Circuit Court Record Book 6: 1830 to 1833
Item
St. Louis Circuit Court, “Circuit Court Record Book 6: 1830 to 1833”, 1830-1833, St. Louis Circuit Court Historical Records Project, accessed October 2, 2026, https://digitalexhibits.library.washu.edu/s/ccr/item/65795
- Title
- Circuit Court Record Book 6: 1830 to 1833
- Creator
- St. Louis Circuit Court
- Date
- 1830-1833
- Source
- Missouri State Archives - St. Louis
- Rights
- Public Domain
- Identifier
- rcd1830.0006.584
- PDF Download
- Download PDF of all images
- Transcription
-
# Record 6 1830 to 1833
---
**Viewer Page 1** (rcdbook1830_06_0000.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 2** (rcdbook1830_06_0001.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 3** (rcdbook1830_06_0002.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 4** (rcdbook1830_06_0003.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 5** (rcdbook1830_06_0004.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 1
---
**Viewer Page 6** (rcdbook1830_06_0005.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 2
---
**Viewer Page 7** (rcdbook1830_06_0006.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 3
---
**Viewer Page 8** (rcdbook1830_06_0007.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 4
---
**Viewer Page 9** (rcdbook1830_06_0008.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 5
---
**Viewer Page 10** (rcdbook1830_06_0009.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 6
---
**Viewer Page 11** (rcdbook1830_06_0010.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 7
---
**Viewer Page 12** (rcdbook1830_06_0011.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 8
---
**Viewer Page 13** (rcdbook1830_06_0012.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 9
---
**Viewer Page 14** (rcdbook1830_06_0013.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 10
---
**Viewer Page 15** (rcdbook1830_06_0014.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 11
---
**Viewer Page 16** (rcdbook1830_06_0015.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 12
---
**Viewer Page 17** (rcdbook1830_06_0016.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 13
---
**Viewer Page 18** (rcdbook1830_06_0017.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 14
---
**Viewer Page 19** (rcdbook1830_06_0018.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 15
---
**Viewer Page 20** (rcdbook1830_06_0019.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 16
---
**Viewer Page 21** (rcdbook1830_06_0020.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 17
---
**Viewer Page 22** (rcdbook1830_06_0021.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 18
---
**Viewer Page 23** (rcdbook1830_06_0022.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 19
---
**Viewer Page 24** (rcdbook1830_06_0023.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 20
---
**Viewer Page 25** (rcdbook1830_06_0024.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 21
---
**Viewer Page 26** (rcdbook1830_06_0025.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 22
---
**Viewer Page 27** (rcdbook1830_06_0026.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 23
---
**Viewer Page 28** (rcdbook1830_06_0027.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 24
---
**Viewer Page 29** (rcdbook1830_06_0028.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 25
---
**Viewer Page 30** (rcdbook1830_06_0029.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 26
---
**Viewer Page 31** (rcdbook1830_06_0030.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 27
---
**Viewer Page 32** (rcdbook1830_06_0031.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 28
---
**Viewer Page 33** (rcdbook1830_06_0032.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 29
---
**Viewer Page 34** (rcdbook1830_06_0033.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 30
---
**Viewer Page 35** (rcdbook1830_06_0034.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 31
---
**Viewer Page 36** (rcdbook1830_06_0035.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 32
**Frederick Dent vs Charles Robert & Louis Valle Impl**
> Related to Case ID ccr1829.05555.014
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and the said defendants although solemnly called come not but make default nor have they pleaded to the action aforesaid of him the said plaintiff whereby the said plaintiff remains therein undefended against him whereof the said plaintiff ought to recover against them the said defendants, but because it is unknown to the court what damage the said plain- -tiff hath sustained by reason of the premises it is commanded to the Sheriff of St Louis County that he summon twelve good and lawful men of his county that they be and appear at the next term of this court then and there to enquire what damage the said plaintiff hath sustained by reason of the premises and the same day is given to both parties
**William Frye vs Gabriel Paul**
Plea filed
**The State of Missouri vs Henry (a slave)**
Bill of Exceptions filed
**Thornton Grimsley vs Joseph White**
continued
**Clement March vs Charles F Delauriene**
continued
**Nicholas Jones vs John H Gay & John W Honey**
> Related to Case ID ccr1829.05555.014
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attor- -neys aforesaid and thereupon also come a Jury to wit, Augustin Bowles, Daniel Quigley, Beriah Cleland, Robert Irwin, James McClelland, James Loper, Benjamin Walker, Wilson A Bell, James F Thomas, Jabez Warner, Isaac A Letcher and William Skinner twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issues within joined between the parties aforesaid on their oath aforesaid do say as to the first issue within joined that they the said defendants are guilty of the wrongs and trespasses above laid to their charge and every of them in manner as the said Nicholas Jones has above complained against them and as to the second issue within joined the Jurors aforesaid on their oath aforesaid do say that at the time the said wrongs and trespasses above complained of are alleged to have been committed by the said defendants the said Nicholas Jones was not and is not a slave- and they assess the damage of the said plaintiff by him sustained by reason of the wrongs and trespasses in his declaration mentioned to the sum of one cent therefore it is considered that the said Nicholas Jones be liberated and entirely set free from the said John H Gay and John W Henry and all persons claiming by through or under them and it is further considered that the said Nicholas Jones recover against the said John H Gay and John W Honey his damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Jury assessed and also his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution
**Benjamin Smith & Frederick Greaff vs Alanson Mead & John Hemper**
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys and neither of the parties requiring a Jury all and singular the premises are by them submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood it is considered by the court that the Judgement of the Justice be affirmed and that the said Benjamin Smith and Frederick Greaff recover against the said Alanson Mead and John Kemper and Richard Wilkinson the security in the appeal bond the sum of seventy one dollars twenty cents for their debt and also the sum of Four dollars sixty cents for their damages by them sustained by reason of the detention of said debt together with their costs and charges by them about their suit before the Justice expended and also in this behalf expended and that they have thereof execution
This Judgement is satisfied see execution Book No3 page 79-
**John Mullanphy vs Jonas Newman**
continued on account of the absence of Zachariah Witson a witness on behalf of the plaintiff and at the costs of the plaintiff
---
**Viewer Page 37** (rcdbook1830_06_0036.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 33
---
**Viewer Page 38** (rcdbook1830_06_0037.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 34
---
**Viewer Page 39** (rcdbook1830_06_0038.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 35
---
**Viewer Page 40** (rcdbook1830_06_0039.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 36
---
**Viewer Page 41** (rcdbook1830_06_0040.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 37
---
**Viewer Page 42** (rcdbook1830_06_0041.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 38
---
**Viewer Page 43** (rcdbook1830_06_0042.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 39
---
**Viewer Page 44** (rcdbook1830_06_0043.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 40
---
**Viewer Page 45** (rcdbook1830_06_0044.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 41
**Whiting Johnson vs Charles M Strader & James Thompson**
> Related to Case ID ccr1829.05558.011
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and says he will not further prosecute his said action against the said defendant but voluntarily suffers the same to be discontinued therefore it is considered that the said Whiting Johnson take nothing by his said suit and that the said defendants go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said Charles M Strader and James Thompson recover against the said Whiting Johnson their costs and charges by them about their defence in this behalf expended and that they have thereof execution.
**Alexis Amelin & wife vs John Smith**
Now at this day come the said defendant by his attorney and the said plaintiffs although solemnly called come not but make default nor have they prosecuted their said suit with effect therefore it is considered that the said plaintiffs take nothing by their said suit and that the said defendant go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said John Smith recover against the said Alexis Amelin and Margaret his wife his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution.
This judgement is satisfied see Execution Book No 3 Page 32.
**Malcolm H Smith vs Charles M Strader & James Thompson**
Continued at the costs of the plaintiff
**Maria Whiten vs Garland Rucker**
Now at this day come the said defendant by his attorney and the said plaintiff although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath she prosecuted her said suit with effect therefore it is considered that the said Maria Whiten take nothing by her said suit and that the said Garland Rucker go thereof without day.
**Patrick Henry vs Garland Rucker**
> Related to Case ID ccr1829.05558.011
Now at this day come the said defendant by his attorney and the said plaintiff although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he prosecuted his said suit with effect therefore it is considered that the said Patrick Henry take nothing by his said suit and that the said defendant go thereof without day.
The Court audit and allow an account of John Hempstead amounting to seven dollars fifty cents, an account of William Hibler amount to seven dollars and fifty cents and an account of Samuel Hibler amounting to sic dollars to be paid out of the estate of William Jamison deceased according to the several rights of the Heirs of said William for services rendered by said Samuel and William Hibler and John Hempstead as commissioners for the partition and sale of the real estate of said William Jamison
**The State of Missouri vs James Jenkins**
It is ordered by the court that a special Venue issue to the Sheriff of this county commanding him to summon Forty Eight good and lawful men to attend on Friday the twentieth day of August instant at Nine O'Clock in the morning to serve as Jurors
**George White, Administrator of Nathan Shotwell vs William Triplett & Adam Douglas**
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys and neither of the parties requiring a Jury all and singular the premises are by them submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood it is considered by the court that the Judgement of the Justice be affirmed and that the said George White Administrator of Nathan Shotwell deceased recover against the said William Triplett and Adam Douglass and William Hanna the security in the appeal bond his said debt of Thirty five dollars twenty five cents and also the sum of one dollar ninety three cents for his damages by him sustained by reason of the detention of said debt together with his costs and charges by him about his suit before the Justice expended and also in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution.
This Judgement is satisfied see Execution Book No 3 page 84
**Robert Simpson Sheriff of the county of Saint Louis appears here in open court and acknowledges the execution of a deed from him as Sheriff as aforesaid to Robert Wash therein named for a certain tract or parcel of land situate in the county of Saint Louis containing**
---
**Viewer Page 46** (rcdbook1830_06_0045.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 42
---
**Viewer Page 47** (rcdbook1830_06_0046.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 43
---
**Viewer Page 48** (rcdbook1830_06_0047.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 44
---
**Viewer Page 49** (rcdbook1830_06_0048.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 45
---
**Viewer Page 50** (rcdbook1830_06_0049.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 46
---
**Viewer Page 51** (rcdbook1830_06_0050.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 47
---
**Viewer Page 52** (rcdbook1830_06_0051.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 48
---
**Viewer Page 53** (rcdbook1830_06_0052.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 49
---
**Viewer Page 54** (rcdbook1830_06_0053.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 50
Monday 16th August 1830 Court met pursuant to adjournment present same Judge
**Abner Blize administrator of John Bacon vs Nathaniel Bacon Senior**
> Related to Case ID ccr1829.05552.166
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and says he will not further prosecute his said action against the said defendant but voluntarily suffers the same to be discontinued therefore it is considered that the said plaintiff take nothing by his said suit and that the said defendant go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said Nathaniel Bacon Senior recover against the said Abner Blize, Administrator of John Bacon deceased his costs and charges by him about his defence in this behalf expended and that he have thereof Execution
**E.P. Wheeler & Wm Waddingham vs William Bowman**
Exception to answer of John Crawford Garnishee filed
**William P & M Bryan vs Joseph Robidoux**
Plea filed
**John Mullanphy vs Abner Goodall**
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and thereupon also come a Jury to wit, William B. Reed, Austin J. Raines, Henry Massie Daniel Ligon, Robert Sutton, John H Reed, Jacob Rupley, Franklin Ridgely, Charles L Billon, John B Bouis, Christopher Halstead and Bazil Alexander twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected, tried and sworn well and truly to try the issue within joined between the parties aforesaid on their oath aforesaid do say that the said defendant did not undertake and promise in manner and form as the said plaintiff hath above thereof complained therefore it is considered that the said John Mullanphy take nothing by his said suit and that the said Abner Goodall go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said Abner Goodall recover against the said John Mullanphy his costs and charges by him about his defence in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution.
**John L Bogardus vs Francis Bourbonne**
On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff it is ordered that the said defendant be notified that an action of debt for Four Hundred Dollars damages Four hundred dollars has been commenced against him by the said plaintiff that a writ of attachment has issued against his estate and that unless he be and appear on or before the third day of the next term of his court and file special bail to the action aforesaid a Judgement will be entered against him and his said estate sold to satisfy the same and it is further ordered that a copy of this order be inserted for four weeks successively in some Newspaper published in the city of Saint Louis and at least twenty days before, the next term of this court.-
**James G Clare use of Jacob Hornbrook vs William Garrard**
On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff it is ordered that the said defendant be notified that an action of assumpsit damages six Hundred dollars has been commenced against him by the said plaintiff that a writ of attachment has issued against his estate and that unless he be and appear on or before the third day of the next term of this court and file special bail to the action aforesaid a Judgement will be entered against him and his said estate sold to satisfy the same and it is further ordered that a copy of this order be inserted for four weeks successively in some Newspaper published in the City of Saint Louis and at least twenty days before the next term of this court.
On the affidavit of Nathan Cole as the next friend of William G Ferris now filed it is ordered that a writ of Habeas Corpus issue to James Deane Esquire Captain in the third Reqiment of United States
---
**Viewer Page 55** (rcdbook1830_06_0054.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 56** (rcdbook1830_06_0055.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 52
have thereof execution
**George Smith vs Absolin Carlisle**
> Related to Case ID ccr1829.05552.166
Now at this day come Mr Geyer attorney for the Garnishee in this case and the said plaintiff although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he prosecute his suit against the said garnishee with effect therefore it is considered that the said plaintiff take nothing by his said suit against the said garnishee and that he go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said William Hill garnishee as aforesaid recover against the said Absolem Carlisle his costs and charges by him about his defence in this behalf Expended and that he have thereof execution.
Court adjourned until To Morrow Morning 9 O'Clock
Tuesday 17th August 1830 Court met pursuant to Adjournment present as before
**David Kyle vs John Wetherill**
David Kyle the plaintiff in this case by John McCausland his attorney in fact the power of attorney from the said David Kyle to said John McCausland being produced here in court and the execution thereof proved by James Clemens Junior examined on oath having filed a bond with John McCausland as his security which bond is approved by the court it is ordered by the court that the said David Kyle have execution of his Judgment against the said John Wetherill
**Francis Arenty vs Asher Anderson**
On motion of the said defendant by his attorney it is Ruled that a dedimus issue to any Judge or Justice of the peace of the State of Illinois to take the depositions of witnesses to be read on the trial of this cause on the part of the defendant.
**Vincent vs James Duncan**
> Related to Case ID ccr1829.05552.166
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and thereupon also come a Jury to wit, John A Ackley, John F Hamtramck, John W Blair, William B Reed, Austin J Raines, Henry Massie, John H Reed, Franklin Ridgely, Charles L Billon Christopher Halstead, Bazil Alexander and John B Bouis twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issues within joined between the parties aforesaid, on their oath aforesaid as to the first issue within joined between the parties aforesaid do say that the said James Duncan is not guilty of the wrongs and grievances above laid to his charge in manner and form as the said plaintiff has above in complaining alleged against him, and as to the second issue within joined between the parties aforesaid the Jurors aforesaid on their oath aforesaid do say that the said Vincent at the time of the commencement of his action aforesaid was and still is a slave, therefore it is considered that the said Vincent take nothing by his said suit and that the said James Duncan go thereof without day
**William P & Timothy M Bryan surviving partners of Schlatter & Bryans vs Joseph Robidoux**
It is ordered by the court that the plea filed on yesterday be stricken out Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and thereupon also come a Jury to wit, William Renshaw William Skinner, Abjah Hull, Daniel Ligon, Robert Sutton, Jacob Rupley, George K McGunnegle James Woods, Richard Dunlavy, James Robb, Michael Reiley and James Pullen twelve good and lawfull men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issues within joined between the parties aforesaid and the said plaintiffs by their said attorney move the court to strike out the plea of the said defendant of non est factum by him thirdly above pleaded which motion is sustained by the court and the said plea is stricken out accordingly and the Jurors aforesaid on their oath aforesaid as to the first issue within joined between the parties aforesaid do say that the said Joseph Robidoux
---
**Viewer Page 57** (rcdbook1830_06_0056.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 53
did undertake and promise in manner and form as the said William P and Timothy M Bryan the plaintiff have thereof above complained against him the said Joseph and they assess the damage of the said plaintiffs by them sustained by reason of the nonperformance of the promises and undertakings in their declaration mentioned to the sum of one thousand three hundred and eighty three dollars six cents therefore it is considered that the said William P Bryan and Timothy M Bryan surviving partners of the late firm of Schlatter and Bryan's recover against the said Joseph Robidoux their damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Jury assessed and also their costs and charges by them about their suit in this behalf expended and that they have thereof execution
Court adjourned until Tomorrow Morning 9 O'Clock
Wednesday 18th August 1830 Court met pursuant to adjournment present as before
**Joseph C Laveille & George Morton vs John Molthrop**
On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff it is ordered that the defendant be notified that an action of assumpsit damages three hundred dollars has been commenced against him by the said plaintiffs that a writ of attachment has issued against his estate and that unless he be and appear on or before the third day of the next term of this court and file special bail to the action aforesaid a Judgment will be entered against him and his said estate sold to satisfy the same and it is further ordered that a copy of this order be inserted for four weeks successively in some news -paper published in the city of St Louis and at least twenty days before the next term of this court
**Frederick Dent, use of Zebulon C Palmer vs Mary P Ledue**
Judgement Book Page 243
Now at this day come Arthur L Magenis attorney of Record for the said plaintiff and acknowledges to have received full and entire satisfaction (with the exception of costs) of the Judgement obtained in this case on the twenty fourth day of March one thousand eight hundred and twenty nine for the sum of one thousand dollars, debt and twenty three dollars eighty three cents damages for the detention of said debt.
**George F Strother vs William Christy**
Now at this day come the said defendant by his attorney and the said plaintiff although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he prosecuted his said suit with effect therefore it is considered that the said plaintiff take nothing by his said suit and that the said defendant go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said William Christy recover against the said George F Strother his costs and charges by him about his defence in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution
Satisfied see Execution Book No 3 page 85
The court impose a fine of Two dollars each on Michael Reily, Isaac Dyer, George K McGunnegle and Edward McDonald for not attending as Jurors after being summoned by the Sheriff so to do
On motion of Elkhanah English it is ordered by the court that he be discharged from the Recognizance entered into by him for the appearance of Peter a slave of Allen C Tanner
**The State of Missouri vs Peter Dumond alias Pierre Guirette**
It is ordered by the court that a special Venue issue to the Sheriff of this county commanding him to summon thirty good and lawful men to attend on Friday the twenty seventh instant at Nine O'Clock in the morning to serve as Jurors
**Vincent vs James Duncan**
> Related to Case ID ccr1829.05552.166
The plaintiff by his attorney files his affidavit and prays an appeal to the supreme court of this state.
---
**Viewer Page 58** (rcdbook1830_06_0057.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 54
---
**Viewer Page 59** (rcdbook1830_06_0058.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 55
---
**Viewer Page 60** (rcdbook1830_06_0059.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 56
---
**Viewer Page 61** (rcdbook1830_06_0060.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 57
---
**Viewer Page 62** (rcdbook1830_06_0061.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 58
---
**Viewer Page 63** (rcdbook1830_06_0062.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 59
---
**Viewer Page 64** (rcdbook1830_06_0063.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 60
---
**Viewer Page 65** (rcdbook1830_06_0064.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 61
---
**Viewer Page 66** (rcdbook1830_06_0065.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 62
---
**Viewer Page 67** (rcdbook1830_06_0066.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 63
---
**Viewer Page 68** (rcdbook1830_06_0067.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 64
---
**Viewer Page 69** (rcdbook1830_06_0068.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 65
---
**Viewer Page 70** (rcdbook1830_06_0069.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 66
---
**Viewer Page 71** (rcdbook1830_06_0070.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 67
Friday 27th August 1830 Court met pursuant to adjournment - present as before.
**T.C. Chouteau Ext. of A Chouteau vs William Morrison**
Additional court filed by leave of the court and Replication filed
**John McDonald vs David Waldo**
The plaintiff in this suit having filed in the office of the Clerk of this court a trans- -cript of a Judgement before V Garnier Esq a Justice of the peace for the Township and County of St Louis shewing that an execution has issued on said Judgement which had been returned that not goods or chattels or body of said defendant found in said township on motion of said John McDonald by Mr. Darby his attorney it is ordered that the said John McDonald have leave to take out at execution from the office of said clerk directed to the County of Gasconade-
**David L Salbot vs Philip McGovern**
This Judgement is satisfied see Execution book No 3 page 84
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and neither of the parties requiring a Jury all and singular the premises are by them sub- -mitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood the court do find as to the first issue within joined between the parties aforesaid that the said defendant did undertake and promise in manner and form as the said plaintiff hath above thereof complained against him, and as to the second issue within joined between the parties aforesaid the court do find that the said defendant did not pay to the said plaintiff the said several sums of money in the declaration mentioned in manner and form as the said defendant hath in his said plea alleged and they assess the damage of the said plaintiff by him sustained by reason of the nonperformance of the promises and undertakings in his declaration mentioned to the sum of Two Hundred and Fifty dollars Eighty Eight cents therefore it is considered that the said David J Talbot recover against the said Philip McGovern his damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the court assessed and also his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution.
