in this cause, it is ordered that he be discharged hence, at the costs of the plaintiffs. The sum of Five Dollars is allowed said garnishee for appearing herein.
---
**Viewer Page 107** (rcdbook1858_27_0106.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 103
**Richard P. Hanenkamp et al vs Daniel Glasgow, garnishee of John Nevison**
On motion of Daniel Glasgow, the garnishee herein, and it appearing to the Court that no allegations and interrogatories have been filed herein, it is ordered that he be discharged hence, at the costs of the plaintiffs. The sum of Five Dollars is allowed said garnishee for appearing herein.
**Samuel A. Halliday administrator of Mason Converse, died vs Philander Bassett and Phebe Basset**
Dismissaul.-
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**The President, Directors and Company of the Bank of Louisville vs Ebon G. Smith and Wm K. Sherwood**
The Defendants by leave of Court file an amended answer herein.
**E. J. Glasgow et al vs Isaac W. Taylor et al**
The defendants file an answer herein.
**John Grether vs William B. Watson**
The defendant files an answer herein.
**Julia Morriso vs James K. Philliber**
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her attorney and suggests to the Court the intermarriage of said plaintiff with [Noes ?] Yennon and the same is not denied, and by consent of parties he is joined with the plaintiff in this action. Motion to quash depositions filed.
**Stephen Hoyt vs Henry Harmson gar & c**
Denial of answer filed.
**John S. Thompson, William White and Hiram A. Pryor vs Josiah W. Tyzach, Jacob Frank and Hermen Beisen**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney and dismiss this cause as to the said defendants Josiah W. Tyzack and Herman Beison; But the other defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney it is ordered by the Court that their petition be taken against said defendant as confessed. Thereupon the plaintiffs submit this cause to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to
---
**Viewer Page 108** (rcdbook1858_27_0107.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 104
**February Term 1858**
said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and sixty five Dollars and forty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said Defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Henry W. Billings vs Alexander Norton**
Now at this day come Thomas T. Gantt and John M. Krum, the referees in this cause and file their report. And no one appearing to object to the said report, it is ordered by the Court that said report be confirmed Thereupon the Court doth on motion of said plaintiff find from said report that the said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and forty-seven Dollars and fifty-two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John S. Thompson vs Robert Sterling et al**
The Defendants Sterling and Wallace file an answer herein.
**Squire Hall vs William H. Deriar**
Reply to counter claim filed.
**Zorada Reynolds vs Elisha S. Reynolds**
Divorce.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff by her attorney, it is ordered by the Court, that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court having leaving proceeded to hear the testimony in this cause and having been satisfied from such testimony that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, It doth consider adjudge and decree that said plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with said defendant ant that she be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. It is, further ordered by the Court that said plaintiff pay the costs of this proceeding and the execution issue therefor.
**William Klauenberg vs Carl Abeland Anton Jaeger**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and fifty-three Dollars and forty-cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Shillito and Woods vs State Saving's Institution garnishee of Gormley**
The said garnishee files an answer herein.
---
**Viewer Page 109** (rcdbook1858_27_0108.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 105
**Samuel McCartney vs Joseph W. Clark et al**
John J. Anderson garnishee in this cause files an answer herein.
**Sophia Williams vs William Williams**
On motion of the plaintiff by her attorney, on alias writ of summons is ordered to issue herein returnable to the next term of the Court.
**Albert Billings et al vs James B. Ricords and John A. Smithers, garnishees of Charles Fink**
On motion of the said garnishees by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that they be discharged hence as such garnishees, at the costs of the said plaintiffs. The sum of Five dollars is allowed to each of said garnishees for appearing herein.
**Charles D. Anter vs Washington West**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and ninety four Dollars and forty-four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**August Setzer vs The Franklin Iron Company**
Dismissaul.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**William Heintz vs Mary Heintz**
Dismissaul.- This cause having been called for trial and no one appearing to prosecute the same it is ordered by the Court, that it be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**The Citizens Savings Institution vs A. M. Waterman et al**
**Sol Smith vs A. M. Waterman**
**James C. Page vs A. M. Waterman**
Objections filed by George W. Thatcher, to the bond of indemnity taken and returned by the Sheriff.
**Henry Hamilton vs Peter Bauduy Gareschi administrator of Joseph P. Scull. discused**
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and neither party requiring a Jury, this cause is submitted to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find the issue joined in favor of the said defendant. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff take nothing by his said suit in this behalf expended but that said defendant go hence without day and recover of said plaintiff his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 110** (rcdbook1858_27_0109.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 106
**February Term 1858**
**Logan D. Dameron vs John W. Carrall**
Amended petition filed.
**Alexis Mudd, Graham L. Hughes John J. Mudd, Henry M. Mudd and Armstead O. Grubb Jr. vs William H. Austin and C. H. Albers**
Dismissal.-
On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**Patrick Long vs Jeremiah Cronin**
Dismissal.-
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**James H. Lucas et al vs The County of Saint Louis gar & c**
The time for answering herein is extended twenty days.
**Archibald J. Sommerville vs Thomas S. Nelson**
The Defendant files an answer herein.
**Samuel McKee vs Joseph H. White**
Demurrer to counter claim filed.
**Samuel Engler et al vs George B. Sanderson**
Denial of answer filed.
**Henry Hamilton vs P. B. Gareschi admr et al**
Motion for new troal filed.
**William T. Smith vs Joseph Mogride et al**
Motion to set aside nonsuit filed.
**Albert Billings et al vs Charles Fink**
On motion of the said defendant by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that a Commission issue herein to the State of Misconsin, to take depositions of witnesses, to be used in the trial of this cause, on the part of the said defendant.
---
**Viewer Page 111** (rcdbook1858_27_0110.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 107
**John Hartman vs Miles G. Moies and Henry M. Woodward, Thomas B. Ellis Henry Ellis and James Ellis**
The court having duly heard and considered the motion of the said plaintiff to strike out the answer of the said defendant, and being thereof fully advised, doth order that said motion be sustained, And it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this case. it doth on motion of said plaintiff order that his petition be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and thirty four dollars and twenty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**David B. Hill vs Paul Carlin, John Helgenberg and Henry Gronhesin**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of said defendants to the petition of said plaintiff and being thereof fully advised, it doth order that the same be sustained. By leave of Court the plaintiff amends his said petition by interlining the same with the words, in the fifth line on first page the sum of six hundred dollars.
**James M. Riley and Edward E. Cartes vs Archibuld B. Earle and James Findley**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney and dismiss this cause as to the said defendant James Findley. Thereupon the said other defendant comes and enters his voluntary appearance, to this cause, and this same cause is, thereupon submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three Thousand, six hundred and one dollars and sixty nine cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William T. Hazzard vs Lyman Scott et al**
On motion of said defendants by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that a Commission issue herein to the State of Maryland to take depositions of witnesses, to be used on the trial of this cause, on the part of said defendants.
**Louis Carr et al vs C. D. Sullivan et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of said defendants to the petition of the plaintiffs and being thereof fully advised, doth order that the same be overruled. On motion, the defendants have five days to file an answer herein. Motion for security for costs filed.
**Washington F. Adams vs John T. Chappell et al**
Motion for security for costs filed.
---
**Viewer Page 112** (rcdbook1858_27_0111.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 108
**February Term 1858**
**Robert Jackson vs W. C. Jackson**
Replication to the defendants aff-set filed.
**Elias Abrahams vs Raphael Keiler, Adolphus Isaacs and William Keiler**
On Note.- The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of said defendants to plaintiffs petition and being there of fully and sufficiently advised, it doth order that the same be overruled.
**Patrick Hogan vs Joseph K. Rent**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said defendant to rule the plaintiff for security for costs and being thereof fully advised, doth order that said motion be and the same is hereby sustained.
**Jacob S. Brown vs Francis G. Henderson et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of the said defendant Rice to the petition of the said plaintiff, doth order that the same be overruled.
**Bank of the State of Missouri vs Benjamin F. C. Champion et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of said defendants to the petition of said plaintiff and being thereof fully advised, it doth order the same be overruled.
**T. G. Comstock vs J. L. Papin et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said defendant in arrest of the Judgment herein rendered, doth order that the same be overruled.
**Frederick Heaman vs Martin Hammerle**
Answer filed.
**George H. Wicker vs George J. King**
Answer filed.
**William McDowell vs George J. King**
Answer filed
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs Thomas T. Smith et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of said defendants to the petition of said plaintiffs to the petition of said plaintiff, it doth order that the same be overruled.
---
**Viewer Page 113** (rcdbook1858_27_0112.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 109
**Charles K. Bacon vs William M. Plant et al**
Replication to defendants counter claim filed.
**Joseph Cooker, to use & c vs Charles Shinkle et al**
Defendants file an answer herein
**Daniel Ryan vs R. C. Mcallister et al**
Defendants file an answer herein.
**William A. Maffit et al vs Philip S. Lanham et al**
The Court having duly heard the motion of said plaintiffs to strike out the answer of said defendants and being thereof fully advised, it doth order that said motion be, and the same is hereby sustained. Leave is given said defendants to file another answer herein, within five days.
**The State of Missouri vs Joseph W. Thornton**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of the said defendant to be discharged hence, and being thereof fully advised, doth order that said motion be overruled.
**Stephen Hoyt vs Henry Harmsen, gar & c**
Motion to dismiss proceedings against garnishee, filed
**Thomas G. C. Davis vs William M. Stelham**
Dismissal.
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor. Leave is given said plaintiff to withdraw the exhibit said on, on his leaving an attested copy therefor.
**Thomas L. Salisbury vs Jacob Janshir, William Hassinger, John Ruedi and Jacob Spindeer**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of eleven hundred and eighty-two dollars and six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 114** (rcdbook1858_27_0113.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 110
**Louis Carr et al vs C. D. Sullivan et al**
The defendants file an answer herein.
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs Benjamin F. C. Champion et al**
The defendants file an answer herein.
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs Thomas F. Smith et al**
The defendants file an answer herein.
**John Shillits et al vs James Gormley's gar & c**
Interplea of Benjamin Coursin.
**Max Waxer vs Smith & Wilmot**
Default.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant Wilmot although duly Summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against him as confessed.
**Roger C. McAllister vs John Lowry and Lewis Lemaitre**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and seventy-two dollars and ninety cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Roger C. McAllister vs Lewis Lemaitre**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said Defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and six dollars and thirty nine cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Henry B. Belt et al vs George W. Goode**
Replication to answer and counter claim filed.
**John Kennedy vs C. L. Gilpin gar & c**
Denial of answer filed.
---
**Viewer Page 115** (rcdbook1858_27_0114.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 111
**Lyman W. Patchin vs William Sallcott**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of the said defendant to the petition of said plaintiff, and it appearing to the Court that it has no Jurisdiction of the cause of action set forth in the petition, it doth order that said demurrer be sustained, and That this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**James Caldwell vs The City of Saint Louis**
On Contract.-
Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys, and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: Herman Diefenbrun, Henry Holeman, William H. Reid, George Shade, Richard Jones, George W. Parker, John B Longenoth, Henry Barkaefer, J. B Dickson, John Hellenkamp, Franz Blatseg and Fleming Bates, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected, tried and recover well and truly to try the matters in controversy between the parties aforesaid, the trial of this cause progressed, But the said plaintiff says he will not further prosecute his suit in this behalf; Wherefore the Court doth order that the Jury empannelled and sworn herein be discharged It is, therefore, considered by the Court that the said defendant go hence without day and recover of said plaintiff her costs and Charges herein expended and have thereof execution. Leave is given the plaintiff to file a motion to set aside the non suit herein.
[A ?]1073.32
**William Voorhies vs George N. Lynch, William A. Lynch, Jesse Arnot and Anderson Arnot**
On Note.- Now at this day come the said parties by their attorneys, and the said defendants waive the issuing and service of process and enter their voluntary appearance to this suit. And it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it doth, on motion of said plaintiff order that his petition be taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One Thousand and seventy three Dollars and thirty-two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution. It is further ordered by the Court that the said Judgment bear interest at the rate of ten percent per annum, until paid.
**John P. Gould et al vs Trowbridge and Priest**
Affidavit for continuance filed.
**James Death et al vs Robert A. W. Crensheew**
Plea in abatement filed.
**John B. Valli et al vs John C. G. Henirich et al**
Answer filed by leave of Court.
---
**Viewer Page 116** (rcdbook1858_27_0115.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 112
**February Term 1858.**
**George Pomeray et al vs Theodore Bitts et al**
By leave of Court the affidavit to the petition, in this cause, is amended by inter-living the words ``attorney for plaintiffs'' in the first line of said affidavit. The defendants Bitts and Millen file an answer herein.
**Hayman Levin vs Dewitt Van Evera et al**
By leave of Court the motion herein filed, to quash the return of the Sheriff made in this cause, is withdrawn; and the plaintiffs have fifteen days to have the same amended.
**Hayman Levin vs George S. Nicholls et al**
By leave of Court the notion herein filed, to quash the return made by the Sheriff in this cause, is withdrawn, and the plaintiffs have fifteen days to have the same amended.
**Louisa L. Freligh vs Joseph W. Ames et al**
Amend petition filed.
---
**Viewer Page 117** (rcdbook1858_27_0116.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 113
**John S. Thompson et al vs James H. McCullough et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of said defendants to the petition of said plaintiffs and being thereof fully and sufficiently advised, doth order that the same be overruled Leave is given said defendants to file an answer herein within ten days.
**Mary L. Tarr vs Will Tarr**
The plaintiff files proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication heretofore made in this cause has been duly published according to lair.
**Lagan D. Dameson vs John W. Carrall et al**
The Defendants Sass and Stratton file an answer herein
**David B. Hill vs Paul Carlin et al**
The Defendants Helgenberg and Gronheim file an answer herein.
**Nicholas Frank vs Franz Nassal**
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed; and by agreement of parties, it is ordered that each party pay his own costs, and that execution issue therefor.
**Henry Wells, President & c vs Michael O. Rourke**
Amended petition filed by leave of Court.
**John Wills Sawyer and William [Piclersgill ?] vs John H. Hall and Clark A. Morton**
Confession of Judgment.- Now at this day come the said defendant and file a statement duly verified by affidavit, whereby it appear to the Court that the said defendants are indebted to the said plaintiffs in the sum of One Thousand and Seventy-three dollars and sixty nine cents; and the said defendant consent and agrees that Judgment may be rendered against them for that sum and in favor of said plaintiffs. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
**Hugh Bayle vs Jalia Buchanan**
Motion to strike out answer and for Judgment filed.
**Herman Grundt vs Cornduis D. Sullivan and Jeremiah T. Sullivan**
Dismissal.-
On motion of the said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 118** (rcdbook1858_27_0117.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 114
**February Term 1858**
**John A. Ubsdell, Charles Person William Barr and James Duncan vs John Cunningham**
Attachment- Order of Publication.- The Sheriff having made return that said defendant cannot be found, and the Court being satisfied that said defendant cannot be served with process, therefore, on motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered that the defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against him for the sum of Three-hundred and forty nine dollars and five cents on account of goods, wares and merchandize sold and delivered by the plaintiffs to the said defendant, and which remains due and unpaid, and that his property has been attached; and unless he appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of Saint Louis, within and for the County of Saint Louis, on the first Monday of October next, and on or before the sixth day thereof, answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, Judgment will be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published in the Missouri Democrat, a news-paper printed in the City of Saint Louis.
**Franklin gruble vs Frederick Myers et al**
By consent of parties this cause is continued until the next term of the Court.
**George B. Murray vs William P. Fenn and Charles L. Hunt**
Dismissal.-
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Thomas O. Lawrenson vs Campbell and Lawrenson**
Motion for security for costs filed.
**In the matter of the Assignment of Schuermann and Kefferstein**
Now at this day comes the assignee herein and renounces the trust and assignments conferred to him; and which said renunciation is approved by the Court.
**Matilda McDowell vs George H. McDowell**
The said defendant comes and files an answer herein.
**State of Missouri, to use & c vs August Riebschlager**
Motion to suppress depositions filed.
**Dominique Urban vs A. Jansen and Philip Ceasar**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and eighteen Dollars and five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 119** (rcdbook1858_27_0118.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 115
**A T. Shart vs James Castello**
Motion to set aside Judgment by default, filed
**Oliver Quinette vs Charles J. Carpenter**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said plaintiff to strike out the answer of the said defendant and being thereof fully advised, doth order that said motion be sustained.
**William Ringwalt vs Herman Weiner et al**
Motion to strike out parts of answer filed.
**George F. Boulier vs Francis A. Hunt and Edward Hunt**
Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: Anton Farrel, Peter Gomasch, W. T. Guion, Nicholus Spond Michael Pourcelli, David Anderson, Bernard Spickerman, P. B. Dickson, John Rippy, Jack Jaeffry, John B. Longenoth and Edward Mitchell, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and room well and truly to try the matters in controversy, the trial of this cause progressed, and being now finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their on the aforesaid find the issue joined in favor of said plaintiff and assess his Damages at the sum of One Thousand and Three Dollars and three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Peter Gallagher vs William Taussig**
Dismissal-
On motion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**A. J. Carpenter vs Thomas Wall**
It is ordered by the Court that this cause be continued until the next term of the Court, at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**James Young vs Lydia Young**
Dimissal.- This cause being called for trial, and no one appearing to prosecute the same, the Court doth order that the same be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Thomas B. Ellis vs Richard C. Shackelford**
Dismissal.- On motion of the said parties, it is ordered that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendant and that execution issue therefor.
**Christopher Crone, Frederick Dermon Nicholas Hatch and Louis Bartold vs Thomas A. Pickering and Howard M. [Churchball ?]**
Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury to wit: Herman Dissuburne, Henry Hobman, William A. Reed, George Shade, George W. Parker, A. G. [Snitzer ?], Henry Barkoefer, A. P. Johnson John Hellenkamp, Frank Blatzig, Fleming Bates and Richard Jones, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected, tried and proven, well and truly to try the matters in controversy between the parties aforesaid, the trial of this cause progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issue soined in favor of the said plaintiffs and
---
**Viewer Page 120** (rcdbook1858_27_0119.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 116
**Feby Term 1858**
against said defendants and assess the damages of said plaintiffs by reason of the premises in their petition mentioned at the sum of Two-hundred Dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as by the Jury assessed and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
**Michael Murphy vs Archie Campbell and John Theeman**
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly notified and called come not, Wherefore, on motion of the plaintiff this cause is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth assess the damages sustained by said plaintiff by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of Three hundred Dollars and fifty seven cents It is, therefore, considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Samuel Jones vs Maurice Stimback**
The defendant files an answer herein
**Adam Hammer vs George Schneider**
The defendant files an answer herein
**John S. Thompson et al vs Robert Sterting et al**
Motion to strike out answer and for Judgment filed.
**Samuel Myerson vs John Halliday and Francis Mayer**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and forty six Dollars and Seventy cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court, that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Samuel Myerson vs John Halliday**
On Notes.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Thirteen hundred and forty seven and fifty-two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said
---
**Viewer Page 121** (rcdbook1858_27_0120.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 117
plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Samuel Myerson vs Valentine Moller and Nicholas Moller**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called comes not, but make default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said Defendant is indebted to Said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and seventy-eight dollars and twenty one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of Said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**George Pomeroy, William H. Benton and George H. Chase vs John O. Neil**
On Note.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes, default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this cause is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of seven hundred and eighty nine dollars and thirty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution. It is further ordered by the Court that the said Judgment bear interest at the rate of ten percent per annum until paid.
**John R. Gill vs George King**
The defendant files an answer herein.
**Michael Murphy vs Archie Campbell et al**
Motion for new trial filed.
**Charles G. Martin et al vs Hall & Smith gar & c**
The said garnishees file an answer herein.
**Firmin Cousinery et al vs Benjamin F. C. Champion et al**
Plea in abatement filed.
**George Pomeroy et al vs Joshua W. Alexander et al**
Motion to strike out parts of answer filed.
**Thomas M. Taylor et al vs George W. Morris et al**
Motion to strike out answer and for Judgment. filed
**Alvin West -vs- Andrew H. Downing et al.-**
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that this suit be dismissed as to the defendant Andrew H. Downing.
---
**Viewer Page 122** (rcdbook1858_27_0121.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 118
**February Term 1858**
**John Hartman vs Miles G. Moris et al**
Motion to set aside Judgment, filed.
[A ?]191.211.
Dismissed as to A. H. Downing.
**Alvan West vs Andrew H. Downing, James Downing and Elizabeth Worthington**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of one-hundred and ninety one dollars and twenty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Frederick Buschman vs Richard Ivers et al**
Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: Anton Farrel, Peter Gomasch, W. Guion, Nicholas Spore Michael Paurcelli, David Anderson, Bernard Spickermann, P. B. Dickson, John Aippy, Jacob Joeffry, John B. Langenoth and [Edw- ?]Mitchell, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the matters in controversy between the parties aforesaid, the trial of this cause progressed, but not being finished is laid over until to-morrow morning.
**Andelina Lotze vs John C. Lotze**
On motion of said plaintiff by her attorney, it is ordered by the Court that an alias writ of summons issue herein, returnable to the next term of this Court.
**John F. Mauntel, Henry Butti and Mathias Baker vs James McFadin**
Dismissal.-
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**Marin E. Stillman vs John Wickham administrator of Nicholas Boilvin**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said plaintiff for an order on the said defendant to pay over certain money in his hands, belonging to said estate, and being thereof fully advised doth order that said motion be over ruled. It is, also further ordered by the Court that the said application be dismissed and that the said defendant go hence without day and recover of said plaintiff his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Moria H. Boilvin vs John H. Wickham, administrator of Nicholas Boilvin**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said plaintiff for an order on the said defendant to pay over certain money which he now has in hands, belonging to the estate of Nicholas Boilvin, deed, and the Court being thereof fully advised, doth order that said motion be overruled. And it is, further considered that the plaintiff take nothing by her said motion and that said defendant go hence without day and recover of said plaintiff his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 123** (rcdbook1858_27_0122.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 119
**The Saint Louis Building and Savings Institution vs Thomas D. Gage, James L. Gage and Joshua Fine**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said defendant to strike out the answer of said defendants and being thereof fully advised, it doth order the same be overruled.
**Mary J. Shultz vs Alexander M. Mitchell**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by her attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Cleander Mighells vs Lorenzo D. Jones**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this Cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**The President Directors of the Bank of Louisville vs [- ?] E. G. Smith et al**
Motion to strike out answer filed.
**Lloyd R. Coleman et al vs Philip D. Gordon**
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney as well as the said defendant; and the said defendant files a statement duly verified by affidavit, whereby he confesses himself indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Four Thousand two hundred and twenty seven Dollars and sixty seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Hugh Bogle vs Julia Buchanan**
By leave of Court the original answer filed in this cause is withdrawn; and another answer is filed instead.
**David M. Wagner & Wm A. Thomas Jr vs Charles Rogers**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called come not, but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Eight hundred and three dollars and eighty four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their Costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 124** (rcdbook1858_27_0123.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 120
**February Term 1858**
**John R. Gill vs George King**
It appearing to the Court that the plaintiff has failed to file security for costs, within the time prescribed by the Court, Therefore, on motion of said defendant by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor
**Patrick Long vs Frederick W. Heiteman**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three hundred and seventeen dollars and fifty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Henrietta Myers vs Henry Myers**
Default.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly notified and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed.
**William Kelly vs D. D. Page et al**
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney this cause is dismissed as to the said defendant Henry D. Racon.
**Lorenzo P. Sanger vs Daniel D. Page et al**
Dismissal.
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the defendant H. D. Bacon.
**James H. Sturdy et al Lewis Palmer et al**
Dismissal.-
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to defendant Wm Myers.
**David Hirsch vs George Rockwell, George W. Morris and August P. Guibert**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and twenty two dollars and ninety nine cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Francis Rogers and L. Matthews vs Charles R. Lamb**
Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury to wit Herman Diefenbrun, Henry Hofman, William H. Reid, George Shade, George W. Parker; A. G. Switzer, Henry Barkoefer, A. P. Johnson, John Hellenkamp Franz Blatzig, Fleming Bates and Richard Jones, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected, tried and sworn the matters in controversy well
---
**Viewer Page 125** (rcdbook1858_27_0124.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 121
and truly to try, the trial of this cause progressed, and now being finished the Jurror aforesaid upon their oath aforesaid find the issue soined in favor of the said defendant. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said defendant go hence without Day and recover of said plaintiff this costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Henry Pike vs Antoine Michael and James W. Roberts**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of eleven hundred and twenty five dollars and twenty-three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Frederick Buschman vs Richard Ivers and Joseph Magehan**
Now at this day come again the said parties by their respective attorneys and the Jury empannelled and [scoorn ?] herein also Come, and the trial of this cause being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issue joined in favor of said plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of one cent. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the damages aforesaid in form aforesaid as found by the Jury and his Costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**In the matter of the application of John Ruedi**
The Court having duly heard and considered the application of John Ruedi, for an order on the Sheriff to stay further proceedings under the execution issued at the last term of this Court in favor of one Carl Wittig and against said defendant John Ruedi for the sum of Two-hundred and ten dollars, It doth, therefore, order that James Castello, Esquire, Sheriff of the County of Saint Louis, be, and his servants, agents and attorneys are hereby restrained from further proceeding under said execution, as aforesaid, until the further order of this Court. The petitioner files a bond, conditioned according to law, in the sum of Four hundred Dollars, which is approved by the Court.
**Eliza Balz vs Frederick Balz**
Divorce.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by her attorney, an on his motion this cause is submitted to the Court upon the petition and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same such proofs and being satisfied from such proofs that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, It doth, consider, adjudge and decree that said plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with said defendant and restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. And it appearing to the Court that the said defendant from his habits and course of life is an unsuitable person to have the care, custody and control of the infant child mentioned in the petition, who is of tender years, It is, therefore, further considered that the said plaintiff have the care, custody and maintenance of the said child, and that said defendant be restrained and enjoined from interfereing with the plaintiff in this behalf, until the further order of this Court. It is further ordered that said plaintiff pay the costs of this proceeding and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 126** (rcdbook1858_27_0125.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 122
**February Term 1858**
**Louise Ekel vs Joseph Ekel**
Divorce.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by her attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and solemnly called, comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff by her attorney, it is ordered by the Court that her petition be taken against said defendant as confessed. The plaintiff waiving a Jury, this cause is submitted to the Court upon the petition and proofs, And the Court having proceeded to hear such proofs, and being satisfied therefore that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, it is, therefore considered adjudged And decreed that said plaintiff be absolutely and for ever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with said defendant and that she he restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. It is, further considered by the Court that said plaintiff pay the costs and charges of this proceeding and that execution issue therefor.
**R. Barbara Koch vs Andreas Koch**
Divorce.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by her attorney, but said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, in motion of said plaintiff by her attorney this cause is submitted to the Court upon the petition and proofs, And the Count having proceeded to hear the testimony in this cause, and having been satisfied from such testimony that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, it doth consider, adjudge and decree that said plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with said defendant and that she be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. And it is further considered by the Court that said plaintiff pay the costs of this proceeding and that execution issue therefor.
**Lorenzo P. Sanger vs Daniel D. Page et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of the defendants to the petition of said plaintiff and being thereof fully advised, it doth order that the same be sustained. Leave is given the said plaintiff to file an amended petition herein.
**Frederick Buschman vs Richard Ivers et al**
Motion for non trial filed.
**William Russill vs Syluester H. Laflin**
The defendant files an answer herein.
**Robert Bayle vs John Cowan**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 127** (rcdbook1858_27_0126.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 123
**Thomas Boylan and Wm P. Gettys vs Washington West and John L. Harbinson**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and fifty three Dollars and seventy four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Shendan C. Hunt and James R. Wiseman vs Robert Cartan and Denm's Fennisey**
On Account.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants although duly notified and called come not, but make default. Wherefore, on motion of plaintiffs by their attorney this cause is submitted to the Court upon the petition, exhibits and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth assess the damages sustained by said plaintiffs by reason of the premises in their petition stated at the sum of One hundred and eighty five dollars and eighty-eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that Said plaintiffs recover of said defendants to the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Oliver Quinette vs Charles J. Carpenter**
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default and it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it doth order that the petition of Said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed; And this cause being submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, it doth find from such proofs that said Defendant is indebted to said plaintiff, and assess his damages by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of One-Thousand Three hundred and thirty-two dollars and seventy five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Adam Hammer vs George Schneider**
Change of Venue.- Now at this day comes the defendant George Schneider and files an affidavit, stating that the plaintiff in this cause has undue influence over the mind of the Judge of this Court It is, therefore, ordered that a change of venue be awarded to him, and that the Clerk of this Court immediately make out a full transcript of the record and proceedings together with all the original papers in this cause, and transmit the same duly certified to the Clerk of the Saint Louis Court of Common Oleas.
**J. Cunningham vs James Pawers exr & c**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said defendant to rule the plaintiff for security for costs, and being thereof fully advised, doth order that said motion be sustained.
**Edward Cunningham vs Patrick Sullivan, Exr & c**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said defendant for security for costs herein, doth order that said motion be sustained.
---
**Viewer Page 128** (rcdbook1858_27_0127.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 124
**February Term 1858**
**James Clark vs Lachariah T. Caffin**
Attachment.- Order of Publication.- On motion of the plaintiff, it is ordered that the defendant be notified that a civil action been commenced against him for the sum of Four hundred and thirty seven dollars and twelve cents, on account of a promissory note executed by the said defendant and delivered to plaintiff and that his property has been attached; and unless he appear at the next term of this Court, to be begun and held at the City of Saint Louis, within and for the County of Saint Louis, on the first Monday of October next, and on or before the third day thereof answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, Judgment will be rendered against him, and his property sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed in the City of Saint Louis.
**Frank Rogers et al vs Charles Lamb**
Motion for new trial filed.
**George Shaffner vs The City of Saint Louis**
The defendant files an answer herein.
**George Gass et al vs H. R. Merritt et al**
The defendants file an answer herein
**Saint Louis Car Wheel Factory vs John Lowry**
Publication filed.
**John L. Harbinson et al vs Solomon J. Lettlefield**
On Account. Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: Harman Diefinbrune, Henry Holeman, William H. Reid George Shade, A. G. Switzer, George W. Parker, Henry Barkoefer, A. P. Johnson, John Hellen Kamt, Franz Rlatzig, Fleming Bates and Richard Jones, twelve good and Lawful men, who being duly elected, tried and seven, the matters in controversy well and truly to try the trial of this cause progressed, but now being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid, retire to consult of their verdict.
**Albert De Shacke vs Philip Klein**
It is ordered by the Court that this cause be continued until the next term of the Court, at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Francis W. Crane vs James Hewitt et al**
Ordered by the Court that this cause be continued until the next term of the Court.
**John T. Chamberlain vs Julin M. Chamberlain**
Dismissal.- No one appearing to prosecute this suit, it is ordered by the Count that it be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 129** (rcdbook1858_27_0128.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 125
**Milton W. M Lean's administrator James B. Ricords vs Henry Brundy**
Dismissal.-
No one appearing to prosecute this action, it is ordered by the Court that the said cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Lorenzo P. Sanger, William D. Sanger James G. Sanger, Hugh A. Clark Hart L. Stewart, Wilson King and Irwin Camp vs Henry Harber**
Dismissal
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiffs and that Execution issue therefor.
**James C. Rainey vs Michael Burk et al**
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be continued until the next term of the Court, as on affidavit of said plaintiff, at his costs and that execution issue therefor.
**Engene Jacoard vs Alexander M. Mitchell**
Ordered by the Court that this cause be continued until the next term of the Court.
**Thomas Walsh vs Robert Cartan and Denms Fennessy**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Charles C. Whittelsey admr de bonis non of Thomas F. Smith, de [e l ?] vs Tullia C. Beckwith, admx & c**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said defendants to compel the plaintiff to file an amended petition herein, and being thereof fully advised doth order that said motion be overruled. Leave is given said defendants to file an answer in this cause.
**Patrick Hogan vs Joseph K. Bent**
The plaintiff comes and files security for costs herein.
**John R. Gill vs George King**
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the Judgment of dismissal heretofore rendered in this cause be, and the Same is hereby set aside, upon the plaintiffs paying all the costs which has accrued in this cause.
---
**Viewer Page 130** (rcdbook1858_27_0129.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 126
**Feby Term 1858**
**Francis Otts Stephan vs 114Oct'56 Amani Louise Stephan**
Divorce.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although duly notified and called comes not, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney this cause is submitted to the Court, and the Court having proceeded to hear the testimony in said cause, and having been satisfied from such testimony that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, it doth consider, adjudge and decree that said plaintiff be absolutely and for ever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by him contracted with said defendant, and that he be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. And it is further considered by the Court that said plaintiff pay the costs of this proceeding and that execution issue therefor.
**Solomon Smith vs George W. Thatcher gar & c**
Interragatories field.
**Job. T. Doan et al vs John McFee**
The Plaintiffs file proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication heretofore made in this cause has been duly published according to law.
**John L. Harbinson and Francis B. Atherton vs Solomon J. Littlefield**
Now at this day comes again said parties by their respective attorneys and the Jury sworn and empannelled herein also come and the trial of this cause progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issue joined in favor of said plaintiffs and assess their damages at the sum of Nine hundred and forty nine dollars and two cents It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**The Citizens Savings Institution vs Genge W. Thatcher gar & c**
Interrogatories filed.
**James C. Page vs George W. Thatcher gar & c**
Interrogatories filed.
**Harvey H. Humphrey vs James Castells**
Now at this day comes G. McMurtry administrator of the said Harvey H. Humphrey, deceased, and files his appearance as party plaintiff in this behalf. Thereupon this cause is continued
**Louis L. Freligh vs Joseph W. Ames et al**
Answer filed.
---
**Viewer Page 131** (rcdbook1858_27_0130.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 127
**Griffin P. Theobold, William Cook and James K. B. Rice vs Saint Louis Lumbermen and Mechanics Insurance Company**
Now at this day comes the said defendant by its attorney, but the said plaintiffs although solemnly called come not, Wherefore, on motion of the said defendant by its attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the said plaintiff be nonsuited. It is, therefore considered by the Court that said defendant go hence without day and recover of the said plaintiffs its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Thomas M. Taylor and Osear W. Collet vs George W. Moriis, George Rockwell Augustus P. Guibert and J. A. Inslee**
On Bill of Exchange.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of seven hundred and twenty six dollars and twenty eight cents. it is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Thomas Skinker vs Robert W. Hunt**
Confession of Judgment. Now at this Day comes the said defendant and files a statement in writing, duly verified by affidavit whereby he confesses himself indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Thirteen hundred and fifty-six Dollars and thirty four cents, and consents and agrees that Judgment may be rendered against him for that sum and in favor of said plaintiff. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and Charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**George W. Thomas et al vs Jules C. Kingsbury**
Motion to quash Sheriffi return filed.
**Justus Finch vs James Tarleton et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said defendants for security for costs herein and being thereof fully and sufficiently advised, doth order that said motion be sustained. Leave is given said plaintiff to file said security for costs, within ten days from this date.
**William W. Walker vs Daniel T. Rawlings**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Hall R. Jackson vs Nathan C. Corington**
By consent of parties, this cause is continued, until the next term of the Court.
**Anna Buckoltz vs Theodore Backoltz**
Dimissal.- No one appearing to prosecute this cause, it is ordered by the Court that the same be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 132** (rcdbook1858_27_0131.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 128
**February Term 1858**
**Job. T. Doun and John H Farrell vs John McFee**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendant although duly notified and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney this cause is submitted to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of One Thousand, Two hundred and ninety one and sixty one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**James C. Walker vs George G. Presbury**
On Land Warrant. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and consent and agree that Judgment may be rendered in favor of said plaintiff and against said defendant for the sum of Two hundred and thirty one dollars and eighty one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as agreed upon and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Melvin L. Gray, Josiah H. Obear administrators of Wm vs F. Kent, died vs John W. Carroll and Alonzs W. Nason**
Confession of Judgment. Now at this day come the defendants and file a written statement duly verified by affidavit, whereby they confess themselves indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Three Thousand seven hundred and twelve dollars and ninety three cents, and consents and agrees that Judgment may be rendered against them for that sum and in favor of said plaintiffs. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John P. Gould et al vs Trowbridge and Priest**
It is ordered by the Court that this cause be continued, on the affidavit of said defendants, until the next term of the Court, at their costs, and that execution issue therefor
**Robert Stevens vs Brainard Million et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said defendants for security for costs, and being thereof fully advised, doth order that said motion be sustained; and it is further ordered that unless said said security is filed within ten days from this date, the said cause will stand dismissed.
[A ?]300[- ?]
[Doms ?]
**Patrick Hogan vs Joseph K. Bent**
Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury to wit: Herman Diefenbrune, Henry Holeman, William Reid, George Shade, George W. Parker A. G. Switzer, Henry Barkeofer, Frunz Blatzeg, John Hellenkent, Flaming Bates, Richard Jvers and A. P. Johnson, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected, tried and sworn the matter in controversy well and truly to try, the [al ?] trial of this cause progressed and being concluded the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths
---
**Viewer Page 133** (rcdbook1858_27_0132.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 129
aforesaid find the issue joined in favor of said plaintiff and assess his damages by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of Three hundred dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found by the Jury and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**James R. Smith vs E. G. Tuttle**
Dismissal.- On motion of the said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue thereof.
**William V. N. Bay, trustee of Flora Byrne vs Joseph Wescott and Corneluis D. Sullivan**
Now at this day come the said parties by respective attorney and thereupon come a Jury to wit. Anton Farrell, Peter Gomash, W. Guion, Nicholas Spond, Michel Pourcelli David Anderson, Bernard Speickerman, P. B. Drickson John Rippy, Jacob Joeffry, John B. Langenoth, Edward Mitchell, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected, tried and sworn the matters in controversy well and truly to try, the trial of this cause progressed and being finished, the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issue in favor of said plaintiff and assess his damages by reason of the premises in his petition mentioned at the sum of One hundred and forty three dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed by the Jury and his costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.
**Theodore Wolff and Sebastian Engert vs Peter Reinhart**
Confession of Judgment. Now at this day comes the said defendant and files a statement duly verified by affidavit, whereby he confesses himself indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Eight Thousand, Two hundred and ninety three dollars and fifty-two cents. It is, therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and their costs And charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Joseph Farrell vs William A. Lee and Thomas J. Broadwell**
Dismissal.-
On motion of the said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 134** (rcdbook1858_27_0133.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 130
**February Term 1858**
**Andrew J. Coons vs Isaac W. Taylor et al**
Answer filed
**Edward Pate vs George D Moore**
Depositions on the part of the defendant filed.
**James Patterson vs Maria Patterson**
Divorce.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly notified and called comes not, Wherefore on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney this cause is submitted to the Court upon the petition and proofs and the Court being satisfied from such proofs that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, it doth consider adjudge and decree, that said plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by him contracted with said defendant, and restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. It is, further adjudged by the Court that said plaintiff pay the costs of this proceeding and that execution issue therefor.
**Nicholas Schaeffer et al vs John Nevison**
The plaintiffs come and file proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication heretofore made in this behalf has been duly published, according to law.
**Susan Walker vs C. P. Mallory**
The defendant files an answer herein.
**Lorenzo P. Sanger vs Daniel D. Page et al**
The plaintiff files an amended petition herein.
**Isaac Lamaster vs The Wood Boat Hardin**
The plaintiff files an amended petition herein.
**Augustus F. Shapleigh vs John Sigerson and Anapias Rice**
On Note.- Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys, and neither party requiring a Jury this cause is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three-Thousand, seven hundred and sixty seven dollars and forty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution. It is further ordered by the Court that said Judgment been interest at the rate of ten percent until paid.
---
**Viewer Page 135** (rcdbook1858_27_0134.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 131
**Newton S. Gay and George Gay vs Milford Smith**
On Account.- Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: John H. Garnhard, Henry Harting, Frederick Berg, Joseph Rippy Reinhart Baese, Edward Coffee, John Buschmann, Frederick Stendeman, Orlands Fish, Joseph Walenfechtler, Nelson Tindal and James Dickey twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected, tried and sworn well and truly to try the matters in controversy, the Trial of this cause progressed and not being finished is laid over until to morrow morning at Ten O. Clock
**Sarah L. Mortimer by her next friend George Lewis vs Richard R. Mortimer**
Divorce.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by her attorney, but the said defendant although solemnly called comes not, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff by her attorney, this cause is submitted to the Court, and the Court having proceeded to hear the testimony in said cause and having been satisfied from such testimony that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, It doth consider, adjudge and decree that said plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with said defendant and that she be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person And it is further considered by the Court that said plaintiff pay the costs of this proceeding and that execution issue therefor.
**Phebe Brondley vs Samuel Brondley**
The plaintiff files proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication heretofore made in this cause has been duly published according to law. Thereupon comes the plaintiff by her attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore the petition is taken against him as confessed.
**State to use, of Abram Inslee vs August Reipschlaeger, Frank Thias, Henry Langing and Hem's Th: Wilde**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said defendants to suppress the depositions of Stephen D. Gould and Ezra Gould, filed herein, in behalf of said plaintiff and being thereof fully advised, it doth order that said motion be sustained. Thereupon come the said parties by their respective attorneys and and thereupon also come a Jury to wit: James Quickley, Josiah Alkire, C. W. Anderson John Bugg, Richard Landy, Benjamin Philebert, D. O'Brien, John Grosbert, Josiah Hlzinger W. W. C. Perry and Charles Haren, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the matters in controversy well and truly to try, the trial of this cause progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issue joined in favor of said plaintiff and assess his damages at the Sum of Two hundred and sixty one dollars and twenty cents. It is, therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 136** (rcdbook1858_27_0135.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 132
**February Term 1858**
**Samuel McCartney vs John J. Anderson, gar of Joseph W. Clark et al**
On motion of the said garnishees herein, it is ordered by the Court that they be discharged hence, at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor. The sum of Ten dollars is allowed said garnishees for filing answer herein.
**William T. Hazard vs Lyman Scott et al**
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that the time for filing an answer herein on the part of the said defendant Lyman Scott be extended until the tenth day of May. next.
**Sarah A. Smith vs William C. B. Smith**
Dismissal.- On motion of the said plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
[A ?]2600
[A ?]1165.
[A ?]710.25
[A ?]1747.40.
**William Barnhill and James M. Brush vs Waldo Marsh William H. Ewing and William Dilworth vs Waldo Marsh Robert E. Sellers and Egbert S. Weaver vs Waldo Marsh James Rees vs Waldo Marsh**
Foreclosure of mortgage.
This day comes Waldo Marsh and voluntarily enters his appearance as defendant and files his answer herein. And neither party requiring a Jury submit this cause with all the matters in the said petition and answer set forth to the Court for Judgment thereon. And the Court being fully advised of and concerning the premises doth find that the statements in the said petition, are true, and that the said mortgage was executed in the manner and for the purposes therein set-forth. And the Court doth further find that there is now due to James Rees the sum of seventeen hundred and forty seven dollars and forty cents; that there is now due William Barnhill and James M. Brush the sum of twenty six hundred dollars; that there is now due William H Ewing and William Dilworth the sum of eleven hundred dollars and sixty five cents; that there is now due Robert E. Jellers and Egbett S. Weaver the sum of seven hundred and ten dollars and twenty five cents. It is, therefore, considered that the plaintiff James Rees recover of the said defendant Waldo Marsh the sum of seventeen hundred and forty seven dollars and forty cents, together with his costs and charges in this behalf expended. It is further considered that the said plaintiffs William Barnhill and James M. Brush recover of the said defendant Waldo Marsh the sum of Twenty six hundred Dollars, together with their costs and charges herein expended. It is further considered that William H. Ewing and William Dilworth recover of the said defendant Waldo Marsh the sum of eleven hundred dollars and sixty five cents together with their costs and charges herein expended. It is further considered that Robert E. Sellers and Egbert S. Weaver recover of said defendant Waldo Marsh the sum of seven hundred and ten dollars and twenty-five cents. It is further ordered and decreed by the Court that the said plaintiffs above named respectively recover of the said defendant the said several amounts recovered as aforesaid together with their costs and charges in this behalf to be levied of the mortgaged property in the said mortgage and petition described, to wit: The Steam Boat Ocean Spray ``together with her furniture, apparel, tacked & c And if the said mortgaged property be not sufficient to. satisfy said debt, damages and costs, then the residue to be levied of other goods, chattels, lands and tenements of the said defendant Waldo Warsh.