**Daniel Fletcher & John Darst vs Thomas McCartan**
Continued by consent
**Daniel Woodram vs John Kelly**
continued
On the petition of John Kelly by Mr. Strother his attorney it is ordered by the court that a writ of Habeas Corpus issue to the Sheriff or keeper of the Jail of the County of Saint Louis commanding him to have the body of the said John Kelly before the court at Five O'Clock this afternoon -whereupon and upon return of the said writ the said John Kelly being here present in Court on debate of the matter and upon mature deliberation it is ordered by the court that the said John Kelly be forthwith discharged from his arrest and imprisonment which is done
**The Heirs & Representatives of Elias Metz dec Petition for partition**
Mr Bates attorney for the petitioners suggests here to the court that since the filing of the petition in this case Elias Stover one of the heirs of Elias Metz deceased hath died and the said petitioners by leave of the court withdraw their petition aforesaid
**Dougal Forguson vs David S Garland**
Now at this day come the said defendant by his attorney and the said plaintiff although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he prosecuted his said action with effect therefore it is considered that the said plaintiff take nothing by his said suit and that the said defendant go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said David S Garland recover against the said Dougal Ferguson his costs and charges by him about his defence in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution
---
**Viewer Page 72** (rcdbook1830_06_0071.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 68
---
**Viewer Page 73** (rcdbook1830_06_0072.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 69
---
**Viewer Page 74** (rcdbook1830_06_0073.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 70
---
**Viewer Page 75** (rcdbook1830_06_0074.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 71
---
**Viewer Page 76** (rcdbook1830_06_0075.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 72
---
**Viewer Page 77** (rcdbook1830_06_0076.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 73
---
**Viewer Page 78** (rcdbook1830_06_0077.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 74
---
**Viewer Page 79** (rcdbook1830_06_0078.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 75
---
**Viewer Page 80** (rcdbook1830_06_0079.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 76
---
**Viewer Page 81** (rcdbook1830_06_0080.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 77
---
**Viewer Page 82** (rcdbook1830_06_0081.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 78
---
**Viewer Page 83** (rcdbook1830_06_0082.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 79
---
**Viewer Page 84** (rcdbook1830_06_0083.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 80
and the said defendants in their own proper persons come and defend the wrong and injury when and say they cannot deny the action aforesaid of him the said plaintiff nor but that they do owe the said plaintiff the sum of Three Hundred and two dollars ninety cents as the said plaintiff hath in his petition set forth for which sum they confess Judgment, therefore it is considered that the said Charles Wahrendorff Administrator of the estate of James McGunnegle deceased recover against the said Hugh Miller and Stephen Hancock his debt aforesaid in form aforesaid confessed and also his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution
John McCausland appears here in Court and files his affidavit setting forth that on the Eighteenth day of January One thousand Eight hundred and twenty eight he appeared in open court and declared on oath that it was bona fide his Intention to become a citizen of the United States of America and that it appears that no entry of his having done so, it was made on the Records of this Court, and the Court being satisfied that such declaration was made by said McCausland according to law at the time and place aforesaid as in said affidavit stated- It is ordered that said entry be made nine pro tune
Tuesday 15th January 1828
John McCausland a Native of Ireland aged about twenty five years appears here in open court and declares upon oath that it is bona fide his intention to become a citizen of the United States of America and to Renounce forever all allegiance to every Foreign prince state or Sovereignty what- -soever and particularly to George the Fourth King of Great Britain and Ireland whereof he is at present a subject.
Be it Remembered that on this twenty ninth day of March in the Year of our Lord one thousand Eight hundred and thirty one John McCausland a Native of Ireland and born a Subject of the King of Great Britain appeared in open court and proved to the satisfaction of the court that he has resided in the United States for Five years and within the State of Missouri for more than one Year immediately pre- -ceding this application and of his having taken the preparatory steps required by the laws of the United States concerning the Naturalization of Foreigners and prays to be admitted a citizen of the United States of America and the said John McCausland declaring upon oath that it is bona fide his intention to become a citizen of the United States of America and to renounce all allegiance to every Foreign prince potentate having proved to the court by John K Walker and Sulivan Blood that such have been his intentions for three years next preceeding this application and on taking the oath in open court to support the constitution of the United States and renouncing all allegiance and fidelity to every Foreign prince power state of Sove- -reignty whatever and particularly to William the fourth King of Great Britain and the court moreover, being satisfied of the good moral character of the said John McCausland and of his attachment to the Con- -stitution of the United States and well disposed to the good order and happiness of the same he is therefore admitted a citizen of the United States of America. This Entry is Expunged
This Entry is Expunged
**Vincent vs James Duncan**
> Related to Case ID ccr1829.05552.166
It is ordered by the court that the Sheriff of the County of Saint Louis take possession of Vincent the petitioner in this case and hire him out to the best advantage from time to time during the pendency of this suit and that he take a bond from the person hiring said petitioner in the penalty of Five hundred dollars conditioned that the said Vincent shall at all times during the pendency of this suit have reasonable liberty of attending his counsel and that the said petitioner shall not be removed out of the Jurisdiction of this court and that he shall not be subject to any severity of treatment on account of his said application for freedom.
**The Heirs & Representatives of Guy Seely deceased Petition for partition**
Cumberland James, Elisha Patterson and John Patterson three of the Commif -sioners appointed by the court to make sale of certain Real Estate belonging to the
---
**Viewer Page 85** (rcdbook1830_06_0084.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 81
---
**Viewer Page 86** (rcdbook1830_06_0085.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 82
---
**Viewer Page 87** (rcdbook1830_06_0086.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 83
---
**Viewer Page 88** (rcdbook1830_06_0087.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 84
---
**Viewer Page 89** (rcdbook1830_06_0088.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 85
---
**Viewer Page 90** (rcdbook1830_06_0089.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 86
---
**Viewer Page 91** (rcdbook1830_06_0090.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 87
---
**Viewer Page 92** (rcdbook1830_06_0091.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 88
---
**Viewer Page 93** (rcdbook1830_06_0092.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 89
---
**Viewer Page 94** (rcdbook1830_06_0093.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 90
---
**Viewer Page 95** (rcdbook1830_06_0094.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 91
---
**Viewer Page 96** (rcdbook1830_06_0095.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 92
**Dunky vs Andrew Hay**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06739.048
George D Shaw presents the petition of Dunky a woman of color praying that she may be permitted to institute a suit against Andrew Hay for establishing her right to freedom and that she may be permitted to sue as a poor person, thereupon the court permit the said Dunky to sue as aforesaid and direct an action of assault and Batter and false imprisonment to be brought in the name of the said Dunky and assign George D Shaw and Stephen W Foreman as her counsel, and it is ordered by the court that the said Andrew Hay permit the said petitioner to have a reasonable liberty of attending her counsel and the court when occasion may require it and that the said petitioner shall not be taken or removed out of the Jurisdiction of this court or be subject to any severity of treatment on account of her said application for freedom
**Judgment against Garnishee satisfied see Execution Book No 3 page 106 John Salmon vs William A. Beard**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06739.048
Further answer of Julius Vairin Garnishee in this case filed Now at this day come again the said plaintiff by his attorney and the said Julius Vairin one of the Garnishees in this case having by his answer admitted that he is indebted to the said William A Beard in the sum of Eighty dollars twenty three cents subject to this attachment therefore it is considered that the said John Salmon recover against the said Julius Vairain Garnishee as aforesaid the said sum of Eighty dollars twenty three cents and the court allow to the said Julius Vairain the sum of Five dollars twenty five cents as compensation for his trouble and the expence attending his answering in this case
Court adjourned until tomorrow morning 10 O'Clock
**Thursday 7th April 1831**
Court met pursuant to adjournment present same Judge
**Mariquette vs Samuel McKinney**
George F Strother presents the petition of Mariquette a woman of color praying that she may be permitted to institute suit against Samuel McKinney for establishing her right to freedom and that she may be permitted to sue as a poor person, thereupon the court permit the said Mariquette to sue as aforesaid and direct that an action of Assault and Battery and False imprisonment be brought in the name of the said Mariquette and assign George F Strother as her counsel and it is ordered by the court that the said Samuel McKinney permit the said Mariquette to have a reasonable liberty of attending her counsel and the court when occasion may require it and that the said petitioner shall not be taken or removed out of the Jurisdiction of this court or be subject to any severity of treatment on account of her said application for freedom.-
**Mary Philip Ledue vs Peter A Labeaume & Elizabeth his wife**
Now at this day come the said Mary P Ledue by his attorney and the said Peter A Labeaume and Elizabeth his wife although solemnly called come not but make default nor have they answered the petition of the said plaintiff whereby the siad plaintiff remains therein undefended against him wherefore the said plaintiff ought to recover and it appearing to the court that there is in arrear and unpaid on the said mortgage the sum of Fifteen Hundred and Thirty eight dollars, and that there is also in arrear and unpaid the sum of Two Hundred and thirty six dollars sixty eight cents for interest thereon up to this date, it is thereupon ordered by the court that the said mortgaged premises to wit, "all that certain tract piece or parcel of land, situated lying & being about three miles westwardly of the city of St Louis in the prairie near a place called [ ?] Brilliante-Con-
---
**Viewer Page 97** (rcdbook1830_06_0096.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 93
---
**Viewer Page 98** (rcdbook1830_06_0097.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 94
---
**Viewer Page 99** (rcdbook1830_06_0098.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 95
---
**Viewer Page 100** (rcdbook1830_06_0099.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 96
---
**Viewer Page 101** (rcdbook1830_06_0100.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 97
---
**Viewer Page 102** (rcdbook1830_06_0101.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 98
---
**Viewer Page 103** (rcdbook1830_06_0102.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 99
---
**Viewer Page 104** (rcdbook1830_06_0103.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 100
---
**Viewer Page 105** (rcdbook1830_06_0104.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 101
---
**Viewer Page 106** (rcdbook1830_06_0105.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 102
---
**Viewer Page 107** (rcdbook1830_06_0106.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 103
---
**Viewer Page 108** (rcdbook1830_06_0107.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 104
---
**Viewer Page 109** (rcdbook1830_06_0108.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 105
hath he prosecuted his said suit with effect, therefore it is considered that the said plaintiff take nothing by his said suit and that the said defendant go thereof without day and it is further consi- -dered that the said Joseph Navaless alias L'espagnol recover against the said William Rice his costs and charges by him about his defence in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution
**William Rice & Sarah Rice vs Joseph Navaless alias L'Espagnot**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06731.014
Now at this day come the said defendant by his attorney and the said plaintiffs although solemnly called come not but make default nor have they prosecuted their said suit with effect therefore it is considered that the said plaintiffs take nothing by their said suit and that the said defendant go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said Joseph Navaless alias L'Espagnol recover against the said William Rice and Sarah Rice his costs and charges by him about his defence in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution-
**John Reynolds vs Samuel H Boynton**
continued at the costs of the Plaintiff
**William Myers vs Charles Mulligan, H. Simmons, C Collins et al**
Continued at the costs of the plaintiff
**Antoine Dumay to use of vs James Snell**
continued at the costs of the plaintiff
**William Christy vs Ames Hill & Martin Thomas**
Continued on the affidavit of the defendants and at their costs
**Thomas Wright vs Ames Hill & Martin Thomas**
continued on the affidavit of the defendants and at their costs
**John Lemond vs Nareisse Cornoye**
It is ordered by the court that this case be dismissed from the docket
****
Upon the filing of the affidavit of Arthur L Magenis Esquire an attorney and Coun- -sellor of this court stating that on Wednesday the thirteenth instant while in this Court and acting as counsel for the defendants in the case of S.W. Foreman vs. Keernle & Brooks Stephen W Foreman the plaintiff in said suit who is an attorney of this court addressed this affiant and said you are a scoundrel, you are a coward, which words as affiant believes were several times repeated by said Foreman in the hearing of other individuals then and there present that this affiant made no reply to this language nor was he addressing himself to said Foreman at the time said expressions were uttered that this affiant then made known to the Court the abusive epithets used by said Foreman and that after having so done said Foreman observed he had used the language imputed to him and would stand by it or words to that effect, this affiant further states that all this language was used in presence of the court and during the trial of said cause. Therefore it is Ruled that the said Stephen W Foreman Esquire an attorney and counsel- -lor of this court shew cause on Saturday next the Sixteenth instead why an attachment should not issue against him for a contempt of Court in using abusive and insulting language to a member of the Bar in an under voice whilst the said attorney was engaged in the management of a suit then pending before the court to wit on the thirteenth day of April instant
**Whiting Johnson vs Charles M Strader & James Thompson**
continued at the costs of the Plaintiff
---
**Viewer Page 110** (rcdbook1830_06_0109.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 105
---
**Viewer Page 111** (rcdbook1830_06_0110.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 107
---
**Viewer Page 112** (rcdbook1830_06_0111.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 108
---
**Viewer Page 113** (rcdbook1830_06_0112.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 109
---
**Viewer Page 114** (rcdbook1830_06_0113.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 110
---
**Viewer Page 115** (rcdbook1830_06_0114.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 111
---
**Viewer Page 116** (rcdbook1830_06_0115.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 112
---
**Viewer Page 117** (rcdbook1830_06_0116.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 113
**William Hill & George K. McGunnegle to use of William Hill vs Oliver Hudson**
> Related to Case ID ccr1830.05559.034
On motion of the said plaintiffs by their attorney it is ordered that the said Oliver Hudson be notified that an action of assumpsit Damages one thousand dollars has been commenced against him by the said plaintiffs who sue for the use of William Hill, that a writ of attachment has issued against his estate and that unless he be and appear at the next July term of this court and plead to the action aforesaid according to law a Judgment will be entered against him and his said Estate sold to satisfy the same, and it is further ordered that a copy of this order be inserted for four weeks successively in some Newspaper published in the City of St Louis and at least twenty days before the next July term of this court.
**Beriah Cleland vs John Mullanphy**
The defendant by his attorney moves the court to grant him a new trial in this case and files his reasons therefor which motion upon mature deli- -beration is by the court overruled
**Louis Menard vs James J Wilkinson**
The plaintiff by his attorney moves the court to grant him a new trial in this case and files his reasons therefor which motion upon mature deliberation is by the court overruled
**Stephen W Foreman vs Ch Keemle & Sam S Brooks**
The defendants by their attorney move the court to grant them a new trial in this case and file their reasons therefor which motion upon mature deliberations is by the Court overruled
**William Henry vs David G Bates**
> Related to Case ID ccr1830.05559.034
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and thereupon all and singular the matters whereof the parties aforesaid have put themselves upon the Judgment of the court are by them submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood and mature delibera- -tion being thereupon had for that it appears to the court that the said plea of said defendant secondly above pleaded and the matters therein contained in manner and form as they are therein contained in manner and form as they are therein pleaded and set forth are not sufficient in law for the said defendant to bar and preclude him said plaintiff from having and maintain- -ing his aforesaid action against him nor is he bound by the law of the land to answer the same therefore it is considered that the demurrer of the said plaintiff to the second plea of the said defendant be sustained
**The Heirs of Richard Caulk deceased Petition for partition**
Stephen Lanham and John Hempstead two of the commissioners ap- -pointed by the court to make partition among the Heirs and to Admeasure the Dower of the widow of the said Richard appear and file and acknowledge their report
**The State of Missouri vs Stephen W Foreman**
Upon a Rule to show cause Upon the Return of the Rule granted against Stephen W Foreman to shew cause this day why an attachment should not issue against him for a contempt of court as in said Rule let out, the said Stephen appearss by W Bates his counsel and waives the filing of Interroga- -tories to be by him answered and by his counsel aforesaid for cause why an attachment should not issue represents to the court that the said Arthur L Magenis was the aggressor and provoked him to use the language set out in said Rule - but the court being of opinion that the said Stephen W Foreman is in contempt the said Stephen W Foreman prays to be allowed to purge said contempt upon oath and he is accordingly admitted so to do and upon his oath denies any intention
---
**Viewer Page 118** (rcdbook1830_06_0117.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 114
of bringing the court into contempt or of misbehaving in the presence of the court but the court not deeming the explanation aforesaid sufficient do order and adjudge that the said Stephen W Foreman do pay to the State of Missouri for the use of the County of Saint Louis the sum of Five dollars as a fine for the offence aforesaid and also the costs of this Rule
**The Heirs of James Musick deceased petition for partition**
> Related to Case ID ccr1830.05560.008
It appearing to the court that in the entry of the Report of the commis- sioners made on the Twenty fifth day of November Eighteen Hundred and twenty nine, the Tract of land sold to Jaques Chauvin was entered as having been sold for Four Hundred and seventy five dollars whereas it was actually sold for but Four hundred and twenty Five dol- -lars and was so stated in said commissioners report it is therefore ordered by the court that the entry made as aforesaid be corrected so as to shew that the land sold as aforesaid was sold by the commissioners aforesaid for the said sum of Four Hundred and twenty five dollars
Court adjourned until Monday morning 10 O'Clock
Monday 18th April 1831 Court met pursuant to adjournment present same Judge
**David Lawrence vs John Mullanphy**
covenant On motion of the attorney for the defendant leave is given him to file a plea of payment which is done.
**David Lawrence vs John Mullanphy**
Assumpsit Continued at the costs of the plaintiff
**William Pigott vs Louis Dezerey & Julie Labadie**
continued at the costs of the plaintiff
The Court impose a Fine of one dollar on Michael McLaughlin for not attending as a witness in the case of Louis Dezercy & Julie Labadie after having been duly summoned so to do and also order that he pay the costs of the attachment issued against him.
**The State of Missouri to the use of the University vs James Duncan**
Now at this day come the said State of Missouri by McGamble the circuit attorney and says that the said plaintiff will not further prosecute the said suit against the said defendant but voluntarily suffers the same to be discontinued therefore it is considered that the State of Missouri who sues to the use of the University take nothing by the said suit and that the said defendant go thereof without day.
**Romulus Riggs & John B Aertsen vs John J Daley**
Interrogatories to Garnishees filed
**Olis Reynolds & James Gunsollis vs John T Barr & William Lodwick**
Interrogatories to Garnishees filed
**Joe vs James Duncan**
> Related to Case ID ccr1830.05560.008
It is suggested here to the court that since the last continuance of this cause the said Joe the said plaintiff hath died which suggestion is not denied but
---
**Viewer Page 119** (rcdbook1830_06_0118.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 115
---
**Viewer Page 120** (rcdbook1830_06_0119.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 116
---
**Viewer Page 121** (rcdbook1830_06_0120.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 117
court here fully understood the court do find as to the issue within joined between the parties aforesaid that the said Hezekiah C Simmons and Jonas Newman did assume and promise in manner and form as they the said plaintiffs have above thereof complained against them the said Simmons and Newman and they assess the damage of the said plaintiffs by them sustained by reason of the non performance and twenty dollars thirty three cents, therefore it is considered that the said Thomas Barnell and James T Ivers recover against the said Hezekiah C Simmons and Jonas Newman their damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the court assessed and also their costs and charges by them about their suit in this behalf expended and that they have thereof Execution
The Court impose a fine of one dollar on William Risley for not attending punctually on the Jury at the adjourned Hour of the Court
**Ralph vs. James & Coleman Duncan**
> Related to Case ID ccr1830.05568.192
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and says he will not further prosecute his said suit against the said James Duncan but voluntarily suffers the said action so far as regards the said James Duncan to be discontinued therefore it is considered that the said Ralph take nothing by his said suit against the said James and that he go thereof without day.-
**Ralph vs Coleman Duncan**
> Related to Case ID ccr1830.05568.192
It is ordered by the court that Ralph the plaintiff in this case be delivered by the Sheriff to James Duncan or to Coleman Duncan on their or either of them entering into Recognizance with sufficient security in the sum of six Hundred dollars conditioned that the said Ralph the petitioner shall at all times during the pen- -dency of this suit have reasonable liberty of attending his counsel and that the said Ralph shall not be removed out of the Jurisdiction of this court and that He shall not be subjected to any severity of treatment because of his application for freedom
**William Frye vs Gabriel Paul**
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys afore- -said and neither of the parties requiring a Jury all and singular the premises are by them submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood the court do find as to issue within joined between the parties aforesaid that he said Gabriel did undertake and promise in manner and form as the said plaintiff hath above thereof complained against him and they assess the damage of the said plaintiff by him sustained by reason of the non performance of the promises and undertakings in the declaration men -tioned to the sum of One Hundred and ninety one dollars thirty cents, therefore it is considered that the said William Frye recover against the said Gabriel Paul his damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the court assessed and also his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution.
**Jacob Reinhard & Paul Reinhard vs John Clark**
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and neither of the parties requiring a Jury all and singular the premises are by them submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood the court do find as to the issue within joined between the parties aforesaid that the said John Clark did undertake and promise in manner and form as the said plaintiff have in declaring alleged against him and they assess the damage of the said plaintiffs by them sustained by reason of the non performance of the promises and undertakings in their decla- -ration mentioned to the sum of One Hundred and Eighty three dollars twenty nine cents
---
**Viewer Page 122** (rcdbook1830_06_0121.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 118
---
**Viewer Page 123** (rcdbook1830_06_0122.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 119
---
**Viewer Page 124** (rcdbook1830_06_0123.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 120
---
**Viewer Page 125** (rcdbook1830_06_0124.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 121
---
**Viewer Page 126** (rcdbook1830_06_0125.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 122
---
**Viewer Page 127** (rcdbook1830_06_0126.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 123
---
**Viewer Page 128** (rcdbook1830_06_0127.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 124
---
**Viewer Page 129** (rcdbook1830_06_0128.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 125
---
**Viewer Page 130** (rcdbook1830_06_0129.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 126
---
**Viewer Page 131** (rcdbook1830_06_0130.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 127
---
**Viewer Page 132** (rcdbook1830_06_0131.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 128
---
**Viewer Page 133** (rcdbook1830_06_0132.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 129
---
**Viewer Page 134** (rcdbook1830_06_0133.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 130
---
**Viewer Page 135** (rcdbook1830_06_0134.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 131
---
**Viewer Page 136** (rcdbook1830_06_0135.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 132
---
**Viewer Page 137** (rcdbook1830_06_0136.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 133
---
**Viewer Page 138** (rcdbook1830_06_0137.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 134
Saturday 23rd April 1831 Court met pursuant to adjournment present same Judge
**Daniel Richardson's Executors vs William L Long E Musick & others**
> Related to Case ID ccr1830.05568.192
Replication and Demurrer Filed
**Benjamin W Edwards vs William Ferguson**
The defendant by his attorney appears and moves the court to set aside the Judgment entered in this case for Irregularity which motion upon mature deliberation is by the court overruled
**Louis Rouse use of Michael Dousman vs John O'Fallon**
Replications Filed
**Ames Hill vs William R Douglass**
Replication Filed
**John B Sarpy vs Auguste A Chouteau**
Interrogatories filed
**John F Hamtramck vs John Calvert**
Interrogatories filed
**John F Kemper vs Joseph Swager**
Interrogatories filed
**Isaac A Letcher vs Daniel B McCownell**
Answers of William R Grimsley and Abraham Fox Garnishee filed
**Isaac A Letcher vs Xavier Dugal**
On motion of Charles Collins it is ordered by the court that the surpluss money raised on the sale of the property sold by virtue of the execution issued in this case be paid over to the said Charles Collins
**Louis Calloux vs J.V. Garnier & H Renard**
The plaintiff by his attorney moves the court to set aside the order dismissing this suit for want of security for costs and for leave to file a bond for costs now which motion upon mature deliberation is by the court overruled
**Ralph vs Coleman Duncan**
> Related to Case ID ccr1830.05568.192
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney leave is given him to amend his declaration in this case which is done
**Leonard Jacobs vs John C Wilson**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and says he will not further prosecute his said suit against the said defendant but voluntarily suffers the same to be discontinued therefore it is considered that the said plaintiff take nothing by his said suit and that the said defendant go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said John C Wilson recover against the said Leonard Jacobs his costs and charges by him about his defence in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution
**David Kyle & John McCausland vs James Gonsols**
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and thereupon all and singular the matters aforesaid whereof the parties aforesaid have put themselves upon the Judgment of the Court are by them submitted to the Court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood and mature deliberation being thereupon had for that it appears to the court that the said plea of the said James Gonsols and the matters therein contained in manner and form as the same are above pleaded and set forth are not sufficient in law to bar or preclude them said David and John from having or maintaining their aforesaid action thereof against said James and
---
**Viewer Page 139** (rcdbook1830_06_0138.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 140** (rcdbook1830_06_0139.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 141** (rcdbook1830_06_0140.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 137
---
**Viewer Page 142** (rcdbook1830_06_0141.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 138
in this case and files his reasons therefor
**John Salmon vs William A Beard**
> Related to Case ID ccr1830.05560.008
The plaintiff in this case having heretofore filed a bond with security as required by law which was approved of by the court it is ordered by the court that the said John Salmon have execution of his Judgment against Julius Vairin the Garnishee in this case
**Richard D Wood & William L Abbott vs James S Lane & George Knox**
Arthur L Magenis attorney for the plaintiffs appears here in court and acknowledges to have received of the said defendants the sum of Five Hundred and Five dollars Eighty three cents in part satisfaction of the Judgment obtained in favor of the said plaintiffs on the twenty fourth day of August last- being the amount stated by James S Lane one of the defendants in his petition to the Judge of this court in vacation to stay proceedings upon the execution issued upon the Judgment aforesaid it is thereof ordered by the court that the order of the Judge in vacation staying the proceedings upon the execution aforesaid be set aside as to the residue of said Judgment.
**The President Directors [ ?] of the Bank of Missouri vs Thomas Brady's & John McKnight's heirs**
On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff it is ordered by the court that this cause be reinstated on the docket, and leave is given him to amend his petition by making Augustus Jones Administrator of Thomas Brady deceased a party in said suit which is done
**Thomas F Smith and Emilie his wife Henry Chouteau and Edward Chouteau vs Rene Paul & Eulalie his wife, Gabriel Paul & Louise his wife, Auguste & Gabriel Chouteau**
Now at this day come the said petitioners by their attorney aforesaid and the said Rene Paul and Eulalie his wife, Gabriel Paul and Louise his wife Auguste Chouteau and Gabriel Chouteau not having appeared or answered said petition are now solemnly called and come not but make default, and the said petitioners pray the court to give Judgment of partition - whereupon it is ascertained and determined by said Court that the said parties are interested in lands, tenements and heridaments in the petition mentioned and described in the following manner that is to say that said Emilie Smith (married to Thomas F Smith) Henry Chouteau, Edward Chouteau, Eulalie Paul (married to Rene Paul) Louise Paul (married to Gabriel Paul) Auguste Chouteau and Gabriel Chouteau are each entitled to one seventh part thereof, therefore it is considered by the court that partition be made of the said lands tenements and Hereditaments in said petition mentioned and described among the said parties according to their respective rights therein as above ascertained and it is hereby ordered that John O'Fallon, Henry Von Phul, Charles Wahrendarff, James Clemens Junior and Joseph C Brown, Five respectable Householders residents of Saint Louis County where the said lands lye be and the same are hereby appointed commissioners to make the said partition quantily and guality relatively considered according to the respective rights and interests of said parties as above ascer- tained and that they make report of their proceedings as the next July term of this court.-
**Archibald Gamble vs Aaron Daniel**
Petition for partition Now at this day come into court here Mary P Ledue, Joseph C Brown, Edward Tracy, David B Hill and George Morton the commissioners heretofore appointed and qualified to make partition of certain lands and tenements in the petition of Archibald Gamble mentioned between the said Archibald Gamble and Aaron Daniel and file and acknowledge their report as follows to wit; We the Undersigned Commissioners appointed by the circuit court of St Louis County on the ninth day
---
**Viewer Page 143** (rcdbook1830_06_0142.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 139
---
**Viewer Page 144** (rcdbook1830_06_0143.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 140
---
**Viewer Page 145** (rcdbook1830_06_0144.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 141
**Benjamin Wilder vs John Mullanphy**
> Related to Case ID ccr1830.05568.192
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney leave is given him to amend his declaration in this case
**John Pitcher vs John alias Charles Pickens**
Bill of Exceptions Filed
**John G Stevenson vs William P Foster**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by Mr Spalding his attorney and here in court freely remits to the said defendant the sum of Two Thousand seven hundred and seventeen dollars twenty nine cents part and parcel of the damages recovered in this case therefore it is considered that the said defendant be acquitted and discharged from the said sum so as aforesaid remitted
**Benjamin Owen to use of vs Henry Waddle's Administrator and William Bennet**
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and thereupon all and singular the matters aforesaid whereof the parties aforesaid have put themselves upon the Judgment of the court are by them submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood and mature delibe- -ration being thereupon had for that it appears to the court that the said pleas of the said defendant firstly secondly, thirdly, fourthly and fifthly above pleaded that the same and the matters therein con -tained in manner and form as the same are above pleaded and set forth are not sufficient nor is either of them sufficient in law to bar and preclude him the said Benjamin from having and maintaining his aforesaid action thereof against him the said Bennet and that he the said Benjamin is not bound by the law of the land to answer the same therefore it is considered that the demurrer to the first, second, third, fourth and fifth pleas of the said defen -dant be sustained
James Duncan as principal and Robert Duncan as security acknowledge themselves to be indebted to the State of Missouri in the sum of Six Hundred Dollars each to be levied of their respective goods and chattels lands and tenements if the said James Duncan shall fail in the condition underwritten the condition of this Recognizance is such that whereas Ralph a man of color has instituted suit in this court against the said James Duncan impleaded with Coleman Duncan to establish his freedom, now if the said Ralph shall at all times during the pendency of said suit have reasonable liberty of attending his counsel that he shall not be removed out of the Jurisdiction of this court nor be subjected to any severity of treatment because of his application for freedom then this Recognizance to be void otherwise to remain in full force
Robert Wash presents a petition to the court praying that the present Sheriff of this county be directed to execute to him a deed for two lots of ground situated in that part of or addition to St Louis laid off by Chouteau and Lucas and known on the plot of said addition as lots No 93 and 94 and are the same whereon Thomas McGuire then lived, which said lots were sold by the then Sheriff of the County of Saint Louis on the twenty second day of October in the year Eighteen Hundred and twenty three by virtue and under an execution issued from the office of the clerk of the St Louis circuit court in favor of David Logan which said Execution was issued on a Judgment recovered in said Court in favor of the said David Logan against said Thomas McGuire at which said sale by the Sheriff aforesaid said Robert Wash being the highest and last bidder for the same at the price and sum of ten dollars he became and was the purchaser of said two lots of ground as appears by the return of the said Sheriff made on said Execution and it also appearing that no deed has yet been made for the same and it being satisfactorily shewn to the Court that the purchase money for said lots has been duly paid it is therefore ordered by the court that the present Sheriff of the County of St Louis
---
**Viewer Page 146** (rcdbook1830_06_0145.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 142
---
**Viewer Page 147** (rcdbook1830_06_0146.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 143
---
**Viewer Page 148** (rcdbook1830_06_0147.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 144
---
**Viewer Page 149** (rcdbook1830_06_0148.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 145
---
**Viewer Page 150** (rcdbook1830_06_0149.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 146
---
**Viewer Page 151** (rcdbook1830_06_0150.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 147
---
**Viewer Page 152** (rcdbook1830_06_0151.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 148
---
**Viewer Page 153** (rcdbook1830_06_0152.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 149
---
**Viewer Page 154** (rcdbook1830_06_0153.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 150
---
**Viewer Page 155** (rcdbook1830_06_0154.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 151
---
**Viewer Page 156** (rcdbook1830_06_0155.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 152
---
**Viewer Page 157** (rcdbook1830_06_0156.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 153
---
**Viewer Page 158** (rcdbook1830_06_0157.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 154
---
**Viewer Page 159** (rcdbook1830_06_0158.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 155
---
**Viewer Page 160** (rcdbook1830_06_0159.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 156
---
**Viewer Page 161** (rcdbook1830_06_0160.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 157
---
**Viewer Page 162** (rcdbook1830_06_0161.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 158
---
**Viewer Page 163** (rcdbook1830_06_0162.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 159
---
**Viewer Page 164** (rcdbook1830_06_0163.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 160
---
**Viewer Page 165** (rcdbook1830_06_0164.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 161
---
**Viewer Page 166** (rcdbook1830_06_0165.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 162
---
**Viewer Page 167** (rcdbook1830_06_0166.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 163
---
**Viewer Page 168** (rcdbook1830_06_0167.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 164
---
**Viewer Page 169** (rcdbook1830_06_0168.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 165
---
**Viewer Page 170** (rcdbook1830_06_0169.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 166
west of the mill tract so called and occupied by a black Smith's shop and an enclosure and contain- -ing one half of an acre of ground part of the premises in the declaration mentioned and every part thereof in manner and form as the said plaintiff has above thereof complained against them and they assess the damage of the said plaintiff by him sustained by reason of the Trespass and Eject- -ment aforesaid at the sum of six cents therefore it is considered that the said Thomas Wright recover against the said Ames Hill and Martin Thomas their damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Jury assessed and also their costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf ex -pended and that he have thereof execution and the said plaintiff by his attorney prays the writ of the State of Missouri to cause him to have possession of the premises aforesaid which is granted accordingly
Court adjourned until To morrow morning 9 O'Clock
Wednesday 10th Augsust 1831 Court met pursuant to adjournment present same Judge
**Robert Rodgers vs John H Hayward**
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and neither of the parties requiring a Jury all and singular the premises are by them submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood the court do find as to the issue within joined between the parties aforesaid that the said John H Hayward is not guilty of the said grievances above laid to his charge in manner and form as the said Robert Rodgers has complained against him therefore it is considered that the said plaintiff take nothing by his said suit and that the said defendant go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said John H Hayward recover against the said Robert Rodgers his costs and charges by him about his defence in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution
**Dunky vs Andrew Hays**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06739.048
Pleas filed
**Curtis Skinner vs Isaac G Gardner**
Allegations & Interrogatories filed
**Charles Collins vs Oliver Dubois**
Allegations & Interrogatories filed
**Thomas Gibbins vs Joseph Robidoux**
Pleas filed
**Inhabitants Town St Ferdinand vs Francis Theibeau**
Bill of Exceptions filed
Oswald Sturdy a Native of Ireland aged Thirty six years appears here in open court and declares upon oath that it is bona fide his intention to become a citizen of the United States of America and to renounce forever all allegiance and fidelity to every Foreign prince, power, State or Sovereignty whatsoever and particu- -larly to William the Fourth King of Great Britain & Ireland whereof he is at present a subject
**William Henry vs David G Bates**
> Related to Case ID ccr1830.05559.034
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and thereupon also come a Jury to wit, Daniel Miller, Charles Bufseron, Merit Hicks, Hugh Richards, Levi Benjamin, John H Reed, William R Grimsley, Hubert Guion, George A Underhill Christian Kienlen, George W Chapman and James Wilgus twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issue within Joined between the parties aforesaid on their oath aforesaid do say that the said David G Bates is Guilty of the wrongs and trespasses above
---
**Viewer Page 171** (rcdbook1830_06_0170.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 167
laid to his charge in manner and form as the said William Henry has above in declaring alleged against him and they assess the damage of the said plaintiff by him sustained by reason of the wrongs and trespasses in the declaration mentioned to the sum of one cent therefore it is considered that the said William Henry be liberated and entirely set free from the said David G Bates and all persons claiming from through or under him and it is further considered that the said William Henry recover against the said David G Bates his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution
Court adjourned until To morrow morning 9 O'clock
Thursday 11th August 1831 Court met pursuant to adjournment present same Judge
**David Lawrence vs John Mullanphy**
> Related to Case ID ccr1830.05568.192
Demurrer & Replications filed
**R L Keen & Jn H Page vs John Ashton**
alias writ awarded
**Jacob V.D. Stout vs Benjamin Ames**
Stander Pleas, and Demurrer to Second Plea filed
**Thomas Philips vs John Mosley**
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney leave is given him to take from the files the note filed in this case on his leaving a copy thereof
**Ralph vs Coleman Duncan**
> Related to Case ID ccr1830.05568.192
On motion of the attorney for the defendant it is Ruled that a dedimus issue to any Judge or Justice of the peace of the state of Kentucky to take the depositions of witnesses to be read in evidence on the trial of this cause on the part of the defendant
**Thomas Forsythe vs The President Directors and Company of the Bank of Missouri**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and the said defendants although solemnly called come not but make default nor have they pleaded to the action aforesaid of him the said plaintiff whereby the said plaintiff remains therein undefended against him wherefore the said plaintiff ought to recover but because it is unknown to the court what damage the said plaintiff hath sustained by reason of the non performence of the promises and undertakings in the declaration mentioned therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff of Saint Louis County that he summon twelve good and lawful men of his county that they be and appear at the next November term of this court then and there to enquire what damage the said plaintiff hath sustained by reason of the premises and the same day is given to the said defendant
**john B. C. Lucas vs Martin Thomas**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and the said defendant although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he pleaded to the action aforesaid of him the said plaintiff whereby the said plaintiff remains therein undefen- -ded against him wherefore the said plaintiff ought to recover but because it is unknown to the court what damage the said plaintiff hath sustained by reason of the non performance of the promises and undertakings in the declaration mentioned therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff of Saint Louis County that he summon twelve good and lawful men of his county that they be and appear at the next Novemeber Term of this court then and there to enquire what damage the said plaintiff hath sustained by reason of the premises and the same day is given to the said defendant.
---
**Viewer Page 172** (rcdbook1830_06_0171.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 168
---
**Viewer Page 173** (rcdbook1830_06_0172.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 169
---
**Viewer Page 174** (rcdbook1830_06_0173.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 170
reason of the non performance of the promises and undertakings in the declaration mentioned to the sum of Four Hundred and forty six dollars sixty three cents therefore it is considered that the said Richard Drean who sues for the use of Fryer and Anderson recover against the said John P Reily Administrator of Henry Reily deceased his damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court assessed and also his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution against the goods and chattels lands and tenements which were of the said Henry Reily deceased at the time of his death in the hands of his said Administrator to be Admin- istered-
**Israel Barret vs George D Shaw**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06740.030
Now at this day come the said appellant in his own proper person and the said Israel Barret although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he prosecuted his suit in this behalf with effect therefore it is considered by the court that the Judg- ment of the Justice be reversed and for nought held and esteemed that the said appellee take nothing by his said suit and that the said appellant go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said George D Shaw recover against the said Israel Barret his costs and charges by him about his defence before the Justice expended and also about his appeal in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution
**Seraphim Benoist vs Joseph & John Lemare**
Now at this day come the said defendants by their attorney and the said plaintiff although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he prosecuted his suit in this behalf with effect therefore it is considered by the court that the Judg- -ment of the Justice be reversed and for nought held and esteemed that the said plaintiff take nothing by his said suit and that the said defendants go thereof without day and it is further con- -sidered that the said Joseph Lemare and John Lemare recover against the said Seraphim Benoist their costs and charges by them about their defence before the Justice expended and also about their appeal in this behalf expended and that they have thereof execution.-
**Satisfied in execution Book No 3 page 114 Richard W Hamilton vs Dominique Catereno**
Now at this day come the said appellant in His own proper person and the said appellee although solemnly called comes not but make default nor hath he prosecuted his suit in this behalf with effect therefore it is considered by the court that the Judgment of the Justice be reversed and for nought held and esteemed that the said appellee take nothing by his said suit and that the said appellant go thereof without day and it is further con- -sidered that the said Dominique Catereno recover against the said Richard W Hamilton his costs and charges by him about his defence before the Justice expended and also about his appeal in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution
**Francis Dyon vs Edward Melley**
Now at this day come the said appellant by his attorney and the said appellee although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he prosecuted his said suit with effect therefore it is considered by the court that the Judgment of the Justice be reversed and for nought held and esteemed that the said appellee take nothing by his said suit and that the said appellant go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said Edward Melley recover against the said Francis Dyon his costs and charges by him about his defence before the Justice expended and also about his appeal in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution.
**Mariquette vs Samuel McKinney**
On motion of the said plaintiff by her attorney leave is given her to amend her declaration by making Charles Wahrendorff a defendant which is done and pleas filed
---
**Viewer Page 175** (rcdbook1830_06_0174.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 171
---
**Viewer Page 176** (rcdbook1830_06_0175.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 172
---
**Viewer Page 177** (rcdbook1830_06_0176.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 173
---
**Viewer Page 178** (rcdbook1830_06_0177.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 174
---
**Viewer Page 179** (rcdbook1830_06_0178.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 175
---
**Viewer Page 180** (rcdbook1830_06_0179.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 176
---
**Viewer Page 181** (rcdbook1830_06_0180.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 177
---
**Viewer Page 182** (rcdbook1830_06_0181.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 178
---
**Viewer Page 183** (rcdbook1830_06_0182.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 179
---
**Viewer Page 184** (rcdbook1830_06_0183.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 180
---
**Viewer Page 185** (rcdbook1830_06_0184.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 181
---
**Viewer Page 186** (rcdbook1830_06_0185.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 182
---
**Viewer Page 187** (rcdbook1830_06_0186.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 183
---
**Viewer Page 188** (rcdbook1830_06_0187.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 184
---
**Viewer Page 189** (rcdbook1830_06_0188.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 185
---
**Viewer Page 190** (rcdbook1830_06_0189.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 186
plaintiff take nothing by his said suit and that the said defendants go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said Stephen Hancock, Adam Bates and Thomas J Ferguson recover against the said John Livergood their costs and charges by them about their defence in this behalf expended and that they have thereof Execution
**Cary vs Benjamin Wilder**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06731.014
Now at this day come the said defendant by his attorney and the said plaint- -iff although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he prosecuted his said suit with effect therefore it is considered that the said plaintiff take nothing by his said suit and that the said defendant go thereof without day
**James Clemens Jr vs James Loper**
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and neither of the parties requiring a Jury all and singular the premises are by them submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood the court do find as to the issue within joined between the parties aforesaid that the said defendant did undertake and promise in manner and form as the plaintiff hath above thereof complained against him and they assess the damage of the said plaintiff by him sustained by reason of the non performance of the promises and undertakings in the declaration mentioned to the sum of Three Hundred and Eighty two dollars thirty seven cents therefore it is considered that the said James Clemens Jr. recover against the said James Loper his damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the court assessed and also his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended and that he have thereof Execution
**John F Hamtramck vs John Calvert**
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and neither of the parties requring a Jury all and singular the premises are by them submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood the court do find as to the first issue within joined between the parties aforesaid that the said defendant did undertake and promise in manner and form as the plaintiff hath thereof alleged against him, and as to the second issue within joined between the parties aforesaid the court do find that he the said defendant did not well and truly pay to him the said plain- -tiff the several sums of money in the declaration mentioned as he the said defendant mentioned as he the said defendant hath in his said second plea alleged and they assess the damage of the said plaintiff by him sustained by reason of the non performance of the promises and undertakings in the declaration mentioned to the sum of Eighty three dollars fifty two cents therefore it is considered that the said John F Hamitramck recover against the said John Calvert his damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the court assessed and also his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended. and John H Fergu- -son one of the Garnishees in this case although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he answered the interrogatories filed by the plaintiff in this case therefore it is considered that the said John F Hamtramck recover against the said John H Ferguson Garnishee as aforesaid the sum of Eighty three dollars fifty two cents for his damages aforesaid and also his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended- and Isaac Dyer one of the Garnishees in this case although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he answered the interrogatories filed by the plaintiff in this case therefore it is considered that the said John F Hamtramck recover against the said Isaac Dyer Garnishee as aforesaid the sum of Eighty three dollars fifty two cents for his damges aforesaid and also his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended.
**William Brown and John W Stone vs John Shackford & Nathan Ranney**
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys attorneyes aforesaid and neither of the parties requiring a Jury all and singular the premises are by
---
**Viewer Page 191** (rcdbook1830_06_0190.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 187
---
**Viewer Page 192** (rcdbook1830_06_0191.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 188
---
**Viewer Page 193** (rcdbook1830_06_0192.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 189
**The State of Missouri vs Beriah Cleland**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06731.014
On Rule to shew cause why an attachment should not issue The defendant by his counsel enters his appearance and prays that Interrogatories may be exhibited for him to answer in this behalf and the court direct that the same be filed by the circuit attorney.
**Samuel Merry vs Andrew Stepp**
The defendant by his attorney moves the court to set aside the Judgment by default entered in this case at the last March Term of this court which motion upon mature deliberation is by the court overruled
**Phineas Barllett vs Joseph Benjamin & Pamela his wife**
The defendants by W Strother their attorney move the court to set aside the Judgment rendered against them in favor of the said plaintiff which motion upon mature deliberation is by the court overruled.