---
**Viewer Page 137** (rcdbook1858_27_0136.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 133
**Edward Pate vs George D. Moore**
Deposition filed on the part of said plaintiff.
**Peter O. D. Byrne vs R. A. Masterson and James A. Maginnis**
Dismissal.-
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Newton S. Gay and George Gay vs Mipford Smith**
Now at this come again said parties by their respective attorneys and thereupon come also the Jury sworn and empannelled herein and the trial of this cause progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issue joined in favor of the said defendant. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said defendant go hence without day and recover of said plaintiffs his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**George Pomeroy et al vs no 188 William Wade et al**
Answer of E. G. Frost, filed.
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs no 383 William Wade et al**
Answer of D. M. Frost and wife filed.
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs (No 382) William Wade et al**
Answer of D. M. Frost and wife. filed.
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs (no 384) Wm Wade et al**
Answer of D. M. Frost and wife, filed.
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs (no 386) William Wade et al**
Answer of D. M. Frost and wife filed.
**George Pomeroy et al vs (no 143) William Wade et al**
Answer of D. G. Frost filed.
---
**Viewer Page 138** (rcdbook1858_27_0137.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 134
**February Term 1858**
**Henry McElroy vs William Wade et al**
Answer of D. M. Frist and wife, filed.
**In the matter of the assignment of Tourville and Leoni**
On motion of the assignee, it is ordered that Werbert Forster and Wilhelm Roemheld he, and they are hereby appointed to appraise the property, estate and effect assigned
**The State Savings Institution vs Graff and Hammerstein**
Demurrer to set-off filed.
**James H. Lucas, Henry L. Patterson, Henry S. Turner Robert N. Nisbet and William J. Sherman vs David R. Risley**
On Bill of Exchange. Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore on motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, this cause is submitted to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three hundred and eighty dollars and thirty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
**Frederick Biebusch vs Henry Bussmeyer**
Dismissal.-
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Simon Abeles vs Wilson Henley et al**
Now at at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: Benjamin M. Bunyan, James Quickley, C. W. Anderson, John Burg, Richard Lundy Benjamin Philibert, D. O. Brien, John Engbert, Josiah Holzinger W. C. Perry, Charles Haren and Josiah Alkier, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected, tried and sworn the matters in controversy well and truly to try, the trial of this cause progressed, but not being concluded is laid over until to-morrow morning at Ten O Clock.
**Carsbine Betzold vs George F. Betzold**
Slader.- Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys, and the said defendant withdraws the answer filed by him; and thereupon it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, on motion of said plaintiff by her attorney, it is ordered by the Court that her petition be taken against said defendant as confessed. Thereupon, on motion of the plaintiff come a Jury, to wit: John O: Garnhardt, James Supple, James Quickley, Henry Hartwig, Frederick Berg, Joseph Rippy, J. B. Featherstone, Reinhart Boese, Edward Coffie John Buchaman Fred Steudeman, Orlanda fish twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to assess the damages of
---
**Viewer Page 139** (rcdbook1858_27_0138.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 135
said plaintiff, the trial of this cause progressed and being finished the Juros aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid, [assesso ?] the damages sustained by said plaintiff by reason of the premises in her petition stated at the sum of Five hundred Dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed by the Jury and her costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**In the matter of the application of James Castello**
Substitution of Trustee.
It appearing to the Court from the statement of James Castello, duly verified by affidavit, that John H. Watson, trustee in a certain deed of trust executed by Francis P. Blair, and acknowledged, July 17th. 1858. which said deed is recorded in the Recorder's Office of said County in Book 192. page 420., hath departed this life, without having completed the performance of the duties imposed upon him by the said deed of trust, It is, therefore, ordered by the Court that James Castello, Eog. Sheriff of Saint Louis County, be and he is hereby appointed and substituted trustee in place of said John H. Watson, deceased, with the like trusts and powers, according to the Statute in such Case made and provided.
**Maria Boyland vs Wilson Boyland**
Divorce- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her attorney, but the said defendant although solemnly called comes not, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff by her attorney this cause is submitted to the Court, and the Court having proceeded to hear the testimony in this cause, and having been satisfied by such testimony that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, it doth consider, adjudge and decree that said plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with said defendant and that she be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. It is further considered that said plaintiff pay the costs and charges of this proceeding and that execution issue therefor.
**Catharine Seiler by her next friend William H. Cols vs Jacob Seiler**
Divorce.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her attorney, but the said defendant although duly [& ?] solemnly called comes not, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff by her attorney this cause is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having proceeded to hear the testimony in said cause and having been satisfied from such testimony that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, It doth consider, adjudge and decree that said plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with said defendant, and that she be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. it is further considered by the Court that said plaintiff pay the costs of this proceeding and that Execution issue therefor.
**Emiston McClelland vs Stephen M. Whitehouse Warner W. Oglesby and John Whitehouse**
Order of Publication and Alias writ of Attachment. the Sheriff having made return that the said defendants cannot be found and the Court being satisfied that said defendants cannot be served with process, it is, on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney ordered that said defendants be notified of the commencement
---
**Viewer Page 140** (rcdbook1858_27_0139.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 136
**February Term 1858**
of this suit, the object of which is to recover of said defendants the sum of Four Thousand, one hundred and twenty four Dollars and twenty nine cents. on account of a bill of exchange executed by the defendants, and for the said sum, and unless they be and appear at the next term of the Court to he begun and held at the City of Saint Louis on the First Monday of October next, and on or before the third day thereof answer the petition of said plaintiff the same will be taken against them as confessed, Judgment rendered against them, and the property attached at the commencement of this suit as belonging to the defendants will be sold to satisfy the said sum, interest and costs. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof he published according to law, in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed in the City of Saint Louis, It is further ordered by the Court that an alias writ of attachment issue herein returnable to the next term of the Court.
**The Saint Louis Building Savings Institution vs Thomas D. Gage, James L. Gage and Joshua Fine**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said plaintiff to strike out the answer of said defendants and being thereof fully and sufficiently advised doth order that said motion be and the same is hereby overruled.
**Lyman Patchin vs William Sillcott**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of said defendant to the petition of said plaintiff and being thereof fully advised, it doth order that the same be overruled.
---
**Viewer Page 141** (rcdbook1858_27_0140.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 137
**Charles C. Whittelsey administrator de bonis non of Thomas F. Smith, deceased vs Tullen C. Beckwith administratrix of Frederick W. Beckwith, deceased, Marshall Brotherton, Executor of Rine Paiel deceased, David Thomas, Joseph H. Garrett administrator of Joseph Garrett deceased, James M. Bucklin and Walter H. Dorseth**
Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys, and neither party requiring a Jury, this cause is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered such proofs and being thereof fully advised, doth find the issue joined in favor of said defendants. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that the defendants go hence without day and recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their Costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Simon Abeles vs Wilson Henby and Joseph L. Papin**
Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and the Jury empannelled and sworn herein also come and the trial of this cause being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issue joined in favor of said plaintiff and assess his damages by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of Five hundred Dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed by the Jury and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Charles Jeffies vs D. D. Denton et al**
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be continued until the next term of the Court, as on the affidavit of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor
**John Levin vs James Castello**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of the said defendant for additional security upon the bond for the delivery of the property mentioned in the plaintiffs petition, and being thereof fully advised, it doth order that said motion be overruled.
**John Levin vs Layman W. Patchin**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of the said defendant for additional security upon the bond for the delivery of the property mentioned in the plaintiffs petition, and being thereof fully advised, doth order that said motion be overruled.
**Louisa L. Freligh vs Joseph W. Ames et al**
Demurrer filed.
**State of Missouri, to use of Inslee vs August Reipschlaeger et al**
Motion for new trial filed.
---
**Viewer Page 142** (rcdbook1858_27_0141.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 138
**Louis A. Willard vs (no 211) Miles G. Moris et al**
By leave of Court the exhibit sued on in this cause is withdrawn, and a copy is left therefor.
**Louis A. Willard vs (No 850) Miles G. Moris et al**
By leave of Court the exhibits sued on in this cause is withdrawn, and a copy is left therefor.
**Andrew T. Short vs James Castello**
Now at this day comes the defendant by his attorney and the Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said defendant to set aside the Judgment by default heretofore rendered against him, and being thereof fully advised, it doth order that said motion be overruled. Thereupon this cause is submitted to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth assess the damages of said plaintiff by reason of the premises in the petition stated at the sum of It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended. This Judgment is erroneously rendered, the cause having been tried by a Jury and not by the Court as is herein stated, and is, therefore set aside.
**Andrew T. Short vs James Castello**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of the said defendant to set aside the Judgment by default rendered in this cause and being thereof fully advised, it doth order that the same be overruled. Thereupon come the said parties and also a Jury, to wit: James Castello, John H. Garnhart, Henry Hartwig, Frederick Berg, Joseph Rippy, Reinhard Boese Edward Coffie, John Buchanan, Frederick Studeman, Orlenda Fish, Joseph [Walesfechtter ?], Nelson Tindall and Richard Landy, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected, tried and sworn, the matters in controversy well and truly to try, the trial of this cause progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid, assess the damages sustained by the plaintiff by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of Two-hundred and eighty seven dollars and forty seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 143** (rcdbook1858_27_0142.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 139
**Solomon Smith vs Alfred M. Waterman**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said defendant Waterman to strike out part of the affidavit of said plaintiff upon which the attachment herein was issued, and being thereof fully advised, it doth order that the same be sustained.
**The Citizens Savings Institution vs A. M. Watermann et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said defendant Waterman, to strike out part of the affidavit of said plaintiff, upon which the attachment herein was issued and being thereof fully advised, doth order that said motion be and the same is hereby sustained.
**James C. Page vs Alfred M. Waterman et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said defendant to strike out part of the affidavit of said plaintiff upon which the attachment was issued and being thereof fully advised, doth order that the same be sustained.
**John B. Muroe vs Charles S. Barnard William D. W. Barnard and Budolph Adams**
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not but make default. Wherefore the petition of said plaintiff is taken against them as confessed.
**John B. Muroe vs Charles S. Barnard William D. W. Barnard and Rudolph Adams**
Dismissal.
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
[A ?]2202.92.
Dams.
**John Scott, Clinghan Scott and William C. Scott vs Thomas M. Caldwell, James F. Cummings and John C. Coldwell, partners & c**
On Account. Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants although duly notified and called come not, Wherefore, Wherefore on motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the plaintiffs waiving a Jury this cause is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs; and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth assess the damages of said plaintiffs, by reason of the premises in their petition stated at the sum of Five-Thousand-two hundred and two dollars and ninety-two Cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have therefor execution.
**Inluis H. Gerhardt vs Charles Marlon**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 144** (rcdbook1858_27_0143.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 140
**Mary F. Beller vs Francis Beller**
Divorce.- Now, at this day comes the said plaintiff by her attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and solemnly called comes not Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff by her attorney, it is ordered by the Court that her petition be taken against him as confessed; and the Court having proceeded to hear the testimony in this cause and having been satisfied from such proofs that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, It doth, consider adjudge and decree that said plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with said defendant and restored to all her rights and privileges of an unmarried person. It is further considered adjudged and decreed that said plaintiff be restored to her maiden name and that all the property which she possessed before and at the time of her marriage, be restored to her by the said defendant It is further ordered by the Court that said defendant pay the costs of this proceeding and that execution issue therefor.
**George Pomeroy, William H. Benton and George H. Chase vs William Hassinger, Russell Scarritt and Paris H. Mason**
On Note.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of six hundred and sixty-four dollars and sixty eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Maria C. Grunkemeier vs John Charles Grunkemeier**
Divorced.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by her attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default. Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff it is ordered by the Court that her petition be taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court having proceeded to hear the testimony in this cause, and having been satisfied from such testimony that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, It doth consider, adjudge and decree that said plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with said defendant and that she be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. And it is further considered, adjudged and decreed that said plaintiff be restored to her maiden name. ``Warza C. Westerkamt'' and it is also ordered by the Court that said plaintiff pay the costs of this proceeding and that execution issue therefor.
**The Collir White Lead and Oil Company vs John Keller**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not: but makes default. Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four hundred and eleven dollars and thirty nine cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and that he have execution therefor against the property attached at the commencement of this suit.
---
**Viewer Page 145** (rcdbook1858_27_0144.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 141
**James McGregor and Thomas F. Stewart vs Robert H. Betts[- ?]**
On Note.-
Now at This day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Fourteen Thousand Four hundred and twelve dollars and fourteen cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and Charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Edward Block and Adolph Schlensinger vs Christian Schaffler and Frank Fox**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but said defendant although duly summoned and called come not, but make default. Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three hundred and ninety one dollars and twenty five cents. it is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Albert J. Averill vs Daniel D. Page, Henry D. Bacon, Edward Wyman and Thomas Brown**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the defendant Henry D. Bacon, Thereupon this cause is submitted to the Court and it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Fourteen hundred and twenty eight dollars and eighty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Theodore H. Becker vs Daniel D. Page and Henry D. Bacon**
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said defendant Henry D. Bacon; and it appearing to the Court, there is no answer filed in this cause, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three-hundred and fifty-four Dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of Said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Adam H. Dickbreder vs John Kohler**
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed. Thereupon comes the plaintiff as well as a Jury, to wit: James Supple, James
---
**Viewer Page 146** (rcdbook1858_27_0145.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 142
**February Term 1858**
James Quickley, C. W. Anderson, John Bugg, J. B. Fetherstone, Benjamin Philibert, D. O. Brien, John Groler, Josiah Holzinger, W. W. C. Perry, Charles Haren and Josiah Alkier, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected, tried and sworn well and truly to try the issue joined between the parties aforesaid, the trial of this cause progressed, but not being finished is laid over until to-morrow morning at Ten O. Clock.
**Simon Abeles vs Wilson Henley et al**
Motion for new trial filed.
**Thomas Baylan et al vs Pleasant Devinney et al**
Defendant Beasley files an answer herein.
**John E. Cook vs Pleasant Devinney et al**
Defendant Beasley files an answer herein.
**Frederick Marquard vs Michael [Relter ?]**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of said defendant to the petition of said plaintiff, doth order that the same be overruled. Whereupon comes the plaintiff by his attorney and the defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed.
**Samuel McKee vs Joseph H. White**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of said plaintiff to the defendants amended answer, and being thereof fully advised, it doth order that the same be sustained.
**Benjamin Leiber vs John B. Ganter**
On motion of said plaintiff, it is ordered by the Court that a Commission issue to the State of Pennsylvania, to take depositions of witnesses to be used on the trial of this cause, on the part of said plaintiff.
**James S. Wason et al vs Christian Schaffler et al**
On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney a Commission as awarded to the state of Pennsylvania, to take depositions of witnesses on the part of said plaintiffs.
**George Pomeroy, William H. [Berton ?] and George H. Chase (no 329) vs Washington West, Thomas H. West John J. Anderson and Reuben Anderson**
Dismissal.-
Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore the petition of said plaintiff is taken against them as confessed.
**George Pomeroy, William H. Reuton and George Chase (no 329) vs Washington West, Thomas H. West, John J Anderson and Reuben Anderson**
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor
---
**Viewer Page 147** (rcdbook1858_27_0146.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 143
**William B. Belknap and Morris S. Belknap vs The Breckinridge Cannel Coal Company alias The Breckinridge Coal and Oil Company**
On Draft and Account. Now at this day Come the said plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the Court doth order the plaintiffs petition be taken against it as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find from such proofs that the said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Fourteen hundred and forty-three Dollars and seventy nine cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Samuel B. Allen, Charles H. Allen and Alfred F. Allen vs The Breckinridge Oil and Coal Company**
On Account.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, Wherefore, the Court doth order that the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against Said defendant as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth assess the damages of said plaintiff by reason of the premises in their petition stated at the sum of nine hundred and sixty dollars and thirty Cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Charles H. Dubs vs Thomas Campbell**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of said defendant to the petition of said plaintiff and being thereof fully advised, doth order that said demurrer be sustained. Leave is given said plaintiff to amend his petition within ten days.
**Henry Bohler and George K. Zeigler vs Michael Abrahams**
On Note.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, but said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two hundred and twenty six Dollars and forty-two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid As found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Sebastian Berberick vs The City of Saint Louis**
On account.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, Wherefore the Court doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed; and this cause being submitted to the Court upon the petition and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth assess the damages of said plaintiff at the sum of Thirteen hundred and
---
**Viewer Page 148** (rcdbook1858_27_0147.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 144
forty-three dollars and eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John Kohn vs The City of Saint Louis**
On Account. Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the Court doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed. And this cause being submitted to the Court upon the petition and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, it doth assess the damages of said plaintiff by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of One thousand and twenty dollars and twenty nine cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Peter Fabic vs The City of Saint Louis**
On Account.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court doth assess the damages of said plaintiff by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of Two-thousand and thirty five dollars and thirty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John Steffin vs The City of Saint Louis**
On Account.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore the Court doth order that the plaintiffs petition be taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court doth assess the damages of said plaintiff by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of eleven hundred and sixty-six dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Anton Franz vs Margaret Franz**
Divorce.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff it is ordered by the Court that his petition be taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court having proceeded to hear the testimony in this cause, and having been satisfied by such testimony that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, It doth consider, adjudge and decree that said plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by him contracted with said defendant and that he be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. And it is further considered by the Court that said plaintiff pay the costs and charges of this proceeding and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 149** (rcdbook1858_27_0148.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 145
**Samuel McCartney, Thomas V. Strode and Anaclet L. Lacrix (no 23) vs Joseph W. Clark, Luther C. Clark, Edward Chase, Edward Dodge and Jay Cook**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**Patrick Walsh vs Thomas Walsh**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed At the costs of said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Samuel McCartney, Thomas V. Strode and Anaclet L. Lacroix vs (no 59) Joseph W. Clark, Luther C. Clark, Edward Chase, Edward Dodge and Jay Cook**
Dismissal.
On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**Dexter T. Wales Joseph C. Cabot and Oliver H. Wales vs Cornelius D. Sullivan and Jeremiah T. Sullivan**
Dismissal.
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendants and that execution issue therefor.
**Morris Rosenheim and Martin Collius vs Leopold Fisher**
Dismissal.-
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**Archibald C. Goddin, James T. Johnson Barton S. Wilson and Elisha W. Brown vs John Nevison**
Attachment. Order of Publication.- The Sheriff having made return that the said defendant cannot be found and the Court being satisfied that said defendant cannot be served with process. therefore, on motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered that the defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against him for the sum of Four hundred and fourteen dollars and ninety five cents on account of goods, wares and merchandize sold and delivered by the plaintiffs to the said defendant, and that his property has been attached; and unless he appear at the next term of this Court, to be begun and held at the City of Saint Louis, on the First Monday of October next, and on or before the third day thereof, answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, Judgment will be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed in the City of Saint Louis.
---
**Viewer Page 150** (rcdbook1858_27_0149.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 146
[no content]
---
**Viewer Page 151** (rcdbook1858_27_0150.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 147
**Frederick Marquard vs Michael Reiter**
Now at this day come the said parties by his [respection ?] attorney and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: James Supple, James Quickley, C. W. Anderson, John Bugg, J. B. Featherstone, Benjamin Philibert, John Grobert, Josiah Holzenger, Charles Haren Josiah Alkier, Joseph Walenfechtler, James Dickey, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected, tried and sworn the matters in controversy well and truly to try, the the matters in controversy between the parties aforesaid, the trial of this cause progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find in favor of said plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of Five hundred Dollars. It is, therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed by the Jury and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John F. Maintel, Henry F. Bulte and Mathias Baecker vs John M. Schmitt**
On Note. Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three hundred and thirty eight Dollars and twenty four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Francis Moder vs John H. Singleton**
On Note. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two hundred and five Dollars and fifty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Philip C. Morehead vs The City of Saint Louis**
On Account. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the Court Doth assess the damages of said plaintiff by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of One hundred and thirty dollars and ninety two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 152** (rcdbook1858_27_0151.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 148
**February Term 1858**
**William R. Riddlecome vs The City of Saint Louis**
On Account. Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the Court doth assess the damages of said plaintiff by reason of the premises in his petition stated, at the sum of One hundred and thirty one dollars and seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John Decker vs The City of St Louis**
On Account. Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default: Wherefore, the Court doth assess the damages of said plaintiff by season of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of One hundred and thirty one dollars and thirty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Elias Abrahams vs Michael Abrahams**
On Account. Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the Court doth assess the damages of said plaintiff, by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of Two hundred and sixty eight dollars and forty six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**The State of Missouri, to the use of Eugene Jaccard, Augustus Mermod and Constunt Jaccard vs Henry Myers, Nathaniel C. Myers and Abraham Newmark**
On Penal Bond.- Now at this come the said parties by their respective attorneys and Neither Party requiring a Jury, this cause is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth assess the damages sustained by said plaintiffs by reason of the premises in their petition stated at the sum of One hundred and twenty five dollars and forty six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**George Bender, Theodore Hildewbraudt and Frederick Etzel vs Theodore Cramer**
On Account.- Now at this day come the said: plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not but makes default. Wherefore the Court doth assess the damages of said plaintiff by them sustained by reason of the premises in their petition mentioned at the sum of Two-hundred and three Dollars and thirty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 153** (rcdbook1858_27_0152.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 149
**Adam H. Dickbreder vs John Kohler**
Slander. Now come again said parties by their respective attorneys and the Jury empannelled and sworn herein also come and the trial of this cause being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issue joined in favor of said plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of Five dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Thomas Conran vs Calvin Townsley**
On Account. Now at This day comes the Said plaintiff but the said defendant although duly summoned and Called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore, the Court doth assess the damages sustained by said plaintiff by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of Three hundred and twenty three Dollars and sixteen cents. It is therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff Recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Peter Dow vs The City of Saint Louis**
On Account. Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the Said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default Wherefore, the Court doth assess the damages of said plaintiff by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of Four hundred and fifty three Dollars and fourteen cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said Defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Casper Warms vs The City of Saint Louis**
On Account. Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the Court doth assess the damages sustained by said plaintiff by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of Twelve hundred and thirty eight dollars and forty cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John Simons vs The City of Saint Louis**
On Account.- Now at this day comes Said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the Court doth assess the damages sustained by said plaintiff by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of eight hundred and twenty dollars and eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Stephen Haskell et al vs Andrew A. LeBean et al**
The Defendant Myerson files an answer, by leave of Court.
---
**Viewer Page 154** (rcdbook1858_27_0153.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 150
**February Term 1858**
**John G. Roker, John Boker and Louis Funke vs David H. Evans**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiffs by their attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-Thousand one hundred and seventy six Dollars and ninety one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.
**Louis C. Garnier vs The City Bank of Saint Louis**
On Check.- Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and neither party requiring a Jury, this cause is submitted to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and ninety-three dollars and thirty eight cents. It is, therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof and have thereof execution.
**Henry Blasksley vs Edward S. Wheaton**
On Note. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing a which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and eighty-four dollars and ninety-eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Harrison Williams vs William C. Anderson and Joseph Conn**
On Note.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that cause be dismissed as to the said defendant William C. Anderson; and it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it doth order that said plaintiffs petition be taken against said other defendant as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three hundred and fifty-five dollars and fifty-eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**David Milne vs True Worthy Hoit**
On Account. Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-thousand four hundred and thirty seven dollars and ninety seven cents. It is, therefore, considered
---
**Viewer Page 155** (rcdbook1858_27_0154.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 151
by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**James D. Houseman and Julius H. Smith vs Charles H. Heywood and James Morris**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called come not, but make default. Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of one hundred and sixty two dollars and twenty two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.
**Joseph Farnsworth vs The Terre Haute Alton & St Louis Rail Road Company**
Leave is given the plaintiff to withdraw the note sued on in this cause, upon his leaving a receipt and an attested copy therefor.
**Charles H. Dubs vs Thomas Campbell**
The time for filing an amended petition herein, is, on the application of said plaintiff by his attorney extended twenty five days.
**Thomas Slevin and Charles Slevin vs Nelson Chamblin**
On Notes and Account.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of sixteen hundred and thirteen dollars and sixty three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Thomas Slevin and Charles Slevin vs Samuel Michael and Isaac Michael**
On Note.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called come not, but make default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Fifteen hundred and thirty seven dollars. and sixty seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 156** (rcdbook1858_27_0155.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 152
**February Term 1858**
**Thomas Slevin and Charles Slevin vs Henry Dietrick**
On Account.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the Court doth assess the damages of said plaintiffs by reason of the premises in their petition stated at the sum of Two hundred and forty nine dollars and twenty one cents. It is, therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Thomas Slevin and Charles Slevin vs Augustus Brazean and Samuel A. Brazean**
On Note.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of six hundred and seventy-nine dollars and ninety-three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
**Thomas Slevin and Charles Slevin vs Moses Pfeiffer**
On Account.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore, the Court doth assess the damages sustained by said plaintiffs by reason of the premises in their petition stated at the sum of Three hundred and ninety dollars and fifty six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Thomas Slevin and Charles Slevin vs Gerhard H. Sands and J. H. Fisher**
On Account. Now at this day come said plaintiffs by their attorney, but said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth assess the damages sustained by said plaintiffs by reason of the premises in their petition stated at the sum of eight hundred and forty five dollars and sixty seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
---
**Viewer Page 157** (rcdbook1858_27_0156.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 153
**Quight Durkee et al vs Peter Chouteau Jr et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said defendants to quash the writ issued in this case, and being thereof fully advised, doth order that the same be overruled. The defendants, thereupon, by leave of Court file an answer herein.
**Louisa L. Freligh vs Frederick Pollitz et al**
Amended petition filed by leave of Court.
**William Pitts vs Elijah Cody and John F. Baker**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor. By leave of Court the exhibit said on is withdrawn and a copy is left therefor.
**United States Savings Institution vs Paul Carlin and Henry Gronheim**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said defendant to strike out the name of the said petition and being thereof fully advised, doth order that said motion be overruled. Thereupon, it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, the Court doth, on motion of said plaintiff, order that its petition be taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three hundred And fifteen dollars, It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Martin Maas and Frederick Maas vs Charles Weil and William Meyer**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**Eleanor Erskine Guy vs Henry Ames and Edgar Ames**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of said defendants to the plaintiffs petition and being thereof fully advised, it doth order that said demurrer be sustained, and that the said petition be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 158** (rcdbook1858_27_0157.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 154
**February Term 1858**
**Charles C. Whittelsey admr & c vs Tullin C. Beckwith admr & c**
Motion for new trial filed.
**Joseph Cooper vs Charles Shinkle et al**
Motion to strike out answer filed
**Samuel Jones vs Maurice Steinback**
Exhibit filed.
**Francis Rogers et al vs Charles B. Lamb**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said for a new trial of this cause and being thereof fully advised, it doth order that said motion be sustained.
**James Graham vs Jacob Ingraham**
Dismissal.
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**In the matter of Marianna Krebs**
Habeas Corpus. The Court having duly heard and considered the application of the said Ulrich Krebs for the custody and possession of the said infant Marianna Krebs and being thereof fully advised doth consider that the said Ulrich Krebs from his habits and course of life is an unsuitable person to have the care, custody and control of the said Marianna Krebs, who is of tender years, It is, therefore, ordered, adjuded and decreed that Frederick Wengler have the care custody and maintenance of the said infant, and that said Ulrich Krebs be restrained and enjoined from interfering with the [/ ?] said Wengler in this behalf until the further order of this Court.
**Dewitt Van Evard et al vs Rudolph Ulrici gar & c**
Denial of answer of garnishee filed. And Motion to strike out same filed
---
**Viewer Page 159** (rcdbook1858_27_0158.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 155
**John C. Powell vs Anapias Riceand John Sigerson**
Now at this day come Thomas Marshall and George B. Sanderson, the assignees of the Judgment in this case, and enter full and entire satisfaction of the Judgment obtained by said plaintiff against said defendants.
**John K. Brettelle vs Patrick Molloy**
Order of Replevin.
The plaintiff comes and files A statement in writing, duly verified by affidavit claiming the possession of certain personal property therein described, wherefore it is ordered that the defendant deliver the property specified in the petition to the Sheriff of Saint Louis County, and said Sheriff is hereby directed if said property to not delivered to him, to take it from the defendant and deliver it to the plaintiff.
**Stephen Hayt vs Henry Harmson gar & c**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of the said garnishee to be discharged hence, and being thereof fully advised, doth consider that the same be overruled.
**Jacob Hosteller et al vs Benjamin A. Albright et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of said defendants to the petition of said plaintiffs and being thereof fully advised, doth order that the same he overruled.
**Jacob Hosteller et al vs Edward W. Williams et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of said defendants to the petition of said plaintiffs and being thereof fully advised, doth order that the same be overruled.
**William T. Smith vs Joseph Mogridge et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said defendants to set aside the Judgment of nonsuit herein, and being thereof fully advised doth order that the same be sustained.
**The State of Missouri at the relation of George Kyler vs Benjamin Farrar**
On application of Charles G. Mauro, Circuit Attorney, leave is given him to file an information in the nature of a quo-warranto, returnable to the first Monday in april next.
**Patrick Fitzgerrald vs Saint Louis Alton and Chicago Rail Road Company**
Motion for security For costs filed.
**Ferdinand Meyer et al vs Peter Reinhart et al**
On motion of plaintiffs leave is given them to withdraw the exhibit said on; and an attested copy is left therefor
---
**Viewer Page 160** (rcdbook1858_27_0159.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 156
**February Term 1858**
**John P. Schenck vs Timothy Ives**
Dismissal.- On motion, and by consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendant and that execution issue therefor.
**William B. Betts vs Richard Disfenbach**
Depositions on the part of the defendant filed.
**Daniel Ryan vs Roger C. McAllister**
Depositions on part of plaintiff filed.
**John Hughes vs J. H. Crane**
Now at this day comes the said parties by their respective attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: William P. Cowels, John Hoelker, Samuel Pilkington, T. Slevin, John F. Hostedt, Joseph Nolte, William R. Hynes, S. M. Gray, John Simon, R. L. Garvin, William Wasterbrock and Michael S. Cerre, twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected, tried and sworn well and truly to try the matters in controversy, the trial of this cause progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issue joined in favor of said defendant. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said defendant go hence and recover his costs and charges herein expended of the said plaintiff and have thereof execution.
**Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company vs Francis H. Munter**
Dismissal.- By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendant and that execution issue therefor.
**The State of Missouri to use of H. Stemp vs Chester W. Pomeroy et al**
It is ordered by the Court that this cause he continued, on the affidavit of said defendant, at his costs and that execution issue therefor.
**Herman Schroeder vs John W. Schoerff et al**
Continued by consent.
**Abraham Goldsmith vs Adams Express Company**
Continued by consent.
**Andrew Thorp et al vs John Baker**
On motion of said plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that an alias writ of summons issue herein, returnable to the next term of the Court.
---
**Viewer Page 161** (rcdbook1858_27_0160.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 157
**The Keokuck Packet Company vs The Steam Boot W. S. Nelson**
Continued by consent.
**Patrick Fitzgerrald vs Saint Louis Alton and Chicago R. R. Company**
Continued at the costs of the plaintiff with leave to amend.
**Iulia M. Guitar vs Henry Guitar**
On motion of the plaintiff by her attorney it is ordered by the Court that an alias writ issue herein returnable to the next term of the Court.
**George E. Madden vs Louisa Madden**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendant and that execution issue therefor.
**Charles Pearson vs John Marrin**
Continued.
**Patrick Barret vs Lieat Weed et al**
It is ordered by the Court that this cause be continued until the next term of the Court.
**Samuel Howison vs Thomas L. Rives**
Continued.
**Darton Garnee vs W. W. Chappelear**
Continued.
**The Dollar Savings Institution vs John A. W. Williams et al**
Continued.
---
**Viewer Page 162** (rcdbook1858_27_0161.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 158
**Louis A. Benvist et al vs John G. Biyan**
Motion to set aside Judgment filed.
**John K. Brettelle vs Patrick Molloy**
Motion for order on plaintiff to file additional bond filed
**The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain R. R. Company vs Anthony H. Menkins and Bernard Menkins**
Dismissaal.
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendants and that execution issue therefor.
**The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain R. R. Company vs Richard P. Barada**
Dismissal. By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Raid Road Co vs Inlein Gamache**
Continued by consent.
**Francis Beeler vs John McFaul**
On motion of said defendant a Commission is awarded him to take depositions of witnesses in the State of Indiana. to be used on the trial of this cause, on the part of said defendant.
**Thomas M. Taylor et al vs George W. Morris et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said plaintiff for Judgment upon the answer of said defendants, and being thereof fully advised, it doth order that said motion be overruled
**Dwight Durkee et al vs Pierre Chouteau et al**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**William C. Woodson vs Charles S. Rannels**
Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: Charles G. Martin Samuel Pilkington, Henry Miller, John T. Martin, Charles A. Allendoerfer, George Buhr, John Simon, George W. Link, James Kirk, John Wheeler, John F. Edmondson and James Eaton, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn, the matters in controversy well and truly to try, the trial of this cause progressed, but not being finished is laid over until to-morrow morning at Ten O. Clock.
---
**Viewer Page 163** (rcdbook1858_27_0162.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 159
**William Prosser vs Ann Prosser**
Divorce.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and solemnly called comes not, Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, this cause is submitted to the Court upon the petition answer and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth find from such proofs that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, It doth, therefore, consider adjudge and decree that said plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by him contracted with said defendant and restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. It is, further ordered that said plaintiff pay the costs of this proceeding and that execution issue therefor.
**Frederick Schulenberg, Adolphus Baeckler and Louis C. Hirschberg vs John Maguire, David B. Dayton, Sarah H. Ladd, Harriex Clapp and Mary F. Dayton**
Dismissal. By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendants and that execution issue therefor Agreement of parties filed.
**Nimrod Beck vs Kingeland & Caddy**
Continued by consent.
**William C. Wagley et al vs William S. Grant et al**
Replication filed.
**The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company vs James L. Gage**
Dismissal.
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendant and that execution issue therefor.
**Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail R. Company vs David H. Armstrong**
Continued by consent.
**Same vs John C. Ivory**
Dismissal.-
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendant and that execution issue therefor.
**Saint Louis and Iron Mountain R. R. Company vs Gustavus Fisher**
Dismissal. By consent of parties, this cause is ordered to be dismissed at the costs of the said defendant and that execution issue therefor.
**The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company vs Frederick Gilfort**
Dismissal.
On motion of said plaintiff by its attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 164** (rcdbook1858_27_0163.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 160
**February Term 1858**
**Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company vs William M. McPherson**
Dismissal.
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendant and that execution issue therefor.
**The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company vs William A. Dietz**
Dismissal.-
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendant and that execution issue therefor.
**Joseph M. Brown and Thomas H. Thatch vs John S. McCune, Samuel Gaty, Henry Whitmore, Kenneth McKenzie, William H. Hazzard, Richard Philips, Christopher Rhodes, William H. Gore George Knapt and Asa Farr**
Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit. Samuel Pilkington, Henry Miller, Charles G. Martin, John F. Martin Charles Allendoefer George Buhr, John Simon, George W. Link, James Kirk, John Wheeler, John J. Edmondson and James Eaton, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected, tried and sworn the matters in controversy between the parties well and truly to try the trial of this cause progressed, But the said plaintiffs suy they will not further prosecute their said suit in this behalf; Wherefore, it is ordered by the Court that the Jury empannelled herein be discharged; and that said plaintiffs take nothing by their suit in this behalf, but that said defendants go hence without day and recover of said plaintiffs their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
**Justus Finch vs James Parleton and Catharine Parleton**
Dismissal.- On motion of said defendants by their attorney, and it appearing to the Court that said plaintiff has failed to file security for costs, as required by rule heretofore made in this behalf, it is ordered, that this cause be dismissed for want of security for costs.
**Solomon Smith vs George W. Thatcher gar & c**
On motion of said garnishee by his attorney, the time for answering herein is extended ten days. Bill of Exceptions filed.
**James C. Page vs G. W. Thatcher gar & c**
On motion of said garnishee by his attorney the time for answering is extended ten days. Bill of exceptions filed.
---
**Viewer Page 165** (rcdbook1858_27_0164.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 161
**The Citizens Savings Institution vs George W. Thatcher gar & c**
The time for answering herein on the part of said garnishee, is extended ten days. Bill of Exceptions filed.
**David Anderson vs John H. Singleton**
On Note.- Now at this day come the Said parties by their attorneys, and neither party requiring a Jury, this cause is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, it doth find from the answer of said defendant that he is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of on thousand one hundred and thirty nine dollars and twelve cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have hereof execution.
**Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road C. vs John Sigerson et al**
Continued by consent.
**The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company vs Isadore Busch and Charles Taussig**
Dismissal.- By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said defendants and that execution issue therefor.
**William B. Betts et al vs Michael Diefenbach et al**
Replication filed.
**The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company vs Frederick Schulenberg et al**
Continued by consent.
**Issac Lamaster vs The Wood Boat Hardin**
Motion to strike out parts of answer filed.
**John Grether vs William B. Watson**
Motion to strike out answer filed.
**Joseph Farrell vs P. D. Gordon**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but said defendant although duly notified and solemnly called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and sixty six dollars and one cent. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 166** (rcdbook1858_27_0165.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 162
**February Term 1858**
**Jules Hanel vs Stephen Haskell et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of said defendant to the plaintiffs petition and being thereof fully advised it doth order that said demurrer be sustained. Thereupon plaintiff by leave of Court amends his petition, as follows, in the Twenty first line from the top of the first page insert the words ``for a reasonable consideration'' after the word ``promised'' in said line; also in the seventh line from the top of second page after the word. ``dollars'' insert the words ``which amount was so received by defendants for the use and benefit of the plaintiff.''
**William C. Woodson vs Charles S. Rannels**
Now at this day come again said parties by their respective attorneys and the Jury Empannelled and sworn herein also come and the trial of this cause progressed, but not being finished is laid over until to-morrow morning at Ten O'Clock.
**Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company vs Meredith Martin**
Dismissal. By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain R. R. C. vs William Taussig**
Dismissal. By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court, that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendant and that execution issue therefor.
**The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company vs George [Rauchenstrouch ?]**
Default.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendant as confessed.
**The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company vs Isadore Busch and Charles Taussig**
Dismissal.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney, and in [of ?] his motion it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendant and that execution issue therefor.
**The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company vs Philip Stremmel**
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendant and that execution issue therefor.
**The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road vs R. H. Stone**
Dismissal. By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendant and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 167** (rcdbook1858_27_0166.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 163
Alexander Jefferson, (a man of color) whose identity is proven by the testimony of William Glasgan and Evaus Casselberry, two credible witnesses, comes in Open Court, and acknowledges the execution of certain deeds of emancipation to Gilead Jefferson and Thomas Jefferson.
**James C. Page vs A. M. Waterman's garnishee Geo W. Thatcher**
Motion to strike out the allegations and Interragatories filed Answer of garnishee filed.
**Citizens Savings Institution vs George W. Thatcher, gar & c**
Motion to strike out allegations and interrogatories and answer of garnishee filed.
**Solomon Smith vs George W. Thatcher gar & c**
Motion to strike out allegations and interrogatories filed; and the answer of garnishee filed.
**Jules Hauel vs Stephen Haskell et al**
Defendants file an answer herein.
**Lorenzo P. Sanger vs Daniel D. Page Henry D. Bacon and Thomas Brown**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said Defendant Henry D. Bacon. and it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it doth therefore, on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney order the petition of said plaintiff be taken against Said defendants as confessed, and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this cause is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Four thousand, seven hundred and thirteen dollars and fifty-five cents It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Joseph M Brown et al vs John S. McCune et al**
Motion for new trial filed.
---
**Viewer Page 168** (rcdbook1858_27_0167.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 164
**February Term 1858**
**John B. Anderson vs E. A. Goodrich gar & c**
Replication to answer filed.
**George H. Bussing et al vs George M. Willing**
The plaintiffs in this cause withdraw the exhibit said on in this behalf, and leave an attested copy therefor
**William C. Woodson vs Charles S. Rannels**
Now at this day come again said parties by their respective attorneys and the Jury empannelled and sworn herein also come, and the trial of this cause progresses and being now finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issue joined in favor of said plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of Forty-three Dollars and sixtyseven cents. it is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed by the Jury and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Edward Cunningham vs Patrick Sullivan, Exr & c**
**John Cunningham vs Patrick Sullivan, exr & c**
Security for costs filed.
**Theophile Schaefer vs John G. Mack**
Continued.
**John J. H. Vogt and Charles J. H. Vogt vs Charles F. Baker and James Moore**
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and neither party requiring a Jury, this cause is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Four hundred and sixty eight dollars and seventy four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 169** (rcdbook1858_27_0168.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 165
**Isaac W. Mitchell vs Andrew A. LeBeau, Ezra O. English and Samuel Myerson**
Dismissal.- By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendants and that execution issue therefor.
**George B. Sanderson vs Andrew A. LeBeau and Ezra O. English**
Dismissal.
By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed hence at the costs of the said defendants and that execution issue therefor.
**George B. Sanderson vs Ezra O. English, John Burns Jacob Johann and Andrew A. LeBeau**
Dismissal.-
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this case be dismissed at the costs of the said defendants and that execution issue therefor.
**Nerie Valli et al vs John T. Chappell et al**
On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney it is ordered by the Court that a Commission issue to the State of Louisiana, to take depositions of witnesses, to be used on the trial of this cause, on the part of said plaintiffs.
**John Feder vs Andrew A. LeBeau and Ezra O. English**
Dismissal.-
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendants and that execution issue therefor.
**George H. Chase vs Ezra O. English, John Burns Jacob Johann and Andrew A. LeBeau**
Dismissal.
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendants and that execution issue therefor.
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs John Dalton, garnishee & c**
The said garnishee files an answer herein.
**John B. Henderson vs Jos G. Goodrick gar of William A. Vantilburgh**
On motion, it is ordered by the Court that the said garnishee be discharged hence, at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor. The sum of Ten Dollars is allowed said garnishee for answering herein.
**John Levin vs Lyman W. Patchin**
The defendant files an answer herein.
---
**Viewer Page 170** (rcdbook1858_27_0169.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 166
**February Term 1858**
**John Davis and Noel Davis vs Michael Abrahams**
Confession of Judgment. Now at this day comes the said defendant and files a written statement, duly verified by affidavit, whereby he confesses himself indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Five hundred and thirty-one Dollars and forty one cents and consent and agrees that Judgment may be rendered against him for that sum and in favor of said plaintiffs. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Stephen Haskell and James M. Franciscus vs Charles W. Hebert, Henry J. Darrah Chester W. Pomeroy and Samuel Myerson**
On Note.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, and on his motion it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said defendant Charles W. Herbert. Thereupon the said other defendants by their attorney withdraw the answer herein filed by them. And this cause being submitted to the Court it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said other defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of One Thousand and seventy Dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**George Pomeroy, William H. Benton and George H. Chase vs Ezra O. English, John Burnes Jacob Johann and Samuel Myerson**
Dismissal.
Now at this day come the said parties by respective attorneys and consent agree that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendants and that execution issue therefor.
**Squire Hall vs William H. Deriar**
Depositions filed, on part of said defendant
**John B. Henderson vs E. A. Goodrich gar & c**
Continued.
**David T. Wheeler vs S. B. Bullock**
Report of Referee filed.
**Samuel Jones vs Maurice Steinback**
Exhibit filed.
---
**Viewer Page 171** (rcdbook1858_27_0170.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 167
**Alexander Young vs Thomas Webster, William Anderson, Emory P. Seymore, John G. Cornelle and Edward W. Shands**
Change of Venue. The Judge of this Court having been of counsel in this cause, it is, therefore, ordered that this cause be transferred to the Saint Louis Court of Common Pleas for trial, and that the Clerk of this Court make out a full and complete transcript of the record and proceedings herein and deliver the same duly certified to the Clerk of said Court of Common Pleas
**Thomas Webster vs William Anderson and Emory P. Seymour**
Change of Venue. The Judge of this Court having been of counsel in this cause, it is, therefore, ordered that this cause be transferred to the Saint Louis Court of Common Pleas for trial, and that the Clerk of this Court make out a full and complete transcript of the record and proceedings herein and deliver the same duly certified to the Clerk of the said Court of Common Pleas.