**Hugh McTiernan vs Ephraim Town & Louis A Benoist**
The defendants by their attorney move the court ro set aside the Report of the referees in this case and upon mature deliberations it is ordered by the court that the said report be set aside- and this cause continued
**Town St Ferdinand vs Francis Thibeau**
The plaintiffs by their attorney move the court to grant them a new Trial in this case and file their reasons therefor which motion upon mature delibe -ration is by the court overruled
**Benjamin Wilder vs John Mullanphy**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and the said defendant although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he pleaded to the amended court of the said plaintiffs declaration whereby the said plaintiff remains therein undefended against him wherefore the said plaintiff ought to recover but because it is unknown to the court what damage the said plaintiff hath sustained by reason by reason of the non performance of the promises and undertakings in the amended court of said plaintiffs declaration mentioned therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff of the County of Saint Louis that he summon twelve good and lawful men of his county that they be and appear at the next November term of this court then and to En -quire what damage the said plaintiff hath sustained by reason of the premises and the same day is given to the said defendant
This Judgment is set aside see page 196
Court adjourned until Monday morning next 9 O'Clock
Monday 22nd August 1835 Court met pursuant to adjournment present same Judge
**Jacques Desire vs Baptiste Perault & wife**
Bill of Exceptions Filed
**Cary vs Benjamin Wilder**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06731.014
Bill of Exceptions filed
**Hiram Nicholson vs Jn Gant & Jefferson Blackwell**
The parties appear by their attorneys and this cause is continued
Samuel McKee a Native of Ireland aged about forty years appears here in open court and declares upon oath that it is bona fide his intention to become a citizen of the United States of America and to renounce forever all allegiance and fidelity to every Foreign prince, power, State or Sovereignty what-
---
**Viewer Page 194** (rcdbook1830_06_0193.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 190
---
**Viewer Page 195** (rcdbook1830_06_0194.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 191
---
**Viewer Page 196** (rcdbook1830_06_0195.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 192
---
**Viewer Page 197** (rcdbook1830_06_0196.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 193
---
**Viewer Page 198** (rcdbook1830_06_0197.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 194
---
**Viewer Page 199** (rcdbook1830_06_0198.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 195
---
**Viewer Page 200** (rcdbook1830_06_0199.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 196
---
**Viewer Page 201** (rcdbook1830_06_0200.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 197
---
**Viewer Page 202** (rcdbook1830_06_0201.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 198
---
**Viewer Page 203** (rcdbook1830_06_0202.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 199
---
**Viewer Page 204** (rcdbook1830_06_0203.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 200
---
**Viewer Page 205** (rcdbook1830_06_0204.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 201
---
**Viewer Page 206** (rcdbook1830_06_0205.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 202
---
**Viewer Page 207** (rcdbook1830_06_0206.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 203
---
**Viewer Page 208** (rcdbook1830_06_0207.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 204
---
**Viewer Page 209** (rcdbook1830_06_0208.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 205
---
**Viewer Page 210** (rcdbook1830_06_0209.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 206
---
**Viewer Page 211** (rcdbook1830_06_0210.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 207
**William Piggott vs Louis & Julia Garcie alias Labadie**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06731.014
The defendants by their attorney move the court to grant them a New Trial in this case and file their reasons therefor which motion upon mature deliberations is by the court sustained and it is ordered by the court that the Judgment heretofore entered in this case be set aside and a new trial granted
See page 165
**Antoine Dumay, use of Thomas English vs James Snell**
The plaintiff by his attorney moves the court to grant him a new trial in this case and files his reasons therefor which motion upon mature deliberation is by the court sustained and it is ordered by the court that the Judgment entered in this case be set aside and a new trial granted
See page 173
**Cary vs Benjamin Wilder**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06731.014
The plaintiff by his attorney moves the court to set aside the Judgment of nonsuit in this case and files his reasons therefor which motion upon mature deliberation is by the court overruled
**Thomas Rothwell vs James M Seantling**
The plaintiff by his attorney moves the court to set aside the Judgment of non Juros in this case and for leave to file a Replication which motion upon mature deliberation is by the court overruled
**Curtis Skinner vs Isaac G Gardner**
The plaintiff by his attorney files an affidavit shewing the situation of the property attached in this case and it appearing to the court that the said property is in a perish- -able condition, the court doth order that the property attached be sold at auction by the Sheriff of the County of Saint Louis- on a credit of Six months, that he take bond and security for the payment of the purchase money, and that he give at least ten days notice of the time, place and terms of said sale as required by law
**Arend Rutgers vs Henry McLaughlin**
Arend Rutgers the plaintiff by McGeyer his attorney moves the court to award an Execution in this case to the County of Saint Charles, and for cause shewn it is ordered that the said plaintiff have leave to take out an Execution as prayed for
**William Tighe vs Isaac G Gardner**
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney and it appearing to the Court that the property attached in this case is in a perishable condition the court doth order that the property attached be sold at auction by the Sheriff of the county of Saint Louis on a credit of Six months that he take bond and security for the payment of the purchase money and that he give notice of the time terms and place of sale, as required by law.
**George Hood & John C Abbott vs Isaac G Gardner**
On motion of the plaintiffs by their attorney and it appearing to the court that the property attached in this case is in a perishable condition the court doth order that the property attached be sold at auction by the Sheriff of the County of Saint Louis on a credit of Six months, that he take bond and security for the payment of the purchase money and that he give notice of the time terms and place of said sale as required by law
**Louis A Benoist, Archibald E Orme & Samuel McCullough vs Charles & Eulatie Bright**
Mary P Ledue, Edward Charlefs and Hubert Guion commissioners appoin- -ted by the court to make partition of a certain tract of land containing forty arpens situated in the County of Saint Louis bounded on the south by lands of Thomas Biddle on the East by Federal avenue so called, and on the north by land claimed by Alfred Skinner
---
**Viewer Page 212** (rcdbook1830_06_0211.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 208
---
**Viewer Page 213** (rcdbook1830_06_0212.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 209
---
**Viewer Page 214** (rcdbook1830_06_0213.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 210
Jury in this case and of the defendant to grant him a new trial are by the court continued Court adjourned until Court in Course
State of Missouri set At a circuit court begun and held at the City of St Louis within and for the county of Saint Louis in the third Judicial Circuit of the State of Missouri on the Fourth Monday of November being the twenty eighth day of said Month in the Year of our Lord One thousand eight Hundred and thirty one were present the Honorable William C Carr Judge of the third Judicial Circuit of the State of Missouri, John K Walker Esquire Sheriff of the County of Saint Louis and Archibald Gamble Clerk
**Nathaniel Cook vs John Johnson**
> Related to Case ID ccr1829.05552.166
Pleas and Replications and Demurrer to Second plea filed
**Henry Underhill vs John Burroughs**
Pleas filed
**Alexander H Hansbrough vs George F Strother**
pleas filed
The court doth order and direct that the Sheriff summon twenty four good and lawful men of his county to appear before the court now in session then and there to serve as Jurors until discharged by the Court
**Daniel Bissell vs Risdon H Price**
Plea filed
**Adam Mills & William G Wetzell vs Sherman Robbins**
On motion of the defendant by his attorney it is Ruled that a Dedimus issue to any Judge or Justice of the peace of the State of Illinois to take the depositions of witnesses to be read in evidence on the trial of this cause on the part of the defendant
**David Lawrence vs John Mullanphy**
On motion of the attorney for the defendant it is ordered that a Venire issue to the Sheriff of this County commanding him to summon twenty four good and lawful men of his county to attend as Jurors on the second day of December next al the hour of ten O'Clock in the forenoon
**Vincent vs James Duncan**
> Related to Case ID ccr1829.05552.166
On motion of the Plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered that a Venire issue to the Sheriff Commanding him to summon eighteen good and lawful men of his county to attend and serve as Jurors on the fifth day of December next at the hour of Ten O'Clock in the forenoon of that day
---
**Viewer Page 215** (rcdbook1830_06_0214.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 211
---
**Viewer Page 216** (rcdbook1830_06_0215.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 212
---
**Viewer Page 217** (rcdbook1830_06_0216.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 213
---
**Viewer Page 218** (rcdbook1830_06_0217.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 214
---
**Viewer Page 219** (rcdbook1830_06_0218.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 215
---
**Viewer Page 220** (rcdbook1830_06_0219.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 216
---
**Viewer Page 221** (rcdbook1830_06_0220.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 217
**Thomas C Price vs James Bailey pnpl**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06734.030
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and the said defen- -dant although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he pleaded to the action aforesaid of him the said plaintiff whereby the said plaintiff remains therein undefended against him wherefore the said plaintiff ought to recover and this action being founded on an instrument in writing and it appearing to the court that the said defedant is indebted to the said plaintiff in the sum of Six Hundred and twenty one dollars ninety five cents as he the said plaintiff hath in his petition alleged and that the said plaintiff hath sustained damage by reason of the detention of said debt to the sum of twenty four dollars sixty five cents there- -fore it is considered that the said Thomas C Price recover against the said James Bailey his debt afore- said in form aforesaid found to be due and also his damages aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed together with his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution.-
**This judgment is satisfied on execution book No 3 page 126 Thomas S Whitesaid vs Alexander Donaldson**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and the said defendant although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he pleaded to the action aforesaid of him the said plaintiff whereby the said plaintiff remains therein undefended against him wherefore the said plaintiff ought to recover and this action being founded on an instrument in writing and it manifestly appearing to the court that the said defen- -dant is indebted to the said plaintiff in the sum of One Hundred and fifty dollars and that the said plaintiff hath sustained damage by reason of the detention of said debt to the sum of Ninety cents therefore it is considered that the said Thomas S Whiteside recover against the said Alexan- -der Donaldson his debt aforesaid in form aforesaid found to be due and also his damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the court assessed and also his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution
**Alfred Skinner & Wm Skinner vs James C Lynch**
Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney and the said defendant although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he pleaded to the action aforesaid of him the said plaintiff whereby the said plaintiff re- -mains therein undefended against him wherefore the said plaintiff ought to recover and this action being founded on an instrument in writing and it manifestly appearing to the court that the said defendant is indebted to the said plaintiffs in the sum of One Hundred and Forty two dollars three six cents as they the said plaintiffs have in their petition alleged therefore it is considered that the said Alfred Skinner and William Skinner recover against the said James C Lynch their debt aforesaid in form aforesaid by the court found to be due and also their costs and charges by them about their suit in this behalf expended and that they have thereof execution
**William Padfield vs James Loper**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and the said defendant although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he pleaded to the action aforesaid of him the said plaintiff whereby the said plaintiff remains therein undefended against him wherefore the said plaintiff ought to recover, and this action being founded on an instrument in writing and it manifestly appearing to the court that the said defendant is indebted to the said plaintiff in the sum of One Hundred and one dollars thirteen cents as the said plaintiff hath in his petition alleged and that the said plaintiff hath sustained damage by reason of the detention of said debt to the sum of Three dollars seventy five cents therefore it is considered that the said William Padfield recover against the said James Loper his debt afore- -said in form aforesaid by the court found to be due and also his damages aforesaid in form aforesaid assessed together with his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended and
---
**Viewer Page 222** (rcdbook1830_06_0221.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 218
---
**Viewer Page 223** (rcdbook1830_06_0222.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 219
---
**Viewer Page 224** (rcdbook1830_06_0223.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 220
---
**Viewer Page 225** (rcdbook1830_06_0224.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 221
---
**Viewer Page 226** (rcdbook1830_06_0225.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 222
---
**Viewer Page 227** (rcdbook1830_06_0226.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 223
---
**Viewer Page 228** (rcdbook1830_06_0227.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 224
---
**Viewer Page 229** (rcdbook1830_06_0228.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 225
---
**Viewer Page 230** (rcdbook1830_06_0229.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 226
---
**Viewer Page 231** (rcdbook1830_06_0230.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 227
---
**Viewer Page 232** (rcdbook1830_06_0231.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 228
---
**Viewer Page 233** (rcdbook1830_06_0232.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 229
---
**Viewer Page 234** (rcdbook1830_06_0233.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 230
---
**Viewer Page 235** (rcdbook1830_06_0234.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 231
---
**Viewer Page 236** (rcdbook1830_06_0235.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 232
---
**Viewer Page 237** (rcdbook1830_06_0236.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 233
**Thomas McMasters vs Josiah Winters In F Clarke & Joseph Morrisan**
Claim of property filed by George H Morgan
**Sanford Calvert vs Silas L Duvall**
> Related to Case ID ccr1830.05568.192
Plea filed
**Ralph vs Coleman Duncan**
> Related to Case ID ccr1830.05568.192
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and thereupon also come a Jury to wit John Carman, James H Farris, John Bingham, Walter H Dorsett, Harris Downey, Solomon King, Henry Duval, Fielding Phelps, Peter Mullen, William Wash, Isaac Stoner and Benjamin Lacy twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issues within joined between the parties aforesaid on their oath aforesaid do say as to the first issue within joined between the parties aforesaid that the said defendant is not guilty of the wrongs and trespasses above laid to his charge in manner and form as the said Ralph has above in declaring complained against him and as to the second issue within joined between the parties aforesaid the Jurors aforesaid on their oath aforesaid do say that at the time of the committing of the said supposed trespasses the said Ralph was and still is a slave and thereupon the said plaintiff by his attorney aforesaid moves the court do grant him a new trial in this case
Court adjourned until monday 5th Instant 10 O'Clock Forenoon
Monday 5th December 1831 Court did not meet to day on account of the Inclemency of the weather
Tuesday 6th December 1831 Court adjourned by virtue of an order from the Judge directed to the Sheriff until Monday 12th instant which said order is as follows - "You will be pleased to adjourn the court till monday have abated- At my Chambers, Tuesday 6 Dec 1831 Will C Carr To the Sheriff of St Louis County"
Monday 12th December 1831 On this day the court is adjourned until Monday the Nineteenth of December instant by virtue of an order from the Judge thereof directed to the sheriff of this county which said order is as follow, "You will adjourn the court till Monday the 19th instant It being out of my power to hold it present from sickness- Will C Carr- Monday 12 Dec 1831 Sheriff of St Louis County"-
Monday 19th December 1831 Court met pursuant to adjournment present same Judge
**Wilson P Hunt vs Anderson Bowles**
On motion of the plaintiff it is ordered that he have leave to take from the files the note on which this action is founded on his leaving a copy thereof.
**Hezekiah Sanders vs Aaron Bennett**
Attachment on Execution The said plaintiff having filed his interrogatories to be answered by David Martin Garnishee summoned upon execution against Aaron Bennett the said David Martin appears and by his answer admits that some time last Spring on summer on settlement between said Gar
This Judgment is satisfied See Execution book No 3 page 129
---
**Viewer Page 238** (rcdbook1830_06_0237.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 234
---
**Viewer Page 239** (rcdbook1830_06_0238.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 235
---
**Viewer Page 240** (rcdbook1830_06_0239.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 236
---
**Viewer Page 241** (rcdbook1830_06_0240.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 237
---
**Viewer Page 242** (rcdbook1830_06_0241.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 238
---
**Viewer Page 243** (rcdbook1830_06_0242.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 239
---
**Viewer Page 244** (rcdbook1830_06_0243.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 240
---
**Viewer Page 245** (rcdbook1830_06_0244.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 241
---
**Viewer Page 246** (rcdbook1830_06_0245.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 242
may require it and that the said Vina the plaintiff shall not be taken or removed out of the Jurisdiction of this court and that the shall not be subject to any severity of treatment on account of her said application for freedom and the court do further order that the Sheriff of the county of Saint Louis in whose custody the said vina now is do hire out the said Vina to the best advantage from time to time during the pendency of this suit and that he take a bond from the person hiring said petitioner conditioned according to law
**Louisa vs Sanford Calvert**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06745.021
On motion of the plaintiff by her attorney it is ordered by the court that the Sheriff of the county of Saint Louis in whose custody now is do hire out the said Louisa to the best advantage from time to time during the pendency of this suit and that he take bond from the person hiring said petitioner conditioned according to law
**John Mullanphy vs James R Pullen**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and the said defendant although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he pleaded to the action aforesaid of him the said plaintiff whereby the said plaintiff remains therein undefended against him wherefore the said plaintiff ought to recover but because it is unknown to the court what damage the said plaintiff hath sustained by reason of the nonperformance of the promises and undertakings in his declaration men- -tioned therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff of the county of Saint Louis that he summon twelve good and lawful men of his county that they be and appear at the next March term of this court then and there to Enquire what damage the said plaintiff hath sustained by reason of the premises and the same day is given to the said defendant
**Lambert Salle dit Lajoye vs Peter Primm**
On motion of the Plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered that a survey of the premises in dispute be made by the county surveyor showing the different pretensions of the claimants and the true situation of the property as appears to him and that he make five copies of said survey
**Lambert Sable dit Lajoye vs Sullivan Blood**
On motion of the Plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered that a survey of the promises in dispute be made by the county surveyor shewing the different pretensions of the claimants and the true situation of the property as appears to him and that he made five copies of said survey
**Felix Coonce vs Jacob Judy**
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered that a survey of the premises in dispute be made by the county surveyor, shewing the different pretensions of the clam- -ants and the true situation of the property as appears to him, and that he make five copies of said survey
**Solomon H Robbins vs Xavier Dugal**
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered that a survey of the promises in dispute be made by the county surveyor shewing the different pretensions of the claimants and the true situation of the property as appears to him, and that he make five copies of said survey
**Samuel McKee vs Stewart McKee, J Bates & K Catheant**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and says he will not further prosecute his writ of certiorare in this case but voluntarily suffers the same to be discontinued therefore it is considered that the said plaintiff take nothing by his said writ and that the said defendants go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said Stewart McKee, Joseph Bates and Robert Catheart recover against the said Samuel McKee their costs and charges by them about their suit before the Justices expended and also about their
---
**Viewer Page 247** (rcdbook1830_06_0246.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 243
---
**Viewer Page 248** (rcdbook1830_06_0247.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 244
---
**Viewer Page 249** (rcdbook1830_06_0248.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 245
Sellick B Andrews be notified that an action of assumpsit damages One Hundred and fifty dollars has been commenced against him by the said Eli Mintoni that a writ of attachment has issued against his estate and that unless he be and appear at the next March term of this court and plead to the action aforesaid according to law a Judgment will be entered against him and his said Estate sold to satisfy the same and it is further ordered that a copy of this order be inserted for four weeks successively in some Newspaper published in the city of St. Louis and at least twenty days before the next March term of this court.
Court adjourned until To Morrow morning 10 O'Clock
Thursday 22nd December 1831 Court met pursuant to adjournment present same Judge
**Christian Seabaugh vs Josiah Winters & John F Clark**
> Related to Case ID ccr1830.05568.192
Replication filed
**William Bartlett vs Josiah Winters & John F Clark**
Replication filed
**Henry S Coxe vs Ephraim Town**
the defendant moves the court to grant him a new trial in this cause for reasons filed therefor which motion upon mature deliberation is by the court overruled
**Henry Shaw vs John D Daggett & Enoch Price**
The defendants by their attorney move the court to grant them a new trial in this case for reasons filed therefor which motion upon mature deliberation is by the court overruled: therefore it is considered that the said Henry Shaw recover against the said John D Daggett and Enoch Price his damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Jury assessed and also his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution- Bill of Exception filed
This Judgment is satisfied see Execution Book No 3 page 199
**Ralph vs Coleman Duncan**
> Related to Case ID ccr1830.05568.192
Now at this day come again the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and thereupon on mature deliberation the motion for a new trial in this case is by the court overruled therefore it is considered that the said Plaintiff take nothing by his said suit and that the said defendant go thereof without day and the said plaintiff files his bill of Exceptions and also files his affidavit and prays an appeal to the Supreme Court which is granted and the Record and proceedings are ordered to be certified up accordingly
**John & Augustus Kerr vs Peter Primm**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by their attorney and the said defen- dant although solemmly called comes not but makes default not Hath he pleaded to the action aforesaid of them the said plaintiffs whereby the said plaintiffs remain therein undefended against them wherefore the said plaintiffs ought to recover but because it is unknown to the court what damage the said plaintiffs have sustained by reason of the non performance of the promises and undertakings in their declaration mentioned therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff of the County of St Louis that he summon twelve good and lawful men of his county that they be and appear at the next March term of this court then and enquire what damage the said plaintiffs have sustained by reason of the premises and the same day is given to the said defendant
**Clayton Tiffin vs Settleberry Winningham**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and the said defendant although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he pleaded to the action aforesaid of him the said plaintiff whereby the said plaintiff remains therein undefended against him wherefore the said plaintiff ought to recover but because it is unknown to the court what
---
**Viewer Page 250** (rcdbook1830_06_0249.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 246
---
**Viewer Page 251** (rcdbook1830_06_0250.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 247
---
**Viewer Page 252** (rcdbook1830_06_0251.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 248
---
**Viewer Page 253** (rcdbook1830_06_0252.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 249
---
**Viewer Page 254** (rcdbook1830_06_0253.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 250
---
**Viewer Page 255** (rcdbook1830_06_0254.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 251
---
**Viewer Page 256** (rcdbook1830_06_0255.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 252
---
**Viewer Page 257** (rcdbook1830_06_0256.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 253
---
**Viewer Page 258** (rcdbook1830_06_0257.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 254
---
**Viewer Page 259** (rcdbook1830_06_0258.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 255
---
**Viewer Page 260** (rcdbook1830_06_0259.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 256
---
**Viewer Page 261** (rcdbook1830_06_0260.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 257
---
**Viewer Page 262** (rcdbook1830_06_0261.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 258
---
**Viewer Page 263** (rcdbook1830_06_0262.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 259
---
**Viewer Page 264** (rcdbook1830_06_0263.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 260
---
**Viewer Page 265** (rcdbook1830_06_0264.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 261
---
**Viewer Page 266** (rcdbook1830_06_0265.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 262
---
**Viewer Page 267** (rcdbook1830_06_0266.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 263
---
**Viewer Page 268** (rcdbook1830_06_0267.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 264
---
**Viewer Page 269** (rcdbook1830_06_0268.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 265
---
**Viewer Page 270** (rcdbook1830_06_0269.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 266
---
**Viewer Page 271** (rcdbook1830_06_0270.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 267
---
**Viewer Page 272** (rcdbook1830_06_0271.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 268
---
**Viewer Page 273** (rcdbook1830_06_0272.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 269
---
**Viewer Page 274** (rcdbook1830_06_0273.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 270
Tuesday 10th April 1932 Court met pursuant to adjournment present as before
**Vincent vs James Duncan**
> Related to Case ID ccr1829.05552.166
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and thereupon also come a Jury to wit, Samuel Vecock, Horatio N Cross, Michael Rourke, Michael Tesson, Henry B Berry, Thomas J Jones, David Coons, Samuel Carlisle, Enoch C Price, Arthur L Johnson Charles Collins and Charles Busserson twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issues within joined between the parties aforesaid on their oath aforesaid do say as to the first issue within joined between the parties aforesaid that he the said James Duncan is not guilty of the wrongs and grievances above laid to his charge in manner and form as the said plaintiff has above in complaining alleged against him and as to the second issue within joined between the parties aforesaid the Jurors aforesaid on their oath aforesaid do say that the said Vincent at the time of the com- -mencement of his action aforesaid was and still is a slave therefore it is considered that the said Vincent take nothing by his said suit and that the said James Duncan go thereof without day.
**Robert Hyslop vs Henry Reily's Adm**
Replications filed
**Stephen B Munn vs Nathan Cole**
Replications filed
**Edward Kenyon vs Diogenes Hill**
continued on the affidavit of the defendant and at his costs
**James Loper vs Arthur L Magenis**
Replications filed
**Oliver Akin vs George A Underhill**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and the said defendant although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he pleaded to the action aforesaid of him the said plaintiff whereby the said plaintiff remains therein undefended against him wherefore the said plaintiff ought to recover and the said plaintiff not requiring a Jury to assess his damages all and singular the premises are by him submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood the court do find that the said plaintiff hath sustained damage by reason of the nonperformance of the promises and undertakings in his declaration mentioned to the sum of one hundred and eighty two dollars twelve cents therefore it is considered that the said Oliver Akin recover against the said George A Underhill his damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the court assessed together with his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution
**The President Directors and Company of the Bank of Missouri vs Angus Lewis Langham & William N Melton & Wilson A Bell**
Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney and the said Wilson A Bell the defendant in this case upon whom process was served although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he answered the petition of the said plaintiffs whereby the said plaintiffs remain therein undefended against them wherefore the said plaintiffs ought to recover and it appearing to the court that there is in arrear and unpaid on the said mortgage the sum of Seventeen thousand five hundred and forty six dollars and sixty nine cents, and that there is also in arrear and unpaid the sum of Elevin thousand and forty two dollars sixty nine cents for interest therein up to this date which said sums the said petitioners are entitled to recover it is thereupon ordered by the court that the said mortgaged premises to wit: all that certain tract or parcel of land lying in said County of St Louis containing one hundred and four arpents and a half arpent being part of the common fields of the big prairie originally granted to Guillaume Biget & the widow Hebert Counded northwardly
---
**Viewer Page 275** (rcdbook1830_06_0274.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 271
---
**Viewer Page 276** (rcdbook1830_06_0275.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 272
---
**Viewer Page 277** (rcdbook1830_06_0276.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 273
expended and also about his appeal in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution-annulled-
**Thenia alias Sarah vs Green Crowder**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06748.008
Replication filed
**Gabriel L Chouteau vs John Louis Provenchee**
Plea filed
**Martin Simpson vs William P Maddox**
Interrogatories filed
**George Hood & Jno C Abbot vs Isaac G Gardner**
Replication to Interpleader filed
**Julia vs Samuel McKinney**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06733.141
Continued at the instance of the plaintiff
**Nancy Richardson Ext & Amos & Rich Richardson Executors Daniel Richardson deceased vs Wm Long Eli Musick & Nancy his wife & Isabella L Mackay**
Now at this day come the plaintiffs by their attorney and say they will not further prosecute their said action against the said defendants but voluntarily suffer the same to be discontinued therefore it is considered that the said plaintiffs take nothing by their said suit and that the said defendants go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said William L Long, Eli Musick and Nancy his wife late Nancy Long, and Isabella L Mackay late Isabella L Long, recover against the said Nancy Richardson Executris Amos Richardson and Richard Richardson Executors of Daniel Richardson deceased their costs and charges by them about their defence in this behalf expended and that they have thereof Execution against the goods and chattels lands and tenements which were of the said Daniel Richardson deceased at the time of his death in the hands of his said Executors to be administered
**Harvey Beyeau vs John B Mousette**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney who not requiring a Jury to assess his damages all and singular the premises are by him submitted to the Court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood the court do find that the said plaintiff hath sustained damage by reason of the nonperformance of the promises and undertakings in his declaration mentioned to the sum of One Hundred and ten dollars therefore it is considered that the said Harvey Beyeau recover against the said John B Mousette his damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the court assessed together with his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended and that he have thereof Execution
**Lefrenier J Chauvin vs Isham B Sexton**
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and neither of the parties requiring a Jury all and singular the premises are by them submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood the court do find as to the issue within joined between the parties aforesaid that the said Isham B Sexton is guilty of the said trespass in the said declaration mentioned in manner and form as the said plaintiff hath above thereof in declaring alleged as to three messuages three barns, three stables forty acres of meadow land, forty acres of arable land, forty acres of woodland, and forty acres of other land all situate lying and being in the county of Saint Louis and the said plaintiff consenting to take nominal damages the court assess the damage of the said plaintiff by him sustained by reason of the trespass and ejectment in the declaration mentioned to the sum of one cent therefore it is considered that the said Lefrenier J Chauvin recover against the said Isham B Sexton his damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the court assessed together with his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution - and the said plaintiff prays the writ of the State to cause him to have possession of the premises afore- said which is granted
This Judgment is satisfied see Execution book No 3 page 143
---
**Viewer Page 278** (rcdbook1830_06_0277.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 274
---
**Viewer Page 279** (rcdbook1830_06_0278.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 275
---
**Viewer Page 280** (rcdbook1830_06_0279.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 276
---
**Viewer Page 281** (rcdbook1830_06_0280.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 277
---
**Viewer Page 282** (rcdbook1830_06_0281.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 278
---
**Viewer Page 283** (rcdbook1830_06_0282.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 279
---
**Viewer Page 284** (rcdbook1830_06_0283.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 280
---
**Viewer Page 285** (rcdbook1830_06_0284.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 281
---
**Viewer Page 286** (rcdbook1830_06_0285.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 282
---
**Viewer Page 287** (rcdbook1830_06_0286.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 283
---
**Viewer Page 288** (rcdbook1830_06_0287.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 284
**Friday 20th April 1832**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06734.030
Court met pursuant to Adjournment present same Judge
**Lambert Sallé dit Lajoye vs Sullivan Blood**
Continued by consent
**Lambert Sallé dit Lajoye vs Peter Primm._**
Continued by consent
**Jacob J. Allender vs William T. Philips**
Pleas and Replications filed
**Charlotte vs Green Crowder**
> Related to Case ID ccr1832.06749.004
Plea filed
**Edward Fitzgerald's Adminr vs John P Cabanné**
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney leave is given him to amend his declaration by filing additional counts
**Peter vs James Walton**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06734.030
Now at this day come the said defendant by his attorney and the said plaintiff although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he prosecuted his suit in this behalf with effect therefore it is considered that the said plaintiff take nothing by his said suit and that the said defendant go thereof without day
**Pierre A LeTour & Marie his wife vs Rosalie M Saugrain**
Now at this day come the said defendant by her attorney and the said plaintiffs although solemnly called come not but make default nor have they prosecuted their suit in this behalf with effect therefore it is considered that the said plaintiffs take nothing by their said suit and that the said defendant go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said Rosalie M Saugrain recover against the said Pierre A Le Tour and and Marie his wife Her costs and charges by her about her defence in this behalf expended and that she have thereof execution
Court adjourned until Monday morning next the 23rd instant 9 O'Clock
**Monday 23rd April 1832**
Court met pursuant to Adjournment present same Judge.
**Governor to use of Ashton & Beach vs William H Ashley**
Joinder in demurrer to 2nd 12th & 16th Replications and Demurrer to 5th 13th 14th & 17th Rejoinders filed
**Harriett Parmely Administratrix of Sylvanus Parmely deceased vs Isaac W White**
Now at this day come the parties foresaid by their respective attorneys and neither of the parties requiring a Jury all and singular the matters in controversy are by them submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood it is considered by the court that the Judgment of the Justice be reversed and for nought held and esteemed that the said plaintiff take nothing by her said suit and recover against the said Harriett Parmely Administratrix of Sylvanus Parmely deceased his costs and charges by him about his defence before the Justice expended and also about his appeal in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution against the goods and chattels lands and tenements which were of the said Sylvanus Parmely deceased at the time of his death in the hands of his said Admin- istratrix to be administered
**John Shannon vs John Jones**
On motion of the attorney for the plaintiff it is ruled that a dedimus issue to any
---
**Viewer Page 289** (rcdbook1830_06_0288.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 285
Judge or Justice of the peace of the district of Columbia to take the depositions of witnesses to be read in Evidence on the trial of this cause on the part of the plaintiff
**Thomas M Clark vs George F Strother**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and the said defendant in his own proper person and the parties aforesaid consenting that the Judgment on this be affirmed therefore it is considered by the court that the Judgment of the Justice be affirmed and that the said Thomas M clark recover against the said George F Strother and [ ?] Colburn the security in the appeal bond the sum of ninety dollars for this debt and also the sum of six dollars nineteen and one half cents for his damages by him sustained by reason of the detention of said debt together with his costs and charges by him about his suit before the Justice Expen- -ded and also in this behalf expended and that he have thereof Execution and the parties consent to a Stay of execution until the first day of June next
**Hiram Nocholson vs John Gantt & Jefferson Blackwell**
> Related to Case ID ccr1830.06738.005
Now at this day come the said defendants by their attorney and the said Plaintiff although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he prosecuted his suit in this behalf with effect therefore it is considered by the court that the Judgment of the Justice be reversed and for nought held and esteemed that the said plaintiff take nothing by his said suit and that the said defendants go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said John Gantt and Jefferson Blackwell recover against the said Hiram Nicholson their costs and charges by them about their defence before the Justice expended and also about their appeal in this behalf expended and that they have thereof execution
**Lambert Salle dit Lajoye vs Sullivan Blood**
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered that a survey of the premises in dispute be made by the county surveyor shewing the different pretensions of the claimants and the true situation of the property as appears to him and that he make five copies of said survey.-
**Lambert Salle dit Lajoye vs Peter Primm**
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered that a survey of the premises in dispute be made by the county Surveyor shewing the different pretensions of the claimants and the true situation of the property as appears to him and that he make five copies of said survey.-
**Jack vs Charles Collins**
> Related to Case ID ccr1830.06738.005
it is ordered by the court that this suit be dismissed from the docket at the costs of the defendant
**Richard J Wilkinson vs Wilson A. Bell & Matthew Johnson**
On motion of the defendants by their attorney it is ruled that the said plaintiff do file security for costs at least thirty days before the next July term of this court
**Charles Collins vs. Charles H Davis & James Lakenan**
On motion of C H Davis one of the defendants by his attorney it is ordered by the court that a summons issue to the said James Lakenan requiring him to appear and shew cause why a severance should not be awarded and the said Charles H Davis be permitted to defend alone
**Francis Foucher vs Simon Bertrand**
continued
**Samuel Wiggins vs John Gantt**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney who not requring a Jury to assess his damages all and singular the premises are by him
---
**Viewer Page 290** (rcdbook1830_06_0289.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 286
---
**Viewer Page 291** (rcdbook1830_06_0290.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 287
---
**Viewer Page 292** (rcdbook1830_06_0291.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 288
---
**Viewer Page 293** (rcdbook1830_06_0292.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 289
---
**Viewer Page 294** (rcdbook1830_06_0293.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 290
---
**Viewer Page 295** (rcdbook1830_06_0294.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 291
---
**Viewer Page 296** (rcdbook1830_06_0295.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 292
---
**Viewer Page 297** (rcdbook1830_06_0296.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 293
---
**Viewer Page 298** (rcdbook1830_06_0297.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 294
---
**Viewer Page 299** (rcdbook1830_06_0298.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 295
---
**Viewer Page 300** (rcdbook1830_06_0299.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 296
---
**Viewer Page 301** (rcdbook1830_06_0300.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 297
---
**Viewer Page 302** (rcdbook1830_06_0301.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 298
---
**Viewer Page 303** (rcdbook1830_06_0302.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 299
---
**Viewer Page 304** (rcdbook1830_06_0303.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 300
---
**Viewer Page 305** (rcdbook1830_06_0304.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 301
---
**Viewer Page 306** (rcdbook1830_06_0305.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 302
---
**Viewer Page 307** (rcdbook1830_06_0306.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 303
---
**Viewer Page 308** (rcdbook1830_06_0307.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 304
---
**Viewer Page 309** (rcdbook1830_06_0308.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 305
---
**Viewer Page 310** (rcdbook1830_06_0309.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 306
---
**Viewer Page 311** (rcdbook1830_06_0310.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 307
---
**Viewer Page 312** (rcdbook1830_06_0311.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 308
---
**Viewer Page 313** (rcdbook1830_06_0312.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 309
---
**Viewer Page 314** (rcdbook1830_06_0313.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 310
---
**Viewer Page 315** (rcdbook1830_06_0314.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 311
---
**Viewer Page 316** (rcdbook1830_06_0315.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 312
---
**Viewer Page 317** (rcdbook1830_06_0316.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 313
---
**Viewer Page 318** (rcdbook1830_06_0317.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 314
---
**Viewer Page 319** (rcdbook1830_06_0318.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 315
---
**Viewer Page 320** (rcdbook1830_06_0319.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 316
---
**Viewer Page 321** (rcdbook1830_06_0320.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 317
---
**Viewer Page 322** (rcdbook1830_06_0321.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 318
---
**Viewer Page 323** (rcdbook1830_06_0322.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 319
---
**Viewer Page 324** (rcdbook1830_06_0323.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 320
---
**Viewer Page 325** (rcdbook1830_06_0324.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 321
---
**Viewer Page 326** (rcdbook1830_06_0325.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 322
---
**Viewer Page 327** (rcdbook1830_06_0326.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 323
---
**Viewer Page 328** (rcdbook1830_06_0327.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 285
**David Lawrence vs John Mullanphy**
Assumpsits
On mature deliberation it is considered by the court that the motion for a new Trial in this case be sustained that the Verdict of the Jury be set aside and a new trial granted on condition that the said defendant do pay the costs incurred in this case at this term.-
**Thomas Phillips vs John Mosely**
The defendant by his attorney moves the court to set aside the finding and Judgment in this case and to grant him a new Trial and files his reasons therefor which motion upon mature deliberation is by the court overruled
**Pierre A LeTour & Marie his wife vs Rosalie M Laugrain**
The plaintiffs by their attorney move the court to set aside the Judgment of non suit entered in this case and file their reasons therefor which motion upon mature deliberation is by the court overruled- Bill of Exceptions filed
**George Carlisle & John W Mason vs Abraham Tox**
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and neither of the parties requiring a Jury all and singular the premises are by them submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood the court do find as to the issue within joined between the parties aforesaid that he the said defendant did undertake and promise in manner and form as the said plaintiffs have above in declaring alleged against him and they assess the damage of the said plaintiffs by them sustained by reason of the nonperformance of the promises and undertakings in their declaration mentioned to the sum of Three Hundred and Eighty nine dollars ninety one cents therefore it is considered that the said George Carlisle and John Mason recover against the said Abraham Fox their damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the court assessed together with their costs and charges by them about their suit in this behalf expended and that they have thereof execution- Bill of Exceptions filed-
**John Thornton vs John B Wallace**
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and thereupon all and singular the matters aforesaid whereof the parties afore- -said have put themselves upon the Judgment of the court are by them submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood for that it appears to the court that the third plea of the said defendant by him above pleaded and the matters and things therein con- -tained in manner and form as the same are therein stated and set forth are not sufficient in law to bar and preclude the said plaintiff from maintaining his said action against the defendant therefore it is considered that the demurrer of the said plaintiff to the third plea of the said defend- -ant be sustained
**Benjamin Wilder & Jacob Cannon vs Henry Atkinson**
On motion of the defendant by his attorney it is ruled that further proceedings in this case be stayed until the said plaintiffs shall have furnished a bill of particulars as heretofore ordered
**Major, Aldermen & Citizens of the City of St Louis vs Joseph Lee**
The plaintiffs by their attorney move the court to grant them a new trial in this case and file their reasons therefor which motion upon mature deliberations by the court overruled
**Matthias McGirk vs Helen Chevalier's Administrator**
The plaintiff by his attorney moves the court to grant him a New Trial in this case and files his reasons therefor which motion upon mature deliberation is by the court overruled- Bill of Exceptions filed-
**Matthias McGirk vs Helen Chevalier's Administrator**
Matthias McGirk the plaintiff in this case files his affidavit and prays an appeal to the Supreme Court and thereupon the said Matthias McGirk
---
**Viewer Page 306** (rcdbook1830_06_0305.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 302
**Pleasant W Rose vs Patrick Carnes**
> Related to Case ID ccr1829.05552.166
Now at this day come the said defendant by his attorney and the said plaintiff although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he prosecuted his suit in this behalf with effect therefore it is considered by the court that the Judgment of the Justice be reversed and for nought held and esteemed that the said plaintiff take nothing by his said suit and that the said defendant go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said Patrick Carnes recover against the said Pleasant W Rose his costs and charges by him about his defence before the Justice expended and also about his appeal in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution.
James Bailey an Insolvent debtor appears here in court and having heretofore proven to the court the publications of notice as required by law and there being no allegations filed against him he is by the court finally discharged under the Insolvent laws of this state and exempted from arrest or imprisonment by virtue of or for any debt, contract, covenant, promise or agreement due from or contracted, or entered into by him individually or Jointly with any other person before his application to the Justice of the County Court for his discharge which appears by the papers returned in this case to have been on the seventeenth day of November one thousand eight hundred and thirty one
**Vincent vs James Duncan**
> Related to Case ID ccr1829.05552.166
Bill of Exceptions filed
**Edward P Wheeler & William Waddingham vs William Bowman**
On mature deliberation it is considered by the court that the motion of the said defendant made at the last November term of this court to Quash the execution issued in this case be overruled.-
**David Lawrence vs John Mullanphy**
Now at this day come again the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and upon mature deliberation thereupon had it considered by the court that the motion of the said defendant in arrest of Judgment be overruled therefore it is considered that the said David Lawrence recover against the said John Mullanphy his damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Jury assessed and also his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution
**James Philips vs Samuel Worthington**
The defendant by his attorney moves the court to grant him a new trial in this case and files his reasons therefor which motion upon mature deliberation is by the court overruled.
**Robert Southridge vs Edward Holden**
The plaintiff by his attorney moves the court to set aside the Judgment of non suit entered in this case and files his reasons therefor which motion upon mature deliberation is by the court overruled
John K Walker Sheriff of the County of Saint Louis personally appears here in open Court and acknowledges the Execution of a deed from his as Sheriff as aforesaid to John McCausland therein named for a lot of Ground in the City of St Louis in Block Fifty five fronting eastwardly sixty feet on Church on second Main Street and running back three hundred feet to third street bounded east by second or church street North by lots of Francis Boucher and Joseph Jovial West by third street and South by almond street sold by virtue of an Execution issued from the Clerks office of the Circuit Court for the County of Saint Louis in favor of David Kayle and John McCausland against James Gunsols- and John McCausland being the highest and last bidder for the same as the price and sum of Twenty dollars the same was stricken off and sold to said John McCausland
Mary P Leduc and Rene Paul subscribing witnesses to a deed of Emancipation executed by There- Cere Chouteau to Lucile therein named and who are personally known to the Judge of this Court to be
---
**Viewer Page 312** (rcdbook1830_06_0311.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 308
**Mark Moss vs Dennis Marks**
> Related to Case ID ccr1829.05552.166
Now at this day come the said defendant by his attorney and the said plaintiff although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he prosecuted his suit in this behalf with effect therefore it is considered by the court that the Judgment of the Justice be reversed and for nought held and esteemed that the said plaintiff take nothing by his said suit and that the said defendant go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said Dennis Marks recover against the said Mark Moss his costs and charges by him about his defence before the Justice expended and also about his appeal in this behalf expended and that he have there -of execution
**John Lemonde vs George Carsner**
Now at this day come the said defendant by his attorney and the said plaintiff although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he prosecuted his suit in this behalf with effect therefore it is considered by the court that the Judgment of the Justice be reversed and for nought held and esteemed that the said plaintiff take nothing by his said suit and that the said defendant go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said George Carsner recover against the said John Lemonde his costs and charges by him about his defence before the Justice expend- -ed and also about his defence in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution
**Vincent vs James Duncan**
> Related to Case ID ccr1829.05552.166
The plaintiff by his attorney files his affidavit in this case and prays an appeal to the Supreme Court of this state whereupon it is ordered by the court that the appeal be granted and that the Record and proceedings be certified up accordingly
**Caleb Cope & Matthew C Cope vs James Bailey (Impleaded)**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by their attorney and the said James Bailey although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he pleaded to the action aforesaid of them the said plaintiffs whereby the said plaintiffs remain therein undefended against them wherefore the said plaintiffs ought to recover against the said defendant and the said plaintiffs not requiring a Jury to assess their damages all and singular the premises are by them submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood the court do find that the said plaintiffs have sustained damage by reason of the nonperformance of the promises and undertakings in their declaration mentioned to the sum of Sixteen hundred and ninety seven dollars twenty three cents therefore it is considered that the said Caleb Cope and Matthew C Cope recover against the said James Baily their damages aforsaid in form aforesaid by the court assessed together with their costs and charges by them about their suit in this behalf expended and that they have thereof execution.