**Michael Hollacher vs Theodore Gennera and William Holzke**
On Transcript.- Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys, and neither party requiring a Jury, this cause is submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find the issue joined in favor of said plaintiff and against the said defendant William Holzke and assess the damages of said plaintiff and against said defendant at the sum of Two-hundred and seventy-four Dollars and ninety seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended And have thereof execution.
**John Gorgerty vs Henry Beckmann**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said defendant for security for costs and being thereof fully advised doth order that the same be sustained. It is further ordered that unless the plaintiff file security for the costs of this action, within twenty days from this date, the same will stand dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff
**Samuel McKee vs Joseph H. White**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and it appearing to the Court that there is no answer files herein it is ordered that the petition be taken against said defendant as confessed, and the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that the said defendant is indebted to the said plaintiff in the sum of Two-Thousand four hundred and nineteen dollars and eighty one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution. Thereupon the defendant files a motion for a review herein, which being heard [x ?] by the Court fully understood, it is ordered that the same be overruled.
---
**Viewer Page 172** (rcdbook1858_27_0171.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 168
**February Term 1858**
**Archibald J. Summerville vs Thomas S. Nelson**
It is ordered that said plaintiff be allowed to sue as a poor person, and that he have all necessary process and other proceedings, as in other cases, without fees, tax or charge.
**Kenneth Hankinson vs Jane Hankinson**
Divorce.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but said defendant although duly summoned and solemnly called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore, on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney this cause is submitted to the Court upon the petition and proofs, and the Court having proceeded to hear the proofs in this cause, and having been satisfied from such proofs that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, therefore it doth considered adjudge and decree that said plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by him contracted with said defendant and that he be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. And it is further considered by the Court that the plaintiff pay the costs of this proceeding and that execution issue therefor.
**Eliza Moran vs Michael Moran**
Divorce.- Now at this day comes said plaintiff by her attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and solemnly called comes not, Wherefore on motion of said plaintiff her petition is taken against said defendant as confessed. And the Court having proceeded to hear the testimony in this cause, and having been satisfied by such testimony that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured party, It is considered, adjudged and decreed that said plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with said defendant and that she be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. And it appearing to the Court that the said defendant from his habits and course of life is an unsuitable person to have the care, custody and control of the said infant children John and Robert mentioned in plaintiffs petition, who are of tender years, it is further adjudged and decreed that said plaintiff have the care, custody and control of the said children and that said defendant be restrained and enjoined from interfering with the plaintiff in this behalf, until the further order of this Court
**In the matter of the assignment of Pourville et al**
On motion of the assignee herein, it is ordered by the Court that John Eidman, be and he is hereby substituted as an appraiser in this behalf, in the place of Norbert Forster, who declines to act.
**Henry A. Homeyer and Lewis G. Clauson vs Andren A. LeBean and Ezra O. English**
Dismissal.
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendants and that execution issue therefor.
**James S. Chen vs Andren A. LeBean, Ezra O. English John Bunns, Jacob Johann and Samuel Myerson**
Dismissal.-
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 173** (rcdbook1858_27_0172.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 169
**Emanuel De Hodiamant vs Andrew A. LeBeau, Ezra O. English and Lewis M. Prince**
Dismissal.-
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendants and that execution issue therefor.
**James Gordon et al vs Thomas Marshall et al gar & c**
Denial of answer filed.
**The State of Missouri, to use of Inslee vs A. Reipschlager et al**
Motion for new trial filed.
**Patrick Hogan vs Joseph K. Bent**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said defendant for a new trial of this cause and being thereof fully advised, doth order that said motion be overruled.
**William Sleeper and Rest Feuner vs Joseph A. Eddy, Joseph A. Jameson Amos Cotting, A. M. Bissell, Charles C. Hellmer and Werner Mayer**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed At the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor. Leave is given plaintiffs to withdraw the exhibits said upon in this cause, and an attested copy is left therefor.
**Frederick Buschman vs Richard Ivers and Jos. Magehan**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said for a new trial of this cause and being thereof fully advised, it doth order that the same be sustained
**Corneluis D Sullivan and Jeremiah T. Sullivan vs Christopher H. Oatman**
Dismissal.-
On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 174** (rcdbook1858_27_0173.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 170
**Albrecht C. Cordes vs Ezra O. English, John Buns and J. Johaun**
Dismissal. By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendants and that execution issue there for The note sued is withdrawn and an attested copy is left therefor.
**John Louderback vs The North Missouri Rail Road**
Amended petition filed by leave of Court, and the affidavit thereto is waived by the defendant.
**Bernandine Florez vs Able S. Werctt et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of said defendants to the petition of said plaintiff and being thereof fully advised, doth order that the same be sustained Ten days is given said plaintiff to file an amended petition
**John J. H. Voght et al vs Charles F. Baker et al**
Motion for new trial and in arrest of Judgment filed.
**John J. Anderson vs John Young and Nathan C. Covington gar & c**
On motion of the said garnishee Nathan C. Covington it is ordered by the Court. that he be discharged hence at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor. Five dollars is allowed said garnishee for appearing herein.
**John Cunningham vs Patrik Sullivan Executor of James Powers, deceased.**
Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury to wit: Andrew Geisel, Marquart Forster, Joseph Suss J. E. Pirce, J. H. Alexander, Frederick W. Meyer, John Tilton, Philip Kuhl [P. ?] Hussey, Richard H. Mulligan, Peter Cook and F. A. Oeters, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected, tried and sworn the matters in controversy well and truly to try, the trial of this cause progresses, but not being concluded is laid over until to-morrow morning at Ten O. Clock.
**Hatfield Halstend vs Joseph Charless and Henry J. Blow garnishees of Ezra Easterly**
Dismissal.
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney, and on his motion, It is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Charles C. Whittelsey admr & c vs Tullin C. Beckwith admx & c**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said plaintiff for a new trial of this cause and being thereof fully advised, it doth order that said motion be and the same is hereby overruled.
---
**Viewer Page 175** (rcdbook1858_27_0174.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 171
**Bernard McAnulty vs A. Schneider gar & c**
Dismissal.-
On motion of plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**H. Halstead vs Joseph Farrell**
Dismissal.-
On motion of plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Samuel Goulding vs E. G. Tuttle gar & c**
**Robert Armstrong vs E. G. Tuttle et al gar**
By consent of parties, it is ordered that these causes be continued until the next term of the Court.
**Job P. Doan and John H Farrell vs John J Murdoch and Charles K. Dickson garnishee of John McFee**
Garnishment. Now at this day come the plaintiffs but the defendants although duly notified and called come not, Wherefore this cause is submitted to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find from the answer of said garnishee that at the time they were summoned herein as such, they were indebted to the original defendant in the sum of Five hundred and twenty one Dollars and twenty seven cents It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum of aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor. Ten Dollars is allowed said garnishees for answering herein.
[# ?]107.
[# ?]77.97.
**Sheridan C. Hunt and James R. Wiseman vs James Henry and William Malone garnishees of Robert Cartan and David Fennessy**
Garnishment on Attachment.- Now at this day comes as well said plaintiffs as said garnishees by their respective attorneys, and it appearing to the Court from the answer of said garnishee James Henry, that at the time he was summoned herein as such he had in his possession belonging to said defendants the sum of One hundred and seven dollars and it also appearing to the Court from the answer of said William Malone that at the time he was summoned herein as garnishee he was indebted to said defendants in the sum of seventy seven Dollars and ninety seven cents, It is, on motion of said plaintiffs, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said garnishees the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed, and that out of said sum they pay the costs and well of the original proceedings as of this, and that the have execution therefor. The sum of Ten Dollars is allowed to the said William Malone for answering herein.
---
**Viewer Page 176** (rcdbook1858_27_0175.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 172
**John Cunningham vs Patrick Sullivan, Executor of James Powers, deed**
Now at this day come again said parties by their respective attorneys and the Jury empannelled and sworn herein also come and the trial of this cause progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issue joined in favor of said plaintiff and assess the damages of said plaintiff at the sum of Three hundred and forty Dollars and Seventy Seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid and his costs in this behalf expended.
**Edward Cunningham vs Patrick Sullivan executor of James Powers, deceased**
Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and neither party requiring a Jury, submit this cause to the Court, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth assess the damages of said plaintiff by reason of the premises in his petition stated at the sum of Two-hundred and fifty-five Dollars and twenty cents, It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended.
**James C. Page vs George W. Thatcher gar & c**
**The Citizens Savings Institution vs George W. Thatcher gar & c**
**Solomon Smith vs George W. Thatcher gar & c**
The said plaintiffs in each of the foregoing cause come and file exception to the answer of said garnishee.
**George D. Little et al vs Frank W. Armstrong et al**
Plaintiffs come and file proof satisfactory to the Court that the order of publication heretofore made in this cause has been day published according to lan.
**Edwin C. Estes vs Joseph S. Hull**
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney and enters full and entire satisfaction of the Judgment heretofore obtained by him against said defendant.
**Albert Billings et al vs Charles Fink**
Depositions filed.
**Isabella Irwin vs Atchison Irwin**
On Habeas Corpus. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and submit all and singular the matters in controversy between the parties, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth order that the said Isabella Irwin have the custody, control and maintenance of the infant mentioned in the petition, and that the same be not removed out of the Jurisdiction of this Court; and it is further considered that the said Atchison Irwin be permitted from time to time, to visit the said infant, whilst the same remain in the custody and control of said Isabella Irwin, to mother, until the further order of this Court.
---
**Viewer Page 177** (rcdbook1858_27_0176.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 173
Mary Kasson comes in, Open Court, and acknowledges the execution by her of a deed of emancipation to Ambrose Smith, a negro man, aged about forty-three years; and whose height is about five feet, ten inches.
**Samuel McKee vs Joseph H. White**
On motion of the defendant by his attorney on appeal is allowed him to the Supreme Court from the Judgment herein; thereupon the defendant files an appeal bond with himself as principal and Charles Marlow as security, which bond is approved by the Court. Bill of Exceptions filed.
**James B. Ricords administrator of Milton McLean died vs Addison G. Bragg**
On Account. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: Andrew Geissel Marquart Forster, Joseph Sass, J. E. Pierce, J. H. Alexander Frederick W. Meyer, John Tilton, Philip Kuhl, B. Hassey Richard H. Halligan, Peter Cook and T. F. Peters, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected, tried and sworn the matters in controversy will and truly to try, the trial of this cause progresses and being concluded the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issue-joined in favor of said plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of five hundred and ninety four Dollars and thirty six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed by the Jury and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Jacob Hostetter et al vs Edward W. Williams et al**
Defendants file an answer herein
**Michael Hollacher vs William F. Holske**
Motion for new trial filed.
**David T. Wheeler vs S. B. Bullock**
The time for filing exceptions to the report of referees is extended ten days.
**Theodore E. Dickerson vs The Saint Louis Lumbermen and Mechanics Ins Co**
The defendant files an answer herein.
**Thomas J. McNair vs Charles L. Hunt et al**
Motion to strike out answer and for Judgment filed.
---
**Viewer Page 178** (rcdbook1858_27_0177.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 174
**William W. Wakelam vs Charles Valentine et al**
On motion of said plaintiff leave is given him to file an amended petition herein, which is accordingly done.
**Hayman Levin vs George S. Nicholls et al**
Motion to quash return of service filed.
**Hayman Levin vs Dewitt Van Evera**
Motion to quash return of service filed.
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs Ezra O. English, John Burns Jacob Johann and Edward Bayle**
Dismissal.-
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendants and that execution issue therefor. The plaintiff by its attorney withdraws the note said on in this cause an attested copy is left therefor.
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs Levertt Mills, Carlos W. Mills Ezra O. English, John Burns and Jacob Johann**
Dismissal.
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendants and that execution issue therefor. Leave is given said plaintiff to withdraw the note said on in this cause, and an attested copy is left therefor.
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs Ezra O. English, John Burns, Jacob Johann, Thomas B. Ellis, James Ellis and Henry Ellis**
Dismissal.-
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendants and that execution issue therefor. Leave is given plaintiff to withdraw the note said on, an an attested copy is left therefor.
**John S. Thompson vs Robert Sterling et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said plaintiff to strike out the answer of said defendants and for Judgment, and being thereof fully advised doth order that said motion be overruled.
**Joseph Cooper, to use & c vs Charles Shinkle et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said plaintiff to strike out the answer of said defendants and being thereof fully advised, doth order that said motion be overruled. Leave is given said defendants to file an amended petition herein, on or before Tuesday next.
**Washington T. Adams vs Frank V. Valli et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said defendants for security for costs herein, and being thereof fully advised, doth order that said motion be sustained. Ten days is allowed to plaintiff to file the same.
---
**Viewer Page 179** (rcdbook1858_27_0178.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 175
**Solomon Smith vs A. M. Watermann**
**James C. Page vs A. M. Waterman et al**
**The Citizens Savings Institution vs A. M. Watermann et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the objections by George W. Thatcher to the bonds of Indemnity taken in the foregoing causes by the Sheriff, and being thereof fully advised, it doth order that the same be sustained; and leave is given said Sheriff to file additional bonds in the above causes on or before the seventh day of April next. It is further considered that said bonds, so required to be taken and returned amount to, in the aggregate, the sum of nine thousand five hundred Dollars.
**Ebenezer Higgins et al vs Cushman Caldwell**
Order of Sale. Now at this day comes James Castello, Sheriff of the County of Saint Louis and files a statement in writing, where by it appears to the Court that the property levied upon by virtue and authority of the attachment issued in the above entitled cause is likely to depreciate in value before the probable termination of this suit, and that the keeping of the same would be attended with much expense, It is, therefore, ordered by the Court that the said James Castello Sheriff as aforesaid, do proceed to sell said property so levied upon, in conformity to the Statute in such case made and provided.
**John M. Meyers vs Angel S. Meyers and Benjamin Lithauer**
On Note.- Now at this day come the defendants by their attorney but the said plaintiff although duly notified and called comes not, Wherefore on motion of said defendants by their attorney it is ordered by the Court that said plaintiff be nonsuited. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf, but that said defendants go hence without day and recover of said plaintiff their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Thomas B. Wing vs Jacob S. William's**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer of said plaintiff to the defendants counter claim, and being thereof fully advised, it doth order that the same be sustained. Leave is given said defendants to file and amended answer herein.
**Louis S. Freligh vs Joseph M. Ames, Francis Hofelman and Leander Laurence**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer to the amended petition herein, and being thereof fully advised, doth order that the same be sustained. Leave is given plaintiff to amend, and thereupon plaintiff files a second amended petition.
**Isaac Lamaster vs The Wood Boat Hardin**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said plaintiff to strike out the answer of said defendant and being thereof fully advised, it doth order that the same be overruled.
**John S. Thompson et al vs James H. McCullough et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said plaintiffs to strike out the answer of said defendant and for Judgment, and being thereof fully advised, doth order that the same be overruled.
---
**Viewer Page 180** (rcdbook1858_27_0179.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 176
**Michael Murphy vs Archie Campbell et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said defendants for a new trial of this cause and being thereof fully advised, doth order that the same be overruled.
**Dewitt Van Evera vs Rudolph Ulrici garnishee of Hayman Levin**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said garnishee to be discharged hence as such, and the Court having fully and sufficiently understood the same, doth order that said motion be sustained. The sum of Five Dollars is allowed said garnishee for answering
**Samuel Engler vs Benjamin F. C. Champion et al**
Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury, to wit: Andren Geissel, Marquart Foster, Joseph Suss, Adam Swiffel, Frederick W. Meyer, John Pilton, B. Hussey, F. F. Oeters. S. O. Smith, David C. Anderson, Andren Johnson and Benjamin F. Crane twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected, tried and sworn, the matters in controversy well and truly to try, the trial of this cause progressed, but not being concluded is laid over until the next meeting of Court.
---
**Viewer Page 181** (rcdbook1858_27_0180.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 177
**Harriet N. Barnard vs Edwin R. Barnard alias Edwin Dean**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said plaintiff to set aside the Judgment of dismissal in this cause and being thereof fully advised, doth order that the same be sustained, upon the payment of all costs which have accrued in this case.
[# ?]2460.12
**Emery Livermore vs Daniel D. Page, Henry D. Bacon Edword Wyman and Thomas Brown**
On Note.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said defendant Henry D. Bacon, and it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it is on motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, ordered that his petition be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-Thousand four hundred and sixty dollars and twelve cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
**Abjah Whiting et al vs Vathan W. Jones**
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be continued until the term of this court next ensuing, at the costs of the defendant and that execution issue therefor.
**John S. Thompson vs Robert Sterling et al**
Bill of Exceptions filed.
**Samuel Willi vs James Castello**
Dismissal. By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendant and that execution issue therefor.
**Martin Hammerle vs William Buhler and Frederick Miche**
Dismissal. On motion of plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Isaac Lamaster vs Wood Boat Hardin**
Leave is given plaintiff to file a reply to counter claim within ten days.
**James Gordon et al vs B. F. Champion et al**
Agreement of parties filed.
---
**Viewer Page 182** (rcdbook1858_27_0181.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 178
**February Term 1858**
**Henry Wells President & c vs Michael O. Rourke**
The time for filing an answer herein is extended until the next term.
**Charles E. Solomon vs Edward W. Sheads, Thomas W. Strode and William C. Inks**
On Account. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but said defendant although duly notified and called comes not. Wherefore, the plaintiff submits this cause upon the petition, answer and proofs, to the Court, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth assess the damages of said plaintiff at the sum of Two-hundred and thirty eight dollars and thirty cents It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Peter Choutean Jr, James Harrison and Felix Valli vs Ezra O. English, John Burns, Jacob Johann James B. Ellis, Henry B. Ellis and James B. Ellis**
Dismissal.-
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendants and that execution issue therefor.
**George Goss et al vs H. B. Meritt et al**
Motion to strike out parts of answer filed.
**Edward Boyle vs Ezra O. English, John Burns and Jacob Johann**
Dismissal.
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendants and that execution issue therefor.
**Robert P. Hall and Eustache H. Smith vs Milton Hawley and Robert Herrin**
Dismissal.
On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**Eugene Eaccord et al vs Alexander M. Mitchell**
The plaintiff comes and files a notice to shorten ten time to take depositions of witness, to be used on the trial of this cause, and the Court having heard said application, doth consider that it be granted.
**Samuel Engler vs Benjamin F. C. Champion and Joseph L. Papin**
Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and the Jury empannelled and sworn herein also come and the trial of this cause progressed, but not being finished is laid over until to morrow morning at Ten O. Clock.
**Francis W. Tillay, who sues as trustee of Puplett, McFaddin & Co vs Joseph Bennett**
Dismissal. This cause having been called for trial, and no person appearing to prosecute the same, the Court doth order that it be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 183** (rcdbook1858_27_0182.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 179
Charles A. Lascoste, whose identity is proven by the testimony of James Walsh and John McCallin, comes in Open Court, and acknowledge the execution of a deed of emancipation by him to the following persons, to wit: to Delia White, a slave, aged thirty four years; Samuel Berthe aged thirty-two years; Abram Berthe aged twenty eight years; Louise Berthe aged twenty three years; James Berthe aged twenty one years; Heloise Berthe aged thirteen years; Carlone Berthe aged eleven years-all mulattoes in color and being all brothers and sisters by the same mother. He also acknowledges a deed of manumissouri to Edward Augustine and James Henry aged respective by seven and three years, who are children of Delia White and are bright mulattoes.
Elizemond Basey, who is personally known to the Court acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation to ``Betsey,'' a slave aged about forty years; to William aged about twenty-two years; Sarah Ann aged twenty years; ``Morris aged about seventeen years; Adonijah aged about fifteen years; Elizabeth aged about thirteen years; Jane aged about eleven years; Allenzo aged about eight years; Mary Eliza aged about five years; Yearly aged about two years. The latter nine children are the issue of Betsy.
**Gottfried Kleinmann vs John Helgenberg et al**
Continued (on the affidavit of the defendant Henry Boernstein, on account of the absence of John Valentine, a material witness on the part of the defendants) at the costs of the defendants and that execution issue therefor.
**The President, Directors and Company of the Bank of Louisville vs E. G. Smith et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said plaintiff to strike out parts of the answer of said defendants, and being thereof fully advised doth order that said motion be sustained.
**In the matter of the Assignment of Rogers, Anderson & Co**
On motion of the assignee herein, it is ordered by the Court that O. C. Kraft and Henry Miller be appointed appraisers, to appraise, to appraise the property effects and things inventoried.
**Bernandino Florez vs Able S. Merrett et al**
On motion of said plaintiff, leave is given him until Saturday next, to file an amended petition herein.
**Solomon Smith vs A. M. Waterman**
New Indemnity bond filed.
---
**Viewer Page 184** (rcdbook1858_27_0183.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 180
**February Term 1858**
**Lucien Carr and Alfred Carr vs Henry Pilcher, William Pilcher and Henry Pilcher Jr.**
On Note.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default. Wherefore, the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and seventy two dollars and seventy one cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**In the matter of the Assignment of Graff and Hammerstein**
On motion of William J. Romyn, assignee herein, it appearing also, to the Court, that it will be to the interest of all interested, it is ordered that said assignee proceed to sell at private sale, to the highest and best bidder for cash, for ninety days, the property and effects assigned.
**Solomon Smith vs A. M. Waterman's gar George W. Thatcher**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said garnishee to strike out the allegations and Interrogatories filed by the said plaintiff against said garnishee and being thereof fully advised, doth consider that the same be overruled. And the Court having duly heard and considered the exceptions of the plaintiff to the answer of said garnishee it doth order that the same be sustained, except as to so much thereof as relates to the tenth interrogatory.
Leave is given said garnishee to file an amended answer herein within one week from date.
**The Citizens Savings Institution vs George W. Thatcher, garnishee & c**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said garnishee to strike out the allegations and interrogatories files by the said plaintiff against said garnishee, and being thereof fully advised, doth consider that the same be overruled. And the Court having duly heard and considered the exceptions of the plaintiff to the answer of said garnishee, it doth order that the same be sustained, except as to so much thereof as relates to the tenth interrogatory. Leave is given said garnishee to file an amended answer herein within a week from date.
**James C. Page vs George W. Thatcher garnishee & c**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of said garnishee to strike out the allegations and interrogatories filed in this cause and being thereof fully advised, doth consider that the same be overruled. And the Court having duly heard and considered the exceptions of the plaintiff to the answer of said garnishee, it doth order that the same be sustained except as to so much thereof as relates to the tenth interrogatory. Leave is given said garnishee to file an amended answer herein within a week from date.
**Samuel Engler vs Benjamin F. C. Champion et al**
Now at this day come again said parties by their respective attorneys and the Jury empannelled and sworn herein also come and the trial of this cause progressed, but not being concluded is laid over until to morrow morning at Ten O. Clock.
**D. P. Wheeler vs S. R. Rullock**
Exceptions to the report of referees filed.
---
**Viewer Page 185** (rcdbook1858_27_0184.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 181
[# ?]7.518.25
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs Charles A. Perry, Clias H. Perry James E. Walker, Francis J. Marshall Theodore F. Warner, Daniel P. Wallingford Benjamin Hollady, John S. Mitchell, Dent G. Tutt, John F. Baker and James A. Burnes**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its attorney and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said defendants Francis J. Marshall and Elias H. Perry. And it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it doth on motion of said plaintiff order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed, and the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of seven Thousand, five hundred and eighteen dollars and twenty five cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof fully execution.
**George Pomeroy, William H. Benton and George H. Chase vs William Wade, Daniel M. Frost Eliza J. Frost, Adam D. Stewart Mary B. Stewart, Robert Campbell trustee of Mary B. Stewart and Joshua B. Brant**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by his attorney and on their motion, this cause is dismissed as to the said Eliza Graham Frost. Thereupon come the parties by their respective attorneys and submit this cause to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-thousand, six hundred and seventy three dollars and twenty three cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs herein expended and have thereof execution.
**George Pomeroy, William H. Benton and George H. Chase vs William Wade, Daniel M Frost Eliza G. Frost, Adam D. Stewart Mary B. Stewart, Robert Campbell trustee for Mary B. Stewart**
On Note.- Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the defendant Eliza G. Frost. Thereupon come the parties by their respective attorneys and submit this cause to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three Thousand- one hundred and ninety five dollars and ninety two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Sanguinette Benoist vs Solomon H. Robbins**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Stephen Haskell (no 504) vs Benjamin F. C. Champion et al**
Dismissal.
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendants and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 186** (rcdbook1858_27_0185.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 182
**Edward Chase vs James Castello, Thomas Chudburn Matthew Little, Samuel McCartney Thomas W. Strode and Anuclet L. Lacroix**
Dismissal.
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**James Stewart vs George Knapt, John Knapt and Nathaniel Paschall**
Dismissal.
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendants and that execution issue therefor.
**Wood and Lynch vs Barke and Walsh**
On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney it is ordered by the Court that a Commission issue herein to the state of Illinois, to take depositions of witnesses to be used on the trial of this cause, on the part of said plaintiffs
**William Wade et al vs John B. Holland**
Continued at the costs of the defendant.
**Matthew T. Miller and Allen B. Miller vs Francis F. Graffand**
Dismissal.-
On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**[Inlin ?] Moriso (now Julia Yenon) and Moses Yenon vs James K. Philiber**
Now at this day this cause come on to be heard upon the amended petition, answer and proofs and evidences therein, and by consent of parties herein appearing by their attorneys before this Court, a Jury was waived, and this cause was tried before this Court. Wherefore this Court proceeded to hear this cause upon the amended petition answer, proofs and thereupon this Court found the following facts: ``By consent of the parties orally declared before the Court and entered upon the minutes of this Court, a Jury was waived and this cause was tried before the Court, upon the trial this Court found the following facts'' It was admitted by the parties and the Court found, that Moses Yenon married Julia Moriso, on the first day of January, eighteen hundred and fifty eight; that the lot in question, on the corner of Green and fifth streets was worth the sum of Five Thousand dollars, on the thirteenth day of March Eighteen hundred and fifty and that Henry J. Backus was the agent of James K. Philiber at the time of the procuring of said deed from Julia Moriso to James K. Philiber of the thirteenth day of March, eighteen hundred and fifty. From the evidence in this cause this Court finds the further facts following: that said Julia on the eleventh day of March eighteen hundred and thirty seven was an infant of the age of fourteen years; that said Iulia on the thirteenth day of March, Eighteen hundred and fifty was a widow living in the State of Michigan, where she has lived ever since she left Saint Louis, which was about
---
**Viewer Page 187** (rcdbook1858_27_0186.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 183
the year eighteen hundred and thirty-seven, except a year or so she lived in Fort Wayne, Indiana; that William Moriso her first husband was then dead; that at the time of the execution of said deed by Julia Moriso to James K. Philiber of the thirteenth of March eighteen hundred and fifty, one Samuel Mulholland acted as the agent of said Julia for the sale of her interest in said premises described in said deed of the thirteenth day of March eighteen hundred and fifty, to James K Philiber and at the same time the said Mulholland acted as the agent of said Philiber in making the purchase of said premises described in said deed from said Julia. Mulholland having been employed by said Bacchus who was the agent of the defendant; that the said Julia had been a servant for said mulholland in his family before the said time, and was greatly under his influence and control; that the said Mulholland received from the defendants agent Henry T. Backus on behalf of the defendant, the sum of twenty five dollars, for procuring the said Julia to make the said deed to said defendant, and paid over to said Julia as the consideration for the said deed the sum of seventy-five dollars; that the said Julia was ignorant of the true value of said lot of land conveyed by the said deed, that she had no correct knowledge thereof, that she could not read or write, and had lived near said Mulholland's place in the State of Michigan from the time she was sixteen years old, except a short time she resided in Fort Wayne, Indiana, until the said year eighteen hundred and fifty, that at the time of the negotiation for the execution of said deed of the thirteenth of March eighteen hundred and fifty, the said Mulholland acting as the agent for both the said Julia and defendant, represented to the said Julia that the premises to be conveyed by her might be sold for taxes; and that, that would embarass the title, and did not disclose to her the value of her interest in the said land; that no one disclosed to said Julia the value of her interest in the said lot of land before the execution of said deed of the thirteenth of March eighteen hundred and fifty. That said Deed of the Thirteenth day of March eighteen hundred and fifty was procured by the agents of the defendant from the said Julia and she executed the same for a grossly in adequate consideration. And this Court declares the law to be and the conclusions of law upon the foregoing facts, to be, that the said deed of the thirteenth day of March eighteen hundred and fifty from Julia Moriso to James K. Philiber for the said premises on the corner of Fifth and Green sheets in the City of Saint Louis, described in said deed is fraudulent and void in law and in equity; that all the title and interest of the said James K. Philiber which the said deed purports to convey to said defendant Philiber shall reinvest in the said Julia Moriso, now the wife of Moses Yenon and that the plaintiff shall pay into this Court the sum of seventy five dollars, paid to said Julia for the execution of said deed and that the defendant is bound to pay all the costs of this suit, out of the said seventy five dollars, if the same shall be sufficient to pay the costs, and if any balance of said seventy-five dollars remain after the payment of the costs, the said balance shall be paid over to said defendant. Now, therefore, this Court in consideration of the premises, doth order, adjudge and decree that the deed of Julia Moriso to James K. Philiber, acknowledged the thirteenth day of March, Eighteen hundred and fifty and recorded in the Recorder's Office of Saint Louis County on the twenty first day of March eighteen hundred and fifty, in Book L. number five page three hundred and twenty seven, in the words and figures following'' This Deed made and entered into this thirteenth day of March in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and fifty by and between Julia Moriso, window of William Moriso, deceased late Julie Couzineau of the Township of Erie, County of [Nunroe ?] and state of Michigan, partie of the first part and James K. Philiber of the City and County of Saint Louis and State of Missouri party of the second part, Witnesseth; that the said party of the first part in consideration of one hundred dollars to her paid by the said party of the second part, the receipt of which is
---
**Viewer Page 188** (rcdbook1858_27_0187.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 184
**February Term 1858**
hereby acknowledged does by these presents grant, bar gain and sell, convey release and quit claim and confirm unto the said party of the second part, all here right, title and interest in law and inequity of in and to a certain lot of of ground situate lying and being in the City of Saint Louis in Block number ninety-five of said City containing and fronting forty-five feet southwardly on Green street of said City and boundary westwardly thirty five feet on fifth street of said City and running back thirty-five feet in depth from the front on Green street, the same being part of lot number twenty two of William Christy's Addition to the City of Saint Louis, being part of a lot which Stewart McKee derived from William Christy and wife by deed dated the tenth day of December in the year eighteen hundred and twenty three and recorded in Book L. page four hundred and eighty seven, the same land conveyed by said Stewart McKee to Buzile Mary and Julie Couzineau, infant children of Tossaint and Marie Conzineau, by deed dates the thirtieth day of March in year eighteen hundred and twenty four and recorded in Book M. page two hundred and eighty four and derived to said party of the first part, party by this last deed and party by inheritance from her sister Mary, her mother and here brother Bazile by the said Julie. To have and to hold the same together with all and singular the rights, immunities, privileges and appurtenances to the same belonging unto the said party of the second part and to him his heirs and assigns forever. The said Julie Moriso widow of the said William Moriso as aforesaid hereby covenanting that she and her heirs executors and administrators shall and will warrant and defend the title to the premises to the said party of the second part and to his heirs and assigns forever against the lawful claims of all persons claiming under her on any persons whatever. In witness Whereof the said part of the first part has hereunto set her hand and seal the day and year first above written. Julie Moriso late Julie her mark Couzeneau [seal ?] widow of William Moriso, decease. Signed, sealed and delivered in presence of J. Babcock. Samuel Mullolher. was and is fraudulent and void in law and in equity and that the same be and hereby is cancelled and anmelled forever. and this Court doth further order, adjudge and decree that all the title, estate and interest of the said James K. Philiber which the said deed purports to convey to him and his heirs in the said premises shall reinvest in the said Julie Moriso and her heirs now the wife of Moses Yenon, and that she he seized of her former estate in the said premises described in said deed, in like manner as if the said deed had never been made by her to said Philiber, and that the said plaintiff pay into the Court the sum of seventy five dollars paid to said Julie for the execution of said deed and that the defendant pay all the costs of this suit out of the said seventy five Dollars, if the same be sufficient to pay the costs, and if any balance of said seventy-five dollars remain after the payment of the costs the said balance shall be paid to said defendant.
**Firmin Cousinery et al vs Benjamin F. C. Champion et al**
Continued by consent.
**Thomas B. Wing vs Jacob S. Williams**
Amended answer filed.
**George B. Sanderson vs Ezra O. English, John Burns and Jacob Johann**
Dismissal.
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said defendants, and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 189** (rcdbook1858_27_0188.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 185
**George B. Sanderson vs Ezia O. English, John Burns, Jacob Johann and Samuel Myerson**
Dismissal.
Now at this day come the said parties and consent and agree that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendants. It is, therefore considered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said defendants and that execution issue therefor.
**George H. Wicker vs George J. King**
Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury to wit: J. H. Alexander, Philip Kuhl, Richard Willigan Lucien Dumaine, Peter Willard, W. C. Baker, W. A. Gregory, Conrad R. Stinde, John Steer, W. P. Fisher and L. C. Taylor, eleven good and lawful men, who by consent of parties, serve as a panel herein, and being only elected tried and sworn the matters in controversy well and truly to try, the trial of this cause progressed, but not being finished is laid over until to morrow morning at Ten O. Clock.
**Thomas Baylan and William R. Gettys vs Benjamin F. Beasley and Pleasant Devinney**
On Note.- Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys, and the said defendants withdraw the answer herein filed by them. Thereupon the plaintiffs submit this cause to the Court, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Two-hundred and fifty-one Dollars and seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants, the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John E. Cook vs Benjamin F. Beasley and Pleasant Devinney**
On Note.- Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the said defendants withdraw the answer filed by them. Thereupon the plaintiff submits this cause to the Court, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two-hundred and thirty four dollars and nine cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Barbetta Hoffman vs George Hoffman**
Dismissal.
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the defendant and that execution issue therefor.
**William H. Russell vs Syl H. Laflin**
Continued by consent.
**Joseph Farrell vs Henry N. Hart**
Replication filed.
---
**Viewer Page 190** (rcdbook1858_27_0189.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 186
**February Term 1858**
**Amos C. Paxon vs J. S. Haskell**
On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury, submit this cause to the Court, and thereupon the trial of this cause progressed, But said plaintiff says that he will not further prosecute his suit in this behalf, It is, therefore, considered by the Court that the plea in abatement herein, be taken against said plaintiff as confessed, and that said defendant go hence without day and recover of said plaintiff his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Jacob Schlitter vs Noel Toilbert**
Dismissal.
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**Frederick Dattelzwig vs M. W. F. Black**
Nonsuit.- Now at this day comes the said defendant by his attorney, but the said plaintiff although solemnly called comes not, Wherefore on motion of the said defendant by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the plaintiff be nonsuited; and that be take nothing by his said suit in this behalf, but that said defendant go hence without day and recover of the plaintiff his costs and charges herein expended and that he have execution therefor. And it further appearing to the Court that the plaintiff has executed a bond conditioned according to law for the forthcoming of the property attached ``when and where the Court shall direct.'' Now, therefore on motion of said defendant by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that the property and effects attached at the commencement of this suit be delivered to the said defendant according to the provisions of the statute in such case made and provided.
**Thomas Alexander vs James J. Todd, William Kay and James McMahan**
Order of Publication. The Sheriff having made return that the defendants William Ray and James McKahan cannot be found, and the Court being satisfied that the ordinary process of law cannot be served upon them, on motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the defendants be notified that a civil action has been commenced against them for the sum of Two-thousand two hundred and ninety-four dollars and forty five cents, on account of a promissory note made by said defendants, as co-partners under the name of James J. Todd & Co and payable to the order of plaintiff and that their property has been attached; and unless they appear at the next term of the Court, to be begun and held at the City of Saint Louis, within and for the County of Saint Louis on the first Monday of October next, and on or before the third day thereof answer to the action aforesaid, according to law, Judgment will be rendered against them, and their property sold to satisfy the same. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published [according to law, ?] in the Missouri Democrat, a news paper printed in the City of Saint Louis.
**Samuel Engler vs Benjamin F. C. Champion et al**
Now at this day come again said parties by their attorneys and the Jury empannelled and sworn herein also come and the trial of this cause progressed but not being finished is laid over until to morrow morning at Ten O. Clock.
---
**Viewer Page 191** (rcdbook1858_27_0190.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 187
**Henry Grone vs Francis Petterson administratrix of John Petterson, deceased and Jacob Schleer**
On Note. Now at at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury, this cause is submitted to the Court, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three hundred and sixty on Dollars and eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found, and it is further ordered that said plaintiff pay the costs of the proceeding and that execution issue therefor.
**John Ludewig vs John Reuss, H. Esenann & Co and George Martin**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney and on his motion, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed as to the said H. Esenann & co. Thereupon the said plaintiff submits this cause to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two hundred and seventy four Dollars and fortyfive cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**[Bernandino ?] Florez vs Able S. Meritt et al**
The plaintiff comes and files an amended petition herein.
**Samuel Engler vs Benjamin F. C. Champion and Joseph L. Papin**
Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and the Jury empannelled and sworn herein also come and the trial of this cause being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they cannot agree upon a verdict. Wherefore the Court doth order that the said Jury be discharged, It is further ordered by the Court that this cause be continued until the next term of the Court.
**F. Cousinery et al vs Benjamin F. C. Champion et al**
2 cases
The plaintiffs come and file an affidavit of co-partnership
**John Gogerty vs Henry Beckman**
Damages. Nonsuit.- Now at this day comes the said defendant by his attorney but the said plaintiff although duly summoned and called comes not, Wherefore, the Court doth, on motion of the said defendant order that the said plaintiff be nonsuited. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said defendant go hence without day and recover of said plaintiff his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
---
**Viewer Page 192** (rcdbook1858_27_0191.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 188
**February Term 1858**
**Ellen J. Wilgns, Albert J. Noble and James S. Wilgus vs Edward A. Byron**
On Account. Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore on motion of said plaintiffs, it is ordered by the Court that their petition. be taken against said defendant as confessed. And the plaintiffs waiving a Jury, submit this cause to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth assess the damages of said plaintiffs by them sustained by reason of the premises in their petition stated at the sum of Three hundred and sixty seven Dollars and ninety seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John T. Parkinson vs Joseph L. Papin, Cornelius D. Sullivan and Jeremiah T. Sullivan**
On Note.- Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys, and the said defendants withdraw the answer filed by them in this cause. Thereupon comes the plaintiff and submits this cause to the Court, and the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of one-thousand and sixty six dollars and eighty-eight cents. It is, therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John T. Parkinson vs John Largue and Charles L. Hunt**
On Note.- Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and the said defendant Charles L. Hunt withdraws the answer filed by him in this behalf. And it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed herein, it doth on motion of said plaintiff order that his petition be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court finds from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of one-thousand five hundred and ninety nine dollars and eighty-eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**John T. Parkinson vs John Largue and Charles L. Hunt**
On Note.- Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys and the said defendant Charles L. Hunt withdraws the answer filed by him, and it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it doth order that the petition of said plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed. And the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Fifteen hundred and ninety eight Dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**George Pomeroy et al vs Moses Pfeiffer**
By consent of parties, it is ordered by the Court that the attachment herein be dissolved at the costs of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 193** (rcdbook1858_27_0192.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 189
**John T. Parkinson vs John Largue and Charles L. Hunt**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney as well as the defendant Charles L. Hunt, who withdraws the answer filed by him. Thereupon this cause is submitted to the Court, and the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of One thousand and sixty four dollars and ninety six cents. It is, therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company vs Charles S. Rannels**
On agreement. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its attorney, but the defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the Court doth assess the damages of said plaintiff by reason of the premises in its petition stateds at the sum of Fourteen hundred and fifty six dollars and eighty seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
**George Pomeroy, William H. Benton and George H. Chase vs Moses Pfeiffer**
Attachment. Now at this day come said parties and submit this action on petition answer and exhibits to the Court, and the Court having fully heard and considered the same, it doth find from the proofs in said case that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Three hundred and eighty five dollars and twenty six cents. It is therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor.
**The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company vs [- ?]William Weber[- ?]**
On agreement.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default, Wherefore, this cause is submitted to the Court, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth assess the damages of said plaintiff by reason of the premises in its petition stated at the sum of One hundred and forty- dollars and twenty cents. It is therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company vs [- ?]Philip Schmitt[- ?]**
On Account.- Now at this day comes said plaintiff by its attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore this cause is submitted to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth assess the damages of said plaintiff by reason of the premises in her petition stated at the sum of Four hundred and thirty dollars and twenty six cents. It is, therefore,
---
**Viewer Page 194** (rcdbook1858_27_0193.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 190
**February Term 1858**
considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum foresaid in form aforesaid as assessed and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Stephen Haskell and James M. Franciscus vs James H. Hayden, H. Hadson and Samuel Myerson**
On Note. Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney and the said defendants withdrawn the answer filed by them in this behalf; and it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause it doth order that the petition of said plaintiffs be taken against said defendants as confessed, and the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Four hundred and thirty dollars. It is therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have therefor execution.
**James S. Franciscus vs Edward S. Wheaton and Joseph C. Papin**
On Note.- Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the said defendants withdraw the answer filed herein by them. Thereupon this cause is submitted to the Court, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, it doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Three hundred and thirty-three Dollars and eighty two cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Solomon Littlefield vs The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company**
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury, submit this cause to the Court and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth find from the petition, exhibits and proofs that the said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of eleven hundred and four Dollars and forty seven cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have therefor execution.
**Benedict Schultz vs John Valentine et al**
Now at this day comes the plaintiffs by his attorney but the said defendants John Valentine and Charles Frank, although duly summoned and called come not, but make default. Wherefore the Court doth order the petition of said plaintiff to be taken against said defendants as confessed. On motion of said plaintiff it is ordered that an alias writ issue herein against M. Hirschfeld. Thereupon this cause is continued to the next term of the Court.
**Charles Balmer vs Paul Carlin, H. Gronheim and John Helgenberg**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default. Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the
---
**Viewer Page 195** (rcdbook1858_27_0194.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 191
sum of seven hundred and forty four Dollars and forty eight cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**William Kelly vs Daniel D. Page, Henry D. Bacon and Thomas Brown**
On Note.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney, and on his motion it is ordered by the Court that Henry D. Bacon be discharged from this proceeding. And the said other defendants although being duly summoned and called come not, but make default. Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and seventy-three dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**James Harrison vs Chorles Hays**
Motion for Judgment and counter claim filed.
**The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company vs Frederick Zepp**
On agreement.- Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the Court doth find from the proofs in this cause that said defendants is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Thirty nine Dollars and eighty four cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company vs George Rauchenstraoch, defendant**
On Agreement. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and called come not, but make default. Wherefore the Court doth find from the proofs in said cause that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and forty eight dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company vs William R. Price**
On Agreement. Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by its attorney, but the said defendant although duly summoned and called comes not, but makes default. Wherefore the Court doth find from the proofs in said cause that said defendant is indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of Two hundred and ninety seven Dollars and seventy cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have therefor execution.
---
**Viewer Page 196** (rcdbook1858_27_0195.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 192
**February Term 1858**
**The Saint Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company vs Hiram W. Leffingwell and Richard S. Eliott**
On Agreement.- Now at this day comes the plaintiff by its attorney, but the said defendants although duly summoned and called come not, but make default. Wherefore the Court doth find from the proofs in said cause that said defendants are indebted to said plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and fifty seven dollars. It is, therefore, considered by the Courr that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and its costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Ellen J. Wilgus, Albert J. Noble and James S. Wilgus vs The Steam Boat Flying Cloud Joseph M. Robinson and Roger C. McAllister (secy's)**
On Account.- Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury, submit this cause to the Court upon the petition, exhibits and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, it doth assess the damages of said plaintiffs at the sum of Two hundred and forty nine dollars and ninety four cents. It is, therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant and of Joseph M. Robinson and Roger C. McAllister the securities in the bond for the return of the boat, the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution.
**Ellen J. Wilgus, Albert J. Noble and James S. Wilgus vs The Steamboat Allegheny Clifford G. Wayne and Roger C. McAllister (securities)**
On Note and Account.- Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys, and waiving a Jury, submit this cause to the Court upon the petition, exhibits and proofs, and the Court having duly heard and considered the same, doth find that the said defendant is indebted to said plaintiffs in the sum of Twelve hundred and thirty four dollars and fifty six cents. It is, therefore, considered by the Court that said plaintiffs recover of said defendant and of Clifford G. Wayne and Roger C. McAllister the securities in the bond for the return of the boat, the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and their costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor
**Morris Rosenheim and Marten Collins vs Leopold Fisher**
Dismissal.
On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor.
**James W. Sherman vs Bernard Noel and Charles Noel**
Dimissal.
On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the said plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
**George L. Pollard vs Thomas Bower, Francis Mayer Frank Solar and John W. Seubert**
Dismissal.- On motion of said plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor.
---
**Viewer Page 197** (rcdbook1858_27_0196.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 193
**John A. Ubsdell, Charles Peirson William Barr and James Duncan vs Michael Gillespie**
Attachment.- Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their [respective ?] attorneys and thereupon come also a Jury to wit: Andrew Geissel, Marquard Foster, Joseph Suss, Adam Swefel Frederick W. Meyers, John Tilton, B. Hussy, F. F. Oeters S. O. Smith. David C. Andrews, Andrew Johnson B. F. Crane, twelve and good lawful new who being duly elected, tried and sworn the matters in controversy upon the plea in abatement, the trial of this cause progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issue in favor of said plaintiffs. It is, therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that said defendant at the date of the commencement of this suit was a non resident of the state of Missouri. Thereupon come the plaintiffs as well as the Jury sworn and empannelled herein and the trial of this cause progressed, and the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid assess the damages of said plaintiffs by reason of the premises in their petition stated at the sum of one hundred and eighty one dollars and forty-five cents; therefore it is considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of said defendant the debt aforesaid in form as assessed and also their costs and have execution therefor
**Stephen Haskell & vs Benjamin F. C. Champion &**
This day come the defendants by their attorney and withdraw their answer herein.
**Stephen Haskell & James M. Franciscus vs Benjamin F. C. Champion Cornelius D. Sullivan Jeremiah T. Sullivan & Raymon Apapin**
On Note. Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorneys but the said defendants, although duly summoned and solemnly called coming not make default. Wherefore the Court doth find from the instrument of writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of One thousand six hundred and fifty eight dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution
**James Fox vs John Sigerson & George [Suriyer ?]**
On Note- Now at this day come The said parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court, whereupon the Court doth find from the proofs that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and thirty seven dollars and thirty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution.
**The State of Missouri to use of Joseph Spold vs Samuel Jacob & John Valentine and Moncus Phate**
Now at this day come the defendants by their attorney and upon his motion It is ordered that a writ of [Dedimus ?] issue herein for the taking of depositions an the part of the defendant in the city of Vienna in the Empire of austria.
---
**Viewer Page 198** (rcdbook1858_27_0197.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 194
**February Term 1858**
**Archibald J. Somerville who [Sues ?] in forma [pankins ?] vs Thomas J. Nelson**
Now at this day comes the defendant by his attorney and moves the Court to grant him Judgment against the plaintiff upon the setoff herein filed and the Court being satisfied that he is entitled there to It is therefore considered that the defendant have judgment against the plaintiff for the sum of one cent and for his costs herein expended
**John A. Ubsdell Charles Pierson William Barr & James Duncan vs Michael Gillespie**
On Plea in the nature of Plea in abatement Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and thereupon this case being called for hearing upon the Plea in abatement came a Jury viz Fred Wm Meyer twelve good and lawful men who, being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issue joined upon said plea and having heard the evidence and the argument find the issue therein joined for the plaintiff and the defendant although solemnly called and coming not fails and refuses further to plead herein but makes default, whereupon the Jury doth find from the proofs in the case that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and eighty one dollars and forty five cents, It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and there costs herein expended and thereof have execution.
---
**Viewer Page 199** (rcdbook1858_27_0198.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 195
**Frederick Dattelywig vs M. N. Black**
Now at this day comes the plaintiff and files motion to set aside the nonsuit herein and affidavit in suport of said motion
**Stephen Haskell & vs Benjn F. C. Champion &**
Now at this day comes the plaintiffs by their attorneys and on his motion It is ordered that this case be dismissed as to defendant Joseph L. Papin and the plaintiffs by leave of Court file amended petition
**George H. Wicker vs George J King**
Now at this day come again the parties by their respective attorneys and also the Jury empaneled herein and the Jury representing to the Court that they cannot agree upon a verdict herein, It is ordered by the Court that they be discharged and this case be continued generally.
**Richard Bridgfox vs Louis Charleville & Solomon H. Robbins**
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court and the Court having seen and heard the proofs and being advised of and concerning the premises doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Three thousand two hundred and ninety four dollars and nineteen cents with interest thereon from this date at the rate of ten percentum per annum until paid. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found together with interest thereon as aforesaid and also his costs herein and thereof have execution.
The death of the Non Thomas Hart Benton was announced to the Court by C. A Kannegan Esq whereupon in respect to the memory of the deceased It [is ?]
---
**Viewer Page 200** (rcdbook1858_27_0199.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 196
**James M. Crawford vs Amos H. Shultz**
On note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and here in open court consent that judgment may be entered against the defendant for the sum of two hundred and forty dollars and forty four cents, wherefore It is considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by consent found and also his costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution[- ?]
**Calvin F. Burns vs Charles L. Hunt & William M. Cooke**
On note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer to the plaintiffs petition, whereupon, the defendants although called coming not and failing further to plead herein make default, on motion It is considered by the court that the petition of the plaintiff be taken for confessed and the court doth find from the instrument of writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two thousand one hundred and fifty two dollars and thirty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**Samuel Willi vs John Largue & Charles L. Hunt**
On note
Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer and failing and refusing further to plead herein. It is considered by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff be taken for confessed. And the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and eighty seven dollars and seventy there cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs and thereof have execution
**Matthew Park vs Henry C. Lynch Francis Rogers Lowrey Mathew & Thomas Lowrey**
On note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants, withdraw their answer, and failing and refusing further & plead herein, It is considered by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff be taken for confessed and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and seventy two dollars and nine cents. It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff recover against the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution[- ?]
---
**Viewer Page 201** (rcdbook1858_27_0200.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 197
**Edward V Bryan et al vs Henry S. Martin et al**
On motion of plaintiff by attorney It is ordered that an alias writ issue against the defendant H S. Bryan directed to the sheriff of pike County
**Mechanics Bank vs A. N. Street Adam Diefenbach & Samuel Myerson**
One Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer and failing and refusing further to plead herein It is considered by the Court that the plaintiffs petition be taken for confessed and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Eleven hundred and forty two dollars and Eighty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution.
**Alfred D Green et al vs James M M Fadin Peter Mueller & Jacob Raeder**
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney and on motion It is ordered that this case be dismissed as a defendants Peter Mueller and Jacob Reader[. ?]
**Alfred D Green Edward H Thomas & Fity Henry Narren vs James M M Fadin**
On Bill of Exchange
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendant withdraws his answer and failing and refusing further to plead It is considered by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff be taken for confessed and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of One thousand seven hundred and seventeen dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**M. Sousa vs Calvin Townsley**
Confession of Judgment
Now at this day comes the defendant by Henry Hitchcook Esq his attorney and files a written statement duly verified by affidavit whereby he confesses himself indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and twenty three dollars and thirty cents and consents and agrees that Judgment may be entered against him and in favor of plaintiff for that sum. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Julia Morisso vs J. K. Philiber**
Motion for new trial filed
---
**Viewer Page 202** (rcdbook1858_27_0201.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 198
**Ephraim Ball, Cornelius Altemus Thomas R. Jones Louis Miller Jacob Miller & George Cook Mann Facturing & Trading under the name and Style of Ball [alteruna ?] & Co vs John Sigerson and William Sigerson, Trading under the name & Style of John Sigerson & Co**
On account.
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants withdrawing their answer consent and agree that judgment may be rendered against them for the sum of two thousand eight hundred and ninety there dollars and ninety one cents in favor of the plaintiffs. It is therefore considered and agreed that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid consented to and also their costs and charges in and about this suit expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Mechanics Bank vs Cornelius D Sullivan & Jeremiah J. Sullivan partners trading under the name of C D Sullivan & Co & Joseph L. Papin**
On note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer whereupon the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court upon the petition and proofs and the Court doth find from the instrument of writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and sixty six dollars and fifty cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also her costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Charles D Coleman vs The City of S Louis**
On account and award
Now at this day come to parties by their respective attorney and the defendant withdrawning her answer consents and agree that Judgment may be rendered against her and in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of Two thousand nine hundred and sixty nine dollars and fifty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid consented to and also his costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Benedict Shultz vs John Valentine et al**
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and files motion to set aside the Order setting aside the default herein and to reaffirm the judgment of default
**Sophia [Aufterheid ?] vs Caspar [Aufterheid ?]**
The sheriff of S Louis County having made return that the defendant cannot be found in his County, On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff It is ordered that the defendant be notified by the publication
---
**Viewer Page 203** (rcdbook1858_27_0202.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 199
according to law of this order, that a civil action has been commenced against him in the Circuit Court of S Louis County the object of which is to procure a divorce from the bonds of matrimoney and that unless he be and appear at the next term of the said Court to be begun and held at the Court house in the city S Louis on the first monday of October next and on or before the sixth day of the said term answer to the said petition the same will be taken for confessed, and a decree of divorce rendered against him[. ?] [and ?]
**Thomas Lawless vs Edward Hughes & William Dukes**
Dismissal
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and by consent It is ordered that this case be dismissed at the cost of the defendants and that execution issue therefor
**John J. Partkinson vs John Largue & Charles L. Hunt**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the defendants withdrawing their answer the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court upon the petition and proofs and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of One thousand and sixty three dollars and forty cents. It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**In the matter of the assignment of Wm M. Stephenson**
Jacob M Bixler assignee of Wm M Stephenson comes into Court and files an [invention ?] of the effects assigned and thereupon the Court appoints John Sexton and Frank Overstaltz
The day came in Open Court James Castello Sheriff of S Louis County and acknowledged deed to James Johnson by him here presented to be his act and deed for the purposes therein mentioned[. ?]
**Franklin L. Neber vs Charles Haryig**
Order of Sale
Now at this day come the sheriff of St Louis county and files his application stating that the property levied on by him under the attachment herein is perishable and liable to great damage and prays the Court to grant an order of Sale herein It is therefore Ordered by the Court that the sheriff proceed to sell said property according to law after having duly advertised the same and that he make due report of his proceeding under this Order on the first day of the next term of this Court[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 204** (rcdbook1858_27_0203.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 200
**Walter T. Hatch vs Alfred Willonghly**
Order of Sale
Now at this day comes the Sheriff of S Louis county and files his application representing to the Court that the property seized by him under the attachment issued herein is perishable and liable to great damage and prazo the Court to grant an order of Sale herein. Wherefore It is ordered by the Court that the sheriff proceed after duly advertising the same according to Law to Sell the said property and that he make due report of his proceeding under this order on the first day of the next term of this Court
**Louisa L. Freligh vs Charles L. Hunt et al**
Amended petition filed
**James Lefferts vs Joseph A Eddy et al**
On motion of plaintiffs by his attorney it is ordered that this case be dismissed. It is therefore considered by the Court that the defendants recover of the plaintiffs their costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Solomon Smith vs Alfred W. Waterman**
On bill of Exchange. Attachment.
On Plea in abatement
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and this case being called for trial and both parties being ready thereupon came a Jury by John H. Garnhart, Henry Hartwig Frederick Berg, Joseph Pippen Reinhart Boese, Edward Coffie, John Buschman, Frederick Stendeman Orlando Fish Joseph Walenfechtler, Nelson Tindall and James Dickey twelve good and lawful men who were duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issues joined upon the plea in abatement herein and thereupon the trial progressed but not being concluded at the hour of adjournment, further proceeding herein are continued until tomorrow morning at ten O Clock. Court adjourned to some time
---
**Viewer Page 205** (rcdbook1858_27_0204.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 201
**F. Cousinem vs B. F. C. Champion et al**
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and files his petition and prays the Court to make an order on the defendants to produce in Court their books of account relating to the [matteres ?] in controversy herein, and the Court having heard the said petition and being advised of and concerning the premises doth order that the defendants do upon the trial of this case produce in and the said books of account[. ?]
**Max Nacker vs John Smith & Elias Nilmot**
Defendant Smith by his attorney comes and files his separate answer herein
**Samuel McCartney Thomas N Strode & Anaclette L. Lacroix vs A. William Streit & Andreas Reinstudtler**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their attorney and the defendants withdrawing their answer the plaintiff waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the petition and proofs and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three thousand one hundred and thirty seven dollars and Twenty nine cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also their costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Benjamin P. Searcy vs Edward R. Threekeld**
By Consent of parties It is ordered that this case be dismissed at the cost of defendant and that execution issue therefor.
**John J Anderson Reuben Anderson & Erastus Gaylord vs Miles G Moris and Henry M. Woodward**
On Notes
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants withdrawing their answer, the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit this case [or ?] the Court upon the petition and proofs and the Court doth find from the writings upon which this action to founded that the defendants on indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of six hundred and thirteen dollars and forty one cents. it is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs in this suit expended and that they have thereof execution[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 206** (rcdbook1858_27_0205.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 202
**John Merrick vs William C Smith**
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and file their written agreement whereby they consent and agree that judgment may be rendered against the defendant and in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of one cent, and for the costs of this suit. It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid consented to and also the costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Hudson E Bridge John H Beash Henry B. Holland & Leonard B. Holland vs Adam Schoen**
On account
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney and on their motion It is ordered that this case be dismissed It is therefore considered by the Court that the defendant recover of the plaintiffs his costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Robert Stevens vs John L. Millian et al**
Now at this day come the defendants by their attorney and whereby motion It is ordered that this case be dismissed for want of security for costs and the plaintiff by his attorney comes and files motion to set aside dismissal[. ?]
**Ellen J. Wilgus Albert J. Noble & James S. Wilgus vs The Steamboat David Tatum and W. S. Harper and William P Davis H. W Childs Samuel L. McKinney & A B. Earle**
On Steamboat Warrant
Now at this day come the parties by their attorney and the defendants withdrawing their answer the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the petition and proofs and the Court having seen and heard the Same and being thereof advised doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of seven hundred and twenty five dollars and seventy two cents. It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant and Wm P. Davis, H. W. Childs, Samul L. McKinney and A. B. Earle the Securities in the bond of release herein, the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein, and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Solomon Smith vs A. M. Waterman**
On plea in abatement
Now at this day come again the parties by their respective attorney and also the Jury sworn herein and thereupon the trial of this case progressed but not being concluded at the hour of adjournment It is ordered that further proceeding herein be continued until to-morrow morning at ten O Clock
---
**Viewer Page 207** (rcdbook1858_27_0206.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 203
---
**Viewer Page 208** (rcdbook1858_27_0207.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 204
**Alfred Billings & George W. Billings vs Charles Fink**
Attachment
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorneys and an their motion It is ordered that this case be dismissed at the cost of the plaintiffs. It is therefore considered by the Court that the attachment herein be dissolved and that the defendant recover of the plaintiffs this costs herein expended
**Alfred Billings & George W. Billings vs The Boatman's Saving Institution garnishee of Chas. Fink**
Now at this day comes the garnishee by its attorney and an his motion It is ordered by the Court that the garnishee be discharged and be allowed the sum of ten dollars for the trouble had in answering to the garnishment and It is considered by the Court that the garnishee go hence and recover of the plaintiffs the costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Joseph Cooker to use & vs Charles Shnikee et al**
Continued
**Thomas Alexander vs James J. Todd William Ray & James McMahaw**
Order of Publication
Now at this day come the plaintiff by his attorney and the Sheriff having made return that the defendants William Ray and James McMahaw cannot be found in his county, On motion It is Ordered that they be notified by the publication according to law of this order that a civil suit has been commenced against them in this court the object of which is to obtain a judgment against them for the sum of two thousand two hundred and ninety four dollars and forty five cents together with interest [thereso ?] at the rate of ten percent per annum from the first day of October 1857 until paid, and that unless they be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held on the first monday at october next at the Court house in the city of S Louis, and an or before the third day of said term answer to the said action, the petition of the plaintiff will be taken for confessed and judgment rendered against them and their property sold to satisfy the same
**Firmin Cousiney vs B. T. C. Champion et al**
On motion of the attorney for the plaintiffs It is ordered that Mepro Hughes & Marshall. produce here in court on tomorrow morning at ten O Clock the bill books and cash book of the firm of Benj F. C. Champion of, the same being in their custody, in order that said books may be used as evidence upon the trail of this Case
---
**Viewer Page 209** (rcdbook1858_27_0208.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 205
**Wesley. J. Alkire et al vs James Reid**
Motion for Judgment an bond filed
**In the matter of the assignment of William Wade**
The appraiser appointed herein by the Court come and file herein a report of their appraisment[. ?]
**Charles H Dubb vs Thomas Campbell**
amended petition filed[. ?] and Demurrer to amended petition filed[. ?]
**Franklin H. McClung vs Wm H. Thompson**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and consent and agree that Judgment may be rendered against the defendant for the sum of Five thousand One hundred and thirty dollars and forty seven cents of which said same two thousand seven hundred and thirteen dollars and twenty nine cents shall bear interest at the rate of ten per centum per annum and the sum of Two thousand four hundred and seventeen dollars and eighteen cents shall bear interest at the rate of six per centum per annum from this date until paid. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid consented to and also his costs herein expended and it is further by consent ordered that execution hereon be stayed until Oct Term 1858.
**Solomon Smith vs A. M. Waterman**
On Plea in abatement
Now at this day come again the parties by their respective attorney and also come the Jury sworn herein and thereupon the trial of this case progressed but not being concluded at the horn of adjournment It is ordered that further proceeding herein be continued until tomorrow morning at ten O Clock. Court adjourned [k Same ?] time.
---
**Viewer Page 210** (rcdbook1858_27_0209.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 206
**State of Mo to use Kyler vs Benjamin Farrar**
Defendant files his answer herein
**Joseph Cooper to use & vs Charles Shinkle**
Defendant by leave of Court files Supplement at answer herein.
**Benjamin Lieber vs John B. Ganter**
Depositions an part of plaintiff filed
**John H. Calhoun vs George Frederick**
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the Court having heard and being sufficiently advised of and concerning the motion to suppress the depositions herein doth overrule the same and by agreement filed It is ordered that this case be continued at the cost of defendant on account of the absence of Witness L. Howell
**[Emilia ?] Guinget by her next friend Wm Harbinger vs Albert Guinget**
Order Publication
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her attorney and On his motion and the Sheriff of S Louis County having made return that the defendant cannot be found in his county. It is ordered that said defendant be notified by the publication of this order according to law, that a civil suit has been commenced against him in the circuit Court of S Louis County the object of which is to obtain a decree of divorce from the bonds of Matrimoney, and that unless he be and appear at the next term of the said Court to be begun and held at the Court house in the City of S Louis on the first monday of October next and on or before the sixth day of said term answer to the said action the petition of the plaintiff will be taken for Confessed and decree of divorce as prayed for will be rendered[. ?]
**Stephin Hoyt vs Ferdin and Hahn**
Order of Publication
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and on his motion and the Sheriff of S Louis County having made return that the defendant cannot be found is his county It is ordered that the defendant be notified by the publication according to law of this order that a civil suit has been commenced against him in the circuit Court of S Louis County, the object of which is to obtain judgment against him for the sum of six hundred and nine dollars and eighty six cents. On account of notes bond and money loanes as per petition stated, and that his property has been attached and that unless he be and appear at the next October term of the said Court to
---
**Viewer Page 211** (rcdbook1858_27_0210.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 207
be begun and held at the Court house in the city of S Louis on the first monday of October next and on or before the sixth day of said term answer to the said action the petition of the plaintiff will be taken for confessed and Judgment will be rendered against herein and his property sold to satisfy the same[. ?]
**In the matter of the assignment of William Wade**
Bond of assignees filed and approved by the Court[. ?]
**Solomon Smith vs Alfred M Waterman**
On Plea in abatement
Now at this day come again the parties by their respective attorney and also the Jury sworn herein and thereupon the trial of this case progressed but not being concluded at the horn of adjournment It is ordered that further proceeding herein be continued until tomorrow morning at ten O clock. Court adjourned to same time
---
**Viewer Page 212** (rcdbook1858_27_0211.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 208
**Geo Pomeroy et al vs J. H. Alexander**
answer of defendant filed
**E. Guinget [by ?] & c vs A. guinget & c**
On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff be has leave to file amended petition herein
**The State of Mo to use Kyler vs Benjamin Farrar**
On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff time until the 23 instant is granted him to plead to the answer of defendant filed herein[. ?]
**John K Bretelle vs Patrick Mallon**
motion for a new bond and additional security withdrawn
**James Harrison vs Charles Hayes et al**
Answer filed
**Louis Ombrey vs Joseph Vanclaire**
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and by consent It is ordered that this base be continued and that plaintiff have time until the first day of next term to file bond with approved security for the costs in this case
**S Louis Car Wheil Co vs John Dormy**
By agreement of parties this case is continued[. ?]
**Thomas J. McNari vs Charles L. Hunt & Wm M. Cooke**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the Court being sufficiently advised of and concerning the motion to strike out the answer of the defendants, doth sustain the same and thereupon on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff and the defendants failing and refusing further to plead herein It is considered by the Court the Court that the petition of the plaintiff be taken for confessed and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of One thousand one hundred and forty four dollars and twenty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum of One thousand one hundred and forty four dollars and twenty two cents as aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 213** (rcdbook1858_27_0212.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 209
**Wesley J. Alkire & vs G. [x ?] F. Nagel [gars ?] of James Reed**
The plaintiffs by attorney come and file denial of the answer of the garnishee herein
**Alfred Odenwalder vs Madeline Odenwalder**
For divorce
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and solemnly called coming not makes default, Wherefore It is ordered by the Court that the plaintiff petition herein be taken against said defendant as confessed and the plaintiff [waiving a Jury ?] submits this cause to the Court, and the Court being satisfied from the pleading and proofs herein that said plaintiff is an innocent and injured person, doth order adjudge and decree that said plaintiff be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by him contracted with said defendant and be restored to all the rights and privileges of an unmarried person. It is further ordered that said plaintiff pay the costs herein and that execution issue therefor
**Thomas J Wood et al vs Martin Burk et al**
By agreement of Counsel Continued until the next term of this Court[. ?]
**Frederick. Dattelywig vs M. W F. Black**
The Court having heard and being sufficiently advised of and concerning the motion to set aside the nonsuit herein doth overrule the same[. ?]
**Freederick Heaman vs Martin Hammele**
By Consent Continued[. ?]
**Bernandind Florey vs Geo W Manning et al**
On motion of defendants by their attorney further time until the 24th instant is allowed them to file answer to this action[. ?]
**Joseph W Brown et al vs John S. McClane et al**
The Court having heard and being advised of and concerning the motion to set aside Judgment and grant new trial herein doth overrule the same
**Wm V. N. Bay Trustee of Flora Byrne vs Joseph Wescott and Cornelius D Sullivan**
Now at this day come the parties and the Court having heard and being advised of and concerning the motion for new trial herein doth overrule the same[. ?]
**State Savings Institution vs Graff [& ?] Hammerstein**
Now at this day come the defendants by their attorney and withdraw their demurrer to the petition of the plaintiff[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 214** (rcdbook1858_27_0213.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 210
**M. Hollacher vs Wm F. Holske**
The Court having heard and being sufficiently advised of and concerning the motion for new[- ?]trial herein doth overrule the same
**Francis Hamilton vs F. Meyer et al**
The Court having heard and being sufficiently advised of and concerning the demurrer to the petition of the plaintiff doth sustain the same and on motion of the plaintiff he is allowed ten days time in which to file amended petition
**Frank Marquard vs Michalas Ruter**
Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys and the Court having heard and being advised of and Concerning the motion to set aside the judgment and grant now trial herein doth overrule the same[. ?]
**Wm W. Walkelam vs Chal. H. Valentine et al**
On motion of defendants It is ordered that they be allowed thirty days additional time in which to file answer to amended petition herein[. ?]
**Franklein H McClung & c vs Thomas Arches & c**
On motion of plaintiff It is ordered that this case be dismissed as to defendant Thomas J Madell[. ?]
**Franklin H McClung Charles L. Thompson & Amon H McDonald vs Thomas Arches**
On Note
Now at this day come the plaintiff by their attorney but the defendant although duly summoned and Solemnly called, coming not makes default and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court, upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of One-thousand three hundred and seventy two dollars and thirty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**David Daniels vs William Selcott and Robert McDonald**
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and also come the referees herein and file their report whereupon the attorney for the plaintiff moves the Court to confirm the same and render judgment thereon and the Court doth sustain said motion and finding from the said report that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and sixty form dollars and ninety five cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants Wm Selcott and Robt McDonald the sum of six hundred and sixty form dollars and ninety five cents as aforesaid in form aforesaid found and also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 215** (rcdbook1858_27_0214.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 211
**Solomon Smith vs Alfred M Waterman**
On Plea in abatement
Now at this day come again the parties by their respective attorney and also the Jury sworn herein and thereupon the trial of this case progressed and being concluded the Jurors aforesaid upon their Oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff and that the said defendant at the time of the bringing of this suit had not fraudulently conveyed or assigned his property or effects so as to hinder or delay his creditors and that the defendant had not fraudulently concealed removed or disposed of his property or effects so as to hinder or delay his creditor It is therefore considered by the Court that the said defendant go hence and recover of the plaintiff his costs herein and have execution
**Solomon Smith vs Alfred M Waterman**
The defendant by his attorney comes and files motion for new trial together with reasons therefor[. ?] Court adjourned until Monday morning [set ?] at ten O clock
---
**Viewer Page 216** (rcdbook1858_27_0215.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 212
**The President, Directors & Company of the Bank of Louisville vs Elow G. Smith & William K. Sherwood**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and agree and consent to submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having heard the same doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and ninety two dollars and fifty cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also their costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution and by consent It is further Ordered that Execution be stayed ninety days
**John McKnight vs Orleana C. Schaumburg**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and upon agreement filed and the Court having [seem ?] and heard the same doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two thousand seven hundred and fifty eight dollars and twenty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Covenant Mutual Life Insurance Company vs Charles F. Baker et al**
On motion of the attorneys for the plaintiff It is ordered that this case as to defendants, Eliya G. Frost, A D. Stuart and Robert Campbell be dismissed
**Covenant Mutual Life Insurance Company vs Charles F. Baker James Moore William Made Daniel M Frost & Mary B. Stuart**
On Notes
Now at this day come the parties by there attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having sum and heard the same doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and ninety two dollars and sixteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also its costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**State of Missouri to use of Spold vs Jacoby & Valentine**
Continued as on affidavit of defendants and at their costs[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 217** (rcdbook1858_27_0216.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 213
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs Addison G. Bragg Oliver J Bragg Michael Burrows Gerhard H Temmerman and William Palm**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their attorney and waiving a sum submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having seen and heard the same doth find therefrom that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two thousand seven hundred and seventy five dollars and twenty two cents. It is therfore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also her costs herein expended and thereof have execution.
**Dwight Durkee & vs Authony M Foster et al**
On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff It is ordered that this case as against defendants Ferdinand Heman and Jno W Thornburg be dismissed
**Dwight Durkee and Saml. B. Bullock vs anthony M Foster**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having seen and heard the same doth find therefrom that the defendants is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and fifteen dollars and sixty-six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs Benjamin F. C. Champion Cornelius D. Sullivan and Jeremiah T. Sullivan & Joseph L. Papin**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer to the plaintiffs petition and thereupon the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Six hundred and fifty four dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also her costs herein expended and thereof have execution.
**Charles Wiggun vs C. L. Hunt et al**
Continued
**John A Ubsdell & vs Louis Kanfman**
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorneys and on their motion It is ordered that this case be dismissed at plaintiff costs[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 218** (rcdbook1858_27_0217.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 214
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs Addison G. Bragg Oliver J. Bragg Michael Burrows & Gerhard H. Timmerman**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court doth find from the same that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand three hundred and thirty nine dollars and thirty cents, It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also her costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**William Johnston vs Edward S. Wheaton & Joseph L. Papin**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer and thereupon the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits the case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and forty two dollars and sixty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**George D Shackeeford vs Charles L. Hunt & William M. Cooke**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the defendants withdraws their answer and thereupon the plaintiff waiving a jury submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and nineteen dollars and nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Isaac W. Mitchell vs Jacob Fritschle August Fritschle & John Schiffman**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and fifteen dollars and forty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also [him ?] costs and thereof have execution and it is further adjudged and ordered by the Court that the said sum as aforesaid found bear interest at the rate of ten per centum per annum from the date hereof until paid
---
**Viewer Page 219** (rcdbook1858_27_0218.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 215
**George D. Shackleford vs William M. Cooke & Charles L. Hunt**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer to the petition of the plaintiff and thereupon the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred and sixty seven dollars and twenty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Stephen Haskell & James M. Franciscus vs Paul Carlin et al**
Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys and on motion of the plaintiffs It is ordered that this case as against Samuel Myerson be dismissed and the defendants withdraw their answer to plaintiff petition
**Stephen Haskell & James M Franciscus vs Paul Carlin Charles Frity & John Helgenberg**
On Note
Now at this day come the plaintiff by their attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Eight hundred and nineteen dollars and ten cents. it is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also their costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**The Champagne County Bank vs Miles G. Mories & Henry M. Woodward**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleading and proofs and the Court having seen and heard the same doth find therefrom that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and seventy nine dollars and fifty four cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also their costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution.
**Charls H Baxter Alfred T Baxter & Franklin Bell vs Miles G. Mories & Henry M Woodward**
On account
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleading and proofs, and the Court having seen and heard the same doth find therefrom that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and eight dollars and eighty five cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 220** (rcdbook1858_27_0219.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 216
**Edward J. Gleasgow & William H. Gleasgow vs Isaac W Taylor**
On Note
Now at this day come again the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having seen and heard the same doth find that the defendant as indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Two Thousand two hundred and thirty dollars and thirty four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also their costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution
**The State Savings Institution vs Francis F. Graff & Jacob Hammerstein**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having seen and heard the same doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Eight hundred and ninety eight dollars and ninety three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also her costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**Frederick L. Billon vs Edward S. Wheaton & Joseph L. Papin**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants; withdraw their answer to the plaintiffs petition and thereupon the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of from hundred and one dollars, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**John Cochran vs Louis Davis**
On Note[- ?] attachment
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and by their consent It is ordered by the Court that the attachment herein be dismissed, and the defendant withdraws his plea in abatement filed herein and thereupon the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and two dollars and fifty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs and thereof have execution
**St B[r ?] City of Memphis vs Leonard Muthews & c**
Depositions on the part of plaintiff filed
---
**Viewer Page 221** (rcdbook1858_27_0220.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 217
**John B. Valli & Co a firm Composed of John B Valli & Neice Valli vs Heinrich & Reinhard & firm Composed of John C. G. Heinrich & Peter Reinhard**
On account
Now at this day come the plaintiff by their attorney, but the defendants coming not the plaintiff waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleading and proofs and the Court having heard the same doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and one dollars and thirty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also their costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**William Price vs George M. Callier Daniel R. Parsons George [Simyer ?] & Thomas Roger**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective. Attorneys, and the Defendants withdraw their answer and thereupon the defendant waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this actions is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two thousand two hundred and thirty six dollars and seventy cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the defendants recover of the plaintiff the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs and thereof have execution
**James B. Hill vs William Jr Cooke & Charles L. Hunt**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the petition and answer wherefrom the Court doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five thousand three hundred and twenty Seven dollars and twenty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**James S. Mason & William J. Counor vs Christian Shaffler & Frank Fox**
On account
Now at this day come the plaintiff by their attorney but the defendant coming not the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having seen and heard the same doth find therefrom that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Five hundred and forty three dollars and seventeen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover as the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court as aforesaid found and also their costs in this behalf expended and that they have thereof execution[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 222** (rcdbook1858_27_0221.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 218
**Edmund W Tryon Edwin S. Dryden & Francis W Tryon vs H. F. Crass & Thomas A. Simpson**
On Note
Now at this day comes the plaintiffs by their attorney but the defendants coming not the plaintiff waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs wherefrom the Court doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of six hundred and thirty nine dollars and sixty eighty cents It is therefore considered by the Court the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also their costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Jonathan W. Wilson & Stephen H. Shallcross vs D. W. Sanford and H. C. Crane**
On Bill of Exchange
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having seen and heard the same doth find therefrom that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two Thousand seven hundred and ninety six dollars and three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum. Aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also their costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**James E Goll Samuel D addison & Joseph Addison vs H. F. Cross & Thomas A Simpson**
On account & notes
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having seen and heard the same doth find therefrom that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two thousand four hundred and forty one dollars and five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court founded and also their costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Thomas Geatman and Lucretia his wife & Thomas Geatman [& ?] by James E Geatman his friend vs Nathaniel Pope Douglas Pope Cornelia Pope Lucretia Pope Kenneth McKenyie & James H Lucas**
Order of Publication
The Sheriff having made return that said defendants, Cornelia Pope John Pope & Lucretia Pope, Cannot be found, and the Court being satisfied that said defendants herein named cannot be served with process, it is On motion of said plaintiffs by their attorneys ordered that said defendants be notified of the commencement of this suit the object of which it to quiet title to and [procure ?] the sale of certain premises heretofore occupied by plaintiffs as a residence, situate in the city of St Louis in block two hundred and seventy four, beginning at a point in South line of Olive Street, distant fifty fat eastwardly from the the northwest Comes of the block Thence along the South line of Olive Street, eastwardly fifty fat; Thence Southwardly one hundred and nine fat two inches to an alley; Thence westwardly along said alley fifty fat; Thence northwardly and paralled with Tenth shut one hundred and nine fat two inches
---
**Viewer Page 223** (rcdbook1858_27_0222.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 219
to the point of beginning and that unless they be and appear at the next term of the said Court to be begun and held at the city of St Louis on the first monday of October next, and on or before the sixty day thereof answer the petition of said plaintiff, the same will be taken against them an confessed. It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published, according to law in the missouri democrat a newspaper printed in the city of S Louis.
**Firmin Cousnery & c vs Benjamin F. C. Champion &**
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and on motion of the defendant It is ordered that this case be continued at the costs of said defendants an account of the absence of James C. Hopkins a witness matinal on the part of said defendants[. ?]
**Francis Hamilton vs F. Meyers et al**
amended petition filed
**William Raignel et al vs Herman Womer & c**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the Court having heard and being advised of and concerning the motion to strike and parts of the plaintiffs petition herein doth sustain the same and thereupon the plaintiff by leave of Court struck out the following parts of their petition to writ [all ?] that part of said petition beginning at the word plaintiff on the eighteenth line of the first page thereof and ending at the word plaintiff on the cast line of said page inclusive[- ?] also all the endorcements on said [promissary ?] note sued on
**The Citizens Savings Institution vs G. W. Thatcher gar [re ?] & c**
answer of garnishee filed
**James C. Page vs G. W. Thatcher [garco ?] of A M Waterman &c**
answer of garnishee filed
**Isaac Lamaster vs The Wood boal Honding**
Demurrer to amended petition filed
**Wm D Herring vs Kate Herring**
Depositions filed
**Benedict Shulty vs John Valentine &c**
The Court having heard the motion to set aside the order setting aside the default herein doth sustain the same and doth adjudge that the Judgment
---
**Viewer Page 224** (rcdbook1858_27_0223.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 220
of default entered herein on the 23th February 1858 be reinstated
**Lucius A. Willard vs Miles G. Mories & Henry M Woodward**
Plaintiff by attorney comes and files amended petition herein[. ?] and the Court having heard and being advised of and Concerning the motion to suppress the deposition of William S. Woodward doth sustain the same, and doth order and adjudge that said deposition be suppressed Court adjourned as before
---
**Viewer Page 225** (rcdbook1858_27_0224.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 221
**Thomas McAdams vs Charles Muegge impleaded with Paul Carlin &c**
Satisfaction
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by Wm J. Romyn Elis attorney and acknowledges full and entire satisfaction of the Judgment heretofore rendered herein.
**Squire Hall vs Wm J Dinar**
On motion of defendant by his attorney leave is granted him to file an amended answer herein.
**Henry Morham ex &c vs Thomas Simley &c**
On motion of plaintiff by his attorney It is ordered that an alias writ issue herein against defendant Lumley and this case is continued
**Abram Goldsmith vs Adams Epress Co.**
Depositions filed
**J Mayer &C vs Equitable Fin Jwenrance leo of London**
Depositions filed
**Wm D. Herring vs Kate Herring**
Now at this day come the plaintiff by his attorney and on motion the Court doth grant leave to the plaintiff to amend his petition herein by interlining on the eighth line from the [to is ?] of the first page thereof an additional allegation in these words [to writ ?] ``That he was in fact insaire at the time'' which is done
**Lucuis A Willard vs Miles G. Mories &c Henry M Woodward**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and Waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having seen and heard the same and being hereof advised doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and twenty eight dollars and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**George Bellas of vs John Rochler &c Carl [Wehrle ?]**
On Note
Now at this day come the plaintiff by his attorneys, but the defendants although called come not where upon the plaintiff waiving a Jury submit
---
**Viewer Page 226** (rcdbook1858_27_0225.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 222
this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs wherefrom the Court doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and twenty seven dollars and eighteen cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Jacob S. Brown vs Francis G. Henderson & Edward Rice**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit this Case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs wherefrom the Court doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and forty eight dollars and ninety cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs herein and thereof have execution
**Thomas J. Lawrenson vs Joseph Campbell**
Petition for Trespass.
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys, and this case being called for trial and both parties being ready, thereupon came a Jury viz matthew Rippey Bernard Buette, George Clemans C Vail, Thos A. Dryden Geo F. Hill Geo Parker Joseph Cain, Samuel Wiggins, [W. ?] Morton Frank Bergfeild and John Bellerson twleve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn, well and truly to try all the matters in controversy in this action the trial of this case progressed and being now concluded the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issues herein joined in favor of the plaintiff and assess the damage by him sustained at the sum of ninety six dollars and fifty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Jury found and also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Edward J. King vs Charles Herpich and George Stadlmain**
Attachment
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and on their motion It is ordered that this case be dismissed at the cost of plaintiff and that execution issue therefore[. ?]
**William C. Jameson vs John Largue & Charles L. Hunt**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer herein and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs wherefrom the Court doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and one dollars thirty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 227** (rcdbook1858_27_0226.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 223
**Charles Bobb vs William Fulfow & Charles L. Hunt**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proof whereupon the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and forty six dollars and eighty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs Louis A. Welton et al**
Now at this day come the defendants by their attorney and on their motion and upon affidavit filed It is ordered by the Court that this case be continued at defendants casts[. ?]
**Michael Owens vs Wm C. Smith**
Now at this day come the defendants by [their ?] attorney and on motion and upon affidavit filed It is ordered by the Court that this case be continued at the costs of the defendant[. ?]
**Isaac H Sturgcon vs Jerome B. Brown**
Confession of Judgment
Now at this day comes the parties by their respective attorney and the defendant files an instrument of writing from which it appears to the Court that he doth acknowledge and confess that he is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Eight hundred and fifty two dollars and doth come at ant agree that Judgment may rendered against him and in favor of said plaintiff for the same. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the defendant confessed and his costs herein and thereof have execution.
**Edward P. Tesson & Autoine L. Danyen vs Horace D Brady & George T. Brady**
On Note.
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorneys but the defendants although duly summoned and solemnly called coming not make default. wherefore on motion It is considered by the Court that the plaintiffs petition be taken against [their defendants ?] as confessed and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submit the case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing. On which this action is founded that the defendants an indebted to the plaintiff in the sum one thousand and six Dollars and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**George W Brooks vs Allen Brown**
Ordered that this case be continued at defendants costs
---
**Viewer Page 228** (rcdbook1858_27_0227.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 224
**David W. Tenton [Aurow ?] B. Tenton & Benjamin Tenton vs Christian Shaffler & Frank Fax**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and here in open Court Consent and agree that Judgment may be rendered herein in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants for the sum of six hundred and nineteen dollars and eleven cents and for costs of suit. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid consented to and also the costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**Stephen Haskell & c vs John Peters et al**
On motion of the attorney for the plaintiffs It is ordered that this case as to defendants James W. Sherman and Samuel Myerson be dismissed
**Stephen Haskell & James M Franciscus vs John Peters**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court on the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having sum and heard the sum doth find therefrom that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and sixty seven dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**The Steam boat City of Memphis by Wm J. Konuty Master vs Leonard Matthews Charles W. Levering & William H. Matthews**
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and by consent of parties and this case being called for trial thereupon come a Jury viz Joseph Cain Samuel Wiggins, Andrew Pierce, Frank Bergfield, George Braeden, N. Mortow six good and lawful men, who being duly elected trial and sworn well and truly to try the issues joined herein and having heard the evidence and the trial hereof being concluded, the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid do find for the plaintiff and assess the damages sustained at the sum of two hundred and six teen dollars and forty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Jury found and also the costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**Thomas B. Wing vs Jacob. S. Williams**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and this case being called for trial, let a Jury come and thereupon came a Juru viz George Clemens, C. Vail James Meegan Cornelius S. Dailey, Thomas Dryden George Parker John Bellerson lawful men who having been duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issues joined herein, thereupon the trial of this case progressed and being concluded the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issues herein
---
**Viewer Page 229** (rcdbook1858_27_0228.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 225
for the plaintiff and assess his damages at the sum of Three hundred and seventy one dollars fifty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Jury found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?] seed the plaintiff here in open Court [remits ?] of said account the sum of one dollars and sixty nine cents
**Charles Bobb vs Edw S. Wheaton Benj F. Champion &c G L. Papin**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer herein, whereupon the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court, and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and eighty five dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**William C Wagley Jule C. Kingsbury Darius H [Cox ?] &c Daniel G. Eligrity vs William S. Grant**
On Bills exchange
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and this case being called for trial and both parties being ready set a Jury Come, and thereupon came a Jury [viz ?] Matthen Rippy Bernard [Buelte ?] George Clemans, C Vail, James Dryden John Bellerson, James W Roberts, George F. Hill Thomas Rutherford and George Parker by consent ten good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn will and truly to try the issue joined herein and thereupon the trial of this case progressed but not being concluded at the horn of adjournment further proceeding herein are continued until tomorrow morning at ten oclock. Court adjourned as before
---
**Viewer Page 230** (rcdbook1858_27_0229.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 226
**The St B[r. ?] City of Memphis vs Leonard Matthews et al**
Now at this day come the defendants by their attorney and file motion and reasons for new trial herein[. ?]
**Isaac W. Mitechell vs Jacob Fritschle et al**
Motion for new trial filed
**Louis C. Garnier vs English Bruns & Co**
amended answer filed
**Edward J King vs Findley Robb Gar[er ?] & c**
On motion of the garnishees by his attorney and the court being advised of and concerning the premises It is ordered that said Garnishee be discharged from the garnishment herein and that he be allowed the sum of ten dollars for his trouble in answering herein to be paid by the plaintiff[- ?]
**Joseph Farnsworth vs The Jerre Hante, Alton & S Louis Rail Road Co**
On Plea in abatement
Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys and the Court having heard and being advised of and concerning the premises upon the plea in abatement herein doth find the issues therein in favor of the plaintiff, and an motion of the defendant leave to answer further herein is granted
**Louis C. Garnier vs Anton Jaeger & c**
On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff It is ordered that this case as against defendants Charles W. Graeff & Samuel Myerson be dismissed
**Louis C. Garnier vs Anton Jaeger**
On Note
Now at this day come the plaintiff by his attorney and waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and seventy two dollars and six cents together with interest thereon at the rate of ten per centum per annum from date until paid. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution and on motion ordered by the Court that execution hereon be stayed until the first day of September next[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 231** (rcdbook1858_27_0230.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 227
**Maria Larrisa Guerette vs Charles L. Hunt & John Largue**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer herein and thereupon the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court and the Court having seen and heard the proofs doth find therefrom that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and sixty six dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and her costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**William D. Herring vs Kate Beittel alias Kate Herring**
Pet for divorce[- ?] Trial decree
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by Thomas C Johnson his attorney, an it appearing to the Court that the defendant has been duly summoned according to the laws of this state; That she hath not answered the petition and a default hath been regularly entered, and the said defendant being again solemnly called comes not. It is ordered that this cause be heard without further delay, thereupon the same came on for hearing upon the petition, and upon [oral ?] and written evidence adduced by plaintiff to surtain the allegation thereof. Upon consideration whereof the Court doth find that on the 21st of november 1854 the plaintiff and defendant were by legal ceremonies married to each other;- That at the time of said marriage the plaintiff was in in such a condition of mind as to be utterly incapable of consenting to or making the contract of marriage. That after said plaintiff came to a knowledge of said marriage he repudiated it. That the marriage has not been consummated by cohabitation, and that he has never affirmed or consented thereto, and that plaintiff is now a citizen of this state It is therefore adjudges and decreed that the marriage of plaintiff with defendant, in his condition of mind at the time was a fraud upon him and was from the beginning and shall from hence forth be held will and [void ?] and of no validity in all Courts and places whatsoever; and it is further adjudged and decreed that the plaintiff and defendant shall be considered to each other and to all the world as of said [pretended ?] marriage had not taken place. It is further ordered that plaintiff pay the costs of this suit and that execution issue therefor[. ?]