**Jacob Roth & Louis Martin vs Richard L Head**
Now at this day come the said defendant by his attorney and the said plaintiffs although solemnly called comes not but make default nor have they prosecuted their wit in this behalf with effect therefore it is considered that the Judgment of the Justice be reversed and for nought held and esteemed that the said plaintiffs take nothing by their said suit and that the said defendant go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said Richard L Head recover against the said Jacob Roth and Louis Martin his costs and charges by him about his defence before the Justice expended and also about his appeal in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution
**Aja Wilqus vs Joseph Benjamin & wife**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and the said defendants although solemnly called come not but make default nor have they pleaded to the action aforesaid of him the said plaintiff whereby the said plaintiff remains therein undefended against him wherefore the said plaintiff ought to recover but because it is unknown to the court
---
**Viewer Page 319** (rcdbook1830_06_0318.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 315
**Mary B Ponrose vs Hardage Lane**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06745.021
continued
**Wm Maddox & Aug Bowles vs Noah C Parsons**
Continued
**William Hill vs Oliver Hudson**
continued
**William Hill vs Oliver Hudson**
continued
**ChD StVrain vs Pierre A Laveaume**
continued
**Josiah Lawrence vs William Maddox**
continued at the costs of the Plaintiff
**Mariquette vs Samuel T McKinney**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06740.030
continued
**Geo W Martin & Ben H Green vs Charles Collins**
continued
**William Tighe vs Isaac G Gardner**
continued
**Henry Underhill vs William C Batchelor**
continued
**Alexander Fryer vs John Whitehill**
continued
**Alexander Fryer vs Joseph Murphy**
continued
**George Pitzer vs C.M. Price's Estate**
continued
**John Carrot vs Jacob O Munday**
continued
**Joseph Hyattes Adn vs Robert Wash**
continued
**Louisa vs Sandford Calvert**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06745.021
continued on application for plaintiff
**Stephen W Foreman vs Ch Keemle & Jam S Brooks**
answer of Joshua B Brant filed
**John & William Finney & Joseph Tabor vs James Samuel P & Jeremiah Bailey**
Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney and say they will not further prosecute their said action against the said defendants but voluntarily suffer the same to be discontinued therefore it is considered that the said plaintiffs take nothing by their said suit and that the said defendants go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said James Baily, Samuel B Bailey and Jeremiah Baily recover against the said John Finney, William Finney and Joseph Tabor their costs and charges by them about their defence in this behalf expended and that they have thereof execution.
**Charles Collins vs Oliver Dubois**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and says he will not further prosecute his suit in this behalf against the said defendant but voluntarily suffers the same to be discontinued therefore it is considered that the said plaintiff take nothing by his said suit and that the said defendant go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said Oliver Dubois recover against the said Charles Collins his costs and charges by him about his defence in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution
**Hezekiah C Simmons to use of vs Pierre A Labeaume**
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and neither of the parties requiring a Jury all and singular the premises are by them submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood the court do find as to the issue within joined between the parties aforesaid that he the said Pierre A Labeaume did undertake and promise in manner and form as the said Simmons the plaintiff hath above
---
**Viewer Page 323** (rcdbook1830_06_0322.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 319
Court adjourned until To Morrow morning 9 O'Clock
Saturday 5th May 1832 Court met pursuant to adjournment present same Judge
**Samuel Merry vs Constance Chouteau**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06748.008
The defendant by her attorney moves the court to grant her a new Trial in this case and files her reasons therefor which motion upon mature deliberation is by the court overruled
**Samuel Marry & Clayton Tiffin vs Constance Chouteau**
The defendant by her attorney moves the court to grant her a new Trial in this case and files her reasons therefor which motion upon mature deliberation is by the court overruled
**Allen C Tanner vs John Putman**
it is ordered by the court that the appeal in this case be docketed and that the said plaintiff & appellant give notice of said appeal as required by law previous to the next July term of this court
**Phineas Block vs Martin Thomas & William Elliot**
Edward Bates esquire attorney of Record for the plaintiff in this case appears here in open court and acknowledges to have recieved full and entire satisfaction of the Judgment rendered against the said defendants in favor of said plaintiff on the thirtieth day of March, One thousand eight hundred and thirty one
**Governor to use of vs William H Ashley**
Surrebutters filed
**Joseph Woods & George Woods vs Esther Woods & William Woods**
Petition for partition and demurrer to petition filed
**William A Coons vs John L Jones**
**John Carman vs John L Jones**
The court audit and allow an account of John K Walker Sheriff of the County of Saint Louis amounting to One hundred and seventy three dollars Eighty seven and one half cents for the expences of keeping the property attached in the case to be taxed as costs and retained out of money made on Execution the defendant court adjourned until Monday morning 7th Instant 9 O'Clock
Monday 7th May 1832 Court met pursuant to adjournment present as before
**Thomas Eades vs James & Joseph Neill**
continued at the costs of the defendants
**Thenia alias Sarah vs Green Crowder**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06748.008
On motion of the plaintiff by her attorney it is Ruled that a dedimus issue to any Judge or Justice of the peace of the State of Illinois to take the depositions of witnesses to be read in evidence on the trial of this case on the part of the plaintiff
**Charlotte vs Green Crowder**
> Related to Case ID ccr1832.06749.004
On motion of the plaintiff by her attorney it is Ruled that a Dedimus issue to any Judge or Justice
---
**Viewer Page 328** (rcdbook1830_06_0327.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 324
**Assumpsit David Lawrence vs John Mullanphy**
> Related to Case ID ccr1832.06751.013
On mature deliberation it is considered by the court that the motion for a New Trial in this case be sustained, that the Verdict of the Jury be set aside and a New Trial granted on condition that the said defendant do pay the costs incurred in this case at this term.-
**Thomas Phillips vs John Mosely**
The defendant by his attorney moves the court to set aside the finding and Judgment in this case and to grant him a new Trial and files his reasons therefor which motion upon mature deliberation is by the court overruled
**Pierre A LeJour & Marie his wife vs Rosalie M Saugrain**
The plaintiffs by their attorney move the court to set aside the Judgment of non suit entered in this case and file their reasons therefor which motion upon mature deliberation is by the Court overruled- Bill of Exceptions filed
**George Carlisle & John W. Mason vs Abraham Fox**
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and neither of the parties requiring a Jury all and singular the premises are by them submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood the court do find as to the issue within joined between the parties aforesaid that he the said defendant did undertake and promise in manner and form as the said plaintiffs have above in declaring alleged against him and they assess the damage of the said plaintiffs by them sustained by reason of the nonperformance of the promises and undertakings in their declaration mentioned to the sum of Three Hundred and Eighty nine dollars ninety one cents therefore it is considered that the said George Carlisle and John W Mason recover against the said Abraham Fox their damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the court assessed together with their costs and charges by them about their suit in this behalf expended and that they have thereof execution- Bill of Exceptions filed -
**John Thornton vs John B. Wallace**
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and thereupon all and singular the matters aforesaid whereof the parties afore- said have put themselves upon the Judgment of the court are by them submitted to the court which being seen heard and by the court here fully understood for that it appears to the court that the third plea of the said defendant by him above pleaded and the matters and things therein con- -tained in manner and form as the same are therein stated and set forth are not sufficient in law to bar and preclude the said plaintiff from maintaining his said action against the defendant therefore is is considered that the demurrer of the said plaintiff to the third plea of the said defend- -ant be sustained
**Benjamin Wilder & Jacob H Cannon vs Henry Atkinson**
On motion of the defendant by his attorney it is ordered that further proceedings in this case be stayed until the said plaintiffs shall have furnished a bill of particulars as heretofore ordered
**Mayor, Aldermen & Citizens of the City of St Louis vs Joseph Lee**
The Plaintiffs by their attorney move the court to grant them a new trial in this cas and file their reasons therefor which motion upon mature deliberation is by the court overruled
**Matthias McGirk vs Helen Chevalier's Administrator**
The plaintiff by his attorney moves the court to grant him a New Trial in this case and files his reasons therefor whcih motion upon mature deliberation is by the court overruled- Bill of Exceptions filed-
**Matthias McGirk vs. Helen Chevalier's Administrator**
Matthias McGirk the plaintiff in this case files his affidavit and prays an appeal to the Supreme Court and thereupon the said Matthias McGirk
---
**Viewer Page 329** (rcdbook1830_06_0328.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 325
---
**Viewer Page 330** (rcdbook1830_06_0329.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 326
---
**Viewer Page 331** (rcdbook1830_06_0330.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 327
---
**Viewer Page 332** (rcdbook1830_06_0331.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 328
---
**Viewer Page 333** (rcdbook1830_06_0332.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 329
---
**Viewer Page 334** (rcdbook1830_06_0333.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 330
here in court freely remits to the said defendant the sum of Three hundred and forty one dollars thirty Eight cents part and parcel of the interest recovered in this case therefore it is considered that the said defendant be acquitted and discharged from the said sum so as aforesaid remitted
**The Mayor of City St Louis vs Armstead Lawless**
> Related to Case ID ccr1830.05568.192
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys and the said plaintiffs by their said attorney say they will not further prosecute their said suit against the said defendant but voluntarily suffer the same to be discontinued therefore it is considered that the Judgment of the Justice be reversed and for nought held and esteemed that the said plaintiffs take nothing by their said suit and that the said defendant go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said Armstead Lawless recover against the Mayor Alder- -men and citizens of the city of St Louis his costs and charges by him about his defence before the Justice expended and also about his appeal in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution
**Ralph vs Coleman Duncan**
> Related to Case ID ccr1830.05568.192
It is ordered by the court that Coleman Duncan be permitted to retain possession of the said Ralph upon condition that he enter into Recognizance with sufficient security in the sum of Six hundred dollars conditioned that the said Ralph the petitioner shall at all times during the pendency of this suit have reasonable liberty of attending his counsel and that the said Ralph shall not be removed out of the Jurisdiction of this court and that he shall not be subjected to any severity of treatment because of his application for freedom and Isaac A Letcher and David Lawrence are approved of by the court as securities in the said Recognizance
**Thomas F Smith and Emilie his wife Henry Chouteau and Edward Chouteau vs Rene Paul & Eulalie his wife Gabriel Paul & Louise his wife Auguste Chouteau & Gabriel Chouteau**
On motion of the petitioners by their attorney it is ordered by the court that the letter A. The initial letter of the middle name of Auguste Chouteau be inserted throughout the record and proceedings in this case so that said proceedings stand in the name of Auguste A Chouteau the son of Auguste Chouteau deceased
**Thomas F Smith and Emilie his wife Henry Chouteau and Edward Chouteau vs Rene Paul & Eulalie his wife Gabriel Paul & Louise his wife Auguste A Chouteau & Gabriel Chouteau**
This order is Expunged
Joseph C Brown, Henry Von Phul, James Clemens Junior and John O'Fallon, four of the commissioners appointed by this Court to make partition in this case having on the second day of this month returned filed and ack -nowledged their report of partition in said case under their hands and seals which report embrace a survey of the premises and a division of the land mentioned in the petition of the petitioners so far as the same could be made by them. The parties in this case pray the court for Judgment upon the return of said commissioners and no cause being shewn by any of the parties against the Justice or Regu- -larity of said petition and return the court have confirmed and they do hereby confirm the same and do adjudge that the partition made by the said commissioners be firm and effectual forever between all the parties thereto and in manner as follows that is to say. To Auguste A Chouteau is allotted lot Number 1 (one) in the first series of lots as represented on said survey which is bounded south by Clark Street (so called) North by Lucas Avenue cast by a street sixty feet wide called tenth street west by a street eighty feet wide dividing it from lot Number 2 of same series allotted to Henry Chouteau also Lot number 7 (seven) in the second series of lots as aforesaid bounded south by Couteau avenue west by Pratte avenue dividing it from lot number 7 in the third series, and north by lot No 6 in the second series alloted to Henry Chouteau, also lot number 7 (seven) in the third series of lots as aforesaid bounded south by Chouteau avenue, East by Pratte avenue separating it from lot number 7 of the
---
**Viewer Page 335** (rcdbook1830_06_0334.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 331
---
**Viewer Page 336** (rcdbook1830_06_0335.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 332
---
**Viewer Page 337** (rcdbook1830_06_0336.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 333
---
**Viewer Page 338** (rcdbook1830_06_0337.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 334
---
**Viewer Page 339** (rcdbook1830_06_0338.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 335
---
**Viewer Page 340** (rcdbook1830_06_0339.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 336
---
**Viewer Page 341** (rcdbook1830_06_0340.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 337
---
**Viewer Page 342** (rcdbook1830_06_0341.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 338
---
**Viewer Page 343** (rcdbook1830_06_0342.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 339
---
**Viewer Page 344** (rcdbook1830_06_0343.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 340
---
**Viewer Page 345** (rcdbook1830_06_0344.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 341
---
**Viewer Page 346** (rcdbook1830_06_0345.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 342
---
**Viewer Page 347** (rcdbook1830_06_0346.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 343
---
**Viewer Page 348** (rcdbook1830_06_0347.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 344
---
**Viewer Page 349** (rcdbook1830_06_0348.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 345
---
**Viewer Page 350** (rcdbook1830_06_0349.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 346
---
**Viewer Page 351** (rcdbook1830_06_0350.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 347
---
**Viewer Page 352** (rcdbook1830_06_0351.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 348
---
**Viewer Page 353** (rcdbook1830_06_0352.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 349
---
**Viewer Page 354** (rcdbook1830_06_0353.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 350
---
**Viewer Page 355** (rcdbook1830_06_0354.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 351
---
**Viewer Page 356** (rcdbook1830_06_0355.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 352
---
**Viewer Page 357** (rcdbook1830_06_0356.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 353
---
**Viewer Page 358** (rcdbook1830_06_0357.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 354
---
**Viewer Page 359** (rcdbook1830_06_0358.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 355
---
**Viewer Page 360** (rcdbook1830_06_0359.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 356
---
**Viewer Page 361** (rcdbook1830_06_0360.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 357
---
**Viewer Page 362** (rcdbook1830_06_0361.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 358
---
**Viewer Page 363** (rcdbook1830_06_0362.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 359
---
**Viewer Page 364** (rcdbook1830_06_0363.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 360
---
**Viewer Page 365** (rcdbook1830_06_0364.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 361
---
**Viewer Page 366** (rcdbook1830_06_0365.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 362
---
**Viewer Page 367** (rcdbook1830_06_0366.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 363
---
**Viewer Page 368** (rcdbook1830_06_0367.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 364
---
**Viewer Page 369** (rcdbook1830_06_0368.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 365
---
**Viewer Page 370** (rcdbook1830_06_0369.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 366
---
**Viewer Page 371** (rcdbook1830_06_0370.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 367
---
**Viewer Page 372** (rcdbook1830_06_0371.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 368
---
**Viewer Page 373** (rcdbook1830_06_0372.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 369
---
**Viewer Page 374** (rcdbook1830_06_0373.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 370
---
**Viewer Page 375** (rcdbook1830_06_0374.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 371
---
**Viewer Page 376** (rcdbook1830_06_0375.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 372
---
**Viewer Page 377** (rcdbook1830_06_0376.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 373
said petition stated and every part thereof in manner and form as the same is therein stated and set forth and the court do further find that the said defendant is indebted to the said plaintiff in the sum of Seven Hundred dollars as he the said plaintiff hath in his petition alleged and that the said plaintiff hath sustained damage by reason of the detention of said debt to the sum of Seventy six dollars Eighty cents there- -fore it is considered that the said John Miller recover against the said Phineas Bartlett his debt aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Court found to be due and also his damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the court assessed together with his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended and that he have thereof Execution
**The Heirs & Legal Representatives of Vincent Carrico Junior deceased - Petition for Partition**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06746.010
On motion of the Heirs and Legal Representatives of Vincent Carrico Junior deceased by their attorney and it appearing that the property alloted to them and by order of this court of the fourth of May last ordered to be sold, has not been sold as by said order directed- The court therefore doth order that the commissioners heretofore appointed to wit, Francis Nash Cumberland James and John Patterson or a majority of them do proceed to sell the said land so allotted as above said at public vendue to the Highest bidder at the court house door in the City of St Louis on the Fourth monday of September next- Ten per cent of the purchase money to be paid down, and a credit of twelve months to be given for the balance the purchaser giving bond and security with a mortgage on the premises for the payment thereof, and the commissioners aforesaid are directed to give at least twenty days notice of the time, terms and place of the sale of publication in some newspaper printed in the City of St Louis-
Court adjourned until Monday morning next 9 O'Clock
Monday 13th August 1832 Court met pursuant to adjournment present same Judge
**Horatio Belt vs Alfred Benedick**
It is suggested here to the court that since the commencement of this suit the said plaintiff hath died which suggestion is not denied but admitted to be true- and suit abates
John K Walker Sheriff of the county of Saint Louis personally appears here in open court and acknow- -ledges the execution of a deed from him as Sheriff as aforesaid to Augustus H Evans therein named for "a certain piece or lot of ground lying in the city of St Louis containing forty three feet front on oak street and running north fifty nine feet more of less bounded southwardly on oak street, westwardly by a lot of - Murphy Eastwardly by a lot late the property of Apoline Clamorgan and Northwardly by a lot of the heirs of Ceprain Clamorgan it being the same lot described and conveyed in a deed of Charles Collins and wife to Joel Finch and John Whitehill by deed dated the 31st of March 1828 and recorded in book 0 page 454" sold by virtue >of an Execution issued from the Clerk's office of the circuit court for the county of Saint Louis in favor of Augustus H Evans against Alexander Fryer and James R Pullen and the said Augustus H Evans being the highest and last bidder for the same, at the price and sum of thirty dollars the same was stricken off and sold to him the said Augustus H Evans
**A. W. Vanleor W Dixon & J. H. Lanier vs Orlando Kellog**
continued
**Solomon H Robbins vs Xavier Dugal**
continued
**Tenor Washington vs Henry Scott Impl**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06746.010
Now at this day come the said defendant by his attorney and the said plaintiff although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath she prosecuted her suit in this behalf with effect therefore it is considered that the said plaintiff take nothing by her said suit and that the said defendant go thereof without day
---
**Viewer Page 378** (rcdbook1830_06_0377.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 374
---
**Viewer Page 379** (rcdbook1830_06_0378.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 375
---
**Viewer Page 380** (rcdbook1830_06_0379.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 376
---
**Viewer Page 381** (rcdbook1830_06_0380.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 377
---
**Viewer Page 382** (rcdbook1830_06_0381.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 378
---
**Viewer Page 383** (rcdbook1830_06_0382.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 379
---
**Viewer Page 384** (rcdbook1830_06_0383.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 380
---
**Viewer Page 385** (rcdbook1830_06_0384.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 381
---
**Viewer Page 386** (rcdbook1830_06_0385.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 382
---
**Viewer Page 387** (rcdbook1830_06_0386.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 383
---
**Viewer Page 388** (rcdbook1830_06_0387.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 384
---
**Viewer Page 389** (rcdbook1830_06_0388.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 385
---
**Viewer Page 390** (rcdbook1830_06_0389.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 386
---
**Viewer Page 391** (rcdbook1830_06_0390.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 387
---
**Viewer Page 392** (rcdbook1830_06_0391.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 388
---
**Viewer Page 393** (rcdbook1830_06_0392.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 389
---
**Viewer Page 394** (rcdbook1830_06_0393.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 390
---
**Viewer Page 395** (rcdbook1830_06_0394.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 391
---
**Viewer Page 396** (rcdbook1830_06_0395.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 392
---
**Viewer Page 397** (rcdbook1830_06_0396.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 393
---
**Viewer Page 398** (rcdbook1830_06_0397.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 394
---
**Viewer Page 399** (rcdbook1830_06_0398.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 395
---
**Viewer Page 400** (rcdbook1830_06_0399.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 396
---
**Viewer Page 401** (rcdbook1830_06_0400.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 397
---
**Viewer Page 402** (rcdbook1830_06_0401.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 398
---
**Viewer Page 403** (rcdbook1830_06_0402.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 399
---
**Viewer Page 404** (rcdbook1830_06_0403.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 400
---
**Viewer Page 405** (rcdbook1830_06_0404.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 401
---
**Viewer Page 406** (rcdbook1830_06_0405.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 402
---
**Viewer Page 407** (rcdbook1830_06_0406.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 403
---
**Viewer Page 408** (rcdbook1830_06_0407.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 404
---
**Viewer Page 409** (rcdbook1830_06_0408.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 405
---
**Viewer Page 410** (rcdbook1830_06_0409.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 406
---
**Viewer Page 411** (rcdbook1830_06_0410.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 407
---
**Viewer Page 412** (rcdbook1830_06_0411.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 408
---
**Viewer Page 413** (rcdbook1830_06_0412.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 409
---
**Viewer Page 414** (rcdbook1830_06_0413.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 410
---
**Viewer Page 415** (rcdbook1830_06_0414.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 411
---
**Viewer Page 416** (rcdbook1830_06_0415.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 412
---
**Viewer Page 417** (rcdbook1830_06_0416.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 413
---
**Viewer Page 418** (rcdbook1830_06_0417.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 414
---
**Viewer Page 419** (rcdbook1830_06_0418.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 415
---
**Viewer Page 420** (rcdbook1830_06_0419.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 416
---
**Viewer Page 421** (rcdbook1830_06_0420.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 417
---
**Viewer Page 422** (rcdbook1830_06_0421.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 418
---
**Viewer Page 423** (rcdbook1830_06_0422.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 419
---
**Viewer Page 424** (rcdbook1830_06_0423.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 420
---
**Viewer Page 425** (rcdbook1830_06_0424.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 421
---
**Viewer Page 426** (rcdbook1830_06_0425.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 422
---