**In the matter of Robt Mc. OBlenis**
Now at this day come the parties by attorney and on motion It is ordered by the Court that Basil W. Alexander & Robert M. Renick be and they are hereby appointed trustees of the said Robert Mc. OBlenis and thereupon the said Trustee file a bond in the sum of Thirty Thousand dollars, conditioned according to law which bond is approved by the Court
**Charles W Green & Jonas W. Green vs Henry Gronheim**
On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendant withdraws his answer herein and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of one hundred and ninety four dollars and forty five
---
**Viewer Page 232** (rcdbook1858_27_0231.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 228
cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also their costs herein and thereof have execution[. ?]
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs William Wade, Danl M Frost Eliya Graham Frost his wife Adam D Stewart & Mary B. Stewart his wife Robert Campbell, trustee for Mary B. Stewart and trading under style of Wm Wade & Co Thomas B Graham and William E. Wilson**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and by consult It is ordered that the continuance herein be set aside and the defendants William Wade, D M Frost Mary B[e ?] Stewart, Thomas B Graham and William E. Willson withdraw their answers herein, and on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff It is ordered by the Court that this case as against defendants Adam D Stewart, Eliya Graham Frost and Robert Campbell be dismissed, and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this actions is founded that the defendants William Made, D. M Frost, Mary B. Stewart, Thomas B. Graham and William E. Wilson and indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two thousand six hundred and seventy eight dollars, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also her costs herein expended and thereof have execution, agreement of parties by their Counsel filed.
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs William Made, Daniel M Frost Eliya Graham Frost his wife Adam D. Stewart and Mary B. Stewart his wife, and Robert Campbell Trustee for Mary B Stewart Trading under the style of William Wade & Co and James D. Leonard**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and by consent of parties It is ordered that the continuance herein be set aside[. ?] and on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff It is ordered that this case as against defendants Adam D Stewart Eliya Graham Frost and Robert Campbell and the other defendants withdraw their answers herein and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that said defendants Wm Wade, D M Frost Mary B. Stewart and James D Leonard are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand eight hundred and seventy four dollars and sixty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and here costs herein expended and have thereof execution. Agreement filed[. ?]
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs William Wade, Daniel M Frost & Eliza Graham Frost his wife, Adam D. Stewart and Mary B. Steward his wife, Robert Campbell trustee for for Mary B. Stewart trading under Style of Wm Wade & Co & George W. Goode and William E. Wilson**
On Note- Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys, and on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff It is ordered that this case as to defendants [Addam ?] D Stewart, Eliya Graham Frost and Robert Campbell be dismissed[. ?] and the Other defendants withdraw their answer herein, and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded, that the defendants
---
**Viewer Page 233** (rcdbook1858_27_0232.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 229
William Wade, Daniel M. Frost, Mary B. Stewart, George W. Goode and William E. Wilson are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Three thousand six hundred and forty five dollars and eight cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and her costs herein expended and thereof have execution. Agreement filed
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs George W. Goode, William Wade, Daniel M Frost & Eliya Graham Frost his wife Adam D Stewart and Mary B. Stewart his wife and Robert Campbell trustee for Mary B. Stewart all but first mentioned trading under style of William Wade & Co**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by there respective attorney, and on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff. It is ordered by the Court that this case as to the defendants Adam D. Stewart Robert Campbell and Eliya Graham Frost be dismissed[- ?] and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants George W Goode, William Wade, Daniel M Frost, and Mary B. Stewart are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two thousand six hundred and eighty one dollars and twenty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?] agreement of Counsel filed[. ?]
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs William Wade, Daniel M Frost Eliya Graham Frost his wife Adam D Stewart & Mary B. Stewart his wife & Robert Campbell Trustee for Mary B Stewart and George W. Goode**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff. It is ordered by the Court that this case as to defendants Adam D. Stewart, Robert Campbell and Eliya Graham Frost be dismissed and the Other defendants by their attorney withdraw their answers herein; and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the said defendants William Wade, Danl. M. Frost, Mary B. Stewart and George W. Goode are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Three Thousand six hundred and thirty four dollars and forty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also her costs herein expended and thereof have execution, agreement of counsel filed[. ?]
**Thomas Rutherford vs Isaac S. Ketchum**
On Plea in abatement.
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and this case coming its for hearing and decision upon the plea in abatement herein, let a Jury come and thereupon came a Jury viz, A Miltenberger, Andrew Pierce, H. A Pryow, Frank Bergfield D. J. Hancock George Breaden James Meegan, Edwin A. Skeele William [OWheeler ?] Leonard Scollay John
---
**Viewer Page 234** (rcdbook1858_27_0233.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 230
Williams and Cornelius S. Dailsy twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn to try the issues herein joined [the ?] progressed and being concluded the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issues herein for the defendant, and that the defendant was not at the date of the bringing of this suit about to remove from this State with the interest to Change his domicil. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his writ herein but that the defendant go hence and recover of the plaintiff his costs on their behalf expended, and have thereof execution
**Richard Emerson and Nathan Johnson vs Lorenzo D. Jones J. Covell & G. W. Morrison**
Attachment
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and the proofs and the Court having seen and heard the same doth find therefrom for the plaintiffs and doth assess their damages at the sum of five hundred and ninety five dollars and ninety three cents. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also their costs herein expanded and thereof have execution
**William C. Wagley Inle C Kingsburn and Daniel G. Elifrity vs William S. Grant**
On Bills Exchange
Now at this day come again the parties by their respective attorney and also the jurors sworn herein save James Roberts, who being sick and unable to attend; By Consent of parties the trial herein progressed notwithstanding the absence of Said Juror
**David Anderson & John T. Watson vs Myron F. Benjamin Orange W. McKinney & J. Elliott Duryee**
Order of Sale
Now at this day comes James Castells Sheriff of S Louis County and files a Statement whereby it appear to the Court that the property levied upon by virtue of the attachment issued in the above submitted causes is likely to depreciate in value before the probable termination of this suit and that the keeping of the same would be attended with much expense, It is therefore ordered by the Court that the said James Castells Sheriff as aforesaid do proceed to sell said property so levied upon, in Conformity to the Statute in such case made and provided
**Charles H. Waters Silas M. Barrett & Eben Dole vs Myron F. Benjamin & c**
Order of Sale
Now at this day comes James Castells Sheriff of S Louis County and file a Statement whereby it appears to the Court that the property levied upon by virtue of the attachment issued in the above entitted cause is likely to depreciate in value before the probable termination of this suit and that the keeping of the same would be attended with much excuse It is therefore ordered by the Court that the said James Castells Sheriff as aforesaid do proceed to sell said property so levied upon, in conformity with the statute in such case made and provided[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 235** (rcdbook1858_27_0234.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 231
**David Anderson & John T. Anderson vs Myron F. Benjamin Oscar W McKinney & J Elliott Duryel**
Order of Sale
Now at this day comes James Castello Sheriff of S Louis county and files a statement whereby it appears to the Court that the property levied upon by virtue of the attachment issued in the above entitled cause is likely to depreciate in value before the probable termination of the suit and that the keeping of the same would be attended with much expense. It is therefore ordered by the Court that the said James Castello Sheriff as aforesaid so proceed to sell said property so levied upon in conformity with the statute in such case made and provided
**Henry Pike vs Myron F Benjamin [Oscar ?] W McKinney & J Elliatt Duryee**
Order of sale
Now at this day comes James Castello Sheriff of S Louis County and files a Statement whereby it appear to the Court that the property levied upon by virtue of the attachment issued in the above entitled cause is likely to depreciate in value before the probable termination of this suit and that the keeping of the same would be attended with much expense. It a therefore ordered by the Court that the said James Castello sheriff as aforesaid do proceed to sell said property so levied upon in conformity with the statute in such case made and provided[. ?]
**Susan Walker vs Cement P. Mallory**
Petition
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and this cause being called for trial and both parties being ready, thereupon came a Jury viz
twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issues joined herein the trial of this case progressed but not being concluded at the hour of adjournment further proceeding herein are continued until tomorrow morning at ten Oclock.
---
**Viewer Page 236** (rcdbook1858_27_0235.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 232
**In the matter of the assignment of Rogers Anderson & Co**
Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys and on motion It is ordered by the Court that [th ?] John M Krum Esq and Chester Harding Esq be substituted as assignees of the property assigned in place of Charles Anderson heretofore appointed and thereupon said Krum and Harding file herein an Inventory and an appraisment of the said estate and property assigned and also file bond, with good and sufficient security, which is approved by the Court
We acknowledge full and entire satisfactory [of the Judgment ?] recorded [affonts ?] this margin
**George M Thomas & Raymond A Papin vs Inles C. Kingsburn**
On Note and account
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the Court having heard and being advised of and concerning the premises doth sustain the motion to strike out the answer herein-and doth order that said answer be struck out, and that the petition of the plaintiffs be taken for confessed, and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the petition and proofs and the Court having seen and heard the same doth find therefrom that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and thirty three dollars and fifteen cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution
Attest Stephen Rice et al
**George Corning vs Charles L. Hunt & William M. Cooke**
On Note
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the defendants come not and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, wherefrom the Court doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of One thousand and sixty three dollars and thirty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**Covenant Mutual Life Insurance Company vs Baker Moore et al**
Motion to set aside Judgment filed
**Louisa L. Freligh vs Frederick Polity et al**
Defendant Berg files separate answer to amended petition
**In the matter of John N. Straat**
Ordered by the Court that the five of fifty dollars imposed upon John N Straat Esq by the Court for [Contempel ?]
---
**Viewer Page 237** (rcdbook1858_27_0236.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 233
**Susan Walker vs C. P. Mallory**
On Petition
Now at this day come again the parties by their respective attorney and also the Jury sworn herein and thereupon the trial of this cause progressed[. ?] and being concluded, the Jury aforesaid retire to consider of their verdict
**The Citizens Savings Institution vs Alfred M. Waterman Charles W Herbert Henry J Darrah and Chaster W. Pomeroy**
On Plea in abatement
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and this cause coming up for hearing and decision upon the plea in abatement herein, thereupon came a Jury to writ
twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issue joined between the parties upon the plea in abatement herein thereupon the trial progressed but not being concluded at the horn of adjournment further proceeding are continued until tomorrow morning at tem Oclock
---
**Viewer Page 238** (rcdbook1858_27_0237.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 234
**Joseph Farnsworth vs Jerre Hunte Alton and S Louis Rail Road Co**
Motion for new trial filed
**Samuel Simmons vs Thomas Campbell et al**
Now at this day comes the plaintiff and admits the demurrer of the defendants and by leave of Court the plaintiff amends his petition on its face
**Max Wacker vs John Smith and Elias Wilmot**
Petition- attachment
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the defendant comes not and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court upon the pleadings and the Court doth find from the answer of the defendants that they are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and sixty five dollars and seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Susan Walker vs Cement T. Mallory**
Now at this day come again the parties by their respective attorneys and also the Jury sworn herein and the Jurors aforesaid on their oaths aforesaid say they cannot agree upon a verdict herein It is therefore ordered by the Court that the said Jury be discharged and this case be continued until the next term of this Court
**Charles R Anderson assignee of Charles Rogers & Co vs William B. Watson**
Charles R Anderson, the plaintiff haring resigned the trusts reposed in him as assignee of Rogers Anderson & Co, Chester Harding Jr and John M Krum assignees & are substituted plaintiffs in his stead
**Charles R. Anderson assignee of Rogers Anderson & Co vs William B. Watson et al**
Charles R. Anderson, the plaintiff having resigned the trust reposed in him as assignee of Rogers Anderson & Co, Chester Harding Jr. and John M Krum assignees & are substituted plaintiffs in his Stead
**John P. Cabanne vs ``Mary''**
Now at this day comes into Court John P. Cabanne who is personally known to the Court and acknowledge a deed of emancipation to his Slave mary a bright mulatto woman about forty one years of age
---
**Viewer Page 239** (rcdbook1858_27_0238.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 235
**David Anderson and John T. Watson vs Myron F. Benjamin Orange W McKinney & J Elliott Duryee**
Attachment Order of Publication
The Sheriff having made return that said defendants cannot be found and the Court being satisfied that said defendants cannot be served with process, on motion of the plaintiff by their attorney It is ordered that the defendants be notified of the commencement of this suit, the object of which is to recover of said Defendants the sum of two hundred and eighty two dollars and seventy four cents, on account of a promissory note executed by said defendant and delivered to the said plaintiff, and that unless they be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the city of S Louis on the first monday of October next, and on or before the third day thereof answer the petition of said plaintiff the same will be taken against them as confessed and the property attached at the commencement of this suit as belonging to the said defendants will be sold to satisfy the same. It is further ordered that a copy hereby be published according to law in the Missouri Democrat, a newspaper printed in the city of S Louis[. ?]
**David Anderson & John T. Watson vs Myron F Benjamin Orange W. McKinney & J. Elliott Duryee**
Attachment[. ?] Order of Publication
The Sheriff having made return that said defendants cannot be found and the Court being satisfied that said defendants cannot be served with process, it is ordered, that the defendants be notified that a civil action has been commenced against them for the sum of Thirteen hundred and eighty eight dollars and thirty five cents on account of four certain promissory notes executed by the said defendants to the plaintiffs and that their property has been attached and unless they appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the city of S Louis within and for the County of S Louis on the first monday of October next, and on or before the third day thereof answer to the action aforesaid according to law Judgment will be rendered against them and their property sold to satisfy the same And It is further ordered that a copy hereof be published in the missouri Democrat a newspaper printed in the city of S Louis[. ?]
**In the matter of Rofe Neil**
Petitioner by his attorney files an application for a writ of Habeas Corpus and the Court having heard the same refuses to grant the prayer of the petition[. ?]
**Hugh Boyle vs Julia Buchanan**
On motion It is ordered that a [subpoena ?] decrees [recum due ?] herein, directed to Wm M. McPheeten execution of the will of George Buchanan deceased, and Commanding him to produce in Court the will of said George Buchanan deceased on the twenty seventh day of the present month
---
**Viewer Page 240** (rcdbook1858_27_0239.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 236
**Bernardered Florey vs Geo W Manning et al**
Separate answer of A S merritt filed
**Thomas B. Wing vs Jacob. S. Williams**
Motion for new trial filed
**A. F. Shapleigh & c vs John Corsen and F. W. Bailey**
This day come the plaintiffs by their attorney and on his motion It is ordered that this case be dismissed
**The Citizens Savings Institution vs Alfred M. Waterman et al**
Now at this day come again the parties by their respective attorneys and also the Jury sworn herein and thereupon the trial of this case progressed but not being concluded at the hour of adjournment, further proceedings are continued until tomorrow morning at ten O Clock
**William C. Wagley Jules C. Kingsburn Davius H Cox & Daniel G. Elifrity vs William S. Grant**
On Bills Exchange
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and by Consent It is ordered that the Jury sworn herein be discharged and by further consent this case is submitted to the Court upon all the issues therein and the Court being advised of and concerning all and singular the premises doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of one thousand and nineteen dollars and eight cents. It is therefore considered by the court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution
---
**Viewer Page 241** (rcdbook1858_27_0240.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 237
**David B. Hill vs Paul Carlin John Helgenberg & Henry Gronheim**
On Note
Now at this day come the plaintiff and the defendants Helgenberg and gronheim by their respective attorneys and the said defendants withdraw their answer herein but the defendant Carlin although duly summoned and solemnly called coming not, makes default wherfore It is considered by the Court that the plaintiff petition be taken against him as confessed, and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which said action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the defendant in the sum of six hundred and thirty nine dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**Louis C. Garnier vs Oliver Labadie et al**
On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff It is ordered by the Court that this case be dismissed and the plaintiff by leave of Court withdraws the exhibit by him filed herein and leave upon file an attested copy thereof[. ?]
**Joseph Farrell vs Landry Charleville Philip D Gordon George W Lynch**
On Note
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and on his motion It is ordered that this case as against defendant charleville be dismissed and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court and the Court doth doth find from the writing on which this action is founded that the defendants gordon an Lynch are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and twenty eight dollars and seventy two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Watter L. F. Gage et al vs Perry & Chs Tallman**
On motion of plaintiff by their attorney It is ordered by the Court that this case be dismissed
**Thomas F. Smith vs Autoine R. McNari**
On Note
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the petition and proofs[- ?] and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand four hundred and thirty one dollars and twenty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant
---
**Viewer Page 242** (rcdbook1858_27_0241.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 238
the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also the costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**State of Moto use Geo Kyler vs Benjamin Farrar**
On motion of the defendant by his attorney leave [his ?] granted him to withdraw his pleas herein and to file amended pleas herein on or before the 29th day of the present month[. ?]
**[Bernardired ?] Florey vs G. W. Manning et al**
Motion to dissolve injunction filed[. ?]
**Citizens Savings Institution vs Alfred M. Waterman et al**
On Plea in abatement
Now at this day come again the parties by their respective attorneys and also the Jury sworn herein, and thereupon the trial of this case progressed and being concluded the jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issues herein for the defendant and that the said defendant waterman had not at the commencement of this suit fraudulently conveyed or assigned his property or effects so as to hinder or delay his creditors as alleged in the affidavit, and that he had not fraudulently concealed remover or disposed of his property or effects so as to hinder or delay his creditors. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the said plaintiff take nothing by the writ of attachment herein but that the said defendants go hence without day and recover of the plaintiff their costs in this behalf expended
---
**Viewer Page 243** (rcdbook1858_27_0242.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 239
**Solomon Smith vs Geo W. Thatcher gar.**
Answer of garnishee filed
**William M Morrison & Rufus J Lackland vs Samuel McCartney**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and consent and agree that Judgment may be rendered herein in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant for the sum of seven thousand five hundred and sixty six dollars and seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid consented to and also their costs therein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Choutean Harrison & Valle vs English Burns & Co**
By consent of Parties It is ordered that this cause be dismissed at the cost of defendants
**John F Sill vs The S Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Co**
For damages
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and consent and agree that a Judgment may be rendered herein against said defendant and in favor of said plaintiff for the sum al One hundred dollars It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid consented to and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**Edward Boyle vs English Burns & Co**
By consent of parties. It is ordered by the Court that this cause be dismissed at the costs of said defendant
**Thomas M Avery vs W F. Adams**
Deposition filed
**Francis Hamilton vs Frederick Myers et al**
Motion for security for costs filed
**Stephen Haskell et al vs B. F. C. Champion et al**
On motion of plaintiff by their attorney leave is granted their to amend the petition herein by inserting in the same the following words ``That B F. C. Champion under the style of B. F. C. Champion [&c; ?] executed &c''
---
**Viewer Page 244** (rcdbook1858_27_0243.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 240
**Wm M. Morrison & vs Saml M Cartney**
Motion to Strike out parts of answer filed
**Patrick McKenna vs Patrick Malloy**
On account.
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court and the Court having heard the proofs and being advised of the premises doth find for the plaintiff in the sum of one dollars, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and thereof have execution[- ?] and It is ordered that the costs herein expended be taxed against the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor
**Thomas Ryan & Franklin K. Louthan vs Willaim P. Fenn**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs wherefrom the Court doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and fifty three dollars and sixty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**William H. Smith Isaac Laukershiun & Charles L. Hobbo vs Anapias Rice and John Sigerson**
On Note
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the defendant comes not, whereupon the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, wherefore the Court doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and seventy two dollars and fifty cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor
**William B. Betts vs Charles L. Hunt & William M. Cooke**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer and thereupon the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and sixty one dollars and sixty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**Joseph Mewman vs James Mierson**
On motion of plaintiff by his attorney It is ordered that an alias summons returnable at the next term of this Court issue herein and this case is Continued[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 245** (rcdbook1858_27_0244.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 241
**Samuel Jones Michael Jones & John P. Jones vs Maurice Steinbach**
On Draft
Now at this day come the plaintiff by his attorney but the defendant come not, whereupon the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing on which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and forty dollars and twenty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**Henry C. Broadman vs Jacob Fritschle August Fritschle & Henry Pilkington**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the pleading and proofs that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and forty dollars and fifty five cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**George H Bussing & George C Glass vs George M Willing**
On Note.
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendant withdraws his answer herein, and thereupon on motion It is considered by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff be taken for confessed. And the Court doth find from the writing upon which said action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and eighty five dollars and seventy four cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also their costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**Layton C. Dickenson vs John Largue and Charles L. Hunt**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer herein, and thereupon the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court upon the pleading and proofs and the Court doth find from the writing said on that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and eighteen dollars and twenty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**William McCully & Mark W. Watson vs William Hassinger & John OBrien**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer and thereupon on motion It is considered by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff be taken for confessed,
---
**Viewer Page 246** (rcdbook1858_27_0245.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 242
and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is brought that the defendants an indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of. six hundred & eighty one dollars and forty three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also their costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Joel Nouvse Peter Harvey & Samuel Davis vs John Sigerson and Anapias Rice**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer herein, whereupon the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the petition and proofs and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of nine hundred and ninety nine dollars and ninety nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that that plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor[. ?]
**George Rogers vs John Sigerson and John D Taylor**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having seen and heard the same doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and fifty seven dollars and forty cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have exeuction[. ?]
**William B. Betts and William H. Couway & Ewing C. Ketchum vs Michael Diefenbach & Casper Smetter**
On account
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and this case being called for trial and both parties being ready thereupon came a Jury to wit Henry T. Darrah Ferdinand Miller Daniel Dillinger, Theodore Schulte, John H Banker George H. Otto, Francis [Hafkemmeyer ?] D W Stone, Chas Babbington George Handy, W. W Hauston William Magener twleve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issues joined herein, there trial of this cause progressed and being concluded the Jurors aforesaid upon their Oaths aforesaid say they find for the defendants. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs take nothing by his suit but that the defendants go thereof hence without day and recover of the plaintiffs their costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Joseph Newman vs James Mierson**
By Consent of parties It is ordered that this case be continued and that also summons issues against the defendant, returnable at next term[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 247** (rcdbook1858_27_0246.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 243
**George Trumbull vs William M. Cooke & Charles L. Hunt**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer herein and the plaintiff waiving a Jury subnuts this case to the Court and the Court having seen and heard the proofs doth find, from the writing on which this action is founded, that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and sixty nine dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**Logan D Dameron vs John W. Carroll Richard F. Sass & Wiley J. Stratton**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective Attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer herein. And the plainitff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action to founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Two Thousand One hundred one forty three dollars and ninety five cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and this costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Thomas L. Salisbury vs John Largue and Charles L. Hunt**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants [withdraw ?] their answer herein, and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants one indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and fifty two dollars and eighty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**George Barley vs Charles L Hunt & William M Cooke**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer herein, and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court, and the Court doth find from the writing upon which said action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and and ninety nine dollars and seventy cents, with interest thereon at the rate of ten per centum per annum from this date until paid. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution
---
**Viewer Page 248** (rcdbook1858_27_0247.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 244
**David Rokohol James Kinkead vs Paul Carlin John Helgenberg Henry Gronheim & Samuel Myerson**
On Note
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorneys but the defendants coming not the plaintiff waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the petition answer and proofs and the Court having seen and heard the same doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of One thousand two hundred and thirty one dollars and seventy five cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**David Rokohl James Kinkead vs Paul Carlin John Helgenberg Henry Gronheim & Samuel Myerson**
On Note
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorneys but the defendants come not, and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the petition answer and proof and the Court having seen and heard the same doth find therefrom that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Five hundred and sixty four dollars and seventy cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Alfred M. Waterman vs John Sigerson & George Smizer**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court, and the Court doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and fifty six dollars and fourteen cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**James G. McPheeters vs John Sigerson Anapias Rice David W. Graham**
On Note
Now at this day come the defendants by their attorneys and withdraw their answer herein, and the plaintiff by his attorney comes and it appearing to the Court that there is no answer herein, and the defendants although called, Coming not makes default. It is therefore on motion considered by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff be taken against said defendants as confessed, and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and thirty dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution
---
**Viewer Page 249** (rcdbook1858_27_0248.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 245
**Peter Sr Cin vs Mary Sr Cin**
[for ?] Divorce
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and this cause coming on for trial and the Court having duly heard and being advised of and concerning the pleading and proofs doth find that the defendant as an injured and innocent party and that she is entitled to a divorce as prayed for in her answer and crossbill. It is therefore considered adjudged and decreed by the Court that the defendant be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the plaintiff and that she be restored to all the right and privileges of an unmarried woman
It is ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this proceeding
---
**Viewer Page 250** (rcdbook1858_27_0249.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 246
**Jacob Langedorf & Isaac Rosenstein vs David P. Thomas**
Confession of Judgment
Now at this day come the parties by Messrs Krum and Harding attorneys and file a statement from which it appears that the defendant confesses an indebtedness to the plaintiffs in the sum of seven hundred and sixteen dollars, and consents and agrees that judgment may be entered against him and in favor of the plaintiffs for said sum It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid confessed to and thereof have execution as also for the costs herein[. ?]
**Dwight Durkee & Samuel B. Bullock vs Petere Choutean [Jr. ?] James Harrison and Felix Valli**
On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney It is ordered that this case be dismissed at the cost of the plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor[- ?]
**John M. Cashman vs Sylvester Ball et al**
Report of Commissioners filed
**William Wagley et al vs William S. Grant**
Motion for new trial filed
**Francis J. Smith vs Henry G. Hamlin**
Confession of Judgment
Now at this day come the parties by N. Holmes Esq and file a statement from which it appears to the Court that the defendant confesses that he is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Eight hundred and ninety one dollars and sixty three cents, [and ?] consents and agrees that Judgment therefor may be entered against [him ?] and in favor of the plaintiff. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid confessed to and thereof have execution as also for his costs herein expended
**Hugh Boyle vs Julia Buchanan**
On account
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and consent and agree that judgment may be entered herein against the defendant and in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of Eight hundred and eighty nine dollars and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the parties consented to and his costs herein appended and have exeuction therefor
---
**Viewer Page 251** (rcdbook1858_27_0250.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 247
**Hugh Boyle vs Francis S. Buchanan**
On account
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and agree and consent that Judgment may be entered against the defendant and in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of one hundred. And twenty four dollars and eighteen cents[. ?] It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid consented to and there costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?] Execution Stayed until the 1st day of January 1859.
**Krum & Harding [asses &c ?] vs Wm B. Watson et al**
2 cases. Continued
**Michael S. Kelly vs Charles L. Hunt and William M. Cooke**
On Note
Now at this day comes the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer. herein, and upon motion of the plaintiff and the defendants although called coming not It is ordered that the petition of the plaintiff be taken for confessed, and the Court doth find from the writing this action is founded upon that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of One thousand and sixty seven Dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**Henry Pike vs Mosery J Levi & Solomon J Levi**
Ordered that this case be dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor
**Henry B. Belt &c vs George W Goode**
Continued by Consent
**Dwight Durkee & Samuel B. Bullock vs Miles G. Moris Henry M. Woodward Watter E. Sell Thomas Sheppand John S. Thomson William H White and Hiram A Pryor**
On Note
Now at this day come the defendants by their attorney and withdraw their answer filed herein, and the plaintiff by their attorney come, but the defendants make default, It is therefore considered by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff be taken for confessed. And the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants an indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred and twenty four dollars and ninety five cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of
---
**Viewer Page 252** (rcdbook1858_27_0251.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 248
the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**Joel D Smith et al vs John J. Mitchell et al**
Now at this day comes the defendant John J Mitchell by his attorney and enters his appearance to this action and Joins in the demurrer filed by the other defendants
**Wm A Hargadine vs Henry T. Darrah et al**
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the defendant waterman, although duly summoned and solemnly called comes not but makes default, Wherefore on motion It is considered by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff as to said defendant Waterman be taken for confessed[. ?]
**Roland H Hall vs John McCloy, Robert S. McGhee & George G Bast**
On Note
Now at this day come the defendants by their attorneys and withdraw their answer herein, and the plaintiff by his attorney comes but the defendants make default, and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and ninety seven dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**John S. Thompson & vs Webb & McCullough**
Answer of defendants filed and case continued by consent[. ?]
**F. E. Baumgarten vs Louisa A Baumgarten**
Answer filed
**Haviland et al vs Chas F Baker & c**
Continued on affidavit at cost of the defendants
**Joseph Brown vs Charles S. Hunt & William M Cooke**
On Note
Now at this day come the defendants by their attorney and withdraw their answer and the plaintiff comes but the defendants make default wherefore It is ordered that the petition of the plaintiff be taken for confessed and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand six hundred and fifty seven dollars and forty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid
---
**Viewer Page 253** (rcdbook1858_27_0252.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 249
inform aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs in this behalf expended and have thereof execution
**Louis C. Garnier vs Charles L. Hunt Walter H. Dorsett William P. Fenn Richard H. Stevens Robert W Walton Philip S. Lanham & John McDowell**
On Note
Now at this day come the plaintiff by his attorney but The defendant Robert Walton [altho ?] duly summoned and solemnly called coming not makes default, wherefore on motion It is ordered by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff as to said defendant be taken for confessed, and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court, and the Court doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Three thousand and fifty dollars and fifty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**Elias Abraham vs Raphael Keiler Adolphus Isaacs & William Keiler**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and twenty two dollars and eighty eight cents it is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**Sheridan C Hunt et al vs Father James Henry Garnishee of Cartan**
Now at this day come the plaintiffs and acknowledge full and entire satisfaction of the Judgment obtained by their against Father James Henry Garnishe of[- ?] Cartan[- ?]
**Renben J. Guthridge vs Frank W Fillay [Garce ?] of Jas McFadden**
Now at this day comes the plaintiff but the garnishee although duly summoned and Solemnly called comes not. It is therefore on motion considered by the Court that the interrogatories filed against him [be ?] taken for confessed and that inquiry of the indebtedness of the said Garnishee to the defendant be hereafter had
**Renben J Gathridge vs Miles Sells [Garce ?] of Jas McFadden**
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the garnishee although duly summoned and solemnly called [comes ?] not, It is therefore considered by the Court that the interrogatories filed against him be taken for confessed and that inquiry of the indebtedness of the said garnishee to the defendant be here after had
---
**Viewer Page 254** (rcdbook1858_27_0253.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 250
**In the Matter of The Steamboat Orim**
Constable report filed
**Solomon Smith vs A M Waterman**
Additional reasons in support of motion for new trial filed
**Citizens Savings Institution vs A M Waterman et al**
Motion for new trial filed[- ?]
**Thomas D Ford vs George N Beard & Eleager J Beard**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the pleadings and proofs that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and sixty four dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution[- ?]
**Commercial Insurance Company vs Richard Ivers and Theodore Hequembourg**
On Note
Now at this day come the defendants by their attorney and withdraw their answer herein, and the plaintiff comes but the defendant coming not and three being no answer herein It is considered by the Court that the plaintiffs petition be taken for confessed and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and thirty eight dollars and eighty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and thereof have execution
**Commercial Insurance Company vs Holliday et al**
On motion of plaintiff by attorney it is ordered that alias summons issue against defendant Welcker
**Julia Ann Coover vs Martin O. Walker and James Moore**
Order of Publication
On motion of the plaintiff, by her attorney, it is ordered that the defendant be notified that a Civil action has been Commenced against them for the sum of five thousand dollars, and on account of the death of the husband George W Coover by the careless driving and upsetting of one of defendants stage coaches on the 29th of May 1857, in Benton County Missouri whilst said George W Coover
---
**Viewer Page 255** (rcdbook1858_27_0254.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 251
was a passenger on said stage coach, and that unless they appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the city of S Louis, within and for the county of S Louis on the first monday of October next and on or before the sixth day thereof answer to the action aforesaid according to law, judgment will be rendered against them. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law in the St Louis Missouri Democrat
**Walter J. Hatch vs Alfred Willoughby**
On motion of plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered by the Court that this case be dismissed at the cast of plaintiff an that execution issue therefor
**Joseph W Greene vs Samuel Cone and Auguste Cone**
On Plea in abatement
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and this case coming on for trial upon the plea in abatement herein thereupon came a Jury viz George Handy John Betts Z. J. Knatt, Gerhaid H Snedh of John E Hen August Bademan, James M. Franciscus, J. F. Comstock, John Wasson, albert Blackwill Frank H Greif. Edward W Crapster twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issues joined upon said plea in abatement the trial of this case progressed but not being concluded at the horn of adjournment further proceeding are continued until tomorrow morning at ten Oclock - Court adjourned to same time[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 256** (rcdbook1858_27_0255.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 252
**Joseph W Greene vs Samuel Cone & August Cone**
On note and Plea in abatement.
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and also the Jury sworn herein, and thereupon the third of this case progressed, and being concluded the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issues for the plaintiff and that the defendants at the time of the bringing of this Suit had fraudulently conveyed or assigned their property or effects so as to hinder or delay their creditors. And the defendants failing to answer further herein. And coming. Not although solemnly called make default. It is therefore considered by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff be taken for confessed and the court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred and forty two dollars and twelve cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and there costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**David Rokohl James Kinkead vs Paul Carlin John Helgenberg Henry Gronheim & Samuel Myerson**
On Note
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney and on motion and the Court being satisfied that the amount of the Judgment entered herein on the 26th instant is erroneous, It is ordered that the same be set aside, and the Court being now hereof fully advised doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two thousand and seventy two dollars and sixty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs and thereof have execution
**The United States Savings Institution vs Robert C. Gordon**
On Note
Now at this day comes the defendant by his attorney and withdraws his answer filed herein[. ?] And the plaintiff by his attorney comes but the defendant altho called comes not but makes default It is therefore considered by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff be taken for confessed, and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and nine dollars It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and [his ?] costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution
**Samuel Hamilton vs John Christopher et al**
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered that an alias summons returnable to next term be issued against defendant Christopher
---
**Viewer Page 257** (rcdbook1858_27_0256.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 253
**Sherman J Bacon &c vs Oliver T. Bragg et al**
Affidavit of defendant Burrows for continuance filed
**Isaac W Mitchell vs Thomas Campbell & Bazil W Alexander**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer to the plaintiffs petition and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and fifty six dollars and forty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**Herman Gelpeke Frederick W. Keretger & Adolph Reichelt vs Lorenz Schaffler and Christian Schaffler**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer to the plaintiffs petition and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of eight hundred and fifty four dollars forty eight cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution
**Charles K Bacon vs William M. Plant &c Samuel Plant**
On Account
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and thereupon come a Jury viz Henry T. Darrah Ferdinand Miller, Daniel Dillinger Theodore Schulte, John H Banker Francis Hafkenmeyer D W Stone Charles Babbington Aaron Jacks J. T Knatt William Magener, George H. Ott twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issues joined between the parties, the trial progressed, during which the plaintiff [days ?] he will not further prosecute his suit in this behalf, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that defendants go hereof hence without day and recover of plaintiff their costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?] And an motion of plaintiff he has leave to move to set said nonsuit aside,[- ?] Motion to set aside nonsuit filed
**William R. Colladay vs Alonzo Cutter**
On Note[. ?] Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendant withdraws his answer. And the Court doth found from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of
---
**Viewer Page 258** (rcdbook1858_27_0257.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 254
four hundred and sixty seven dollars, and twenty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**Razin Davidge vs Robert Montgomery**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendant withdraws his answer herein and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand one hundred and twelve dollars and fifty seven cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**George P. Fein vs John Valentine & Sigmund Hirshfeldt**
On Note- Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the proofs that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand one hundred and nine dollars and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs and thereof have execution
**Edward J Gay William T. Gay & William Edwards vs Charles H Heywood & James Morris**
On account
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court and that Court doth find from the proofs that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of six hundred and fifty nine dollars and twelve cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**Elizabeth Clark vs William P. Fenn & Charles L. Hunt**
On Note- Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer to the plaintiffs petition, and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three thousand two hundred and five dollars and seventy four cents with interest thereon at the rate of ten per centum per annum until paid. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid an form aforesaid by the Court found and also her costs and charges in and about this suite expended and thereof have execution
---
**Viewer Page 259** (rcdbook1858_27_0258.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 255
**Charles Janssig Moris Janssig & Amelia Abeles vs Adolph L. Kornick**
On Note[. ?] Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the proofs that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and eighty four dollars and eighty three cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**Lewis E. Jones vs Charles L. Hint & William M Cooke**
On Note, Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer, and the Court doth find from the writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand two hundred and ninety one dollars and sixty eight cents.[- ?] It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs herein expended and thereof have execution[- ?] and it is further ordered that said sum bear interest at the rate of ten per centum per annum from the date hereof until paid
**James Shea vs Jacob Fritschle Augustus Fritschle & George W Campbell**
On Note[. ?] Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and [the de ?]fendants withdraw their answer, and the court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of One thousand and two dollars and twenty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution[- ?]
**Amadee Valli vs Charles L. Gilpin G. J. Barnett & E. O. English**
By consent of parties it is ordered by the Court that this case be dismissed at the costs of defendant Gilpin and that execution issue therefor
**William A Moffatt et al vs P. S. Sanham et al**
Motion to strike out defendants answer and for judgment on petition filed
**John S Thompson et al vs J H McCullough et al**
Continued by Consent
**The State of Mo to use of Cone vs Joseph W. Green et al**
Continued upon affidavit filed at the cost of the plaintiff
---
**Viewer Page 260** (rcdbook1858_27_0259.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 256
**Boatmans Savings Institution vs Thomas S. Nelson Cornelius D Sullivan & Jeremiah T. Sullivan**
On Note- Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court and the Court having heard the proofs doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and seven dollars and ten cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and her costs therein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Philip C Mauro vs Charles L. Hunt & William M Cooke**
On Note Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer, and the plaintiff submits the case to the Court, and the Court doth find from the proofs that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and thirty nine dollars and thirty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the court found and his costs and thereof have execution and it is further ordered that the said sum bear interest at the rate of ten per centum per annum from date until paid
**Sanguinette H Benoist & Marshall Sanguinette vs John Largue and Charles L. Hunt**
On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the Court having heard and being advised of and Concerning the motion to strike out the answer of defendants doth Sustain the same and order that said answer be [strick ?] out, and the plaintiffs submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of One thousand nine hundred and sixty two dollars and eleven cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution[- ?]
**William C. Wagley et al vs William S. Grant**
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney and file herein a remittitur of the sum of twenty dollars and seventy two cents of the Judgment entered against the defendant herein on the twenty third day of the present month
**Louis A Benoist et al vs Charles Rogers James Sanderson & William L. Salisbury**
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the defendant Salisbury although duly summoned and solemnly called, comes not, but makes default, It is therefore considered by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff be taken against him as confessed and on motion of the plaintiff it is further
---
**Viewer Page 261** (rcdbook1858_27_0260.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 257
ordered that alias summons issue herein against the defendants Charles Royers and Jas. Sanderson returnable to the next term of this Court[. ?]
**Louis A Benoist vs Louis F. Curties**
On Note. Now at this day come the plaintiff by his attorney but the defendant [altho ?] solemnly called comes not and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits the case to the Court, and the Court having heard and being advised of the premises doth fired that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five thousand six hundred and eighty three dollars and thirty six cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court Found and his costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Samuel McCartney Thomas V Strode Anaclet L. Lacroix vs Daniel D. Page & Henry D. Bacon**
On Note Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney and on their motion it is ordered that this case as to defendant Bacon be dismissed[. ?] And the defendant page by his attorney comes and the parties consent and agree that judgment may be entered in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant for the sum of five hundred and seventy one dollars and twenty five cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the parties consented to and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor
**John H Grossbeck John Kilgrove & John C Culbartson vs Alfred M Waterman**
On Bill of Exchange Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and consent and agree that judgment may be entered herein in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant for the sum of two hundred and ninety one dollars and seventy Cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid consented and their costs of sent and thereof have execution
**State Marine Insurance Co vs Callaway [hining ?] & Manufacturing Co**
On Motion it is ordered that alias summons issue against the defendant and this case be continued
**State fire and Marine Insurance Co vs Samuel Sanderson**
Continued at cost of defendant as upon affidavit
**Quaker Savings Institution vs Edward Wheaton et al**
Continued at cost of defendant as on affidavit
---
**Viewer Page 262** (rcdbook1858_27_0261.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 258
**Commercial Insurance Co vs Samuel Sanderson**
Continued at costs of defendant as an affidavit
**Pennsylvania Insurance Co vs Samuel Sanderson et al**
Continued as an affidavit at cost of defendant
**Samuel Myerson vs John Holliday et al**
It is ordered that alias summons issue herein against the defendants who have not been served with process Court adjourned until tomorrow morning ten O Clock
---
**Viewer Page 263** (rcdbook1858_27_0262.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 259
**The State of Mo to use of Kyler vs Beny F. Farrar**
On motion of the defendant by his attorney it is ordered that he have six days further time in which to plead herein
**Leicester Babcock vs Edward S. Wheatow & Joseph S Papin**
On Note[. ?]
Now at this day come the defendants by their attorney and withdraw their answer herein, and the plaintiff by his attorney comes and submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are undebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and sixty nine dollars and seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and have execution therefor
**The Saint Louis Building & Savings Institution vs James D Gage James S. Gage and Jashua Fine**
On Note
Now at this day come the attorney for the defendants, Messro Knox & Kellogg and State to the Court that they had no authority to enter an appearance herein for James D Gage and that the appearance herein before entered for him was by mistake, whereupon on motion of plaintiff attorney the name of said James D Gage is stricken from the answer and this suit as against him is dismissed. And the defendants by their attorney move the Court to continue this case on the ground that plaintiff has failed to comply with rule no 29 of this Court which motion the Court doth overrule, and defendants except
**George B. Sanderson vs David R. Risley Saw Hager & William Risley**
On Note
Now at this day come the defendants by their attorney and withdraw their answer, and the plaintiff by his attorney comes and submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendant are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and thirty four dollars and twenty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution
---
**Viewer Page 264** (rcdbook1858_27_0263.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 260
**Samuel B Wiggins vs John Smith Elias Wilmot Jacob Bensberg Gerhard Bensberg & Otto J gel**
On Note
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and on his motion it is ordered that this case as against defendants John Smith and Jacob Bensberg be dismissed, and the other defendants by their attorneys come, and the connect for the plaintiff and defendants consent and agree that Judgment may be entered against defendants Elias Wilmot Gerhard Bensberg and Otto J gel for the sum of twelve hundred and thirty nine dollars and forty cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid agreed and his costs of suit and thereof have execution
**Robert K Weight et al vs George M. Willing et al**
Affidavit filed[. ?] Bond, with Security, for cost filed
**George B. Sanderson vs Philip S. Lanham et al**
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered that this case as against defendant Robert A. Walton be dismissed, and this case continued[. ?]
**James M. Hughes and Thomas Marshall vs John Largue and Charles L. Hunt**
On Note
This day come the defendants by their attorney and withdraw their answer herein and the plaintiffs by their attorney come and submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing on which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Eleven hundred and sixty six dollars and sixty six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs of suit and have execution therefor
**James H Hughes and Thomas Marshall vs William P. Fenn & Charles L. Hunt**
On Note
Now at this day come the defendants by their attorney and withdraw their answer and the plaintiffs by their attorney come and submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and thirty form dollars and thirty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 265** (rcdbook1858_27_0264.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 261
**George B. Sanderson vs George Brook & J W. Sherman**
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney It is ordered that this case be dismissed at the costs of plaintiff and that execution issue therefor
**William Raiguel et al vs Herman Weiner et al**
Defendants answer to plaintiff amended petition petition, and counter claim filed. Demurrer to counter claim filed
**Louis C Garnier vs C S. Hunt et al**
Motion to set aside Judgment filed
**Thomas D Ford vs Beard et al**
Motion for new trial filed
**Morrison et al vs Samuel McCartney**
Plaintiff by their attorney [course ?] and withdraw the motion heretofore filed by their to strike out certain specified parts of the answer filed by the defendant herein
**The State of Missouri to the use of Meyer Goldsoll vs William B Watson Joshua B Brant & William M. McPheeters**
Petition for Damages
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and this case being called for trial, thereupon cause a Jury viz George Handy John Betts W W Hanston Gerhard H. Suedhoff John E Henn August Bodeman, Theodore Schutte J. F Comstock John Wasson, Albert Blackwell Frank H Greefe Edward W. Grapeter, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issues joined herein, the trial progressed but not being concluded at the hour of adjournment, further proceedings are continued until tomorrow morning at ten Oclock
---
**Viewer Page 266** (rcdbook1858_27_0265.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 262
**Frederick Robertson vs John Alt et al**
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and on his motion it is ordered that this case be dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor
**The State of Missouri to the use of Meyer Goldsoll vs William B. Watson Joshua B. Brant & William M. McPeeters**
Petition for Damages
Now at this day come again the parties by their respective attorneys and also the Jury sworn herein and the plaintiff by his attorney says he will not further prosecute this suit. It is therefore ordered by the Court that the Jury sworn herein be discharged, and it is considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that the defendants go thereof hence without day and recover of the plaintiff their costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution[. ?] and an motion of plaintiff he has leave to move to set aside the nonsuit herein. Motion to set aside nonsuit filed
**Mathew S. Maloney et al vs Henry Boernstein et al**
On motion of defendants by their attorney it is ordered that a Commission to take depositions in the state of Louisiana on the part of said defendants, issue herein
**Thomas M Avery vs Washington F. Adams**
Motion and affidavit for Continuance filed, and the Court having heard and being advised doth Overrule the same
**R J Harck vs Provost**
Continued
**Thomas H Wist vs James Stewart**
On account
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and consent and agree that judgment may be entered herein in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum of One hundred dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid consented to and also his costs and charges in this behalf expended and thereof have execution
---
**Viewer Page 267** (rcdbook1858_27_0266.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 263
**David C. Tandy vs Edward S. Wheaton & Joseph L. Papin**
On Note
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and also the defendant Papin by his attorney but the defendant Wheaton although duly summoned and solemnly called coming not makes default wherefore it is considered by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff be taken against him as confessed, and the defendant Papin by his attorney withdraw his answer herein, whereby this suit remains undefended, and the plaintiff submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and sixty eight dollars and six cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**Robert K Wright Horace J Smith & Thomton Pike vs George M Willing & George M Willing &**
On Bill of Exchange
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer herein whereby this suit remains undefended and the plaintiff submit the case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and twenty six dollars and seventy cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs of suit and have execution therefor.
**William A Moffitt & George Schrocter vs Philip S. Lanham Charles L. Hunt William C. Woodson William P. Fenn Richard H Stevens Walter H Dorsett Robert A. Walton & John McDowell**
Petition
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and on motion of the plaintiff this case as to defendant Robert A Walton is ordered to be dismissed, and the Court having considered the motion to strike out the answer of defendants doth sustain the same and doth order that said answer be stricken out and this action being now undefended the plaintiffs submit the same to the Court upon the petition and proofs wherefrom the Court doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two thousand six hundred and eighty one dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs in this suit expended and thereof have execution
---
**Viewer Page 268** (rcdbook1858_27_0267.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 264
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs Francis McFaul John Kirkpatrick & Eueas McFaul**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a jury submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the proofs that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six thousand three hundred and thirty seven dollars and sixty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and her costs of suit and thereof have execution
**Sherman J Bacon Samuel J Hyde Edward C Pike & George Erskine vs Oliver T. Bragg Michael Burrows & Addison G. Bragg**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having seen and heard the same doth find therefrom that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred and forty dollars and forty cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs of suit and thereof have execution
**Abigail Walther vs 629 [Iet ?] 3.58 Charles F. Walther**
for Divorce
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and the proofs and the Court having heard the same and being satisfied therefrom that the plaintiff is an innocent and injured person, doth order adjudge and decree that she be absolutely and forever divorced from the bonds of matrimony by her contracted with the defendant and be restored to all the right and privileges of an unmarried person, and also to her maiden name to wit Abrigail Tiernan. And it is ordered that the defendant pay the costs of this suit, and also fifty dollars counsel fees for the plaintiff and that execution issue therefor
**Thomas Buck vs Charles L Hunt & William M Cooke**
On Note[. ?]
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer, whereby this suit remains undefended, and the plaintiff submits the same to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the defendants in the sum of Eleven hundred and twenty four dollars and thirty seven cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of Suit and have execution therefor
---
**Viewer Page 269** (rcdbook1858_27_0268.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 265
**Thomas Buck vs Thomas Campbell & George Michael**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer whereby this suit remains undefended, and the plaintiff submit the case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of nine hundred and fifty four dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution.
**Benjamin Leibert vs John B Ganter**
An account
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the defendant comes not, and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs, and the Court having heard and considered the same doth find that the defendants is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and seventy four dollars and eighteen Cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution
**John Hoffman [adw ?] vs William F Denny et al**
On motion of plaintiff by attorney he had leave granted to file an amended petition herein and this case is continued
**Edward Authorny vs James H Filygibbon**
On bills exchange
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having heard and Considered the same doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and fifty six dollars and ninety six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution
**Robert Holines & John H Dickey vs Benjamin F Beasley James H Whitelan & Robert Scott**
On Note[. ?]
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the defendants B F Beasley and James H Whitelaw altho duly summoned and solemnly called come not but make default, wherefore it is considered by the Court that the plaintiff petition be taken against them as confessed, and the defendant scott by his attorney comes and withdraws his answer herein, whereby this action remains undefended and the plaintiff submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded
---
**Viewer Page 270** (rcdbook1858_27_0269.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 266
that the defendants an indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and fifty five dollars and eight cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs of suit and thereof have execution
**Thomas M Avery vs Washington F Adams**
Petition
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having seen and heard the same doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and seventy six dollars and sixty six cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution
**The S Louis Buildings & Savings Institution vs James L. Gage & Joshua Fine**
On Note
Now at this day come the plaintiff by her attorney but the defendants coming not the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court upon the petition answer and proofs and the Court having heard the same doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and thirty four dollars and six cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and her costs of suit and thereof have execution
**Thomas Cohen vs Francis H Manter**
On Note
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the defendant comes not and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court doth find therefrom that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and one dollars and sixty six cents with interest thereon at the rate of ten percentum perannum from this date until paid. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution
**John C Joory vs Paul Carlin & Ezra O. English**
Petition
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having heard the same doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and forty three dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs and thereof have execution[. ?]
**John Devine et al vs Louis Davis**
Ordered that this case be continued
---
**Viewer Page 271** (rcdbook1858_27_0270.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 267
**Stephen Haskell and James M. Franciscus vs Joseph Warren & Thomas Campbell**
On Note
Now at this day come the plaintiff by their attorney but the defendant Warren although duly summoned and solemnly called comes not wherefore It is considered by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff be taken against him as confessed, and the defendant Campbell by his attorney comes and withdraws his answer herein, whereby this suit remains undefended and the plaintiff submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Seven hundred and fifty dollars and seven cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution
**James S. Thomas vs Cornelius D Sullivan Jeremiah T. Sullivan & Benjamin F C Champion**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the proofs that the defendants Are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and ninety two dollars and fifty nine cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and have execution therefor
**Emannel de Hodeamont vs Charles L. Hunt and William M Cooke**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants by their attorney withdraw their answer herein whereby this suit remains undefended and the plaintiff submits the case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writings upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two thousand one hundred and seventy eight dollars and eighty two cents. One thousand one hundred and one dollars and fifty five cents of said sum to bear interest at the rate of ten per centum per annum from this date until paid. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and have thereof execution
**George B. Sanderson vs P. S. Lanham et al**
Continued
**The State of Mo to use of Peters vs L. M. Shruve**
Continued
---
**Viewer Page 272** (rcdbook1858_27_0271.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 268
**Augustus Rolker Augustus Mollmann Alphouse Perier and Felix Cateaux vs Increase Miller William G. Miller and Vincent Boisaubin**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and on motion of the plaintiffs it is ordered that this case be dismissed as to defendant William G. Miller and plaintiffs by leave of Court amend their petition by striking out the name of William G. Miller and inserting the word Vincent instead of the letter `V' before the name of Boisaubon, and the parties waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the proofs that the defendants an indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and thirty five dollars and forty eighty cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs of suit and thereof have execution[. ?]
**George B. Sanderson vs Charles L. Gilpin et al**
Ordered that this case be dismissed at the cost of defendant be L. Gilpin and that execution issue therefor
**Samuel Bonner and James M. Corbilt vs Ezro O. English John [Burns ?] and Jacob Johann**
Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys and by consent it is ordered that this case be dismissed at the cost of defendants and that execution issue therefor
**John Madden vs Michael Moore**
Now at this day come the plaintiff by his attorney and on his motion it is ordered that this case be dismissed at the cost of plaintiff and that execution issue therefor
**John B Ghio vs William L. Cooke & Charles L. Hunt**
On Note.-
Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys and the defendants by their attorney withdraw their answer herein whereby this suit remains undefended, and the plaintiff submits the case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are undebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two thousand two hundred and ten dollars and six cents with interest thereon at the rate of ten per centum per annum from this date until paid. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs of suit and thereof have execution[. ?]
**James A Monks vs Charles L. Hunt and William M. Cooke**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer herein, whereby this suit remains indefended; and the plaintiff submits the case to the
---
**Viewer Page 273** (rcdbook1858_27_0272.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 269
Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are undebted to the plaintiff the seen of sixteen hundred and twenty three dollars and seventy two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs and have execution therefore[- ?] and it is further ordered that this judgment bear interest at the rate of ten per centum per annum from this date until paid.
**James S Thomas vs Charles L. Hunt and William M Cooke**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer whereby this suit remains undefended and the plaintiff submits the case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are undebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Eleven hundred and three dollars and fifty five cents. it is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution[- ?] and it is further ordered that this judgment bear interest at the rate of ten per centum per annum from date until paid[. ?]
**Fidelis C. Sharpe vs Edward S. Wheaton & Joseph L. Papin**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer whereby this suit remains undefended, and the plaintiff submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that he defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and one dollars and seventy cents. it is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and have execution therefor
**James S. Thomas vs Edward s. Wheaton & Joseph L. Papin**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer whereby this suit remains undefended, and the plaintiff submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and six dollars and seventy cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Fidelio C Sharpe vs Charles L. Hunt & William M Cooke**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and on motion of the plaintiff this suit is ordered to be dismissed as to the note drawn by defendant Wm M Cooke [suit ?] upon in this
---
**Viewer Page 274** (rcdbook1858_27_0273.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 270
petition and the plaintiff by leave of Court, and leaving a Copy of said note withdraws the same, and the defendants come and withdraw their answer whereby this suit remains undefended, and the plaintiff submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and eighty two dollars and ninety cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs of suit and thereof have execution. And it is further ordered that this Judgment bear interest from this date until paid at the rate of ten per centum per Annum
**Samuel McCartney Thomas V. Strode and Anactet L. Lacroix vs A. William Streit and Andres Reinstadler**
On Note
Now at this day come parties by their respective attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer whereby this suit remains undefended and the plaintiffs submit the case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and sixty five dollars and sixty cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs of suit, and thereof have execution
**William M Morrison & Rufus J. Lackland vs Samuel McCartney**
On Draft
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and this case being called for trial thereupon came a Jury viz Frank H Greefe Henry T. Darrah, Ferdinand Miller, Daniel Dillinger John H Banker, George H Otto, Francis Hafkenmeyer, D W Stone, Charles Babbington, Aaron Jacks, Z. T. Knott and William Magener twelve good and lawful men who being duly sworn well and truly to try the issues joined between the parties, the trial hereof progressed but not being concluded at the hour of adjournment further proceedings herein an continued until tomorrow morning at ten O Clock
---
**Viewer Page 275** (rcdbook1858_27_0274.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 271
**Mary Ann Wright et al vs Howard F. Christy et al**
Motion to set aside default filed
**Augustus Rolker et al vs Increase C. Miller et al**
Motion for new trial filed
**The S Louis Buildings & Savings Institution vs James D Gage et al**
Motion for new trial filed
**Benedict Shulty vs John Valentine et al**
Motion to set aside Judgment by default and affidavit in support thereof filed
**William M Morrison & Rufus J. Lackland vs Samuel McCartney**
On draft
Now at this day come again the parties by their respective attorney and also the Jury sworn herein, and thereupon the trial of this case progressed and being concluded the Jurors aforesaid on their oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and seventy one dollars and thirty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Jury as aforesaid found and their costs of suit and thereof have execution
**William A Hargadine vs Henry T. Darrah, Chester W Pomeroy and Alfred M. Waterman**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court doth find therefrom that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two thousand eight hundred and forty six dollars and twenty five cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution
---
**Viewer Page 276** (rcdbook1858_27_0275.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 272
**In the matter of the assignment of William M. Stephenson**
Appraisement filed
**Alraham Kramer and Adolph Loth vs David P. Thomas**
Confession of Judgment
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and file a written statement herein from which it appears to the Court that the defendant confesses that he is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Eight hundred and eighty six dollars and forty two cents, and consents that Judgment may be rendered against him and in favor of the plaintiffs for the same, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid confessed and their costs herein and thereof have execution.
**Septimus Levering vs John Sigerson**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the defendant withdraws his answer herein whereby this suit remains undefended, and the plaintiff submits the case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and ninety three dollars sixty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution
**Thomas B Davis vs Job Stockton White**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys and waiving a jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having heard the same doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Eight hundred and ten dollars and eighty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution.
**James G. Brown vs William C Wilson & John H. Avery**
On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff it is ordered that this case he dismissed at the cost of plaintiff and that execution issue therefor
**George Gass et al vs H. B. Merritt et al**
On motion of the plaintiff by their attorney they have leave to withdraw the drafts said upon by leaving a receipt therefor and the plaintiffs withdraw the said drafts and receipt to the clerk for the same
---
**Viewer Page 277** (rcdbook1858_27_0276.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 273
**Jonas Moore vs Charles L. Hunt and William M Cooke**
On Note
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer whereby this suit remains undefended, and the plaintiff submits the case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and ninety four dollars and sixteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution
**James T. Death Absolom Death & Wilson Death vs Robert A W. Crenshan**
On Plea in abatement
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney, and thereupon came a Jury viz C. D. Larnard, Andrew Wood Henry H Clark John Sibby, William Vogel William Roach, James Adams Thos. Clark, James Croock John Fallon L. Longuemer Wm Brass twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issues joined upon the plea in abatement herein the trial of the same progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issues joined in favor of the plaintiffs, It is therefore ordered that the defendant plead further herein
**Louis Valli vs Francis Hudson & James Hayden**
On Plea in abatement
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and thereupon came a Jury viz B. Madden John Bell Samuel C. Cochran A Mc Murtry Juo. W Schwegman, Wm Brown and C B Eachs, by consent, seven good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issues joined between the parties upon the plea in abatement herein the trial progressed And being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the said issues for the defendants, and that the said defendants at the time of the sueing out of the writ of attachment herein were not non residents of the state of Missouri and that the said defendants were not about fraudulently to convey their property and effects so as to hinder and delay their creditors. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by this writ but that the defendants go there of hence and recover of the plaintiff their costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**William Beste et al vs Joseph T [Tourville ?] et al**
It is ordered that alias summons issue herein against defendant Adolph S. Leone
**Edward Anthony vs James H Fiygibbons**
Motion for new trial filed
---
**Viewer Page 278** (rcdbook1858_27_0277.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 274
**Louisa L Freligh vs Joseph M. [Gones ?] et al**
Affidavit filed
**John McNeil et al vs Bernard Midas**
Order of Sale
Now at this day comes James Castello Sheriff of St Louis County and files a statement whereby it appears to the Court that the property levied on by virtue and authority of the writ of attachment issued herein is likely to depreciate in value before the probable termination of this suit and that the Keeping of the same would be attended with much expense It is therefore ordered by the Court that the said James Castello Sheriff as aforesaid proceed to sell said property as levied upon in conformity with the statute in such case made and provided
**William M Morrison et al vs Samuel McCartney**
Motion for New trial filed and the Court having heard and considered said motion doth overrule the same
**The St B[r ?]. City of Memphis vs Leonard Matthews et al**
The Court having heard and considered the motion for new trial herein doth overrule the same[- ?]
**Louis C. Garnier vs Joseph L. Papin et al**
On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff it is ordered by the Court that this case be dismissed as to defendant Samuel Myerson
**James G. Cattin vs C. L. Hunt et al**
Ordered that this case be dismissed
**Louisa Ripper vs John Ripper**
Order of Publication. On motion of the Attorney for the plaintiff, and the Court being satisfied that the defendant cannot be served with process. It is Ordered by the Court that he be notified that a civil action has been commenced against him in this Court the object of which is to procure a divorce and the custody of the child of the plaintiff and defendant And that unless he be and appear of the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the Court house in the City of St Louis, [and ?] the first monday of October next and on or before the sixth day of said term answer to the said Action, the petition will be taken for confessed and a Decree of divorce will be rendered[. ?] And it is further ordered that a Copy hereof be published in the Missouri Democrat a news paper printed and published in the City of S Louis
**Lucius A Willard vs Miles G. Moies et al**
The Court having heard and considered the motion for new trial herein doth overrule the same
---
**Viewer Page 279** (rcdbook1858_27_0278.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 275
**John T. Dowdall vs John F. Lay et al**
Replication to answer filed
**John Hoffman adw. &c vs Wm F. F. Denny et al**
Amended petition filed
**Stephen Hoyt vs Ferdinand Hahon**
On motion of plaintiff attorney it is ordered that this case be dismissed at the costs of plaintiff and that execution issue therefor
**Louisa L. Freligh vs Joseph M Ames et al**
Affidavit for continuance filed[- ?] and the Court having heard and considered the affidavit doth Overrule the same[- ?]
**Edwin H Munger vs Daniel D Page Henry D Bacon Thomas Brown & Edward Wyman**
Now at this day come the plaintiff by his attorney but the defendants D D Page Tho Brown & Ed Wyman although duly summoned and solemnly called come not but make default, It is therefore considered by the Court that the petition betaken against them as confessed and the defendant H D Bacon not having been served with process it is ordered that an alias summons issue against him herein[. ?]
**Louis V. Bogy et al vs William M Tompkins & David D Mitchell**
Now at this day come the plaintiff by their attorney but the defendant Tompkins although duly summoned and solemnly called comes not but makes default It is therefore considered by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff betaken against him as confessed, and the defendant mitchell not having been served with process it is ordered by the Court that alias summons issue against him and this case is continued[. ?]
**Henry Block vs Charles W Hebert et al**
It is ordered that Alias summons issued against defendant hebert to Jefferson County and this case is continued[. ?]
**Ferdinand A. Reuss et al vs P. D. Gordon et al**
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the defendant P. D. Gordon although duly summoned and solemnly called coming not, makes default. Wherefore It is considered by the Court that the plaintiff petition be taken against him as confessed And the defendant S B. Widson not having been served with process it is ordered that alias summons issue against him
---
**Viewer Page 280** (rcdbook1858_27_0279.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 276
**Pierre Chouteau vs J Rutherford**
Continued
**Pierre Choutea et al vs Valentine Reis et al**
On motion of plaintiffs attorney it is ordered that this case be dismissed at the cost of plaintiffs and that execution issue therefor
**George Richardson vs Charles Gilpin**
Ordered that this case be dismissed at the cost of defendant
**Daniel C Michael vs Isaac T. Wise**
Ordered that this case be dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff
**Julian Dausche vs Nicholas Dausche**
Continued
**Almon Thomson vs Charles L. Hunt & William M Cooke**
On Note- Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer herein[- ?]whereby this suit remains undefended and the plaintiff submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and eighty six dollars and fifty cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution
**Almon Thomson vs Charles L. Hunt & David D Mitchell**
On Note, Now at this day come the parties by their respective Attorneys and the defendants withdraw their Answer whereby this said remains undefended, and the plaintiff submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two thousand one hundred and seventy three dollars and sixty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution
**Joseph Farrill vs Jacob Fritschle Augustus Fritschle & C A Wurth**
On Note Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having seen and heard the same doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Nine hundred and forty nine dollars and twenty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution motion for new trial filed
---
**Viewer Page 281** (rcdbook1858_27_0280.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 277
**Henitt O. Vancornt vs Charles L. Hunt & William M. Cooke**
On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and their defendants withdraw their answer whereby this suit remains undefended and the plaintiff submits the case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and eighty six dollars and seventy four cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution[. ?]
**William V. N. Bay vs Charles L. Hunt & William M. Cooke**
On Note Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants by their attorney withdraw their answer whereby this suit remains undefended, and the plaintiff submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and seventy dollars and seventy three cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court of found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution
**Louisa L Freligh vs Charles L. Hunt William M. Cooke John Lady & Leander Lawrence**
On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer whereby this suit remains undefended and the plaintiff submits the case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of eleven hundred and thirteen dollars and fifty cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also her costs in this behalf expended and have thereof execution, and it is further ordered that the said sum bear interest at the rate of ten percentum per annum from date until paid.
**Lucius A Willard vs Miles G. Moris & Henry M Woodward**
On Note. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the defendants come not, and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleading and proofs and, the Court doth find from the same that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and seven dollars and ten cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution, motion for here trial filed
**Louis A. Benoist & James Christy vs Charles F. Baker & James Moore**
On Note, Now at this day come the plaintiff by their attorney but the defendants come not and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleading and proofs and the Court doth find from the same that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of four hundred and ninety eight dollars and twenty nine cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution
---
**Viewer Page 282** (rcdbook1858_27_0281.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 278
**Lawrence Wesseld vs William C. Smith**
The Plaintiff comes and files a petition and affidavit according to law, claiming the possession of certain personal property therein described, wherefore it is ordered that the defendant deliver the property specified in said petition to the sheriff of S Louis County and said sheriff is hereby directed, of said property be not delivered to him to take it from the defendant and deliver it to the plaintiff
**Matthew S. Moloney & William P. Moloney vs Henry Boernstein & Samuel Jacoby**
On petition- Now at this day come the parties by their Attorneys and the Court having heard and considered the motion for Continuance doth overrule the same. And the parties waiving a Jury submit the case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court doth find therefrom that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and thirty five dollars and fifteen cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs of suit and thereof have execution. Bill of Exceptions filed
**John Dalton vs John Sigerson George Smizer Joseph R. Wondover & Judson Allen**
On Note, Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the proofs that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and seventy eight dollars and eighty eight cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution
**John Dalton vs John Sigerson & George Smizer**
On Note Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court doth find from the same that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and fifty two dollars and forty six cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution
**The People Savings Institution vs John Helgenberg Philip Helgenberg and Francis Saler**
On Note. Now at this day comes this plaintiff by & but the defendant John Helgenberg although duly summoned and solemnly called comes not but makes default wherefore it is considered by the Court that the plaintiff petition be taken against him as confessed, And the defendants Philip Helgenberg and Francis Saler withdraw their answer whereby this Suit remains undefended, and the plaintiff submits the case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of eight hundred and three dollars and forty three cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution
---
**Viewer Page 283** (rcdbook1858_27_0282.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 279
**The Peoples Savings Institution vs Herman Grundt Edward Mead Cornelius D. Sullivan & Jeremiah T. Sullivan**
On Note. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her attorney and on his motion it is ordered that this case as to defendant mead be dismissed, and the defendant grundt although duly summoned and solemnly called coming not makes default wherefore it is considered by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff be taken against him as confessed and the plaintiff files herein a stipulation whereby it appears that the defendants CD and J. T. Sullivan consent and agree that Judgment may be rendered against their and submit the case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of One thousand and seventy five dollars and thirty five cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and her costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution
**George C. Reed & Theodore Yates vs Francis A. Pelletier & John D Pelletier**
On plea in abatement. Now at this come the parties by their respective attorney and thereupon also came a Jury to writ, C D Larnard Andrew Wood Henry H Clark John Sibby William Vogel William Roach James Adams Thomas Clark James Croock John [Renz ?] William Brass and L. [Longuernere ?] twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly [a ?] try the issues joined herein, the trial of this cause progressed but not being concluded at the horn of adjournment further proceeding are continued until tomorrow morning at ten Oclock
---
**Viewer Page 284** (rcdbook1858_27_0283.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 280
**Speck et al vs John Riggin**
Motion to transmit papers & filed
**James H Sturdy et al vs Lewis Palmer et al**
Continued
**John A. Brownlee et al vs James J Todd et al**
On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney it is ordered by the Court that the Judgment heretofore entered herein be set aside and that this case be dismissed[. ?]
**Andrew Brungard vs Thomas H. Caranaugh**
Ordered that Alias summons issue against the defendant[. ?]
**Joseph Farrell vs Paul Carlin et al**
On motion of plaintiff Attorney leave in given the sheriff to amend his return herein according to the facts[. ?]
**In the Matter of the Application of John Maguire**
On motion of said petitioner James Castello is substituted as trustee in place of B B Dazton deceased
**Francis Hamilton vs Frederick Meyers et al**
Bond for costs with approved security filed
**Thomas M Avery vs Washington F Adams**
Bill of executions filed
**Herman [Grimdt ?] vs Cornelins D Sullivan & Jeremiah T. Sullivan**
On motion of plaintiff attorney it is ordered that this case be dismissed it is therefore considered by the Court that the defendants recover of the plaintiff their costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**Wm F. Enders et al vs Francis A Pelletier et al**
Continued
**Charles J Gill et al vs Francis A. Pelletier et al**
Continued
---
**Viewer Page 285** (rcdbook1858_27_0284.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 281
**Samuel Myerson by James Castello Sheriff to Gabriel S Chontean**
James Castello sheriff of S Louis county comes into Court and acknowledges the execution by him as sheriff of a deed to Gabriel S. Chontean fore property of Samuel Myerson sold by said Castello as sheriff under execution against said Myerson and purchased by said Chontean
**William Wesbit vs Peter Reinhardt et al**
On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff it is ordered that this case be dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff and that execution issue therefore
**Samuel Simmons vs Thomas Campbell & George B. Michael**
On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer whereby this action remains undefended and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and thirty one dollars and seventy cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution. Judgment to bear ten per cent per annum interest
**Isaac Wickersham vs Authony H Menkires & Diedrick B. Menkins**
On Note Now at this day come the parties by their respective Attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court and the Court having seen and heard the proofs doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and fifty one dollars fifty five cents. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and have execution therefor. Judgment to bear ten per cent per annum interest and execution by consent stayed until 1st Sept next.
**Newton S. Gay and George Gay vs Cornelius D Sullivan & Jeremiah T. Sullivan**
On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys, and the defendants withdraw their answer whereby this suit remains undefended and the plaintiff submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and twelve dollars, It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs in this behalf expended and have execution therefor
**Louis V. Bogy Engene Mittenberger & William Poulterer vs Edward S Wheaton Benjamin F. C. Champion & Joseph L. Papin**
On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer, whereby this suit remains undefended and the plaintiffs submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this suit is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Eight hundred and seventy eight dollars and ninety eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor
---
**Viewer Page 286** (rcdbook1858_27_0285.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 282
**Louis V. Bogy Eugene Mittenberger & William Poulterer vs Benjamin F Beasley & Samuel Sanderson**
On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective Attorneys and defendant Beasley withdraws his answer, whereby the suit remains undefended and the plaintiff submits the case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which the action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of six hundred and nine dollars and seventy one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution
**John H Gay vs Dawius Crowley**
Petition & [Juyn ?]-. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and consent and agree that Judgment may be rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum of one Court and making perpetual the injunction herein before intend It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid consented to and his costs of suit and have execution therefor. And it is further adjudged and decreed by the Court that the order of injunction heretofore entered herein be made absolute and perpetual.
**Lucius A Willard vs Miles G. Moies & Henry M. Woodward**
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and by leave of Court [remits ?] sixty five dollars and ten cents of the Judgment of seven hundred and seven dollars and ten cents rendered against defendants on may fourth 1858.
**Peter Hayden and Pollock Wilson vs John Sigerson & Wallace Sigerson**
On Bill of Exchange- Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and on motion of the plaintiff it is ordered that this case be dismissed as to defendant Wallace Sigerson and the defendant John Sigerson withdraws his Answer herein whereby this action remains undefended And the plaintiff submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and four dollars twenty eight cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs of suit and thereof have execution[. ?]
**John Dalton vs Thomas F. Wightman & Charles Marlow**
On Note- Now at this day come the plaintiff by his attorney but the defendant Wightman although duly summoned and solemnly called comes not but makes default wherefore it is considered by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff be taken against him as confessed, And the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court in the sum of one thousand and ninety eight dollars and thirty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff doth find therefrom that the defendants an indebted to the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs it this behalf expended and thereof have execution. And it is further ordered that this judgment bear interest at the rate of ten per centum per annum from the date hereof until paid[. ?]
Motion in arrest of Judgment filed
---
**Viewer Page 287** (rcdbook1858_27_0286.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 283
**Samuel Myerson by Castello Sheriff to Gabriel S. Chontean**
James Castello Sheriff of S Louis county comes into Court and acknowledges the execution of a deed of this date from himself as said sheriff to Gabriel S. Chontean for property of Samuel myerson sold by said sheriff under execution to said Chontean
**Samuel Myerson by Castello Sheriff to Gabriel S. Chontean**
James Castello Sheriff of S Louis County comes into Court and acknowledge the execution of a deed of this date from himself as said Sheriff to Gabriel S Chontean for property of Samuel Myerson sold by said sheriff under execution to said Chontean
**Samuel Myerson by Castello Sheriff vs Gabriel S. Chontean**
James Castello Sheriff of S Louis County comes into Court and acknowledge the execution of a deed of this date from himself as said Sheriff to Gabriel S. Chontean for property of Samuel Myerson sold by said Sheriff under execution to said Chontean
**Peter D Muller vs Edward S. Wheaton Joseph L. Papin and Benjamin F. C. Champion**
On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective Attorney and the defendants withdraw their answer, whereby this suit remains undefended, and the plaintiff submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and seven dollars and sixty seven cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution
**Louisa L Freligh vs Frederick Pality**
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her attorney but the defendant although duly summoned and solemnly called comes not but makes default, and Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and Seven dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and her costs of suit and thereof have execution
**George C. Reed & Theodore Yates vs Francis A Pelletier & John D Pelletier**
On Plea in abatement. Now at this day come again the parties by their respective Attorney and also the Jury sworn herein, and thereupon the trial of this cause progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their Oaths aforesaid find the issues herein joined in favor of the plaintiffs It is therefore, considered and adjudged by the Court that said defendants at the commencement of this suit had fraudulently conveyed or concealed their property so as to hinder or delay their creditors in manner and form as is in the plaintiffs petition charged, And the Court doth assess the damages of said plaintiff by reason of the premises mentioned in the petition of said plaintiff at the sum of one thousand and thirty seven dollars and sixty eight cents It is therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and their costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution against the property attached at the commencement of this suit[. . . ?]
---
**Viewer Page 288** (rcdbook1858_27_0287.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 284
**Joseph Farrell vs Henry N. Hart**
On Note.- Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and thereupon came also a Jury viz C. D Larnard, Andrew Wood, Henry Clark, John Libby, William Vogel, William Roach, James Adams, Thomas Clark, James Croock, John Reng, Wm Bross, L. Longueman twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn will and truly to try the issues joined the trial hereof progressed but not being concluded at the horn of adjournment further proceedings and continued >until tomorrow morning at ten O clock.
**Louisa L. Freligh vs Frederick Polity**
Judgment
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her attorney but the defendant although duly summoned and solemnly called coming not makes default. Whereupon the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this Case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs wherefrom the Court doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and seven dollars, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs herein and have execution therefor
---
**Viewer Page 289** (rcdbook1858_27_0288.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 285
**Oliver T Bragg et al vs Denius Barnes et al**
On motion of plaintiff ordered that [dedriners ?] issue to the state of New York to take depositions to be read an the part of the plaintiff on the trial of this cause before peter it Johnstone Justice of the peace of S Louis county[- ?]
**State of Mo to use George Kyler vs Benjamin Farrar**
Defendants plea filed
**Job T. Doan et al vs John McFee**
Proof of publication filed
**George Pomeroy William H Benton, & George H Chase [Partnud ?] trading under Style of Pomeroy Benton & Co vs Theodore Betts, John D Mellen, Joshua Jackson John O. Mellen & A.A.K. Sawyer, [partners ?] trading under Style of Betts mellen & Co & Thomas Orr & Lewis Hull**
Amended Petition filed-
Order of Publication.
Now at this day come the plaintiff by their Attorney and on their motion and the Court being now satisfied that the defendants Orr and Hull are now residents of the State of Missouri, and the Court being further satisfied that process cannot be served on said defendants Orr & Hull it is ordered by the Court that said defendants Orr and Hull be notified of the commencement of this suit the object of which is to recover of said defendants the sum of eleven hundred and ninety mine and sixty five hundredths dollars on account of a certain bill of exchange whereby the defendants, Betts Mellen & Co promised to pay eight months after date to the order of plaintiff the sum of eleven hundred and ninety eight and sixty five hundredths dollars and dated March 12'' 1857. And which Bill of exchange was protested for nonpayment on the 12th day of November AD 1857, which bill of exchange and the interest thereon remain unpaid, and that unless said defendants be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of St Louis On the first Monday of October next, and on or before the third day thereof answer the petition of plaintiffs, the same will be taken against them as confessed. It is further ordered, that a copy hereof be published according to law, in the missouri Democrat a paper printed in the city and county of S Louis
**James S. Chew vs Ferdinand Vandermale Frederick Picker & Samuel Myerson**
On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the petition and answer and the Court having heard the same doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of One thousand and seventy five dollars
---
**Viewer Page 290** (rcdbook1858_27_0289.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 286
and eighty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution
**Joseph Farrell vs Henry M Hart**
On Note- Now at this day come again the parties by their respective Attorneys and also the Jury sworn herein and thereupon the trial hereof progressed and being concluded the Jurors aforesaid upon their Oaths aforesaid find for the plaintiff upon the counterclaim of the defendant and also find for the plaintiff and that he hath sustained damage in the sum of four hundred and twelve dollars and sixty six cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the defendant take nothing by his counterclaim herein and that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Jury found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution
**George C Reed et al vs F A Pelletin et al**
Motion for new trial filed
**Joseph Farrell vs Thomas S. Nelson & Francis H Manter**
On Note- Now at this day Comes the plaintiff by his attorney but that defendant Manter although duly summoned and solemnly called comes not, wherefore It is considered by the Court that the petition of the plaintiff be taken against him as confessed, and the defendant Nelson by his attorney comes and the parties waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the petition Answer and proofs, and the Court doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred are thirty five dollars and fourteen cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution
**Edward T. Glasgow & William H Glasgow vs Julius Jonas & Francis W Thompson**
On Note Now at this day come the plaintiff by their attorney but the defendant F. W Thompson although duly summoned and solemnly called comes not, wherefore it is considered by the Court that the petition of the plaintiffs be taken against him as confessed and the defendant of Jonas by his attorney comes and the parties waiving a Jury submit this case of the Court upon the petition Answer and proofs And the Court doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of two hundred and eleven dollars twenty two cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs of suit and thereof have execution
**Joseph Farrell vs Theodore Walff et al**
Now at this day comes the plaintiff and on his motion It is ordered that this case be dismissed. It is therefore considered by the Court that the defendants recover of the plaintiff their costs herein expended and thereof have execution
---
**Viewer Page 291** (rcdbook1858_27_0290.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 287
**Louisa L Freligh vs Joseph M. Ames Francis Hofelman & Leander Lawrence**
On Note. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by her attorney but the defendant Leander Lawrence although duly warned and called comes not but makes default wherefore It is ordered by the Court that he plaintiffs petition be taken against said defendant as confessed, [and the Court doth find from the instrument of writing on which this action is founded that said defendant Lawrence is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and thirty three dollars and fifty eight cents, it is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and also his costs herein expended and have execution therefor ?], And thereupon come the defendants, Joseph M. Ames and Francis Hofelman by their Attorney, and also a Jury to writ B madden, John Bell, Samuel C Cochran, A McMurtry, Wm Brown, C. B. Eaches, Henry Fallon, James B Kelly, M Castello, William Vogel, C D Larnard and Andrew Wood twelve good and lawful men, who being duly elected tried and sworn the issues herein joined well and truly to try, the trial progressed but not being finished is said over until tomorrow morning[. ?]
**Joseph Farrell vs John Holliday Ferdinand Welcker & Francis Mayer**
On Note. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and on his motion It is ordered that this case as to defendant Welcker be dismissed And the plaintiff submits this case to the Court on the pleading and proofs and the Court doth find that the defendants an indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and thirty eight dollars seventy two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the Sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Joseph Farrell vs Paul Carlin John Helgenberg Theodore Wolf & Sebastian Eugert**
On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney, and the defendants withdraw their answer Whereby, this suit remains undefended And the plaintiff submits this case to the Court And the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff, in the sum of four hundred and seventy eighty dollars seventy five cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs of suit and thereof have execution
**Joseph Farrell vs Paul Carlin Henry Gronheim & John Helgenberg**
On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the defendants withdraw their Answer whereby this suit remains undefended and the plaintiff submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and ninety three dollars fifty eight cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 292** (rcdbook1858_27_0291.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 288
**Joseph Farrell vs Paul Carlin Henry Gronheim & John Helgenberg**
On Note- Now at this day come the parties by their respective Attorneys and the defendants withdraw their Answer whereby this suit remains undefended and the plaintiff submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and eighty dollars ninety seven cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs of suit and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Joseph Farrell vs John Helgenberg Henry Gronheim & Paul Carlin**
On Note- Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the defendants withdraw their Answer whereby this suit remains undefended, And the plaintiffs submits the case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and thirty two dollars and nine cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Joseph Farrell vs Paul Carlin John Helgenberg & Henry Gronheim**
On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective Attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer, whereby this suit remains undefended, and the plaintiff submits this case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and thirty dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid inform aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and have execution therefor
---
**Viewer Page 293** (rcdbook1858_27_0292.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 289
**Louisa L. Freligh vs Joseph M. Ames Francis Hofelman & Leander Lawrence**
On Note. Now at this day come again the parties by their respective Attorney and the Jury empanelled and sworn herein and thereupon the trial of this cause progressed and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid say they find for the plaintiff and assess her damages sustained by reason of the premises in her petition mentioned at the sum of five hundred and thirty three dollars and fifty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid as found and also her costs and charges herein expended and have execution therefor[. ?] Motion for new trial filed
**John C. Evans and Henry L. Parker vs Charles H Pond**
On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective Attorney and the defendant files [his ?] affidavit and moves the Court to continue this case and the Court having heard and considered the affidavit and motion doth overrule the same, And the parties waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court and the Court doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of four hundred and fifty one dollars fifteen cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid as found and his costs of suit and have execution therefor
**Joseph Delaygare vs [Therese ?] Bowers [Admx ?] of Aaron Bowers deceased**
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleading and proofs and the Court having heard the Same doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of Eighty eight dollars fifty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid as found and his costs of suit and have execution therefor
**Charlotte Wead vs Edward Augustine & George Hanck**
By Consent of parties it is ordered that this case be dismissed at the cost of defendants
**The State of Mo to use of George Kyler vs Benjamin Farrar**
On motion of plaintiff six days further time is allowed him to file reply to the plea of the defendant filed herein
**Joseph Farrell vs Henry Boernstein**
By consent of parties it is ordered that this case be dismissed at the cost of the defendant[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 294** (rcdbook1858_27_0293.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 290
**Joseph Farrell vs Paul Carlin & Henry C. Lynch**
On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and also come a Jury to wit B. Madden, [Juo ?] Bell. Samuel C. Cochran A McMurtry Wm Brown C. B. Eaches Henry Fallon, James B. Kelly, M. Castello Wm Vogel C. D. Larnard Andrew Wood twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issues joined herein the trial progressed but not being concluded at the horn of adjournment, further proceedings are continued until tomorrow morning at ten O clock. Court adjourned to same time
---
**Viewer Page 295** (rcdbook1858_27_0294.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 291
**Wm T. Hazzard vs Lyman Scott et al**
Answer of defendant Scot filed
**Louisa L. Freligh vs Frederick Pality &c**
Motion for new trial filed
**Joseph Fanell vs Henry N Hart**
Motion for new trial filed
**John C Evans et al vs Charles H Pond**
Motion for new trial filed
**James Eddie et al vs Green Parks Exor &c**
By leave of Court the defendant withdraw his answer and files demurrer and motion to strike out portion of plaintiffs petition
**John Dalton vs Charles Marlow &c**
Motion for new trial filed
**Schaffnor vs The City of S Louis**
Exhibits filed
**Thomas J Lawrenson vs Thomas F. Lawrenson**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for new trial herein doth ordere that said motion be and the same is hereby sustained
**F. Dattelywig vs M. W Black**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to set aside the nonsuit herein doth order that the Same he Overruled
**Robert Stevens vs Willion et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to set aside the dismissed herein doth order that the same be sustained and that said dismissed be set aside[. ?]
**James Harrison vs Charles Hays et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to Strike Out the counter claim herein doth order that said motion be Overruled
---
**Viewer Page 296** (rcdbook1858_27_0295.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 292
**Isaac Lamaster vs The Woodboat Hardin**
The Court having duly heard and considered the Demurrer herein doth order that the same be sustained
**Isaac W Mitchell vs Jacob Fritschle & c**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for new trial herein doth order that the same be Overruled
**Covenant Life Insurance Co vs Charles F Baker et al**
The Court having heard and considered the motion to Setaside the Judgment herein doth order that said motion be Overruled
**Joseph Farrell vs Paul Carlin & Henry C. Lynch**
On Note, Now at this day come again the parties by their respective Attorneys and also the Jury sworn herein and the trial of this case progressed and being concluded the Jurors aforesaid retire to consider of their verdict, And afterward the jurors aforesaid come into Court and say they cannot agree upon a verdict herein, It is therefore ordered that they be discharged and that this case be continued[. ?]
**Joseph Farnsworth vs The Jerre Hante Alton and St Louis Raid Road Co**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of the defendant herein filed to set aside the Judgment rendered upon the plea in abatement and being thereof fully advised doth order that the same be overruled. And Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney but the said defendant although duly summoned and solemnly called comes not; And it appearing to the Court that there is no answer filed in this cause, it doth, on motion of said plaintiff by his Attorney. order that his petition be taken against said defendant as confessed And this cause being submitted to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth Assess the damages sustained by said plaintiff by reason of the premises mentioned in his petition at the sum of fifteen hundred and ninety three dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of said defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as assessed and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
**Thomas M Avery vs Washington F. Adams**
The defendant, by Attorney files an affidavit for an appeal herein and on his motion an appeal is allowed him to the supreme Court from the Judgment herein and thereupon the defendant files an appeal bond herein with Washington F. Adams as principal and George A. [Putnam ?], Charles D Coleman, Joseph G Shands E Base J H Whitelan and John Byrue J. as sureties which bond is approved by the Court
---
**Viewer Page 297** (rcdbook1858_27_0296.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 293
**David T. Wheeler vs S. B. Bullock**
The Court having duly heard and considered the exceptions to the report of the referes herein doth order that the said exceptions be overruled
**Charles H. Dubs vs Thomas Campbell**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer to the plaintiff petition doth order that the same be overruled
**Amadre Berthald Ferdinand Rogier Jr. and William Fullager vs James Chilton Benjamin F Johnson & John Cole**
Confession of Judgment. Now at this day come the defendants and files statement herein sworn to, whereby it appears to the Court that the defendants confess that they are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of Two thousand three hundred and fifteen dollars eighty five cents and consent and agree that Judgment may be entered against them and in favor of the plaintiffs for said sum, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as confessed and their costs herein and thereof have execution.