**Viewer Page 427** (rcdbook1830_06_0426.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 423
---
**Viewer Page 428** (rcdbook1830_06_0427.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 424
---
**Viewer Page 429** (rcdbook1830_06_0428.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 425
---
**Viewer Page 430** (rcdbook1830_06_0429.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 426
---
**Viewer Page 431** (rcdbook1830_06_0430.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 427
---
**Viewer Page 432** (rcdbook1830_06_0431.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 428
---
**Viewer Page 433** (rcdbook1830_06_0432.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 429
---
**Viewer Page 434** (rcdbook1830_06_0433.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 430
---
**Viewer Page 435** (rcdbook1830_06_0434.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 431
---
**Viewer Page 436** (rcdbook1830_06_0435.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 432
---
**Viewer Page 437** (rcdbook1830_06_0436.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 433
---
**Viewer Page 438** (rcdbook1830_06_0437.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 434
---
**Viewer Page 439** (rcdbook1830_06_0438.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 435
---
**Viewer Page 440** (rcdbook1830_06_0439.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 436
---
**Viewer Page 441** (rcdbook1830_06_0440.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 437
---
**Viewer Page 442** (rcdbook1830_06_0441.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 438
---
**Viewer Page 443** (rcdbook1830_06_0442.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 439
---
**Viewer Page 444** (rcdbook1830_06_0443.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 440
---
**Viewer Page 445** (rcdbook1830_06_0444.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 441
---
**Viewer Page 446** (rcdbook1830_06_0445.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 442
---
**Viewer Page 447** (rcdbook1830_06_0446.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 443
---
**Viewer Page 448** (rcdbook1830_06_0447.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 444
---
**Viewer Page 449** (rcdbook1830_06_0448.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 445
---
**Viewer Page 450** (rcdbook1830_06_0449.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 446
this suit be dismissed out of this court
**James Auchinclofs & Oliver F Grant vs Henry Underhill**
Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney and the said defendant although solemnly called come not but makes default nor hath he pleaded to the action aforesaid of them the said plaintiffs whereby the said plaintiffs remaind therein undefended against them wherefore the said plaintiffs ought to recover against the said defendant but because it is unknown to the court what damage the said plaintiffs have sustained by reason of the nonperformance of the promises and undertakings in their declaration mentioned there- -fore it is commanded to the Sheriff of Saint Louis County that he summon twelve good and lawful men of his county that they be and appear at the present term of this court then and there to enquire what damage the plaintiffs have sustained by reason of the premises and the same day is given to the said defendant
**Simon Bertrand vs Francis Fouche**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and the said defendant although solemnly called come not but makes default nor hath he pleaded to the action aforesaid of him the said plaintiff whereby the said plaintiff remains therein undefended against him wherefore the said plaintiff ought to recover against the said defendant but because it is unknown to the court what damage the said plaintiff hath sustained by reason of the nonperformance of the pro- -mises and undertakings in his declaration mentioned therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff of Saint Louis County that he summon twelve good and lawful men of his county that they be and appear at the next July term of this court then and there to enquire what damage the said plaintiff hath sustained by reason of the premises and the same day is given to the said defendant
**James S. Thomas vs William M Read**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and the said defendant although notified according to law comes not but makes default nor hath he filed special bail or pleaded to the action aforesaid of him the said plaintiff whereby the said plaintiff remains therein undefended against him wherefore the said plaintiff ought to recover against the said defendant and the said plaintiff not requiring a Jury all and singular the premises are by him submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood the court do find that the said plaintiff hath sustained damage by reason of the nonperformance of the promises and undertakings in his declaration mentioned to the sum of one hundred and twenty six dollars forty two cents therefore it is considered that the said James S Thomas recover against the said William M Read his damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the court assessed together with his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended
**James S Thomas vs Charles H Veeder**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and the said defendant although notified according to law comes not but makes default nor hath he filed special bail or pleaded to the action aforesaid of him the said plaintiff whereby the said plaintiff remains therein undefended against him wherefore the said plaintiff ought to recover against the said defendant and the said plaintiff not requiring a Jury all and singular the premises are by him submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understoof the court do find that the said plaintiff hath sustained damage by reason of the non performance of the promises and undertakings in his declaration mentioned to the sum of Two Hundred and sixty six dollars fifty eight cents therefore it is considered that the said James S Thomas recover against the said Charles H Veeder his damages afore- -said in form aforesaid by the court assessed together with his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended
Gustavus A Bird Esquire presents to the court the petition of James Wilkinson a man of color praying that he may be permitted to the institute suit against Aaron Young for Establishing his right to
---
**Viewer Page 451** (rcdbook1830_06_0450.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 447
freedom and that he may be permitted to sue as a poor person thereupon the court permit the said James Wilkinson to sue as aforesaid and direct that an action of assault and battery and false imprisonment be brought in the name of the said James Wilkinson and assign the said Gust and A Bird as his counsel and it is ordered by the court that the said Aaron Young permit the said James Wilkinson to have a reasonable liberty of attending his counsel and the court when ocasion may require it and that the said petitioner shall not be taken or removed out of the Jurisdiction of this court or be subject to any severity of treatment on account of his said application for freedom
**William Hill vs Oliver Hudson**
No 6 March 1831
The plaintiff by his attorney consents that the Garnishees summoned in this case be discharged
**William Hill vs Oliver Hudson**
No 36 March 1831
The plaintiff by his attorney consents that the Garnishee summoned in this case be discharged
**Benjamin Owen to use of vs Henry Waddde's Admen & Wm Bennet**
abated
**Hardage Lane vs Joseph Murphy**
Plea filed
**William Matthews vs George Burgess Adm of John Bothick**
Now at this day come the said appellant by his attorney and says he will not further prosecute his appeal in this behalf against the said appelle but volun- -tarily suffers the same to be discontinued therefore it is considered that the said appellant take nothing by his said appeal and that the said appellee go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said George Burgess Administrator of John Bothick deceased recover against the said William Matthews his costs and charges by him about his defence in this behalf expended and also about his defence before the county court expended and that he have thereof execution
This Judgment is satisfied see Execution Book 3- page 181-
**Hardage Lane vs John Whitehill**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and the said defendant although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he pleaded to the action aforesaid of him the said plaintiff whereby the said plaintiff remains therein undefended against him wherefore the said plaintiff ought to recover against the said defendant but because it is unknown to the court what damage the said plaintiff hath sustained by reason of the trespass and ejectment in the declaration mentioned therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff of the county of Saint Louis that he summon twelve good and lawful men of his county that they be and appear at the next July term of this court then and there to enquire what damage the said plaintiff hath sustained by reason of the premises and the same day is given to the said defendant. - Ordered that this entry be expunged
**David P Ingersoll vs James H Davis**
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered that the said James H Davis be notified that an action of assumpsit damages one thousand dollars has been com- -menced against him by the said David P Ingersoll that a writ of attachment has issued against his estate and that unless he be and appear at the next July term of this court and plead to the action aforesaid according to law a Judgment will be entered against him and his said estate sold to satisfy the same and it is further ordered that a copy of this order be inserted for four weeks successively in some newspaper published in the city of St Louis and at least twenty days before the next July term of this court
**Dunky vs Andrew Hay**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06739.048
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and there- -upon also comea Jury to wit, Charles Cabanne, Edward Charless, Woosler Goodyear, Isaac A Letcher, Merrit Hix, Heram B. Bascom, Richard Raqasdale, Richard Dowling, Elkanah English, William H Pocock, John McGausland and Samuel Watton, twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issue within joined between the parties aforesaid where-
---
**Viewer Page 452** (rcdbook1830_06_0451.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 448
-upon for reasons as well moving the court as the parties aforesaid Charles Cabanne one of the Jurors aforesaid is withdrawn from the panel of the Jury and the residue of the Jurors are discharged from rendering a verdict
**Julia vs Samuel McKinney**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06731.014
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and thereupon also come a Jury to wit, Christian F Kienlen, Samuel Walton, James McClelland, James Martin, Samuel Willi, George Corwin, John Riggin, Alfred Skinner, James Bailey John Goodfellow, James Park and Leon Chenie twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issue within joined between the parties aforesaid on their oath afore- -said do say that the said defendant is not guilty of the said trespasses laid to his charge or any part thereof in manner and form as the said plaintiff hath above thereof complained against him therefore it is considered that the said Julia take nothing by her said suit and that the said Samuel McKinney go thereof without day
**George Speers Administrator of Edward Fitzgerald deceased vs John P. Cabanne**
Now at this day come the said defendant by his attorney aforesaid and the said plaintiff although solemnly called comes not but makes default nor hath he prosecuted his suit in behalf with effect therefore it is considered that the said plaint- -iff take nothing by his said suit and that the said defendant go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said John P Cabanne recover against the said George Speers Administrator of Edward Fitzgerald deceased his costs and charges by him about his defence in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution
**Tenor Washington vs Henry Scott & John Emmerson**
> Related to Case ID ccr1832.06763.007
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by her attorney and the said defendants although solemnly called come not but make default nor have they pleaded to the action aforesaid of her the said plaintiff whereby the said plaintiff remains therein undefended against them wherefore the said plaintiff ought to recover against the said defend- -ants and the said plaintiff not requiring a Jury all and singular the premises are by her submit- -ted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood the court do find that the said defendants are guilty of the trespassassault and battery in the declaration mentioned in- manner and form as she the said plaintiff hath above thereof complained against them and the court assess the damage of the said plaintiff by her sustained by reason of the trespassassault and battery afore- -said at the sum of one cent, therefore it is considered by the court that the said Tenor Washington be liberated and entirely set free from the said Henry Scott and John Emmerson and all persons claiming from through or under them and it is further considered that the said Tenor Washington recover against the said Henry Scott and John Emmerson her costs and charges by her about her suit in this behalf expended and that she have thereof execution
**Robert Simpson vs Isaac A Letcher & James S Lyle**
It is suggested here to the court that since the last continuance of this cause the said James S Lyle one of the said defendants hath died which suggestion is not denied but admitted to be true- and suit abates as to said James S Lyle
**Robert Simpson vs Isaac A Letcher**
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys and the said parties consent that the Judgment be entered against the said defendant for the sum of sixty two dollars fifty cents and the court do find that the said defendant is indebted to the said plaintiff in the sum of sixty two dollars fifty cents in manner and form as he the said plaintiff hath in his declaration alleged against him therefore it is considered that the said Robert Simpson recover against the said Isaac A Letcher his debt aforesaid in form aforesaid by the court found to be due and also his costs and charges
---
**Viewer Page 453** (rcdbook1830_06_0452.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 449
---
**Viewer Page 454** (rcdbook1830_06_0453.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 450
---
**Viewer Page 455** (rcdbook1830_06_0454.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 451
---
**Viewer Page 456** (rcdbook1830_06_0455.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 452
---
**Viewer Page 457** (rcdbook1830_06_0456.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 453
---
**Viewer Page 458** (rcdbook1830_06_0457.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 454
---
**Viewer Page 459** (rcdbook1830_06_0458.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 455
---
**Viewer Page 460** (rcdbook1830_06_0459.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 456
entered into by him individually or Jointly with any other person before his application to the Justice of the county court for his discharge which appears by the papers returned in this case to have been on the thirteenth day of December one thousand Eight hundred and thirty two.
**Susan vs Lemon Parker**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06733.141
On motion it is ordered by the court that the alias writ issued in this case be quashed and that the sheriffs return to the original and to the alias writ be set aside- and the court award an alias writ in this case
John K Walker Sheriff of the county of Saint Louis personally appears here in open court and acknow- ledges the execution of a deed from him as Sheriff as aforesaid to Rene Paul therein named for 1st A Lot of ground situate in the City of St Louis in block No 27. being 25 feet front by 152 feet in length bounded north by a lot of Fr. V Bouis East by first street south by a lot of Thomas Biddle west by an alley being the same lot which Charles D F Vrain bought of the commissioners of A. V. Bouis estate - 2nd the one undivided seventh part of a tract of land situate at the mouth of the Missouri River in the County of St. Louis being a part of survey No 1953 in Township 47 North Range 7 East granted and confirmed to Antoine Soulard and Jacques De StVrain the whole tract containing 3675 arpents the one seventh part of which belonged to said Jacques de StVrain at the time of his death: 3rd a tract of land situate in the Township of St Ferdinand in the county of St Louis on the River Mississippi containing 250 arpens, it being part of a concession granted by the Spanish Government to Jacques Delafsus de St Vrain bearing date April 28th 1802 sold by virtue of an execution issued from the Clerks office of the Circuit Court for the county returnable to the November term of said court in the year Eighteen hundred and thirty one in favor of Rene Paul against Charles D StVrain and the said Rene Paul being the highest and last bidder of the same at the sum of Thirty dollars the same was stricken off and sold to him the said Rene Paul
**James R McDonald vs Joseph W Garrity**
allegations and Interrogatories filed
**Ransom Brown vs Charles Collins**
No notice of the appeal in this case having been given it is considered by the court that the Judgment of the Justice be affirmed and that the said Ransom Brown recover against the said Charles Collins and Elyah D Harris the security in the appeal bond the sum of ten dollars for his debt and also the sum of Thirty five cents for his damages by him sustained by reason of the detention of said debt together with his costs and charges by him about his suit before the Justice expended and also in this behalf expended and that he have thereof Execution
**Julia vs Samuel McKinney**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06733.141
The plaintiff by her attorney moves the court to grant her a new trial in this case for reasons filed therefor which motion upon mature deliberation is by the court overruled
**Marquerite M Nair vs Wilson P Hunt**
On motion of the plaintiff by her attorney leave is given her to amend her declaration in this case and file additional counts which is done
**William Wilkins vs William Hill**
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and thereupon all and singular the matters aforesaid whereof the parties aforesaid have put themselves upon the Judgment of the court are by them submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood and mature deliberation being thereupon had for that it appears to the court that the replication of the said plaintiff to the fourth plea of him the said defendant and the matters and things therein contained in manner and form as the same are above pleaded and set forth are sufficient in law for the said plaintiff to have and maintain his aforesaid action thereof against him the said defendant and that he the said defendant is bound by the law of the land to answer the same therefore it is considered that the demurrer of the said defendant to the Replication of the said plaintiff
---
**Viewer Page 461** (rcdbook1830_06_0460.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 457
to the fourth plea of the said defendant be overruled
**Sarah vs Samuel Johnson**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06733.141
The Court order and direct that the Sheriff of the county of Saint Louis do hire out the said Sarah from term to term of this court and that he take bond of the person who may hire the said Sarah in the penalty of Five Hundred dollars with such security as the sheriff shall approve conditioned according to law and for the return of the said Sarah when it shall be required by the court
**Ann McGee Administrator of James McGee deceased vs Richard Grooms**
It is suggested here to the court by the attorney for the said defendant that since the commencement of this suit the said Ann McGee the plaintiff hath married whereby the letters of administration heretofore granted to her have been revoked and repeated which sug- -gestion is not denied but admitted to be true
Court adjourned until Monday next the 8th instant 10 O'clock forenoon
Monday 8th April 1833 Court met pursuant to adjournment present as before
**Richard H Hardin vs Samuel Gaty**
Pleas filed
**James Goodloe vs Augustus Knapp**
Continued
**Henry E.W. McDearman vs Hugh O'Neil Jr**
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys and pray that a Rule may be entered to refer the matters in dispute between them to Aza- riah Kennedy and Edward Dobyns with power to appoint and call in an empire and that they report in the premises to the present term of this court, it is therefore ordered by the court that the said Azariah Kennedy and Edward Dobyns be appointed arbitrators to settle the matters in controversy between the parties aforesaid and that they report on the premises to the present term of this court.
**Julia vs Samuel McKinney**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06733.141
On the affidavit of the plaintiffs attorney filed by him in this case and on the applica- -tion of the said plaintiff by her said attorney for an appeal to the Supreme court, it is ordered by the court that the appeal be granted and the Record and proceedings are ordered to be certified up accordingly
Court adjourned until To morrow morning 10 O'Clock
Tuesday 9th April 1833 Court met pursuant to adjournment present as before
**Nathan Cole vs Alexander P Field**
> Related to Case ID ccr1832.06757.010
On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is Ruled that a Dedimus issue to any Judge or Justice of the peace of the State of Illinois to take the depositions of witnessed to be read in evidence on the trial of this cause on the part of the plaintiff
**Lambert Salli ait Lajoie vs Sullivan Blood**
It is ordered by the court that a Venire facias issue to the coroner of the county of Saint Louis commanding him to summon Eighteen good and lawful men of his county to attend forthwith and to serve as Jurors in this case.
---
**Viewer Page 462** (rcdbook1830_06_0461.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 458
---
**Viewer Page 463** (rcdbook1830_06_0462.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 459
Anthony W Vanteer, Wallace Dixon and Isaac H Lanier recover against the said Orlando Kellogg their debt aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Jury found to be due and also their costs and charges by them about their suit in this behalf expended and that they have thereof execution
**Henry Reynolds vs Peter W McQueen & Robert McQueen**
Interrogatories filed On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered that the said Peter W. Mc Queen and Robert McQueen be notified that an action of Assumpsit damages Five hundred dollars has been com -menced against them by the said Henry Reynolds that a writ of attachment has issued against their estate and that unless they be and appear at the next July term of this court and plead to the action aforesaid according to law a Judgement will be entered against them and their said estate sold to satisfy the same and it is further ordered that a copy of this order be inserted for four weeks successively in some newspaper pub- -lished in the city of St Louis and at least twenty days before the next July term of this court
**Charles Fefsenden vs Peter W McQueen & Robert McQueen**
Interrogatories filed On motion of the plaintiff by his attorney it is ordered that the said Peter W McQueen and Robert McQueen be notified that an action of Assumpsit damages Five Hundred dollars has been commenced against him by the said Charles Fefsenden that a writ of attachment has issued against their estate and that unless they be and appear at the next July term of this court and plead to the action aforesaid according to law a Judgment will be entered against them and their said estate sold to satisfy the same and it is further ordered that a copy of this order be inserted for four weeks successively in some newspaper published in the city of St Louis and at least twenty days before the next July term of this court
**William Bartlett vs Josiah Winters & John F Clark**
Now at this day come again the said plaintiff by his attorney aforesaid who not requiring a Jury to assess his damages all and singular the premises are by him submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood the court do find that the said plaintiff hath sustained damage by reason of the nonperformance of the promises and undertakings in his declaration mentioned to the sum of Eighty dollars, therefore it is considered that the said William Bartlett recover against the said Josiah Winters and John F Clark his damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the court assessed together with his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended
Harriet an infant by Julia her mother (a woman of color) presents her petition to the court praying that a writ of Habeas corpus issue to Samuel T McKinney and Thomas D James commanding them to bring the body of the said Harriet before this court thereupon it is ordered by the court that a writ of Habeas Corpus do issue as prayed for returnable forthwith
**Harriet vs Samuel T McKinney & Thomas D James**
> Related to Case ID ccr1833.06766.004
Gustavus A Bird Esquire presents here to the court the petition of Harriet a girl of color and an infant under the age of twenty one years praying that she may be permitted to institute suit against Samuel T McKinney and Thomas D James for establish- -ing her right to freedom and that she may be permitted to sue as a poor person thereupon the court permit the said Harriet to sue as aforesaid and direct that an action of assault and battery and false imprisonment be brought in the name of the said Harriet and assign the said Gustavus A Bird as her counsel, and it is order -ed by the court that the said Samuel T McKinney and Thomas D James permit the said Harriet to have a reasonable liberty of attending her counsel and the court when occasion may require it and that the said petitioner shall not be taken or removed out of the Jurisdiction of this court or be subject to any severity of treatment on account of her said application for freedom
**John Brown vs Abram Wilcox**
Now at this day come again the said plaintiff by his attorney aforesaid and the said defendant although notified according to law comes not but makes default nor hath
---
**Viewer Page 464** (rcdbook1830_06_0463.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 460
---
**Viewer Page 465** (rcdbook1830_06_0464.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 461
---
**Viewer Page 466** (rcdbook1830_06_0465.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 462
---
**Viewer Page 467** (rcdbook1830_06_0466.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 463
---
**Viewer Page 468** (rcdbook1830_06_0467.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 464
---
**Viewer Page 469** (rcdbook1830_06_0468.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 465
---
**Viewer Page 470** (rcdbook1830_06_0469.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 466
---
**Viewer Page 471** (rcdbook1830_06_0470.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 467
---
**Viewer Page 472** (rcdbook1830_06_0471.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 468
---
**Viewer Page 473** (rcdbook1830_06_0472.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 469
Garnishee in this case although solemnly called comes not but makes deafult nor hath he answered the Interrogatories filed by the plaintiff in this case therefore it is considered by the Court that the said James S Thomas recover against the said Enoch C March Garnishee as aforesaid the sum of One Hundred and twenty six dollars forty two cents for his damages aforesaid and also his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution.