**Isaac Lainaster vs The Woodboat Hardin**
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having heard the same doth find for the defendant It is therefore considered by the Court that the defendant go hence and recover of the plaintiff her costs in this behalf expended and thereof have thereof execution Bill of Exception filed
**The [St Br ?] City of Memphis vs Matthen Levering &c**
Bill of Exceptions filed
**Solomon Smith vs Alfred M Waterman**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for new trial herein doth order that the same be overruled
**The Citizens Savings Institution vs Alfred M. Waterman et al**
The Court having heard and considered the motion for new trial herein doth order that the same be overruled
**Herman J. Hasbrock vs Hulbertine F. Hasbrock**
Order of Publication
The Sheriff of St Louis County having made return that the defendant cannot be found in his county and
---
**Viewer Page 298** (rcdbook1858_27_0297.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 294
it appearing to the Court that the defendant cannot be served with process, on motion of the plaintiff it is ordered that the defendant be notified of the commencement of this suit the abject of which is to obtain a decree of divorce from the bonds of matrimony by the plaintiff contracted with the defendant and that unless she be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of S Louis within and for the county of S Louis on the first monday of october next and then and their on or before the sixth day of said term Answer to the said action, the petition of the plaintiff will be taken for confessed against her and it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed and published in the City of S Louis[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 299** (rcdbook1858_27_0298.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 295
**Squire Hall vs Wm H Deriar**
Amended answer filed
**James T. Death Absolom Death & Wilson Death vs Robert A. W. Crenshan**
Petition. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and consent and agree that judgment may be rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum of five hundred and eighteen dollars and seventy cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid consented to and their costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution
**In the Matter of Louis Mayer**
Inventory filed
**Louis A Benoist & James Christy vs Charles Rogers, James Sanderson and William L. Salisbury**
On motion of the attorney for the plaintiffs It is ordered that this case be dismissed at the cost of the plaintiffs
**William D Sedgwick vs John Halliday Ferdinand Welcker Eleager Sherman James H. McCullock & Charles Webb**
Now at this day comes James S. Catlin attorney for Wm D. Sedgwick, and acknowledges full and entire satisfaction of the Judgment rendered On the 27th February 1858 herein, for One thousand and eighty dollars fifty six cents in favor of plaintiffs and against said defendants
**Louis C. Garnier vs Joseph L. Papin Cornelius D Sullivan Jeremiah T. Sullivan & Samuel Myerson**
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and on his motion it is ordered that this case as to the defendant Myerson be dismissed. And the other defendants by their Attorney come and the parties waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and thirty seven dollars and fifty cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution
**John R. Shepley vs James C. Musick**
Continued
---
**Viewer Page 300** (rcdbook1858_27_0299.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 296
**James C. Page vs Alfred M. Waterman**
Ordered that this case be continued on the application of defendant and at his cost on account of the sickness of C D Drake Esq Counsel for the defendant
---
**Viewer Page 301** (rcdbook1858_27_0300.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 297
**Isaac W Mitchell vs Jacob Fritschle et al**
Defendants Bill of exceptions filed
**Squire Hall vs William H Deriar**
Ordered that this case be continued at the cost of defendant
**Isaac Bernheimer vs Abraham Newmark**
Application for continuance filed and case continued at the cost of defendant
**In the Matter of Louis Mayer**
Ordered that Zuckweller, Wm D. Henry and Hugh McDone who are hereby appointed appraisers for that purpose do proceed after being duly sworn to appraise the property described in the inventory herein filed, and make due report of their said appraisement
**Wm T. Hazzard vs Lyman Scott et al.**
Depositions filed
**James D Honseman et al vs James Hewitt et al**
Continued by Consent
**Mary Charlatte vs Gabriel Chontean**
Continued.
**Wesley J. Alkire vs James Reid**
Continued
**Joseph B Henderson vs E. Goodrich [Garee ?] &c**
Continued
**William A McDowell vs George J King**
Ordered that this case be continued at the cost of defendant
**Louisa L. Wilson vs Jesse K. Wilson**
Order of publication[. ?] The Sheriff of S Louis County having made return that the defendant cannot be found in his county and the Court being.
---
**Viewer Page 302** (rcdbook1858_27_0301.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 298
satisfied that the defendant cannot be served with process, on motion of the plaintiff by her attorney, it is ordered that the defendant be notified of the commencement of this suit the object of which is to process a decree of divorce from the bonds of matrimoney contracted by the plaintiff with the defendant, and that unless he be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the City of S Louis within and for the County of S Louis on the first monday of October next and on or before the sixth day said term answer to the said action the petition of the plaintiff will be taken against him as confessed. And it is further ordered that a Copy hereof be published according to law in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed and published in the City of S Louis
**The St B[r ?] City of Memphis vs Leonard Matthews**
Now at this day comes the defendant and files an affidavit and prays an appeal to the supreme Court from the judgment rendered herein, And the Court doth allow the appeal prayed for and thereupon the defendant files an appeal bond herein with Leonard Matthews as principal and Alexander Hamilton and Isaac E. Jones as sureties which bond is approved by the Court
**Matthew S. Moloney vs Henry Boernstein & Samuel Jacoby**
Now at this day come the defendants and file an affidavit and pray an appeal to the supreme Court from the judgment rendered herein, and the Court doth grant the appeal prayed for and thereupon the defendants file an appeal bond herein with Henry Boernstein as principal and Samuel Simmons and Gustaous Boernstein as sureties which bond is approved by the Court
---
**Viewer Page 303** (rcdbook1858_27_0302.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 299
**Frederick Ernst Baumgarten vs Louisa Amalia Baumgarten**
Ordered that this case be dismissed at the cost of plaintiff and that execution issue therefor
**Citizens Savings Institution vs Geo W Thatcher [Garee ?] of Waterman**
On motion it is ordered that the said Garnishee be discharged and that he be allowed fifteen dollars for his trouble had in answering herein, to be taxed as costs against the plaintiff
**Solomon Smith vs Geo W. Thatcher [Garee ?] of Waterman**
On motion it is ordered that the said Garnishee be discharged and that he be allowed fifteen dollars to be taxed as costs against the plaintiff, for his trouble in answering herein[. ?]
**James C Page vs Geo W. Thatcher [Garee ?] &c**
Continued until next term of this Court
**John Louderback vs The North Missouri Rail Road**
Continued by Consent
**David Gibson et al vs B Stout**
On motion of Thomas H Noble the Garnishee herein he is discharged and he is allowed five dollars for appearing herein
**Robert Thornburg vs Wm Clark et al Gars &c**
Replication to answer filed.
**James H Lucas et al vs The County of S Louis Gar &c**
Answer filed
**Joseph R. Boggs & Samuel H. Leathe vs America Insurance Co**
Petition on Policy. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and thereupon cause also a Jury viz Adolph Gebarth, Wm Curran, Geo [Carmelick ?], J. W. Spalding, L. Moser, J. F. Shurist, Jacob Littig, Wm Hanlan, Geo W Bushey [Sr ?], D Branch, J DeBus, and Charles Pomeroy twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and Sworn the issue herein joined will and truly to try the trial of this cause progressed but not being finished further proceeding are continued until tomorrow morning
---
**Viewer Page 304** (rcdbook1858_27_0303.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 300
**Solomon Smith vs Alfred M. Waterman**
On motion of the plaintiff he has leave to withdraw his bill of exchange from the files
**Hamilton Bill et al vs William Dawson**
The death of William Le Guerrier one of the plaintiffs is suggested to the Court and this case is continued
**Joseph R. Boggs & Samuel H. Leathe vs America Insurance Company**
Petition on Policy[. ?] Now at this day come again the said parties by their respective attorneys, and the Jurors empanelled and sworn herein also come and thereupon the trial of this cause progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find the issues in favor of the plaintiffs and assess their damages by reason of the premises in their petition mentioned at the sum of five thousand two hundred dollars. It is Therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Jury aforesaid found and their costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution
**William Raiguel et al vs Herman Weiner et al**
Stipulation filed
**Andrew Lemmon to Andrew Jackson**
Now at this day comes into Court Andrew Lemmon to the Court personally known and acknowledges the execution of a deed of emancipation to Andrew Jackson of Color and his Slave[. ?]
**The State of Mo to use Geo Kyler vs Benjamin Farrar**
Replication filed
**The Citizens Savings Institution vs Alfred M. Waterman**
On motion of Plaintiff she has leave to withdraw her bill of exchanges from the files herein[. ?]
**James C Page vs Alfred M Waterman**
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his Attorney and on his motion it is ordered that this case be dismissed, It is therefore considered by the Court that the defendant recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution therefor and the plaintiff on further motion has leave to withdraw his bill of exchange from the files
---
**Viewer Page 305** (rcdbook1858_27_0304.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 301
**James C. Page vs George W Thatcher [Garee ?] of Alfred M. Waterman**
On motion of the Attorney for the plaintiff it is ordered that the garnishment herein be dismissed and it is ordered by the Court that C D Drake Esq be allowed the sum of fifteen dollars for having filed are answer herein[. ?]
**The State of Missouri vs Henry Bunneman**
Grand Larceny. Now at this day comes the attorney for the State and also comes the prisoner and the attorney for the State page that he will not further prosecute the indictment herein. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the prisoner go hereof hence without day[. ?] and it is ordered that the costs herein be certified as is by the Statute provided
**Inles Gre and Alexander [Guenandon ?] vs Gaetans Pittaluga**
On Interpleader of Louis [Sangrinetti ?]
Now at this day come the parties by their respective Attorneys And thereupon come also a Jury to writ Ferdinand Kerna, James Spore Thomas Watkins, William Curran James Shaw, J. T. Sherrick, William Hanlan Samuel Willing, Wood Dickens, John Hickley B. Herman and F M Willond twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and Sworn will and truly the issues joined between the parties aforesaid to try, the trial of this cause progressed but not being finished at the hour of adjournment the same is said over until tomorrow morning at ten Oclock
---
**Viewer Page 306** (rcdbook1858_27_0305.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 302
**Thom B [Wing ?] vs Jacob S. Williams**
Now at this day comes the attorney for the plaintiff and suggests to the Court that since the beginning of this suit the plaintiff has died, and Peter B. Garesche public administrator of St Louis County and by [virtuee ?] of his office administrator of the plaintiff deceased enters his appearance herein
**Lucius A Willard vs Miles G. Moies et al**
The Court having heard and being advised of and concerning the motion to set aside the Judgment herein doth overrule the same
**Lucius A Willard vs Miles G. Moies et al**
The Court having duly heard and being advised of and concerning the motion to set aside the Judgment herein doth overrule the same
**Squire Brown to Lydia**
Squire Brown comes into Court and acknowledges deed of emancipation of his Negro Slave Lydia
**James Harrison vs Charles Hays and Drury Hall**
Now at this day come the parties by their respective Attorneys and the defendants withdraw their motion for Judgment upon their Counter Claim, And the Court on motion of the plaintiff doth order that this case be dismissed. It is therefore considered by the Court that the defendants recover of the plaintiff their costs herein expended and that execution issue therefor
**Mary Peppers vs Emanuel**
Mary Peppers Comes into Court and acknowledges deed of emancipation to her Negro Slave Emanuel
**In the matter of the Assignment of Louis Mayer**
Assignment filed
**Joseph R. Boggs & c vs America Insurance Co**
Motion for new trial filed
**Louis C. Garnier vs Ferdinand Vandermale & Frederick Picker**
Default on Note[. ?] It appearing to the Court that Judgment by default was rendered herein on the sixth day of march last and the same was omitted in the record of that day. it is therefore on motion of the attorney for the plaintiff ordered that said Judgment be entered now as of said sixth day of March 1858.
---
**Viewer Page 307** (rcdbook1858_27_0306.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 303
to writ. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the defendants although duly warned and called comes not but make default wherefore it is ordered that the petition of the plaintiff be taken for confessed against them and the Court doth find from the instrument of writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and thirty dollars and sixty six cents, it is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**R. M. Barclay Levi Hinckle and John Shield vs Wm B. Watson Gar of Daniel Gale**
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the interrogatories and answer, from which the Court doth find that the said Garnishee is indebted to the defendant in the sum of two hundred and eighty dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the garnishee the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found. And have Execution therefor. And on motion it is ordered that said garnishee be allowed the sum of ten dollars for answering herein
**Jules Gre and Alexandier Guenandon vs Gaetand Pittaluga**
On Interplea of [Sangrimatte ?]
Now at this day come again the parties by their respective attorney and the Jury empanelled and sworn herein also come, the trial of this case progressed but not being finished at the horn of adjournment the same is [laid ?] over until monday morning at ten Oclock
---
**Viewer Page 307** (rcdbook1858_27_0306.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 303
to writ. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney but the defendants although duly warned and called comes not but make default wherefore it is ordered that the petition of the plaintiff be taken for confessed against them and the Court doth find from the instrument of writing upon which this action is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of five hundred and thirty dollars and sixty six cents, it is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**R. M. Barclay Levi Hinckle and John Shield vs Wm B. Watson Gar of Daniel Gale**
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the interrogatories and answer, from which the Court doth find that the said Garnishee is indebted to the defendant in the sum of two hundred and eighty dollars and eighty cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the garnishee the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found. And have Execution therefor. And on motion it is ordered that said garnishee be allowed the sum of ten dollars for answering herein
**Jules Gre and Alexandier Guenandon vs Gaetand Pittaluga**
On Interplea of [Sangrimatte ?]
Now at this day come again the parties by their respective attorney and the Jury empanelled and sworn herein also come, the trial of this case progressed but not being finished at the horn of adjournment the same is [laid ?] over until monday morning at ten Oclock
---
**Viewer Page 308** (rcdbook1858_27_0307.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 304
**Joseph Farnsworth vs The Terre Hante Alton & S Louis Rail Road Co**
Bill of Exceptions filed
**Juliane Dausch [admx ?] of Geo Dausch vs Nicholas Dausch**
On motion of plaintiffs attorney its is ordered that this case be dismissed, and the plaintiff by leave of Court withdraws the exhibit filed herein and leaves receipt therefor[. ?]
**Jacob Meyer vs Equitable Fire Insurance Co**
Continued on application of defendant at its costs
**Edgar Sprague vs James D Houseman & Samuel H Lowrey**
On Note. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and on his motion it is ordered that this case as to defendant Houseman be dismissed and the defendant Lowry although duly summoned and solemnly called, coming not makes default, it is therefore ordered by the Court that the petition be taken against him as confessed, And the Court doth find from the the writing upon which this action is founded that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and eighty two dollars and seventy five cents It is therefore considered by the Court that that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**Joseph Hoge vs Daniel D Page & Henry D. Bacon**
Now at this day come the parties by their respective Attorneys and the defendants withdraw their answer whereby this suit remains undefended, and the plaintiff submits the case to the Court and the Court doth find from the writing upon which this suit is founded that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum twelve hundred and seventy five dollars and fifty one cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and have execution therefor
**Cleander Mighells vs Lorenzo D Jones**
This day comes the defendant and files notice and proof of service thereof upon the plaintiff, that he, the defendant will on the 24th Instant move the Court to assess the value of the property taken from the defendant by virtue of the order of delivery herein and delivered to the plaintiff
**Jules Gre and Alexander Guenandon vs Gaetano Pittaluga**
On Interplea of [Sangunitte ?]
Now at this day come again said parties by their respective Attorneys and the Jury empanneled and sworn herein also come
---
**Viewer Page 309** (rcdbook1858_27_0308.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 305
and the trial of this cause progressed but not being finished at the horn of adjournment the same is [laid ?] over until tomorrow morning at ten Oclock
**In the matter of the assignment of Theodore R. Posey**
R. S. Eddy assignee files a report of settlement herein[. ?]
**Louis C. Garnier vs E. D English et al**
Affidavit for continuance filed and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth order that the motion for continuance be overruled
**Stephen Haskell & James M Franciscus vs Francis Mayer John W Siebert John Holliday Philip Ceasar and George W Sherrick**
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and upon motion It is ordered that George W Sherrick be discharged upon his answer herein, and the parties waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleading and proofs and the Court having duly heard the same doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and thirty seven dollars, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor, Sherrick allowed [from ?]
**President Directors & Company of the Bank of Louisville vs William C Watts [Garee ?] of Morris Cahn**
Judgment on Garnishment. Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the interrogatories and answer filed and the Court having duly heard the same doth find from the answer that the Garnishee is indebted to the defendant in the sum of Eight hundred and thirty seven
---
**Viewer Page 310** (rcdbook1858_27_0309.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 306
dollars twenty three cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the said Garnishee the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found. And that they have execution therefor, And it is further ordered that the said garnishee be allowed the sum of ten dollars for his trouble has in answering herein, to be taxed as costs against the said defendant
**The State of Missouri vs William Burke**
On Indictment for Burglary & Larceny. Change Venne from Crim Court Now at this day come as will the Circuit Attorney who prosecutes for the State as the defendant in his own proper person; thereupon come also a Jury to wit Thomas Cummings, George M Willing Jud Mullingan, Saml K Wilson, Robt Montgomery, James Hughes, John M Pfeiffer, H B Merritt, E J Roberts, M B. Humphreys, H A Conant, B Burback, twelve good and lawful new who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try, thereupon the trial of the Cause progressed but not being concluded at the hour of adjournment further proceedings herein are deferred until the meeting of the Court tomorrow morning[. ?]
**Jules Gre and Alexander Guenandon vs Gaetano Pittaluga**
On Interplea of [Sangunette ?]
Now at this day come again the parties by their respective attorney and the Jury empanneled and Sworn herein also come, and the trial of this cause being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their Oaths aforesaid find the issue joined in favor of said plaintiffs and against the said Interpleader. It is therefore considered by the Court that said plaintiff recover of the said defendant their costs and charges by their in this suit expended and have therefor execution[. ?]
**Jules Gre and Alexander Guenandon vs Gaetano Pittaluga**
On Interplea of [Sangunette ?]
Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorneys and Consent and agree that the Court may render Judgment herein for the plaintiff and against said Interpleader as per agreement heretofore filed. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that said plaintiff recover of the said Interpleader their costs and charges by their in this behalf expended and that Execution Issue therefor[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 311** (rcdbook1858_27_0310.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 307
**The Citizens Savings Institution vs Frederick Dent and [Kenneth ?] McKenzio**
Assignment of Judgment filed
**Matthew S. Maloney et al vs Henry Boernstein et al**
Deposition filed
**Sherman J Bacon et al vs Oliver T. Bragg et al**
Deposition filed
**Lucius A Willard vs Miles G. Moris et al**
Bill of Exception filed
**Lucius A Willard vs Miles G. Moris et al**
Bill of Exception filed
**Porter White & Co vs Thomas M. Taylor Gar &c**
Denial of answer, and replication filed
**In the Matter of the assignment of H Bodeman**
Henry N. Hart assignee files a report of sale herein[. ?]
**Charles Webb Benjamin Brison & James H McCulloch vs James Castello**
Judgment. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and consent and agree that Judgment may be rendered against the defendant and in favor of the plaintiffs for the sum of one cent damages. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and that the plaintiff have and retain possession of the property delivered to them by the coroner at the commencement of this suit and it is further ordered that the plaintiffs pay the costs of this suit and that execution issue therefor
---
**Viewer Page 312** (rcdbook1858_27_0311.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 308
**Jules Gre and Alex[r ?] Guenandon vs Gaetano Pittaluga[- ?] Louis Sanguinette interpleader**
Motion for new trial filed
**Robert Thornburgh vs Wm Clark et al**
Supplemental answer filed
**Squrie Hall vs William H Deriar**
On motion of plaintiff he has further time until the the first day of next term allowed him to file reply to the amended answer herein[. ?]
**In the matter of the application of William Herkins & Hervin McGrory alias Webster Shaw**
Habeas Corpus[. ?] The Court having duly heard and considered the application of the petitioners doth order that the same be overruled
**John Dalton vs Thomas F. Wightman & Charles Marlon**
The Plaintiff by his attorney comes and acknowledges full and entire satisfaction of the judgment rendered against said defendants on the 5th day of May 1858 for one thousand and ninety eight dollars and thirty cents
**The State of Missouri vs William Burke**
Motion for new trial filed
**Joseph S. Foster vs Edgar Ames Gar of Stephen M Whitehouse et al**
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered that the garnishee herein be discharged
**Emiston McClellan vs Edgar Ames Gar &**
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered that the garnishee herein be discharged[. ?]
**Luther M. Shreeve vs Frederick W Jugle et al**
Report of referee filed
**John Kennedy vs Charles L. Gilpin [Gain ?] &**
Replication of Garnishee filed
---
**Viewer Page 313** (rcdbook1858_27_0312.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 309
**Robert Montgomery Henry H. Breffenmeyer Alexander Evans Robert L. Crawford & Robert Montgomery Jr vs Robert Stevens Gar of R. W. Pucker**
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and by consent It is ordered that the judgment by [refanet ?] heretofore entered herein be set aside and the said Garnishee files an answer herein. And the parties submit this case to the Court upon the interrogatories and answer, and the Court doth find from the answer of the said Garnishee that he is indebted to the defendant in the sum of sixty two dollars and nine cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the garnishee the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found due and oweing by him to the defendant and thereof have execution. And the said garnishee is allowed five dollars for his trouble had in answering
**The Bank of the State of Missouri vs John Dalton Garnishee of Daniel Shattuck., Jules Hebert, Alonzo H. Wood and Anapias Rice**
Garnishment[. ?] Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the interrogatories and answer, and the Court doth find from the answer of the said garnishee that he is indebted to the defendants in the sum of two hundred dollars, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said garnishee the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and have execution therefor
**Renben J. Guthridge vs Miles Sells [Garee ?] of James M McFadin**
Garnishment[. ?] Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and by consent It is ordered that the Judgment by default heretofore entered herein be set aside and the said garnishee files an answer herein and the parties waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the interrogatories and answer and the Court having duly heard the same doth find from the answer of the garnishee that he is indebted to the defendant in the sum of two hundred and fourteen dollars, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said garnishee the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found, And have execution therefore, And it is further ordered that the said garnishee be allowed ten dollars for his trouble in answering herein[. ?]
**Renben J. Guthridge vs Frank. W Tillay [Garee ?] of James M. McFadin**
Garnishment. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and by Consent It is ordered that the Judgment by default heretofore entered herein be set aside, and the said garnishee files an answer herein and the parties waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court [oathe ?] interrogatories and answer and the Court having duly heard the same doth find from the answer of the said garnishee that he is indebted to the defendant in the sum of two hundred and sixty seven dollars and seventy form Cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said Garnishee the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and have execution therefor, and it is further ordered that the said garnishee be allowed ten dollars for his trouble in answer herein
---
**Viewer Page 314** (rcdbook1858_27_0313.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 310
**John S. Thompson vs Robert Sterling & Joseph Wallace**
On Note Judgment[- ?]
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleading and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two thousand one hundred and sixty five dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs in this behalf expended and have execution therefor And It is further ordered that the defendants return and deliver to the sheriff the property levied on by him by virtue of the writ of attachment herein, and retained in possession by the defendants by virtue of the forth coming bond given herein[. ?]
**George Goss et al vs H. B. Merritt et al**
Now at this day come the defendants and on their application it is ordered that this cause be continued on account of the absence of Penfield and Kernan material witnesses on the part of the defence, and at defendants costs And it is ordered that the motion to strike out the answer of the defendants remain on the motion Docket of this term for hearing
**Benedict Shultz vs John Valentine et al**
Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys and the Court having duly heard and considered the motion of defendant Hirschfeld to set aside the default entered against him doth sustain the same, and thereupon on motion of the plaintiff it is ordered that this case be dismissed as to defendant Hirschfeld and that this case be continued
**James M. Porter & Edward White vs Thomas M. Taylor [garce ?] of Matthew Shaffner**
Judgment[. ?] Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their Attorney, and the garnishee comes not, and Plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit the cause to the Court; and the Court having duly heard and considered the evidence adduced doth find the issue joined in favor of the plaintiff, the Court finding the fact to be that said defendant Shaffner was insolvent at the time of the assignment of stock mentioned in the answer of Garnishee and that said transfer was infraud of Creditors and trial and find the stick described in answer of the Garnishee is held by and Garnishee in trust for said defendant Matthew Shaffner and it further appearing to the Court that Judgment was recovered by plaintiffs in the original cause against defendant for the sum of three hundred and thirty three 96/100 dollars on november 4th 1857, therefore the Court doth allon judgment in favor of said plaintiffs against said Garnishee and order that said garnishee deliver to the Sheriff of S Louis County the certificates of the stock described in the answer of Garnishee as twenty Shares in the Globe Mutual Insurance Company Ten shares in the Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company of St Louis and ten shares in the Quiney Gas light Company of Quiney [Illinois, ?] And it is ordered that the Sheriff of S Louis County sell the aforesaid Certificates of Stock at the Court hence door of S Louis County first giving legal notice of said sale, and that on such sale he hand over to the purchaser the said certificates of stock with [- ?] bill of sale therefor reciting the facts, and out of the proceed of said sale he pay the costs of said suit and the amount of the judgment in the original cause in favor of the plaintiffs with interest from the date of said judgment or so much thereof as can he paid from the proceed of said sale, and the balance if any shall be held for the use of the defendant and subject to the further order of this Court and that said sheriff report to this court his proceedings herein without delay
---
**Viewer Page 315** (rcdbook1858_27_0314.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 311
Note by clerk
The fallowing entry should have been made in the record of the 19th day of may, but owing to an error in the minutes was omitted. The entry is now made as of the 19th may 1858.
**The State of Missouri vs William Burke**
On Indictment for [Burglary ?] & Larceny.
Now again come as well the parties as aforesaid as also the Juror aforesaid who having heard all the evidence in the cause and the argument of counsel upon their oaths aforesaid say they find the said defendant guilty of [Burglary ?] in the second degree, and larceny as charged in the first Court of the indictment and assess his punishment for [burglary ?] in the second degree by imprisonment in the penitentiary for the space of five years, and for the Larceny by imprisonment in the penitentiary for the space of two years. Therefore it is considered by the Court that said defendant for his offence of [Burglary ?] in the second degree aforesaid and in pursuance of the verdict herein rendered be imprisoned in the penitentiary of this state for the space of five years, and it is further considered by the Court that said defendant for his offence of Larceny aforesaid be imprisoned in the penitentiary of this state for the additional space of two years, that he pay the costs of this prosecution and stand committed until this sence be complied with[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 316** (rcdbook1858_27_0315.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 312
**David T. Wheeler vs Samuel B. Bullock**
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and the defendant withdraws his exceptions to the report of the referee herein, and thereupon the Court doth order that said report be and the same is hereby confirmed, and the Court doth find from the said report that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and nine dollars and forty eight cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended and thereof have execution. And it is further ordered that A. M. Gondner Esq be allowed the sum of thirty dollars for his services as referee herein, to be taxed against defendant
**Charles H Dubb vs Thomas Campbell**
For Damages[. ?] Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his Attorney but the defendant comes not, and the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court upon the pleading and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find for the plaintiff and that he hath sustained damage by reason of the promises in his petition mentioned in the sum of two hundred and sixty three dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Louis C. Garnier vs Andrew A LeBean Ezra O English Samuel Myerson John Burns and Jacob Johann**
On Note.- Now at this day come the parties by their respective Attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court [and ?] the pleading and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two thousand two hundred and fourteen dollars and fifty nine cents. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs in this behalf expended and have execution therefor
**Benedict Shultz vs John Valentine et al**
Bill of exceptions filed
**John Kennedy vs Charles L. Gilpin Garnishee of Joseph Larkin**
Garnishment[. ?] Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and thereupon come also a Jury viz John C Bull, Geo M Willing, John Mullingan, Henry B. Merritt, Robert Montgomery, John M Pfeiffer E. G. Roberts, M. B. Humphreys, H. A. Conant Wm Wade Henry Stagg & Alexander Suss, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn will and truly to try the issues joined the trial hereof progressed and the plaintiff saying he will not further prosecute his action in this
---
**Viewer Page 317** (rcdbook1858_27_0316.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 313
behalf but valuntarily take nonsuit, it is ordered by the Court that the Jury sworn herein be discharged and that the plaintiff take nothing by his suit in this behalf but that the garnishee go hence without day and recover of the plaintiff the costs herein expended, And have execution therefor, and it is further ordered that said garnishee be allowed the sum of ten dollars for his trouble in answering herein
Ordered that William Heinty a Juror in this Court be fined the sum of five dollars for non attendance as such Juror[. ?]
**Henry B. Belt & John G. Priest vs George W. Goode**
On account Now at this day come the said parties by their respective attorney and thereupon come also a Jury to writ Thomas Cummings, B Burback, Samuel K. Wilson, Alex. Murdoth, David Lutch, W. P. thayer, George A Baner, G. F. Tower, Geo B. Murry, James Scoley, Ernet Schenk, J. L. Adams twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected, tried and sworn well and truly to try the matters in controversy between the parties aforesaid, the trial of this cause progresses and being finished the Jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid find upon the Counter Claim in favor of said defendant and assess his damages at the sum of forty eight dollars and ninety cents It is therefore considered by the Court that said defendant go hence without day and recover of said plaintiffs the sum aforesaid in from aforesaid as assessed by the Jury and his costs and charges herein expended and have thereof execution
**The State of Missouri vs Joseph W Thornton**
Grand Larceny. Change Venne from Criminal Court Now at this day come As well the circuit attorney who prosecutes for the state as the defendant in his own proper person, and thereupon cause also a Jury to writ John C Bull, George M Willing, John Mulligan, Geo J Barnett, Robert Montgomery, John M [Pfeiffer ?], Henry B Merritt, H. A Conant, William Wade, Henry Stagg, Alexander Suss, and J. L. Adams twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the trial of this case progressed but not being concluded at the horn of adjournment further proceedings are continued until the meeting of the Court tomorrow morning. Court adjournment until ten Oclock tomorrow morning
---
**Viewer Page 318** (rcdbook1858_27_0317.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 314
**Julius H. Smith vs James D. Houseman**
Order of Injunction and appointment of a receiver
The application of the plaintiffs petition having been considered by the Court and the said Court being fully advised thereof, it is ordered by said Court that James D Houseman he enjoined from proceeding further in the collection of any of the assetts or from any way interfering in the matters of the late forms of Houseman Smith & Co and Houseman and Smith until the further order of this Court provided however that the said Julius H Smith first execute a bond to said James D. Houseman in the penal sum of twenty three thousand dollars. with Pierre A Berthold and Samuel Harvill as securities conditioned that if the said Julius H. Smith shall pay all damages occasioned by said restraining order and abide the decision which shall be made therein, and pay all sums of money, damages and costs that shall be adjudged against him if said injunction be dissolved
And the Court having also considered the application of said petitioners, it is ordered that Augustus H Berthond be and he is hereby appointed Receive in this cause to adjust the matters involved, subject to the further direction and order of this Court. And the said defendant Houseman is hereby required to surrender on oath all the books, notes, accounts, [duly ?] money, credits, effects, chattels, goods and papers of every description now in his possession belonging to the [lobe ?] firms of Houseman Smith & Co and Houseman & Smith to the receiver hereby appointed and to render whenever called upon a just account of all business transactions of such above mentioned firms as for as the same may have come within his Knowledge
It is further ordered that said Receiver before entering on his duties, file a bond with sufficient securities in the sum of twenty three thousand dollars conditioned for the faithful performance of his duties[. ?]
**Henry C. Boardman vs Jacob Fritschle et al**
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and remits ninety five cents of the Judgment rendered herein in his favor and against the defendants[. ?] and the Court having duly heard and considered the motion for new trial herein doth overrule the same, Bill of Exceptions filed
**Joseph Farrell vs Jacob Fritschle**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for new trial herein doth overrule the same Bill of Exceptions filed
**The State of Missouri vs Joseph W. Thornton**
For Grand Larceny
Now at this day come again the said parties as aforesaid and also the Jury sworn herein, and thereupon the trial of this cause progressed and the Jurors aforesaid having heard all the evidence and the argument of Counsel upon their Oaths aforesaid say that the defendant is not guilty as charged in the indictment It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that said defendant be acquit and go hereof hence without day
---
**Viewer Page 319** (rcdbook1858_27_0318.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 315
**George W. Parker et al vs John Nevison**
Proof of Publication filed
**William Raiguel et al vs Herman Weiner & O. Schum**
By Consent of Parties It is ordered by the Court that this case be dismissed at the cost of defendants and that execution issue therefor
**Luther M Shreeve vs Frederick Jugle et al**
Motion for judgment on report of referee filed
**William N Laker vs Arthin T. Hollister**
Confession of Judgment[. ?] Now at this day come the defendant and files a statement whereby it appears to the Court that he confesses that he is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three thousand dollars and consents and agrees that judgment may be rendered against him and in favor of the plaintiff for said sum. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid confessed and his costs and charges in this behalf expended and have execution therefor
**George Pomeroy et al vs Joshua W. Alexander et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to Strike out defendants answer doth sustain the same
**Wm M. Morrison et al vs Samuel McCartney**
Bill of Exception filed
**Julia Morrison vs J. K. Philiber**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for new trial herein doth order that the same be overruled.
---
**Viewer Page 320** (rcdbook1858_27_0319.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 316
**In the matter of the Assignment of David W Shepperd**
On the application of David W Shepperd It is ordered that Thomas C. Chester assignee of said David W Shepperd, appear before this Court on the 27th day of may 1858 and exhibit on oath the accounts of his trust or shew cause to the contrary
**Julius H Smith vs James D Houseman**
On motion of plaintiff [dedinus ?] is awarded him to take the depositions of witnesses in the State of Ohio to be read on the trial of this cause
**P. [McKennel ?] vs Molloy**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for a relaxation of costs herein doth overrule the same[. ?]
**Emerson Johnson vs Jones Covill & c**
The Court having duly heard [and ?] considered the motion for new trial herein doth overrule the same
**C. K. Bacon vs Plant et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for new trial herein doth overrule the same
**J. D. Ford vs Beard & Bro**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for new trial herein doth sustain the same
**State to use of Meyer Goldsalt vs Wm B. Watson**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to set aside the nonsuit herein doth overrule the same
**S Louis Building & Savings Institution vs John D Gage**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for new trial herein doth overrule the same
**Augustus Rolker et al vs Increase Miller**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for new trial herein doth overrule the same
**John C. Ivory vs E. O. English et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion in arrest of Judgment herein doth overrule the same
**Simon Sandhelm vs Elias Lyons**
Confession of Judgment. Now at this day comes the defendant and files a Statement whereby it appears that he confesses that he is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and sixty six dollars and fifty cents and consents and [agras ?] that Judgment therfor many be rendered against [him ?] It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid confessed and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor
---
**Viewer Page 321** (rcdbook1858_27_0320.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 317
**George C. Reid et al vs F. A. Pelletier et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for a new trial herein doth order that the same be overruled
**Louisa L. Freligh vs Joseph M. Ames &c**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for a new trial herein doth order that the same be overruled
**Louisa L. Freligh vs Fred D. Pality et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for a new trial herein doth order that the same be overruled
**Charles H. Thornton admr of Francis M Huffaker vs Granville Kimball James Moore and Martin O. Walker**
Petition. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his attorney and on his motion it is ordered that this case as to defendant Granville Kimball and Martin O Walker be dismissed and the defendant James Moore although called coming not, the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court upon the pleading and proofs wherefrom the Court doth find that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one hundred and forty four dollars twenty nine cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and also his costs of suit and have execution therefor
**Geo W Parker Reuben Berman [&c ?] Trumbull G. Russell vs John Nevison**
Petition[. ?] Default[. ?] Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the defendant although duly warned and solemnly called comes not, wherefore on motion of plaintiffs attorney it is ordered that the petition of the plaintiff be taken against him as confessed
**Simon Mayherg vs Bernard Midas & [Menillus ?] Carl**
Order of Sale[. ?] Now at this day comes James Castello Sheriff of Saint Louis County and files a Statement whereby it appears to the Court that the property levied on by virtue and authority of the writ of attachment issued in the above entitled cause is likely to depreciate in value before the probable termination of this suit and that the keeping of the same would be attended with much expense, It is therefore ordered by the Court that the said James Castello Sheriff as aforesaid proceed to sell the same in conformity to the Statute in such case made and provided
**Louis Carr David S. Carr & George A. Haynes vs Cornelius D Sullivan & Jeremiah T. Sullivan**
On Account. Now at this day come the parties by their attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleading and proofs wherefrom the Court doth find for the plaintiffs and doth assess their damages at the sum of two hundred and eighty nine dollars eighty cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid as found and also their costs of suit and have execution therefor
---
**Viewer Page 322** (rcdbook1858_27_0321.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 318
**George B. Sanderson vs Franklin Field C H Barton & Samuel Myerson**
On Note. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his Attorney and on his motion It is ordered that this case be dismissed as to defendant Saml Myerson. And the defendants Field and Barton, although duly warned and called coming not make default wherefore on motion of plaintiff it is ordered that his petition be taken against thereas confessed and the Court finds from the instrument of writing sued upon that said defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of sixteen hundred and fifty nine dollars sixty six cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid as found and his costs of suit and that execution issue therefor
**Augustus T. Shapleigh Thomas D Day & Woodward Crittenden vs John Carson & F. N Bailer**
Order of Publication. Now at this day comes the attorney for the plaintiffs and on his motion and it appearing to the Court that the defendant are not recidents of the state of Missouri, it is therefore ordered that the said defendants be notified of the Commencement of this suit, the object of which is to obtain judgment against them for the sum of twenty five hundred and eighty six dollars and nine cents due from the defendants to the plaintiffs on the note sued upon, and that unless they he and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held on the first monday of october next at the city of saint Louis within and for the county of St Louis, And on or before the third day of said term Answer to the said action, the petition of the plaintiffs will be taken for confessed against them and judgment rendered against them and their property sold to satisfy the same, And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed in the city of Saint Louis
**Augustus F Shapleigh Thomas D. Day & Woodward Crittenden vs Augustus Galliard & Jules Farmishon**
Order of Publication, Now at this day comes the attorney for the plaintiff and on his motion, and it appearing to the Court that the defendants are not residents of the state of Missouri, it is therefore ordered that the defendants be notified of the commencement of this suit the object of which is to obtain a Judgment against them for the sum of four hundred and ninety five dollars seventy two cents upon a note of the defendants in the hands of the plaintiffs and that unless they be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the city of S Louis in and for the County of Saint Louis on the first monday of october next and on or before the third day of said term answer to the said action the petition of the plaintiff will be taken for confessed and judgment rendered against them. And it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed and published in the city of S Louis
**Thomas B. Wing vs Jacob S. Williams**
On motion for new trial
Now at this day come the parties, and the Court having duly heard and considered the motion for new trial herein doth order that the said motion be overruled[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 323** (rcdbook1858_27_0322.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 319
**Stephen Haskell and James M. Franciscus vs Benjamin F. C. Champion Raymond A Papin Cornelius D. Sullivan Jeremiah T. Sullivan & Samuel Myerson**
On Note. Now at this day come the parties by their attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleading and proofs wherefrom the Court doth find that the defendants B. F. C. Champion and Saml. Myerson are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of thirteen hundred and forty three dollars seventy five cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said defendants the sum aforesaid as found and their costs of suit and thereof have execution, And it appearing to the satisfaction of the Court that the note sued upon was [altered ?] and changed after the endorsement thereof by the defendants R. A. Papin and C. D. and J. t. Sullivan, it is therefored ordered that they be discharged from all liability and [saw note- ?] to the plaintiff
**William C. Wagley et al vs William S. Grant**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for new trial herein doth overrule the same[. ?]
**John Brent by his [Guardian ?] and next friend John Garnett vs Alexander J P [Garesche ?] adm of Pierce C. Grace [deed. ?]**
Petition. Now at this day come the parties by their attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleading and proofs wherefrom the Court doth find for the defendant. It is therefore considered by the Court that the defendant go hereof hence and recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have thereof execution
**Robert Brent by his [guardian ?] and next friend John Garnett vs Alexander J P [Garesche ?] [adm. ?] of Pierce C Grace [deed ?]**
Petition Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs wherefrom the Court doth find for the defendant, It is therefore considered by the Court that the defendant go hence and recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution therefor
**[Jam ?] Brent by her next friend & Guardian John Garnett vs Alexander P [Garesche ?] [adm ?] of Pierce C Grace [deed ?]**
Petition. Now at this day come the parties by their Attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleading and proofs wherefrom the Court doth find for the defendant, It is therefore considered by the Court that the defendant go hereof hence and recover of the plaintiff his costs herein expended and have execution therefor
**[Timothy ?] L. Papin and Margaret Papin his wife vs Alex. J. P. [Garesche ?] [adm ?] of Pierce C. Grace [deed ?]**
Petition. Now at this day come the parties by their attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs wherefrom the Court doth find for the defendant [and ?] It is therefore considered by the Court that the defendant go hereof hence and recover of the plaintiffs his costs herein expended and have execution therefor
---
**Viewer Page 324** (rcdbook1858_27_0323.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 320
**James Turner et al vs Benjamin H Batte**
The plaintiffs come and acknowledge entire satisfaction of the Judgment obtained by them against the defendant on the 5th day of January 1852 for three thousand three hundred and seventy nine dollars forty one cents
**John B. Osborne & Alexander C Anderson vs Benjamin H Batte William Schluter & Ernest Schluter**
Satisfaction
Now at this day come the said plaintiff and acknowledge fall and entire satisfaction of all judgments rendered against the defendants on any or either or all of them in the above entitled cause[. ?]
**Samuel L. Moses and Julius L. Moses vs R. F Bridwell and S. L. Norris**
On Note. Now at this day come the plaintiff by their attorney and on his motion it is ordered that this case be dismissed as to defendant S L. Norris, And the defendant Bridwell although duly summoned and called coming not makes default wherefore on motion of plaintiff their petition is taken for confessed against said defendant and the Court find from the instrument of writing sued on that the said defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of three hundred and twenty two dollars fifty cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid as found and their costs of suit and have execution therefor
**Geo Pomeroy et al vs Joshua W Alexander et al**
The Court having duly heard and Considered the motion to strike out the answer of Renick doth sustain the same. Bill of Exceptions filed
**Augustus F Shapleigh Thomas D. Day and Woodward Crittenden vs Charles Boutcam and Point Carway**
Order of Publication. The Sheriff of Saint Louis County having made return that the defendant cannot be found and the Court being satisfied that said defendant cannot be served with process, on motion it is ordered that the said defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against their in this Court the object of which is to obtain judgment against them for the sum of two hundred and ten dollars fifty eight cents [on ?] account of a note and that their property has been attached, and that unless they be and appear at the next term of said Court to he be gun and held at the Court house within and for the County of Saint Louis on the first monday of october next and on or before the third day of said term answer to the said action the petion of the plaintiff will be taken for confessed and judgment will be rendered against him and his property sold to satisfy the same and it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published according to law in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed in the city of Saint Louis
**Augustus F. Shapleigh [Thos ?] D Day & Woodward Crittenden vs Charles Bontcam and Point Carway**
Order of Publication. The Sheriff of S Louis County having made return that the defendants cannot be found and the Court being satisfied that the said defendants cannot be served with process, on motion it is ordered that said defendants
---
**Viewer Page 325** (rcdbook1858_27_0324.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 321
be notified that a civil suit has been commenced against them the object of which is to [obtain ?] judgment against them for the sum of one hundred and [sixty ?] three dollars and sixty one cents, on account of a note, and that their property [to ?] as been attached and that unless they be and appear at the next term of said Court to be begun and held at the city of Saint Louis within and for the county of Saint Louis on the first monday of October next and on or before the third day of said term answer to the said action the petition of the plaintiff will be taken for confessed and Judgment will be rendered against them and their property sold to Satisfy the same, and it is further ordered that a copy hereof be published in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed in the city of St Louis[. ?]
**In the Matter of the assigment of Theodore R. Porey**
Order of Sale
The Assignee this day come and produced to the Court his report of the Settlement of said estate and returned to the Court certain Accounts as uncollectable. It is therefore ordered by the Court that Said assignee sell and assign said accounts at public [rendue ?] to the highest bidder for cash, first advertising said rate in some newspaper printed in the City of Saint Louis ten days before the day of Sale
---
**Viewer Page 326** (rcdbook1858_27_0325.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 322
**Joseph Farrell vs Jacob Fritschle et al**
Now at this day come the defendants and file an affidavit and appeal bond which is acknowledged before and approved by the Court and pray an appeal to the supreme Court from the Judgment of this Court rendered herein, wherefore it is ordered that said appeal be granted
**Alexander M. McNickle vs Edward Boyle**
Petition Now at this day come the parties by their attorneys and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find for the plaintiff and assess his damages at three hundred and sixty five dollars and eighty three cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs of suit and have execution therefor
**[Bernardind ?] Florey vs Able S. Merritt et al**
The Court having heard and considered the motion to dissolve the injunction herein doth overrule the same
**W. V. N. Bay trustee & c vs Joseph Wescott et al**
Bill of exceptions filed
**Martin D. Hickman [admr ?] & c vs John C. Bull Exor & c**
Bill of Exceptions filed
By consent of parties the appearance of James Rumbold, Susan Rumbold his wife and James A Reed as plaintiff is entered of record as if done on the day the Judgment was rendered
**Julius H. Smith vs James D Houseman**
Answer and motion to dissolve injunction and to vocate order appointing Receiver filed
**Louis C. Garnier vs Charles L. Hunt et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for new trial herein doth overrule the same. Bill of Exceptions filed
**William A. Maffitt et al vs Philip S. Lauham et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for new trial herein doth overrule the same Bill of Exceptions filed
**John M. Cashman et al vs Sylvester W. Ball et al**
On motion It is ordered by the Court that the report of the [Commissioners ?] filed herein be and the same is hereby Confirmed
---
**Viewer Page 327** (rcdbook1858_27_0326.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 323
**Henry T. Mudd John J. Mudd Graham L. Hughes & [Arnistead ?] O. Grubb vs B. M. Veatch**
Judgment. Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney and file herein proofs of publication of the order of publication hereto fore made in this case, and the defendant although duly notified and called, failing to come makes default wherefore on motion it is ordered that plaintiffs petition be taken for confessed against him, and the plaintiffs waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having heard and considered the same doth find for the plaintiffs and assess their damages at the sum of Eight hundred and two dollars seventy five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid as found and his costs in this behalf expended and have execution therefor
---
**Viewer Page 328** (rcdbook1858_27_0327.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 324
**Wm Morrison et al vs Samuel McCartney**
Now at this day comes the defendant and files his affidavit and an appeal bond with security which is acknowledged before and approved by the Court and pray an appeal to the supreme Court And it is ordered by the Court that said appeal be granted[. ?]
**Stephen Haskell et al vs Benj. F. C. Champion et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for new trial herein doth overrule the same. Bill of Exceptions filed
**John C. Evans et al vs Charles H Pond**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for new trial herein doth overrule the same
**Andrew J Coons vs Isaac M Taylor & Edwin R. Mason**
On Note, Now at this day come the parties by their Attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleading and proofs and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth find that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of twelve hundred and six dollars and fifty cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid as found and [the ?] costs of suit and have execution therefor,
And the defendants come and file a motion for new trial herein and the Court having duly heard and considered the said motion doth overrule the same[. ?]
**The President Directors and Company of the Bank of Louisville vs Morris Cohn**
Charles D Drake, Attorney for the plaintiff comes, in open Court and acknowledges to have realized on the execution issued in this cause against William C Watt, the garnishee herein the sum of seven hundred and ninety dollars forty one cents, and enters a credit upon the Bill of Exchange sued on for said amount. And by leave of Court the said Attorney withdraws the said Bill of Exchange and leave a receipt for the same
**Morris [Langsdon ?] & Isaac Rocenstein vs Seligman Hohenthal**
Confession of Judgment. Now at this day comes the defendant an files in Court a Statement in writing sworn to whenby it appears to the Court that he confesses that he is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of five hundred and twenty three dollars eighty four cents and consents that Judgment may be entered against him for said amount It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid as confessed and their costs herein expended and have execution therefor
---
**Viewer Page 329** (rcdbook1858_27_0328.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 325
**[Jam ?] Brent by Guardian &c vs A J P. [Garesche adm ?] &c**
The plaintiff comes and files motion for new trial herein and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth order that said motion be overruled
**Robert, Brent By Guardian &c vs A J. P. [Garesche adm ?] &c**
The plaintiff comes and files motion for new trial herein and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth order that said motion be overruled
**John Brent by Guardian &c vs A. J. P. [Garesche adm ?] &c**
The plaintiff comes and files motion for new trial herein and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth order that said motion be overruled
**Timothy L. Papin & Wife vs A. J. P. [Garesche adm ?] &c**
The plaintiff comes and file motion for new trial herein and the Court having duly heard and considered the same doth order that said motion be overruled
**Joseph Farrell vs Jacob [Fritschle ?] &c**
Motion for an additional appeal bond filed
**John C. Ivory vs Paul Carlin et al**
Bill of Exception filed
**W. V. N. Bay trustee &c vs Joseph Wescott et al**
Appeal to the Supreme Court.
Defendants file a bond herein conditioned according to law with G. B. Richardson and Joseph Farrell as securities and thereupon on their motion an appeal to the supreme Court is granted them from the decision herein rendered
**James B. Ricords [adm ?] of Milton N. McLean vs Addison G. Bragg**
Now at this day comes the plaintiff and [remits ?] twenty seven dollars and fifty cents of the Judgment rendered in this behalf on the 30th day of march 1858 for five hundred and ninety four dollars thirty six cents. And the Court having duly heard and considered the motion for new trial herein doth overrule the same
**Louis C. Garnier vs Joseph L. Papin et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for a new trial herein doth overrule the same
**The State to the use of Meyer Goldsoll vs Wm B. Watson et al**
Bill of Exceptions filed
---
**Viewer Page 330** (rcdbook1858_27_0329.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 326
**David Daniels vs William Selcott & Robert McDonald**
Judgment. Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his Attorney and on his motion it is ordered that the Judgment seventeenth day of April 1858 be and the same is hereby set aside and made [mull. ?] And it is further ordered on his motion that the report of the referce, filed herein be and the same is hereby confirmed, and the Court doth find from the said report that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and sixty seven dollars seventy seven cents It is therefore on further motion of plaintiff considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid as found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution
**Louisa S. Friligh vs Joseph M Ames et al**
Now at this day come the defendants by their Attorneys and file an affidavit for an appeal herein and an appeal is allowed them to the supreme Court from the judgment herein, Thereupon the defendants file an appeal bond with Francis Hofelman as principal And George Geisel and F. W. Prauge as securities which bond is acknowledged by the [obligon ?] and approved by the Court
**Julius H Smith vs James D Houseman**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion of plaintiff to continue the ``motion to dissolve injunction'' until the next tum doth sustain the same[. ?]
**Cleander Mighells vs Lorenzo D Jones**
On motion the Court doth order that the order of delivery made in this cause on the tenth day of march last be set aside and that this cause be [neinstated ?] and continued for further proceedings
**Joseph R. Boggs et al vs America Insurance Co**
The Court having heard and considered the motion for new trial herein and being thereof advised doth overrule the same
**John S. Thompson vs Robert Sterling et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for new trial herein and being thereof advised doth overrule the same
**E. Anthony vs J. H. Fitzgibbon**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to set aside the judgment herein doth order that the same be overruled
---
**Viewer Page 331** (rcdbook1858_27_0330.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 327
**Ezekiel W. Parson vs William Brevard**
Depositions filed
**Simon Abeles vs Wilson Henly &c**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for a new trial herein and being thereof advised doth sustain the same
**Louis A Benoist et al vs John Gano Bryan**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion for a new trial herein and being thereof advised doth overrule the same
**Julius H Smith vs James D Houseman**
The plaintiff comes and files motion and affidavit in support thereof for rule upon the defendant to [shew ?] cause why a writ of attachment should not be issued against him
**Joseph Farrell vs Jacob [Fritschle ?] et al**
It appearing to the Court that the appeal bond taken in this cause is insufficient with the securities given, it is on motion ordered that the defendants file on new and sufficient appeal bond herein forthwith[. ?]
**Lucius A. Willard vs Miles G. Moris et al**
Now at this day come the defendants and file their appeal bond with security, which is acknowledged before and approved by the Court
**Eugene Jaccard et al vs Alexander Mitchell**
On motion of plaintiff a [dedinans ?] to take depositions in the District of Columbia to be read on their behalf on the trial of this cause is awarded them
**Herman H. Brugrach &c vs Ferdinand Vandermale**
Receipt for exhibits withdrawn filed
**Joseph R. Bogg &c vs America Insurance Co**
Now at this day comes the defendant by its Attorney and files the affidavit of S. R. Clarke its secretary, and also files an appeal bond with James M Hughes its president as principal and D. R. Garrison & Robert Fisher as securities which bond being acknowledged before and approved by the Court, on motion an appeal is granted the defendant to the supreme Court from the Judgment rendered herein[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 332** (rcdbook1858_27_0331.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 328
**William [Docuch ?] & Thomas S. Rives vs Rush Heintzelman & James M. Clark**
Confession of Judgment. Now at this day come the defendants and file a written statement, sworn to from which it appears to the Court that the defendants confess that they are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of six hundred and twenty dollars seventeen cents and consent that Judgment may be rendered against them for said sum It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid as Confessed and their costs herein expended and thereof have execution
**William [Docuch ?] & Thomas L. Rives vs James M. Clarke**
Confession of Judgment. Now at this day comes the defendant and files a written statement sworn to from which it appears to the Court that the defendants confess that the is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and two dollars seventy two cents and consents that Judgment may be rendered against him for said sum It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid as found and his costs in this behalf expended and thereof have execution
**Richard R. Field vs H. F Cross et al**
On motion It is ordered that Leveritt Bill be appointed receiver in this cause and thereupon the said Bell files his bond as such receiver with security approved by the Court and conditioned according to the statute in such case made provided
**Luther M Shreeve vs Frederick W. Jugle George Lich & Christian Kribben**
Now at this day come the parties by their attorney and the Court being advised of and concerning the report of the referce herein doth confirm the same, and having further considered the same doth find for the defendants. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff take nothing by their suit herein but that the defendants go hence and recover of the plaintiff their costs in this behalf expended and have execution therefor
**Archibald J. Somewille vs Thomas S. Nelson**
Affidavits in support of motion for [him ?] trial filed[. ?]
**Henry T. Mudd John J. Mudd Graham L. Hughes & Armistead O Grubb vs William M. [Lotimer ?] [Garee ?] of B. M. Veatch**
Judgment. Now at this day come the plaintiff by their Attorney but the said Garnishee although duly summoned and called comes not, and having failed to answer herein, the plaintiff waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court upon the interrogatories and proofs and the court doth find that the said garnishee is indebted to the defendant in the sum of five hundred and nineteen dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the said plaintiff recover of the said garnishee the sum aforesaid as found and have execution therefor
---
**Viewer Page 333** (rcdbook1858_27_0332.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 329
**James Castello vs Henry Duermeyer**
On motion for Judgment
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorneys and submit to the Court the motion herein and the Court having duly heard and considered the said motion and being thereof advised doth sustain the same. It is therefore considered and adjudged by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum of three hundred and forty dollars the amount in said motion claimed, and his costs and charges herein and have execution therefor
---
**Viewer Page 334** (rcdbook1858_27_0333.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 330
**James B Ricords [admr ?] &c vs Addison G. Bragg**
Appeal to Supreme Court. Now at this day comes the defendant by his attorney and files an affidavit for appeal and also files an appeal bond with A G Bragg as principal and Michael Burrous and G. B. Richardson as securities which bond being acknowledged before and approved by the Court an appeal is granted the defendant to the supreme Court from the Judgment of the Court
**Frederick Marquard vs Michael Reiter**
Appel to Supreme Court. Now at this day comes the defendant and files an appeal bond with Michael Reiter as security and Andrew H Wing and C. Gibson as securities which bond being acknowledged before and approved by the Court, an appeal is granted the defendant to the supreme Court from the judgment of the Court.
**Julia Morrise vs J. K. Philiber**
Bill of Exceptions filed
**Henry B. Belt & John G. Priest vs George W. Goode**
It is ordered by the Court that the Judgment rendered upon the verdict of the Jury in favor of the defendants Counter claim for forty eight dollars and ninety cents be and the same is remitted
**Geo C Reed et al vs F. A Pelletin et al**
Bill of Exceptions filed
**Louisa L. Freligh vs Joseph M. Ames &c**
Bill of Exceptions filed
**John Caddy vs Charlotte Caddy**
For Divorce. Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and thereupon the Court proceeds to hear the pleadings and proofs herein and the Court having heard the same and being thereof advised doth order that this case be dismissed at the cost of plaintiff and that execution issue therefor
**James H. Lucas vs The County of S Louis Garnishee of the Central Plank Road Company**
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs and the Court having heard and considered the same doth order that the said Garnishee be discharged from the garnishment herein, and go hence
---
**Viewer Page 335** (rcdbook1858_27_0334.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 331
and recover of the its costs in this behalf expended and have execution therefor. Bill of Exceptions filed
**John J. H Vogt vs Charles F. Baker et al**
Affidavit for Appeal filed
**Covenant Life Insurance Co vs Charles F Baker et al**
Affidavit for Appeal filed
**George W. Parker Reuben Berman & Trumbull G. Russell vs John Nevison**
Petition. Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney and waiving a Jury submits this case to the Court upon the pleading and proofs and the Court having heard and considered the same doth [find for the plaintiffs and ?] assess their damages at the sum of one hundred and ninety six dollars and seventy nine cents It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiffs recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid as found and also their costs of suit and thereof have execution[. ?]
**George W Parker Reuben Berman & Trumbull G. Russell vs Kenneth McKengee [Garee ?] of John Nevison**
Garnishment. Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney but the garnishee comes not and the plaintiff submits this case to the Court upon the allegations and answer of the said garnishee, wherefrom The Court doth find that the garnishee is indebted to the defendant in the sum of One hundred and thirty nine dollars thirty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the said garnishee the sum aforesaid as found and have execution therefore And it is further ordered that the said garnishee be allowed the sum of ten dollars for answering herein, to he taxed against said defendant as costs
**Edward Pate vs George D Moore Thomas Clarke William Shan William Ackley & Rass W Doyle**
Order of Publication. the Sheriff of [Sr ?] Louis County having made return that the defendants Thomas Clarke William Shan & William Ackley cannot be found in his county and the Court being satisfied that said defendants cannot be served with process, On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney, it is ordered that said defendants be notified that a civil action has been commenced against them the object of which is to obtain a judgment against them and their Co defendants for the sum of seven hundred dollars damages for injury [done ?] to [Wharf ?] boat of plaintiff, and that unless they be and appear at the next term of this Court to be begun and held at the city of [Sr ?] Louis within and for the County of S Louis and on or before the sixth day of said term answer to the said action the petition of the plaintiff will be taken against them for
---
**Viewer Page 336** (rcdbook1858_27_0335.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 332
confessed against them and judgment will be rendered against them and their property sold to satisfy the same And it is further ordered that [the ?] a copy of this order be published in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed in the city of Saint Louis[. ?]
**Jules Gre and Alex[r ?] [Gevenandon ?] vs Gaetand Pittaluga deft Louis Sanguinette Interpleader**
Now at this day comes the parties by their Attorney and the Court having heard and being advised of and concerning the motion for new trial herein doth overrule the same. And by consent of parties it is ordered that the Bill of Exceptions, when offend herein shall be filed ``nine pro time'' as of to day
---
**Viewer Page 337** (rcdbook1858_27_0336.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 333
**A J Coons vs E. R. Mason &c**
Bill of Exceptions filed
**William A Wakelam vs Charles H Valentine et al**
Amended Answer filed
**Louis C. Garnier &c vs Joseph L. Papin &c**
Bill of Exception filed
**John C. Ivory vs Paul Carlin &c**
Appeal to Supreme Court. Now at this day come the defendants and file an affidavit and pray an appeal to the Supreme Court from the Judgment herein and the Court having heard the same doth grant the said appeal and thereupon the said defendants file an appeal bond which is approved by the Court
**David Rokohl and Charles Kinkead vs Charles L. Gilpin and Egra O. English**
On motion It is ordered by the Court that this case be dismissed at this cost of the defendant Charles L. Gilpin and that the plaintiffs recover of his their costs and have execution therefor
**John C. Evans &c vs Charles H Pond**
Now at this day come the defendants and files herein an appeal bond which is acknowledged before and approved by the Court.
**William A Moffitt &c vs Philip S. Lanham &c**
Now at this day come the defendants and file herein an appeal bond which is acknowledged before and approved by the Court
**Louis C Garnier vs Charles Hunt et al**
Now at this day come the defendants and file herein an appeal bond which is acknowledged before and approved by the Court
---
**Viewer Page 338** (rcdbook1858_27_0337.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 334
**Louis C. Garnier vs Charles L. Hunt et al**
Now at this day comes the defendants by their Attorney and file an affidavit for appeal herein, and the defendants having filed Appeal bond herein, said appeal is granted
**William A Moffitt et al vs Philip S. Lanham et al**
Now at this day come the defendants and file an affidavit for appeal herein, and they having filed an appeal bond herein said Appeal is granted
**John Brent by Guardian &c vs A. J. P. [Garesche admr ?] &c**
Bill of Exceptions filed
**James Brent by Guardian &c vs A J P [Garesche admr ?] &c**
Bill of Exceptions filed
**Robert Brent by Guardian &c vs A J P [Garesche admr ?] &c**
Bill of Exceptions filed
**J. S. Papin & Wife vs A. J. P. [Garesche admr ?] &c**
Bill of Exceptions filed
**Joseph Farnsworth vs Terre Hunte Alton & S Louis Rail Road**
The defendant by her agent [leland ?] files an affidavit for appeal to the supreme Court herein[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 339** (rcdbook1858_27_0338.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 335
**Joseph Farrell vs Henry W. Hart**
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and the Court having heard and considered the motion for [here ?] trial herein doth overrule the same and the defendant files herein his affidavit and prays are appeal to the Supreme Court from the Judgment of this Court and the Court having duly heard the same doth grant the said appeal and thereupon the defendant files on appeal bond with himself as principal and [Bornsondrid Florez ?] and James F [Segnaige ?] as securities which bond being is acknowledged before and approved by the Court
**Louis C. Garnier vs Andrew A [LeBean ?] et al**
The Court having heard and being advised of and concerning the motion for new trial herein doth overrule the same[. ?]
**In the Matter of D T. Card**
Motion to discharge Assignees filed
**William C Wagley &c vs Thomas Grant et al**
Agreement filed
**Joseph Farnworth vs S Louis Alton & [Ten ?] Hante R R. Co**
Now at this day comes the defendant and files herein an appeal bond which is acknowledged before and approved by the Court[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 340** (rcdbook1858_27_0339.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 336
**Louis C. Garnier vs Andrew A LeBean et al**
Now at this day come the defendants English Burns and Johann, and file an affidavit and prag an appeal to the Supreme Court herein from the Judgment of this Court and the Court having heard the same doth grant the said Appeal, and thereupon the said defendants file an appeal bond with E O English as principal and Hiram Shan and Matthias steitz as securities which bond [king ?] acknowledged before and approved by the Court[. ?]
**Andrew J Coons vs Isaac W Taylor &c**
Now at this day come the defendants and file their appeal bond with J W Taylor and E. R. Mason as principal and David S Bigham Henry B. Belt and John G [Priest ?] as securities which bond being acknowledged before and approved by the Court, the Court on motion doth grant the defendants an appeal to the Supreme Court from the decision of this Court
**John C Evans et al vs Charles H Pond**
The defendant comes and files an affidavit and pray an appeal to the supreme Court from the Judgment of this Court and the Court having heard the same and the defendants having heretofore filed bond said appeal prayed for is granted
**Henry Blaksley vs John Kellar**
On motion of the plaintiff by him attorney be has leave to file an amended petition herein during the Vacation after this present term and the Sheriff of Saint Louis County having made return that the defendant cannot be found in his county and the Court being satisfied that said defendant cannot be served with process on motion it is ordered that the defendant be notified that a civil action has been commenced against him in this Court that object of which is to obtain Judgment for the sum of six hundred and seventy dollars on account of goods sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant and that unless he be and appear at the next term of this Court to he begun and held at the city of Saint Louis within and for the county of S Louis and an or before the sixth day of said term answer to the said action the petition of the plaintiff will be taken for confessed and judgment will be rendered against him. And it is further ordered that a Copy hereof be published in the Missouri Democrat a newspaper printed in the city of S Louis[. ?]
**William M. Morrison vs Samuel McCartney**
Now at this day comes the plaintiff by his Attorney and acknowledge full and entire satisfaction of the Judgment rendered herein in his favor at the present term of this Court
---
**Viewer Page 341** (rcdbook1858_27_0340.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 337
**James B. Ricords [adw ?] &c vs Addison G. Bragg**
Bill of Exception filed
**State of Missouri vs William Burke**
Now at this day come again as well the Circuit attorney who prosecutes for the State as the said defendant by his attorney and thereupon the defendants motion for a new trial heretofore filed herein being by said parties argued and submitted to the Court and by the Court here fully understood, therefore it is considered by the Court that said motion for a new trial be overruled, Whereupon the defendant files a motion in arrest of Judgment herein[. ?]
**William. S. Hillyer vs Daniel D Page et al**
This day comes the plaintiff and assigns the Judgment obtained by him against said defendant on the 30th day of October 1857 for five hundred and for dollars and sixty eight cents to Harris D Boogs and files herein a written assignment thereof[. ?]
**Julius H. Smith vs James D Houseman**
Stipulation of parties as to deposition of Witness Bowles filed[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 342** (rcdbook1858_27_0341.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 338
**In the Matter of the assignment of D. T. Card**
The motion of [Melvin ?] L Gray the assignee in this behalf having been duly heard and considered by the Court is sustained and it is ordered by the Court that the said assignee be hence discharged
**James H Lucas vs [Eusas ?] McFaul and Francis McFaul**
Confession of Judgment. Now at this day come the defendants and file a statement in writing, sworn to, from which it appears that the defendants confess that they are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of one thousand and twenty dollars and consent and agree that judgment may be rendered against them and in favor of said plaintiff for said sum It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid as confessed and his costs herein expended and have execution therefor
**Fitz Henry Warren &c E. N. Thomas vs [Eneas ?] McFaul**
Confession of Judgment. Now at their day comes the defendant and files a statement in writing sworn to from which it appears to the Court that the defendant confesses that her is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of twenty one thousand dollars, and consents and agrees that Judgment may be rendered against him for said [same. ?] It is therefore considered by the Court, on motion, that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid as confessed and also their costs herein expended and have execution therefor[. ?]
**Jane Brent by Guardian &c vs Alexander J P [Garesche ?] [adm ?] &**
Affidavit for appeal filed
**John Brent by Guardian &c vs Alexander J P [Garesche adm ?] &c**
Affidavit for Appeal filed
**Timothy L. Papin & Wife vs Alexander J. P. [Garesche adm ?] &c**
Affidavit for Appeal filed
**Robert Brent by Gardian &c vs A J P [Garesche adm ?] &c**
Affidavit for appeal filed
**Frederick Marquard vs Michael Reiter**
Affidavit for appeal filed
---
**Viewer Page 343** (rcdbook1858_27_0342.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 339
**In the Matter of George Williams**
Habeas Corpus. Now at this day come the parties and the Court having duly heard and considered the premises and being advised of and concerning the same doth order that the prayer of the petition be refused and that the said petitioner be remanded again into custody[. ?]
**Louis C. Garnier vs Egra O. English et al**
Bill of Exceptions filed[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 344** (rcdbook1858_27_0343.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 340
**Caroline Renling vs Lorenzo D. Holmes & Wife**
On motion it is ordered by the Court that William A. Alexander be substituted as Guardian ad litern of Caroline Renling in place of Sir W. Rice deceased[. ?]
**James Eddie et al vs Greene Parks**
The Court having duly heard and considered the demurrer herein doth sustaine the same and on motion doth order that this suit be dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff and [that ?] execution issue therefor
**Joseph R. Bogg et al vs America Insurance Company**
Bill of Exceptions filed
**William C. Wagley et al vs Wm S. Grant**
Bills of Exceptions filed
**George Shaffner vs The City of St Louis**
Judgment. Now at this day come the parties by their respective Attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court and the Court having heard and being advised of and concerning the [premises ?] doth find for the plaintiff And doth assess his damages at the sum of Eighteen thousand one hundred and thirty four dollars twenty five cents, It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the sum aforesaid as found and his costs of suit and thereof have execution[. ?]
**Henry C. Stocks vs Christian Schumacher &c Christian Piper**
Judgment on report of Referce Now at this day come the parties by their respective Attorney and, the Court having duly considered the report of the Referce herein doth On motion Confirm the same and the Court doth find from the said Report that the said defendants are indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of two hundred and ten dollars thirty two cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the defendants the sum aforesaid as found and his Costs herein expended and thereof have execution[. ?]
**In the Matter of the assignment David W Shepperd**
Answer of assignee filed and motion for order of sale of real estate filed
---
**Viewer Page 345** (rcdbook1858_27_0344.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 341
**Wm Farrells [adm ?] vs J [Baennans ?] [adw ?] et al**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion to quash the writ of sine facias issued herein, The motion [of ?] set aside the appearance of P. B Garesche, and the motion of the defendant to dismiss And being of said motions fully advised doth overrule the same
**John Wolff [surviwing ?] administrator of Diederich W. [Nohlien ?] and Ann C. Speck plaintiffs vs John Riggin Archibald Gamble Charles Gibson, Wm C Jamison & Barton Bates defendants**
Appeal from Probate Court to Land Court Change of Venne from Land Court
Now at this day come the plaintiffs John Wolff surviwing administrator of Diedrich W. Wohlein and Ann C Speck, and come also the defendants John Riggin, Archibald Gamble, charles Gibson, William C Jamison and Barton Bates and submit to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs the application in writing of said Wolff and Speck to approve a certain sale made by John Wolff administrator and Ann Wohlein administratrix of the estate of Diedrich W. Wohlein on the second day of June eighteen hundred and forty five of the following described real estate in S Louis County to wit, lot number five in block number fourteen of the S Louis common, according to the plat thereof made by Charles DeWard on file in the Recorders office of S Louis County which lot contains three acres and fifty seven hundred the of an [were, ?] bonded north by [Lafayette arenne, ?] east by McNair [Avenne ?] South by the Comboo tract and west by lot number four in said block, the said salt having been made to said Ann Wohlein the said Administratrix and a report of which sale was filed in the S Louis Probate Court on the sixth day of June eighteen hundred and forty five. And the said defendants also submit to the Court upon the pleadings and proofs their objections to said sale and to any approval thereof by the Court, and thereupon the Court being fully advised of and concerning the same doth find that the said sale was irregular informal and contrary to the Statute in such case made and provided and that the same was fraudulently brought about and concluded by said administrator and administratrix. to the great prejudice of the creditor and heirs of said estate And for these and other good and sufficient reasons unto this Court appearing this Court doth disapprove of the said sale and doth declare it to be [well ?] and void And doth order and decree that the defendants recover of the plaintiff their costs in this behalf expended[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 346** (rcdbook1858_27_0345.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 342
**Joseph Farrell vs Henry W. Hart**
Bill of Exceptions filed
**William Farrells [adm ?] vs James [Brennaus ?] [adm ?]**
Bill of Exception filed
**In the Matter of the Assignment of Rogers Anderson & C.**
On motion It is ordered that Charles R. Anderson late assignee of Rogers Anderson & Co deliver to John M Krum and Chester Harding appointed by the Court his Successors in said trust all the books papers and effects moneys and evidences of debt belonging to Said Assigned estate[. ?]
**George Schaffner vs The City of St Louis**
The Court having duly heard and considered the motion in arrest of Judgment herein and being thereof advised doth overrule the same. And the defendant by her attorney comes and files and affidavit and also an appeal bond and prays an appeal to the Supreme Court from the Judgment of this Court and the Court doth approve the bond filed and grant the appeal prayed for[. ?]
**The State of Missouri vs William Burke**
On Indictment for [Burglay ?]
Now at this day come as well the Circuit attorney who prosecutes for the state as the said defendant by his attorney and thereupon the defendants motion in arrest of Judgment being by the said parties argued and submitted to the Court and by the Court here fully understood therefore it is considered by the Court that said motion be overruled; whereupon the defendant by his counsel prays an appeal to the Supreme Court from the Judgment of this Court rendered against him and the Court being of opinion that there is probable cause for said appeal, Grants the same and orders that it operate as a stay of proceeding herein, Thereupon William Burke as principal and Louis Howard and Michael Devoy as his securities here in Court acknowledge themselves to [own ?] the State of Missouri the sum of two Thousand dollars to be levied of their respective goods and Chattels land and tenements Yet upon condition that if the said William Burke Shall appear before the Supreme Court of this State and the next term thereof to be begun and held at the City of St Louis on the Monday of next to receive Judgment on the appeal herein taken and shall also appear before this Court at such time and place as said Supreme Court Shall direct and shall render himself in execution and obey every order and Judgment that shall be made in the premises them this recognizance to be voide else of full force. Whereupon the defendant files his bill of Exceptions herein[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 347** (rcdbook1858_27_0346.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 343
**Henry B. Belt and John G. Prest vs George W Goode**
Appeal allowed
Now at this day come the plaintiff and file an affidavit herein and pray an appeal to the Supreme Court which the Court doth allow and thereupon the said plaintiff file an appeal bound with sufficient security conditioned according to law which bond is approved by the Court. Bill of Exception filed
**Ann C Speck et al vs John Riggin et al**
Appeal
Now at this day come the plaintiffs and file an affidavit and pray an appeal to the Supreme Court herein and the Court being thereof advised doth grant the appeal prayed for
**Christian Kribben [adw. ?] of William Valland [deed. ?] vs Henry Frahm**
[Judgh. ?] Now come the said parties and thereupon the defendant [moves ?] the Court for Judgment against the plaintiff for the [amount ?] of the certificate of deposit described in the petition with interest thereon from their respective dates and [inasmuch ?] as it appears to the Court that three years [had claped since ?] the grant of letter of administration on said estate of William Volland and that no claims have been allowed against the same, therefore the Court in [pursuance ?] of the agreement [J ?] the parties made in writing and heretofore files in [this ?] cause doth order and adjudge that the defendant recover of the plaintiff Six hundred and ninety four dollars and ninety four cents, being the amount of the principal of the certificates of [depost ?] in the petition described, and also his costs and charges in this behalf expended[. ?]
**John D S. Haslett vs John Decker**
Order of Delivery[. ?]
The plaintiff comes and files [as ?] petition and affidavit according to law claiming the possession of certain personal property therein described and on his motion it is ordered that the defendant Deliver the property specified in the petition to the Sheriff of St Louis County and said sheriff is hereby directed if said property be not delivered to him to take it from the defendant and deliver it to the plaintiff
**James Riley vs A. J. P. [Garesche ?] [adm ?] of William Farrell**
Judgment
Now at this day come the parties by their respective attorney and waiving a Jury submit this case to the Court, [upon ?] the pleading and proofs and the Court having heard the same doth find for the plaintiff in the sum of One hundred and twenty four dollars and fifty five cents. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plaintiff recover of the estate of the deceased in the hands of his administrator the sum aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found and his costs herein expended, and it is ordered that this Judgment be certified according to law to the Probate Court of St Louis County[. ?]
---
**Viewer Page 348** (rcdbook1858_27_0347.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 344
**James Castello Sheriff to A K Marshall et al**
Acknowledgment of deed
James Castello Esq. Sheriff of St Louis County Comes into Court and acknowledges herein open Court, the execution by him as said Sheriff of deed to Alexander K Marshall, Thomas Marshall James M Hughes, George B Sanderson and Jesse Holliday for all the right title and interest of John Sigerson and William Sigerson of in and to certain property of said sigerson sold by him as said Sheriff under and by virtue of Execution issued against said sigerson in favor of [Ephraim ?] Ball, [Cornetius Altemus ?] Thomas R. Tanner Louis Miller Jacob Miller and George Cook, said property being described as follows [lato numbered ?] 37. 39. 40. 41. 42. 46. 47. 48, 49. 50. 57. 83. 85. 2. 4. 5. 6. 38. 80. 81. 82. And 84 in the Commons of the City of [Carondelet ?] South of the River[des ?] Pires[. ?]
**The State of Missouri Ex rel Geo Kyler vs Benjamin Farrar**
Now at this day comes Charles G. Manro Circuit attorney of the Eighth Indicial Circuit of the State of Missouri who prosecutes for and on behalf of the said State as the said Benjamin Farrar by his attorney aforesaid whereupon all and singular the premises being seen and fully understood by the Court here and motine deliberation had thereon it is considered and adjudged by the said Court [ten ?] that the said Plea of the said Benjamin Farrar so by him pleaded as aforesaid is not sufficient in law and that the said Farraros adjudged guilty of [usonpation ?] of and [intrinsevn ?] into the office and Franchise of Director of the St Louis & Iron Mountain Rail Road Company, and of unlawfully holding and execution the same And it is hereupon further considered and adjudged by the Court now here, that the said Benjamin Farrar do not in any manner intermeddle with or concern himself in or about the said office of Director of the St Louis & Iron Mountain Rail Road Company or in or about the holding or exercising the duties of Said Office, on any of them in the said Information Specified in virtue of his supposed election by him mentioned in his Plea in [Bar ?] as aforesaid But that the said Benjamin Farrar be absolutely prejudged and excluded from [ever ?] holding using or exercising the same office or any of the duties thereof in future; and that the Said Benjamin Farrar pay to the State of Missouri a five of One cent for his [usonpation ?] of [intruding ?] into and unlawfully holding and exercising the office and franchise of Director of the said St Louis and Iron Mountain Rail Road Company, and that George Kyler, the said Relator in such information shall recover his costs of such prosecution to the taxed; and that the process of this Court issue for the execution of this judgment and for the collection of such fine and costs in accordance with the provision of the Statute in such case made and provided
---
**Viewer Page 349** (rcdbook1858_27_0348.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 345
---
**Viewer Page 350** (rcdbook1858_27_0349.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 346
---
**Viewer Page 351** (rcdbook1858_27_0350.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 347
---
**Viewer Page 352** (rcdbook1858_27_0351.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 348
---
**Viewer Page 353** (rcdbook1858_27_0352.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 349
---
**Viewer Page 354** (rcdbook1858_27_0353.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 350
---
**Viewer Page 355** (rcdbook1858_27_0354.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 351
---
**Viewer Page 356** (rcdbook1858_27_0355.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 352
---
**Viewer Page 357** (rcdbook1858_27_0356.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 353
---
**Viewer Page 358** (rcdbook1858_27_0357.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 354
---
**Viewer Page 359** (rcdbook1858_27_0358.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 355
---
**Viewer Page 360** (rcdbook1858_27_0359.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 356
---
**Viewer Page 361** (rcdbook1858_27_0360.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 357
---
**Viewer Page 362** (rcdbook1858_27_0361.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 358
---
**Viewer Page 363** (rcdbook1858_27_0362.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 359
---
**Viewer Page 364** (rcdbook1858_27_0363.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 360
---
**Viewer Page 365** (rcdbook1858_27_0364.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 361
---
**Viewer Page 366** (rcdbook1858_27_0365.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 362
---
**Viewer Page 367** (rcdbook1858_27_0366.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 363
---
**Viewer Page 368** (rcdbook1858_27_0367.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 364
---
**Viewer Page 369** (rcdbook1858_27_0368.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 365
---
**Viewer Page 370** (rcdbook1858_27_0369.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 366
---
**Viewer Page 371** (rcdbook1858_27_0370.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 367
---
**Viewer Page 372** (rcdbook1858_27_0371.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 368
---
**Viewer Page 373** (rcdbook1858_27_0372.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 369
---
**Viewer Page 374** (rcdbook1858_27_0373.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 370
---
**Viewer Page 375** (rcdbook1858_27_0374.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 371
---
**Viewer Page 376** (rcdbook1858_27_0375.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 372
---
**Viewer Page 377** (rcdbook1858_27_0376.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 373
---
**Viewer Page 378** (rcdbook1858_27_0377.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 374
---
**Viewer Page 379** (rcdbook1858_27_0378.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 375
---
**Viewer Page 380** (rcdbook1858_27_0379.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 376
---
**Viewer Page 381** (rcdbook1858_27_0380.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 377
---
**Viewer Page 382** (rcdbook1858_27_0381.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 378
---
**Viewer Page 383** (rcdbook1858_27_0382.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 379
---
**Viewer Page 384** (rcdbook1858_27_0383.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 380
---
**Viewer Page 385** (rcdbook1858_27_0384.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 381
---
**Viewer Page 386** (rcdbook1858_27_0385.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 382
---
**Viewer Page 387** (rcdbook1858_27_0386.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 383
---
**Viewer Page 388** (rcdbook1858_27_0387.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 384
---
**Viewer Page 389** (rcdbook1858_27_0388.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 385
---
**Viewer Page 390** (rcdbook1858_27_0389.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 386
---
**Viewer Page 391** (rcdbook1858_27_0390.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 387
---
**Viewer Page 392** (rcdbook1858_27_0391.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 388
---
**Viewer Page 393** (rcdbook1858_27_0392.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 389
---
**Viewer Page 394** (rcdbook1858_27_0393.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 390
---
**Viewer Page 395** (rcdbook1858_27_0394.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 391
---
**Viewer Page 396** (rcdbook1858_27_0395.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 392
---
**Viewer Page 397** (rcdbook1858_27_0396.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 393
---
**Viewer Page 398** (rcdbook1858_27_0397.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 394
---
**Viewer Page 399** (rcdbook1858_27_0398.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 395
---
**Viewer Page 400** (rcdbook1858_27_0399.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 396
---
**Viewer Page 401** (rcdbook1858_27_0400.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 397
---
**Viewer Page 402** (rcdbook1858_27_0401.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 398
---
**Viewer Page 403** (rcdbook1858_27_0402.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 399
---
**Viewer Page 404** (rcdbook1858_27_0403.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 400
---
**Viewer Page 405** (rcdbook1858_27_0404.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 401
---
**Viewer Page 406** (rcdbook1858_27_0405.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 402
---
**Viewer Page 407** (rcdbook1858_27_0406.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 403
---
**Viewer Page 408** (rcdbook1858_27_0407.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 404
---
**Viewer Page 409** (rcdbook1858_27_0408.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 405
---
**Viewer Page 410** (rcdbook1858_27_0409.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 406
---
**Viewer Page 411** (rcdbook1858_27_0410.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 407
---
**Viewer Page 412** (rcdbook1858_27_0411.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 408
---
**Viewer Page 413** (rcdbook1858_27_0412.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 409
---
**Viewer Page 414** (rcdbook1858_27_0413.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 410
---
**Viewer Page 415** (rcdbook1858_27_0414.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 411
---
**Viewer Page 416** (rcdbook1858_27_0415.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 412
---
**Viewer Page 417** (rcdbook1858_27_0416.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 413
---
**Viewer Page 418** (rcdbook1858_27_0417.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 414
---
**Viewer Page 419** (rcdbook1858_27_0418.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 415
---
**Viewer Page 420** (rcdbook1858_27_0419.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 416
---
**Viewer Page 421** (rcdbook1858_27_0420.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 417
---
**Viewer Page 422** (rcdbook1858_27_0421.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 418
---
**Viewer Page 423** (rcdbook1858_27_0422.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 419
---
**Viewer Page 424** (rcdbook1858_27_0423.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 420
---
**Viewer Page 425** (rcdbook1858_27_0424.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 421
---
**Viewer Page 426** (rcdbook1858_27_0425.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 422
---
**Viewer Page 427** (rcdbook1858_27_0426.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 423
---
**Viewer Page 428** (rcdbook1858_27_0427.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 424
---
**Viewer Page 429** (rcdbook1858_27_0428.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 425
---
**Viewer Page 430** (rcdbook1858_27_0429.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 426
---
**Viewer Page 431** (rcdbook1858_27_0430.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 427
---
**Viewer Page 432** (rcdbook1858_27_0431.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 428
---
**Viewer Page 433** (rcdbook1858_27_0432.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 429
---
**Viewer Page 434** (rcdbook1858_27_0433.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 430
---
**Viewer Page 435** (rcdbook1858_27_0434.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 431
---
**Viewer Page 436** (rcdbook1858_27_0435.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 432
---
**Viewer Page 437** (rcdbook1858_27_0436.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 433
---
**Viewer Page 438** (rcdbook1858_27_0437.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 434
---
**Viewer Page 439** (rcdbook1858_27_0438.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 435
---
**Viewer Page 440** (rcdbook1858_27_0439.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 436
---
**Viewer Page 441** (rcdbook1858_27_0440.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 437
---
**Viewer Page 442** (rcdbook1858_27_0441.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 438
---
**Viewer Page 443** (rcdbook1858_27_0442.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 439
---
**Viewer Page 444** (rcdbook1858_27_0443.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 440
---
**Viewer Page 445** (rcdbook1858_27_0444.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 441
---
**Viewer Page 446** (rcdbook1858_27_0445.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 442
---
**Viewer Page 447** (rcdbook1858_27_0446.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 443
---
**Viewer Page 448** (rcdbook1858_27_0447.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 444
---
**Viewer Page 449** (rcdbook1858_27_0448.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 445
---
**Viewer Page 450** (rcdbook1858_27_0449.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 446
---
**Viewer Page 451** (rcdbook1858_27_0450.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 447
---
**Viewer Page 452** (rcdbook1858_27_0451.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 446
---
**Viewer Page 453** (rcdbook1858_27_0452.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 447
---
**Viewer Page 454** (rcdbook1858_27_0453.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 448
---
**Viewer Page 455** (rcdbook1858_27_0454.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 449
---
**Viewer Page 456** (rcdbook1858_27_0455.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 450
---
**Viewer Page 457** (rcdbook1858_27_0456.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 451
---
**Viewer Page 458** (rcdbook1858_27_0457.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 452
---
**Viewer Page 459** (rcdbook1858_27_0458.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 453
---
**Viewer Page 460** (rcdbook1858_27_0459.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 454
---
**Viewer Page 461** (rcdbook1858_27_0460.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 455
---
**Viewer Page 462** (rcdbook1858_27_0461.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 456
---
**Viewer Page 463** (rcdbook1858_27_0462.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 457
---
**Viewer Page 464** (rcdbook1858_27_0463.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 458
---
**Viewer Page 465** (rcdbook1858_27_0464.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 459
---
**Viewer Page 466** (rcdbook1858_27_0465.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 460
---
**Viewer Page 467** (rcdbook1858_27_0466.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 461
---
**Viewer Page 468** (rcdbook1858_27_0467.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 462
---
**Viewer Page 469** (rcdbook1858_27_0468.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 463
---
**Viewer Page 470** (rcdbook1858_27_0469.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 464
---
**Viewer Page 471** (rcdbook1858_27_0470.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 465
---
**Viewer Page 472** (rcdbook1858_27_0471.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 466
---
**Viewer Page 473** (rcdbook1858_27_0472.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 467
---
**Viewer Page 474** (rcdbook1858_27_0473.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 468
---
**Viewer Page 475** (rcdbook1858_27_0474.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 469
---
**Viewer Page 476** (rcdbook1858_27_0475.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 470
---
**Viewer Page 477** (rcdbook1858_27_0476.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 471
---
**Viewer Page 478** (rcdbook1858_27_0477.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 472
---
**Viewer Page 479** (rcdbook1858_27_0478.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 473
---
**Viewer Page 480** (rcdbook1858_27_0479.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 474
---
**Viewer Page 481** (rcdbook1858_27_0480.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 475
---
**Viewer Page 482** (rcdbook1858_27_0481.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 476
---
**Viewer Page 483** (rcdbook1858_27_0482.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 477
---
**Viewer Page 484** (rcdbook1858_27_0483.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 478
---
**Viewer Page 485** (rcdbook1858_27_0484.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 479
---
**Viewer Page 486** (rcdbook1858_27_0485.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 480
---
**Viewer Page 487** (rcdbook1858_27_0486.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: Unknown
---
**Viewer Page 488** (rcdbook1858_27_0487.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: Unknown
---
**Viewer Page 489** (rcdbook1858_27_0488.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: Unknown
---
**Viewer Page 490** (rcdbook1858_27_0489.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: Unknown
---
**Viewer Page 491** (rcdbook1858_27_0490.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: Unknown
---
**Viewer Page 492** (rcdbook1858_27_0491.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: Unknown
---
**Viewer Page 493** (rcdbook1858_27_0492.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: Unknown
RECORD 27
1858
CIRCUIT COURT - Extent
- 493 pgs
St. Louis Circuit Court. Circuit Court Record Book 27: 1858. 1857, St. Louis Circuit Court Historical Records Project, accessed October 2, 2026, https://digitalexhibits.library.washu.edu/s/ccr/item/65816