The Judgment is satisfied see Execution book 3 page 177
**Henry Maxwell vs Richard L Head**
> Related to Case ID ccr1832.06749.004
It is suggested here to the Court that since the last continuance of this cause the said defendant hath died which suggestion is not denied but admitted to be true and this suit abates
**John O'Rourke vs Thomas McCartan's Administration**
It is suggestion here to the Court that since the last continuance of this cause the letters of administration heretofore granted to Judith McCartan has been revoked
**Joseph C Laveille & George Morton vs Jacob Rador**
Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney and say they will not further prosecute their said action against the said defendant but voluntarily suffer the same to be discontinued therefore it is considered that the said plaintiffs take nothing by their said suit and the said defendant go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said Jacob Radar recover against the said Joseph C Laveille and George Morton his costs and charges by him about his defence in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution
**Charlotte vs Green Crowder**
> Related to Case ID ccr1832.06749.004
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by her attorney and says she will not further prosecute her said action against the said defendant but voluntarily suffers the same to be discontinued therefore it is considered that the said Charlotte take nothing by her said suit and that the said Green Crowder go thereof without day
**Joseph Woods & George Woods vs Esther Woods & William Woods**
Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney and say they will not further prosecute their said petition against the said defendants but volun- tarily suffer the same to be discontinued therefor it is considered that the said plaintiffs take nothing by their said petition and that the said defendants go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said Esther Woods and William Woods recover against the said Joseph Woods and George Woods their costs and charges by them about their defence in this behalf expended and that they have thereof execution
**Oliver Martin & George N Harvey vs David Duncan & Thomas D Potts Garnishee**
Now at this day come as well the said plaintiffs by their attorney as the said Jacob Forsyth, Henry H Forsyth, William Piddle and P H Goodwin interpleaders in this case by their attorney and neither of the parties requiring a Jury all and singular the premises are by them submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood the court do find as to the issue within joined between the parties aforesaid upon the claim of property of the said interpleaders that the effects goods notes debts and liabilities and each of them attached as aforesaid were not at the time they were attached nor now are the property of said Forsyth Co as they have in their plea above in this behalf alleged, therefore it is considered that the said Interpleaders take nothing by their said claim of property and that the said Oliver Martin and George N Harvey go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said Oliver Martin and George N Harvey recover against the said Jacob Forsyth, Henry H Forsyth, William Riddle and L H Goodwin their costs and charges by them about their defence against the claim of property of the said Inter- -pleaders expended and that they have thereof execution
---
**Viewer Page 474** (rcdbook1830_06_0473.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 470
---
**Viewer Page 475** (rcdbook1830_06_0474.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 471
---
**Viewer Page 476** (rcdbook1830_06_0475.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 472
---
**Viewer Page 477** (rcdbook1830_06_0476.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 473
---
**Viewer Page 478** (rcdbook1830_06_0477.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 474
---
**Viewer Page 479** (rcdbook1830_06_0478.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 475
---
**Viewer Page 480** (rcdbook1830_06_0479.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 476
---
**Viewer Page 481** (rcdbook1830_06_0480.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 477
Wednesday 1st May 1833 Court met pursuant to adjournment present as before
**Thomas Barnett vs Robert McQueen**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06747.023
On motion of Robert McQueen senior, Interpleader in this case it is Ruled that a Dedimus issue to any Judge or Justice of the peace of the State of New York to take the depositions of witnesses to be read on the trial of this case on the part of the said Interpleader
**Thomas Barnett vs Peter W. McQueen & Robert McQueen**
On motion of Robert McQueen Senior, Interpleader in this case it is Ruled that a Dedimus issue to any Judge or Justice of the peace of the State of New York to take the depositions of witnesses to be read on the trial of this case on the part of the said Interpleader
**David Small vs Thomas Breese**
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and thereupon also come a Jury to wit, Theodore S Magill, John K Bell, John Darst, Jotham Biglow, Nathan Cole Richard H McGill, Horatio N Crofs, Thomas Hills, Edward McDonald, Michael Tefson, Caleb Lockwood, and William Smith twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issue within joined between the parties aforesaid on their oath aforesaid do say that the said defendant is quilty of the said trespass in manner and form as the said plaintiff hath above in declaring alleged and they assess the damage of the said plaintiff by him sustained by reason of the wrongs and grievances in the decla- -ration mentioned to the sum of Five Hundred dollars and the said defendant by his attorney moves the court to grant him a new trial in this case and files his reasons therefor
**Thereze Speed vs Reddin B Herrin**
On motion of the plaintiff by her attorney it is Ruled that a dedimus issue to any Judge or Justice of the peace of the State of Illinios to take the depositions of witnesses to be read on the trial of this cause on the part of the defendant
**Mary B Penrose vs Hardage Lane**
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and neither of the parties requiring a Jury all and singular the premises are by them submit- -ted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood the court do find as to the issue within joined between the parties aforesaid that the said defendant does not detain the said slave in the declaration mentioned in manner and form as the said plaintiff hath above thereof complained against him therefore it is considered that the said plaintiff take nothing by her suit and that the said defendant go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said Hardage Lane recover against the said Mary B Penrose his costs and charges by him about his defence in this behalf Expended and that he have thereof execution
**John vs William Campbell**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06747.023
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and neither of the parties requiring a Jury all and singular the premises are by them submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood the court do find as to the issue within joined between the parties aforesaid that he the said defendant is guilty of the grievances above in said declaration laid to his charge in manner and form as the said plaintiff hath above alleged and they assess the damage of the said plaintiff by him sustained by reason of the trespass assault and battery in the declaration mentioned to the sum of one cent therefore it is considered that the said John be liberated and entirely set free from the said William Campbell and all persons claim- -ing from through or under him and it is further considered that the said John recover against the said William Campbell his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended and that he have thereof execution
**Benjamin L E Bonneville vs John Morgan**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and says he
---
**Viewer Page 482** (rcdbook1830_06_0481.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 478
---
**Viewer Page 483** (rcdbook1830_06_0482.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 479
---
**Viewer Page 484** (rcdbook1830_06_0483.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 480
---
**Viewer Page 485** (rcdbook1830_06_0484.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 481
---
**Viewer Page 486** (rcdbook1830_06_0485.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 482
---
**Viewer Page 487** (rcdbook1830_06_0486.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 483
---
**Viewer Page 488** (rcdbook1830_06_0487.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 484
---
**Viewer Page 489** (rcdbook1830_06_0488.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 485
---
**Viewer Page 490** (rcdbook1830_06_0489.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 486
---
**Viewer Page 491** (rcdbook1830_06_0490.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 487
---
**Viewer Page 492** (rcdbook1830_06_0491.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 489
recover against the said defendant. and the said plaintiff not requiring a jury to assess her damages all and singular the premises are by her submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood, the court do find that the said plaintiff hath sustained damage by reason of the non performance of the promises and under- takings in her declaration mentioned to the sum of eleven Thousand and fifteen dollars and seventeen cents. Therefore it is considered that the said Therese C Chouteau Executer of Auguste Chouteau deceased recover against the said Auguste A Chouteau her damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the court assessed and also her costs and charges by her about her suit in this behalf expended
Court adjourned untill tomorrow morning 10 OClock
Friday 3rd May 1833 Court met pursuant to adjournment present as before
The court audit and allow to John K Walker Sheriff of the County of Saint Louis on account amount -ing to One Hundred and sixty dollars twelve and one half cents against the State for Sheriff's and Jailors fees in the case of the State vs Peggy Easton who was indicted for murder and acquitted, and in the case of the State vs. Marquerite Bouche convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to Three years Imprisonment, it being proved here to the court that the said Marquerite Bouche is insolvent and unable to pay costs or any part thereof
**John Muir, Robert G Ormsby & James Wiley vs David G Bates**
> Related to Case ID ccr1832.06756.010
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys afore- -said and neither of the parties requiring a Jury all and singular the premises are by them submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood the court do find as to the issue within joined between the parties aforesaid that he the said David G Bates did undertake and promise in manner and form as the said John Muir, Robert G Ormsby and James Wiley have above in declaring alleged against him and they assess the damage of the said plaintiffs by them sustained by reason of the non performance of the promises and undertakings in their declaration mentioned to the sum of Three hundred and seventy one dollars seventy four cents therefore it is considered that the said john Muir, Robert G Ormsby and James Wiley recover against the said David G Bates their damages afore- -said in form aforesaid by the court assessed together with their costs and charges by them about their suit in this behalf expended and that they have thereof execution
**Burwell & [ ?] Johnson vs James Barry**
continued at the costs of the plaintiffs
**Chauncey Jerome-Noble Jerome & James Darrow vs Thomas Wilcox**
Now at this day come the said plaintiffs by their attorney and say they will not further prosecute their said action against the said defendant but volun- -tarily suffer the same to be discontinued therefore it is considered that the said plaintiffs stake nothing by their said writ and that the said defendant go thereof without day and it is further considered that the said Thomas Wilcox recover against the said Chauncey Jerome, Noble Jerome and James Darrow
---
**Viewer Page 493** (rcdbook1830_06_0492.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 489
---
**Viewer Page 494** (rcdbook1830_06_0493.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 490
**Mary Ann vs Alexander P Fields & Elijah Mitchell**
> Related to Case ID ccr1832.06754.035
The court permit Henry S. Geyer Esquire on his applications to withdraw from the further prosecution of this suit as counsel for the plaintiff
**Mary Ann vs Alexander P. Fields & Elijah Mitchell**
> Related to Case ID ccr1832.06754.035
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and thereupon also come a Jury to wit, William Dean, Thomas Robinson, Charles Billon, John McCausland, Willaim Vincent, Alexander Lyke, Charles R Hall, James Wilgus, William [ ?]oing, Joseph Klunk, Samuel Daniel and Lucien Dumain twelve good and lawful men who being duly elected tried and sworn well and truly to try the issue within joined between the parties aforesaid on their oath aforesaid do say that the said defendants are Guilty of the grievances above in said declaration laid to their charge in manner and form as the said plaintiff hath above alleged and they assess the dam- -age of the said plaintiff by her sustained by reason of the wrongs and greivances in the declaration mentioned to the sum of Two Hundred and fifty dollars therefore it is considered that the said Mary Ann be liberated and entirely set free from the said Alexander P Fields and Elijah Mitchell and all persons claiming from, through or under them and it is further considered that the said Mary Ann recover against the said Alexander P Fields and Elijah Mitchell her damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the Jury assessed together with his costs and charges by her about her suit in this behalf expended and that the have thereof execution
**John D Peers vs Abram Wilcox**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and the said defendant although notified according to law comes not but makes default nor hath he filed special bail or pleaded to the action aforesaid of him the said plaintiff whereby the said plaintiff remains therein un -defended against him wherefore the said plaintiff ought to recover against the said defendant and the said plaintiff not requiring a Jury all and singular the premises are by him submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood the court do find that the said plaintiff hath sustained damage by reason of the nonperformance of the promises and undertakings in his declaration mentioned to the sum of One Hundred and fifty dollars fifty Eight cents there- -fore it is considered that the said John D Peers recover against the said Abram Wilcox his damages afore- -said in form aforesaid by the court assessed together with his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended. Ordered that this [ ?] be expunged see next page
**John H Walker Sheriff of St Louis County Trustee of Pierre A Sabea[ ?] Insolvent debtor vs Auguste A Chouteaue**
Now at this day comes the said plaintiff by his attorney aforesaid and the said defendant although notified according to law comes not but makes default nor hath he filed special bail or pleaded to the action aforesaid of him said plaintiff whereby the said plaintiff ought to recover against him and the action aforesaid being founded on two notes under seal for the amount above demanded and it manifestly appearing to the Court that the said plain -tiff hath sustained damage by reason of the detention of said debt to the sum of one hundred and Sixty dollars and twenty five cents therefore it is considered that the said John H Walker Sheriff of the County of St Louis trustee and assignee of Pierre A Sabea[ ?] Insolvent debtor recover against the said Auguste A Chouteau his said debt of one hundred and
---
**Viewer Page 495** (rcdbook1830_06_0494.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 491
ninety five dollars and also his damages aforesaid in form afore said assessed together with his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended
Court adjourned until tomorrow morning at ten O Clock
Saturday 4th May 1833 Court met pursuant to adjournment present as before
**Vina vs Henry C Rufsell & Henry G Mitchell**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06750.008
Declaration and plea filed by consent of parties
**J & E Walsh & Jonas Newman vs William Waddingham Impl**
Replications filed
**Patsy Luarles & others vs Leanna Luarles**
Demurrer to pleas filed
**John Perry vs W.C Shaw, O.C Tiffany & C Tiffany**
On motion it is ordered by the court that the Garnishees in this case be discharged Interrogatories not having been filed in time
**James R McDonald vs Levi Graves**
On motion it is ordered by the court that the Garnishees in this case be discharged Interogatories not having been filed in time
**Jas Campbell, M Jones & P.V. Opie vs Samuel P Judson**
Traverse of Answer of Lewis M Alverson Garnishee filed
**John D Peers vs Abram Wilcox**
Now at this day come the said plaintiff by his attorney and the said defendant although notified according to law comes not but makes default nor hath he filed special bail or pleaded to the action afore- -said of him the said plaintiff whereby the said plaintiff remains therein undefended against him where- fore the said plaintiff ought to recover against the said defendant and this action being founded on and in- strument in writing and it manifestly appearing to the court that the said defendant is indebted to the said plaintiff in the sum of one Hundred and forty six dollars sixty two and one hay cents as he the said plaintiff hath in his declaration alleged and that the said plaintiff hath sustained damage by reason of the detention of said debt to the sum of Ten dollars ninety five cents therefore it is considered that the said John D. Peers recover against the said Abram Wilcox his debt aforesaid in form aforesaid by the court found to be due and also his damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the court assessed together with his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended
Harriett a woman of color who was committed to the Jail of the county of Saint Louis by Peter Ferguson a Justice of the peace for the county of Saint Louis as a runaway slave being brought before the court as upon Habeas Corpus, and it appearing to the court that the said Harriet has been confined in the Jail of this county for more than a year and that she has been advertised by the sheriff according to Law, the court upon Exami- -nation of the matter do order that said Harriet is discharged from custody, and the court allow to John K Walker Esquire Sheriff of the county of Saint Louis the sum of one Hundred and Sixty six dollars twelve and one hay cents for four hundred and forty three days board of said Harriet at thirty seven and one hay cents per say for Turnkeys fees for committment seventy five cents for cash paid for clothes for the use of said Harriet Three dollars for cash paid printer for publishing advertisement Ten dollars amounting in all to the sum of One hundred and seventy nine dollars Eighty seven and one half cents. to be paid by the State of Missouri
---
**Viewer Page 496** (rcdbook1830_06_0495.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 492
Alexander Felsan who is personally known to the Judge of this court to be the person whose name is subscribed to a deed of emancipation from him to Jenny and her children Eliza and Alexander now here produced to the court personally appears in open court and acknowledges the execution of said deed from his to the said Jenny a negro woman aged about twenty one years and her two children Eliza aged about two years and Alexander aged about one year.-
**Anson vs Henry G. Mitchell & Henry C Rufsell**
> Related to Case ID ccr1832.06760.010
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and neither of the parties requiring a Jury all and sigular the premises are by them submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood the court do find as to the issue within joined between the parties aforesaid that they the said defendants are guilty of the greivances above in said declaration laid to their charge in manner and form as the said plaintiff hath above alleged and they assess the damage of the said plaintiff by him sustained by reason of the wrongs and grievances in the declaration mentioned to the sum of oen cent, therefore it is considered that the said Anson be liberated and entirely set free from the said Henry G Mitchell and Henry C Rusfell and all persons claiming from through or under them and it is further considered that the said Anson recover against the said Henry G Mitchell and Henry C Rufsell his dama- -ges aforesaid in form aforesaid by the court assessed together with his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended and that he have thereof Execution
**Michael vs Henry G. Mitchell & Henry C Rufsell**
> Related to Case ID ccr1832.06759.009
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attorneys aforesaid and neither of the parties requiring a Jury all and sigular the premises are by them submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully under -stood the court do find as to the issue within joined between the parties aforesaid that they the said defend- -ants are guilty of the grievances above in said declaration laid to their charge in manner and form as the said plaintiffs hath above alleged and they assess the damage of the said plaintiff by him sustained by reason of the wrongs and grievances in his declaration mentioned to the sum of one cent therefore it is considered that the said Michael be liberated and entirely set free from the said Henry G Mitchell and Henry C Rufsell and all persons claiming from through or under them and it is further considered that the said Michael recover against the said Henry G Mitchell and Henry C Rufsell his damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the court assessed together with his costs and charges by him about his suit in this behalf expended and that he have thereof Execution
**Matilda vs Henry G Mitchell & Henry C Rufsell**
> Related to Case ID ccr1832.06758.008
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective attor- -neys aforesaid and neither of the parties requiring a Jury all and singular the premises are by them submitted to the court which being seen and heard and by the court here fully understood the court do find as to the issue within joined between the parties aforesaid that they the said defendants are guilty of the grievances above in said declaration laid to their charge in manner and form as the said plaintiff hath above alleged and they assess the damage of the said plaintiff by her sustained by reason of the wrongs and grievances in his declaration men- -tioned to the sum of Two hundred and fifty dollars, therefore it is considered that the said Matilda be liberated and entirely set free from the said Henry G Mitchell and Henry C Rufsell and all persons claiming from through or under them and it is further considered that the said Matilda recover against the said Henry G Mitchell and Henry C Rufsell her damages aforesaid in form aforesaid by the court assessed together with her costs and charges by her about her suit in this behalf expend- -ed and that she have thereof execution
**Vina vs Henry C Rufsell & Henry G Mitchell**
> Related to Case ID ccr1831.06750.008
Now at this day come the parties aforesaid by their respective
---
**Viewer Page 497** (rcdbook1830_06_0496.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 493
---
**Viewer Page 498** (rcdbook1830_06_0497.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 494
---
**Viewer Page 499** (rcdbook1830_06_0498.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 495
---
**Viewer Page 500** (rcdbook1830_06_0499.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 496
---
**Viewer Page 501** (rcdbook1830_06_0500.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 497
---
**Viewer Page 502** (rcdbook1830_06_0501.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 498
---
**Viewer Page 503** (rcdbook1830_06_0502.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 499
---
**Viewer Page 504** (rcdbook1830_06_0503.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 500
---
**Viewer Page 505** (rcdbook1830_06_0504.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 501
---
**Viewer Page 506** (rcdbook1830_06_0505.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 502
---
**Viewer Page 507** (rcdbook1830_06_0506.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 503
---
**Viewer Page 508** (rcdbook1830_06_0507.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 504
---
**Viewer Page 509** (rcdbook1830_06_0508.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 505
---
**Viewer Page 510** (rcdbook1830_06_0509.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 506
---
**Viewer Page 511** (rcdbook1830_06_0510.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 507
---
**Viewer Page 512** (rcdbook1830_06_0511.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 508
---
**Viewer Page 513** (rcdbook1830_06_0512.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 509
---
**Viewer Page 514** (rcdbook1830_06_0513.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 510
---
**Viewer Page 515** (rcdbook1830_06_0514.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 511
---
**Viewer Page 516** (rcdbook1830_06_0515.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 512
---
**Viewer Page 517** (rcdbook1830_06_0516.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 513
---
**Viewer Page 518** (rcdbook1830_06_0517.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 514
---
**Viewer Page 519** (rcdbook1830_06_0518.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 515
---
**Viewer Page 520** (rcdbook1830_06_0519.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 516
---
**Viewer Page 521** (rcdbook1830_06_0520.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 517
---
**Viewer Page 522** (rcdbook1830_06_0521.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 518
---
**Viewer Page 523** (rcdbook1830_06_0522.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 519
---
**Viewer Page 524** (rcdbook1830_06_0523.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 520
---
**Viewer Page 525** (rcdbook1830_06_0524.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 521
---
**Viewer Page 526** (rcdbook1830_06_0525.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 522
---
**Viewer Page 527** (rcdbook1830_06_0526.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 523
---
**Viewer Page 528** (rcdbook1830_06_0527.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 524
---
**Viewer Page 529** (rcdbook1830_06_0528.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 525
---
**Viewer Page 530** (rcdbook1830_06_0529.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 526
---
**Viewer Page 531** (rcdbook1830_06_0530.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 527
---
**Viewer Page 532** (rcdbook1830_06_0531.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 528
---
**Viewer Page 533** (rcdbook1830_06_0532.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 529
---
**Viewer Page 534** (rcdbook1830_06_0533.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 530
---
**Viewer Page 535** (rcdbook1830_06_0534.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: 531
---
**Viewer Page 536** (rcdbook1830_06_0535.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 537** (rcdbook1830_06_0536.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 538** (rcdbook1830_06_0537.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 539** (rcdbook1830_06_0538.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 540** (rcdbook1830_06_0539.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 541** (rcdbook1830_06_0540.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 542** (rcdbook1830_06_0541.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 543** (rcdbook1830_06_0542.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 544** (rcdbook1830_06_0543.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 545** (rcdbook1830_06_0544.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 546** (rcdbook1830_06_0545.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 547** (rcdbook1830_06_0546.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 548** (rcdbook1830_06_0547.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 549** (rcdbook1830_06_0548.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 550** (rcdbook1830_06_0549.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 551** (rcdbook1830_06_0550.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 552** (rcdbook1830_06_0551.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 553** (rcdbook1830_06_0552.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 554** (rcdbook1830_06_0553.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 555** (rcdbook1830_06_0554.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 556** (rcdbook1830_06_0555.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 557** (rcdbook1830_06_0556.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 558** (rcdbook1830_06_0557.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 559** (rcdbook1830_06_0558.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 560** (rcdbook1830_06_0559.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 561** (rcdbook1830_06_0560.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 562** (rcdbook1830_06_0561.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 563** (rcdbook1830_06_0562.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 564** (rcdbook1830_06_0563.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 565** (rcdbook1830_06_0564.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 566** (rcdbook1830_06_0565.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 567** (rcdbook1830_06_0566.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 568** (rcdbook1830_06_0567.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 569** (rcdbook1830_06_0568.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 570** (rcdbook1830_06_0569.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 571** (rcdbook1830_06_0570.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 572** (rcdbook1830_06_0571.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 573** (rcdbook1830_06_0572.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 574** (rcdbook1830_06_0573.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 575** (rcdbook1830_06_0574.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 576** (rcdbook1830_06_0575.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 577** (rcdbook1830_06_0576.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 578** (rcdbook1830_06_0577.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 579** (rcdbook1830_06_0578.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 580** (rcdbook1830_06_0579.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 581** (rcdbook1830_06_0580.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 582** (rcdbook1830_06_0581.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 583** (rcdbook1830_06_0582.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 584** (rcdbook1830_06_0583.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
---
**Viewer Page 585** (rcdbook1830_06_0584.jpg)
> Handwritten Page Number on Record Book: none
****
**** - Extent
- 585 pgs
St. Louis Circuit Court, “Circuit Court Record Book 6: 1830 to 1833”, 1830-1833, St. Louis Circuit Court Historical Records Project, accessed October 2, 2026, https://digitalexhibits.library.washu.edu/s/ccr/item/65795